{"id":60902,"date":"2026-05-02T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T04:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/?p=60902"},"modified":"2026-05-04T17:10:04","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T15:10:04","slug":"theist-philosopher-and-cat-discuss-evidence-for-god","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/","title":{"rendered":"Theistic philosopher and \u2018the cat\u2019 discuss \u201cscientific evidence\u201d for God"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Jos\u00e9 Carlos Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado's book \u2018Evidencias cient\u00edficas de la existencia de Dios\u2019 (Scientific evidences of the existence of God), together with others recently published, is giving play in the media analysis.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most recent debates has taken place in social networks in the video of \u2018Addicted to Philosophy\u2019 entitled \u2018Theistic philosopher reacts to Schr\u00f6dinger's cat. The book that proves God?\u2019\u201d. The final question mark is quite a symptom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is a sample of the conclusions formulated by Roc\u00edo Vidal (Schr\u00f6dinger's cat): \u201cDoes it follow inexorably, as is defended at the beginning of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/news\/interview-jose-carlos-gonzalez-hurtado\/\">book<\/a> Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado), that there is a creator God, conscious, omnipresent and essentially good? The conclusion is no. My conclusion from the first part is that God is still mainly in the realm of philosophy, not science\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The philosopher shares thesis <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It might seem that the philosopher self-described theist on Youtube, Enric G. Gel, \u201creacts\u201d to the cat's thesis, but no. The author of \u2018Is there philosophy in the fridge?\u2019, shares with Roc\u00edo Vidal that \u201cthere is no inexorable way of reasoning towards the existence of God, a properly scientific demonstration that God exists\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe are in the realm of philosophy, and here, sorry for those who seek Cartesian certainty. But we don't have irrefutable proof, neither of this nor of anything, is that on any subject,\u201d he adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It gives the impression that the philosopher Enric, in this 26\u2019 57\u201d video, sets limits to theistic arguments, and at the step from \u201cthere is a cause of the universe\u201d to \u201cthat cause is God\u201d. \u201cAny reason one can give in favor of that step will be philosophical, and in philosophy we are nowhere near the field of irrefutable proofs,\u201d he says at the end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Theism is broadly understood as the belief that affirms the existence of a supreme being, a creator of the universe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Two premises; respect for people<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Before collecting some of the arguments, it should be noted that Enric reveals in the video that he believes in God, and Roc\u00edo, Schr\u00f6dinger's cat, does not.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second issue is respect. \u201cLet's avoid any insulting or offensive comments towards people, in particular Roc\u00edo. On my part, there is no enmity towards her, quite the contrary,\u201d says Enric F. Gel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Let's demonstrate that conviction that I try so hard to promote on this channel, he adds. \u201cIn philosophy, people who are equally intelligent, reasonable, honest and informed can disagree on almost every issue and nothing happens.\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe philosophers have been discussing this issue of the existence of God for centuries and centuries: it is neither closed nor will it be closed in the near future, so just because someone thinks differently from you does not mean that he does not know how to think.\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A very positive point of Roc\u00edo's video, says Enric, is that \u201cit correctly frames the discussion within the philosophical sphere, distancing itself from the scientism that demands that everything, without exception, must pass through the sieve of the scientific method.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Roc\u00edo corroborates this: \u201cI have always been very critical of scientism, which really thinks that the scientific method is the only way to know reality. That's why I study philosophy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"298\" height=\"425\" src=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtadoEvidenciasLibro-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-60905\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtadoEvidenciasLibro-1.jpg 298w, https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtadoEvidenciasLibro-1-210x300.jpg 210w, https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtadoEvidenciasLibro-1-8x12.jpg 8w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\u201cTheisms and atheisms there are many and of very different types.\u201d&nbsp;<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The analysis, of which only some aspects are presented, starts from \u201ctwo minor points, very minor, of discrepancy. First, atheism as a lack of belief in God,\u201d says Enric.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Roc\u00edo criticizes Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado's thesis: \u201cFirst, he continually mentions atheism as an ideology or as a faith. This is an initial consideration that must be made, since atheism is not a movement, it is not an ideology nor is it an activism. In fact, the consideration of atheistic faith is an oxymoron in itself, since atheism, if anything, would be a lack of belief. The lack of a belief cannot be a faith; it is the lack of faith.\u00bb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Enric shares the thesis: \u201cRoc\u00edo is right in that talking about atheism as a unified movement is complex, and the same with theism. We can do so in order to understand each other, but without ceasing to be aware that there are many theisms and atheisms of very different types\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Atheism: Lack of belief in God or denial of God's existence?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, Enric points out that \u201cthe point I would question is to treat atheism as a lack of belief in God, as Roc\u00edo says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is true that in certain sectors there is a tendency to define atheism in that way, but I personally prefer to treat it simply as the denial of the existence of God. In general, although there are some exceptions, in philosophy atheism has tended to be treated in that way: as the position that denies the existence of God.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Second, defining atheism as the lack of belief in God I think easily leads to confusion by lumping two very different attitudes under the same umbrella.\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Three possible answers to the question Does God exist: yes, no and I don't know<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both those who directly deny the existence of God and those who simply shrug their shoulders and say that they do not know if God exists, both lack belief in God. For the one who shrugs his shoulders, we already have a fairly widespread term, that of agnostic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Therefore, it seems better and more useful to reserve \u201catheist\u201d for the former, for the one who directly denies that God exists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In fact, this seems to be the most natural usage as well, because, since there are three possible answers to the question \u201cDoes God exist?\u201d (yes, no and I don't know), the triad theist, atheist and agnostic seems the most accurate. But this, as I said, is a very minor point and comes down to a discrepancy in how we use words. If someone prefers another definition of atheism, it's not a big deal.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The Kalam Cosmological Argument<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The considered cosmological argument Kalam version is the subject of analysis in the video of \u2018Addicted to Philosophy\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Roc\u00edo: \u201cWe are going to base ourselves on the cosmological argument. <a href=\"https:\/\/es.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Argumento_cosmol%C3%B3gico_Kal%C4%81m\">Kalam<\/a>, which is currently, I believe, the most widespread, whose premises are these: everything that begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to exist, therefore, the universe has a cause and that cause can only be God\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Enric: \u201cHere, forgive the digression, a very common criticism that Roc\u00edo does not make, is to ask, \u2018Well, if everything has a cause, what caused God?\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But notice that the objection falls into a straw man, because the argument at no point says that everything must have a cause. What it says is that everything that begins to exist has a cause. Since God, by hypothesis, does not begin to exist, this causal principle does not apply to him\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Is the first cause God?&nbsp;<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Rocio<strong>: \"<\/strong>This logical argument is very interesting, but it is necessary to analyze both the premises and the conclusion. The premise that the universe began to exist, that is, that there is a creation, will be analyzed in the next section.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But even with this, we are still talking about the fact that there has to be a first cause and an uncaused cause\u201d.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSomething or someone must have created the universe, since everything that begins to exist needs a cause and we have to stop somewhere, and that somewhere can only be an eternal, necessary and creative entity, ergo, God.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I have already said, this is a very interesting philosophical debate, isn't it? Since everything must need a cause, except God. But we really have to get to God as well\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Atheist position on what might be the uncaused cause of the universe<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhat is defended from the atheist position, so to speak, is that why not stop the universe? Why not let the universe be the uncaused cause?\u201d asks Roc\u00edo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe logical leap that implies a creator God, eternal, personal and good, is a logical leap that cannot be demonstrated scientifically. It is unknowable, it is very interesting to debate, but it is not an irrefutable proof. We still have much to know about the laws of physics, including the laws of quantum physics.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Therefore, that uncaused cause of the universe could be a physical law, a quantum state, something we don't know, God... The hypotheses are all on the table and we can only place ourselves in the realm of doubt\u00bb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The passage from \u201cThere is a cause of the universe\u201d to \u201cThat cause is God\u201d.\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One might think that the theistic philosopher could put nuances to this argument. But Enric states, \u201dAgain there is much here with which I 100% agree. \u201cThe move from \u201cThere is a cause of the universe\u201d to \u201cThat cause is God,\u201d is known in the literature as the \u2018gap problem.\u2019 And it is a hotly contested thing that is certainly not scientifically demonstrable.\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAny reason one can give in favor of such a step will be philosophical, and in philosophy we are far from being in the realm of irrefutable proofs. There is room, in my opinion, for naturalistic hypotheses of first cause, and whether they are convincing or not is for each one to judge from his own critical thinking.\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Theistic position: that first cause also has personal attributes<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What is common here on the theistic side is to combine the cosmological argument, which would be leading you only to an uncaused and necessary first cause, with other arguments such as the fine-tuning argument or the moral argument that would allow you to make reasonable the hypothesis that that first cause has also personal attributes such as intelligence or goodness.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Again, irrefutable evidence? None, but neither do they claim to be, at least at the academic level,\u201d Enric adds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"920\" height=\"526\" src=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtado.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-60907\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtado.jpg 920w, https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtado-700x400.jpg 700w, https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtado-300x172.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtado-768x439.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtado-18x10.jpg 18w, https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/GonzalezHurtado-600x343.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 920px) 100vw, 920px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Jose Carlos Gonzalez-Hurtado, author of \u00abNew scientific evidence for the existence of God\u00bb.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado: \u2018The Big Bang was the moment of creation of the universe\u2019.\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To better understand the considerations of the philosopher and the cat about the Big Bang, it will be useful to know what Jos\u00e9 Carlos Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado says in his book \u2018Evidencias cient\u00edficas de la existencia de Dios\u2019 (Scientific evidences of the existence of God). In short, the more we know about the <em>Big Bang<\/em> (Big Bang), the more one believes in God, he writes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Indeed, Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe Big Bang was the moment of creation of the universe, which occurred, with all certainty, 13.7 billion years ago (...). \u201cThe universe also had a beginning - the Big Bang - and that puts atheist scientists and non-scientists in a bind.\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cBecause if there is a beginning, there will also be a Beginner. If there was creation, a Creator is also necessary,\u201d continues the author of \u2018Scientific Evidence\u2019. \u201cWe have to think that not only all the matter in the universe was created at that moment, but also that time began at the Big Bang.<em>,<\/em> that is to say that there was no \u201cbefore\u201d the Big Bang. That leads us to a timeless -omnipotent-, non-material and intelligent being as the creator of the Big Bang. That is what we call God.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Roc\u00edo: \u201cwe cannot assume it as scientific evidence\u201d.\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00abBut there is another important problem that leads us to the second central argument, I think, of the book, right?\u201d (Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado's), says Rocio in Enric's video.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAnd that is that the Big Bang is scientific evidence and the Big Bang proves that there has been a moment of creation.\u201d.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The book (by GH) develops a lot of history with George Lema\u00eetre, who in the end was a Catholic priest and who was, therefore, the main developer of the Big Bang theory, which, according to the author's arguments, would demonstrate, then, as I say, that moment of creation.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This logical premise has not been totally demonstrated, but it is one of the hypotheses that are handled in science,\u201d Roc\u00edo assures.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In fact, what the evidence shows for the Big Bang moment is that the universe went through a moment of high matter density, but not a creation per se. We know that there was a tremendous expansion after a primordial moment. We cannot know at the moment with the tools we have what was there before that great expansion. That places us in several hypotheses. One, that of absolute creation and there would enter then what the author defends of a moment of a creator\u201d.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Enric: \u201cThe Big Bang does not necessarily lead to an absolute beginning in time\u201d.\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cYou are going to tell me that I agree with her all the time, but no, relax, we will soon reach a point of disagreement (...). But about this, I have always said that to me the Big Bang does not seem to me to necessarily lead to an absolute beginning in time,\u201d says Enric.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI think it is compatible with different models of an eternal universe. And here I want to be cautious because, well, I am aware that there is a lot of discussion about this subject and in the end I don't have the credentials either to be an authority about what follows or what doesn't follow from the Big Bang, but from what I have been able to read, hear, etcetera, it is the impression I get, that there is not such an obvious, automatic and necessary step from the Big Bang to the absolute beginning of time.\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt seems to me that it is a mistake to take the Big Bang as the absolute beginning of the universe\u00bb. (...) \u201cI think, of course, that the Big Bang is compatible with there being an absolute temporal beginning, but it doesn't seem to me that it necessarily has to be read that way.\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Some authors<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In his analysis, Enric cites some authors that may be useful to consult. For example, David Oderberg.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Anyway, he adds, \u201cif you are interested in a cosmological argument other than the Kalam and that is also very cool, I recommend this book \u00abHow reason can lead to God\u00bb, by Joshua Rasmusen, translated by himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In case it is useful for you to know, the IA recalls that the Church explicitly affirms that the human being can know the existence of God through natural reason, starting from created things. And also that, according to Benedict XVI, reason can be open to God, but it needs to be expanded (not reduced to the scientific method). A topic discussed in the video.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Theistic Philosopher Reacts to Schr\u00f6dinger&#039;s Cat \u25ba The Book That Proves GOD?\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Q4QPMDdGW_U?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El libro de Jos\u00e9 Carlos Gonz\u00e1lez Hurtado \u2018Evidencias cient\u00edficas de la existencia de Dios\u2019, junto a otros reci\u00e9n publicados, est\u00e1 dando juego en el an\u00e1lisis medi\u00e1tico.&nbsp; Uno de los debates m\u00e1s recientes ha tenido lugar en las redes sociales en el video de \u2018Adictos a la Filosof\u00eda\u2019 titulado \u2018Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta reacciona ante la gata de [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2425,"featured_media":60903,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"categories":[57,537],"tags":[2709],"class_list":["post-60902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-argumentos","category-recursos","tag-ciencia-y-dios"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten &quot;evidencias&quot; sobre Dios<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Enric F. Gel ha coincidido con \u2018La gata de Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019), en que \u201cno hay una forma inexorable de razonar hacia la existencia de Dios&quot;.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/resources-2\/theist-philosopher-and-cat-discuss-evidence-for-god\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten &quot;evidencias&quot; sobre Dios\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Enric F. Gel ha coincidido con \u2018La gata de Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019), en que \u201cno hay una forma inexorable de razonar hacia la existencia de Dios&quot;.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/resources-2\/theist-philosopher-and-cat-discuss-evidence-for-god\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Omnes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-02T04:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-04T15:10:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"526\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/051da02e8f621ba5bc903e8c75dc3eb9\"},\"headline\":\"Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten \u201cevidencias cient\u00edficas\u201d sobre Dios\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T04:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-04T15:10:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2642,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Ciencia y Dios\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Argumentos\",\"Recursos\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"WebPage\",\"ItemPage\"],\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/\",\"name\":\"Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten \\\"evidencias\\\" sobre Dios\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T04:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-04T15:10:04+00:00\",\"description\":\"Enric F. Gel ha coincidido con \u2018La gata de Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019), en que \u201cno hay una forma inexorable de razonar hacia la existencia de Dios\\\".\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":526,\"caption\":\"Galaxias en el universo.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/recursos\\\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten \u201cevidencias cient\u00edficas\u201d sobre Dios\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Omnes\",\"description\":\"Informaci\u00f3n de la Iglesia y la sociedad\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Omnes\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Omnes\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo_omnes_negro.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/12\\\/logo_omnes_negro.png\",\"width\":15524,\"height\":3000,\"caption\":\"Omnes\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/051da02e8f621ba5bc903e8c75dc3eb9\",\"name\":\"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/o-de-omens-100x100.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/o-de-omens-100x100.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/o-de-omens-100x100.png\",\"caption\":\"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.omnesmag.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/redaccion-omnes\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Theistic philosopher and \u2018the cat\u2019 discuss \"evidence\" for God","description":"Enric F. Gel has agreed with \u2018Schr\u00f6dinger's cat\u2019), that \u201cthere is no inexorable way of reasoning towards the existence of God\".","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/resources-2\/theist-philosopher-and-cat-discuss-evidence-for-god\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten \"evidencias\" sobre Dios","og_description":"Enric F. Gel ha coincidido con \u2018La gata de Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019), en que \u201cno hay una forma inexorable de razonar hacia la existencia de Dios\".","og_url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/resources-2\/theist-philosopher-and-cat-discuss-evidence-for-god\/","og_site_name":"Omnes","article_published_time":"2026-05-02T04:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-04T15:10:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":526,"url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/"},"author":{"name":"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#\/schema\/person\/051da02e8f621ba5bc903e8c75dc3eb9"},"headline":"Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten \u201cevidencias cient\u00edficas\u201d sobre Dios","datePublished":"2026-05-02T04:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-04T15:10:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/"},"wordCount":2642,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg","keywords":["Ciencia y Dios"],"articleSection":["Argumentos","Recursos"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["WebPage","ItemPage"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/","url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/","name":"Theistic philosopher and \u2018the cat\u2019 discuss \"evidence\" for God","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-02T04:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-04T15:10:04+00:00","description":"Enric F. Gel has agreed with \u2018Schr\u00f6dinger's cat\u2019), that \u201cthere is no inexorable way of reasoning towards the existence of God\".","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/UniversoGalaxiasOk.jpg","width":920,"height":526,"caption":"Galaxias en el universo."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/recursos\/filosofo-teista-y-la-gata-discuten-evidencias-sobre-dios\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fil\u00f3sofo te\u00edsta y \u2018la gata\u2019 discuten \u201cevidencias cient\u00edficas\u201d sobre Dios"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/","name":"Omnes","description":"Information on the Church and Society","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Omnes","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#organization","name":"Omnes","url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo_omnes_negro.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/logo_omnes_negro.png","width":15524,"height":3000,"caption":"Omnes"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/#\/schema\/person\/051da02e8f621ba5bc903e8c75dc3eb9","name":"Editorial Staff Omnes","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/o-de-omens-100x100.png","url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/o-de-omens-100x100.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/o-de-omens-100x100.png","caption":"Redacci\u00f3n Omnes"},"url":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/author\/redaccion-omnes\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2425"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60902"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60902\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60908,"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60902\/revisions\/60908"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.omnesmag.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}