Books

A question of identity

A Question of Identity proposes a Christianity that convinces through openness, coherence and integral formation in the 21st century.

Javier García Herrería-January 8, 2026-Reading time: 2 minutes

Alfonso Aguiló is an authoritative voice in the field of education and Christian reflection. An engineer by training, educator by vocation and president of the Spanish Confederation of Educational Centers (CECE). His perspective combines humanistic training with an open attitude to the changing reality of our time. A question of identity is part of this effort to provide current Christian responses to the cultural, educational and spiritual challenges of the 21st century.

From the very beginning, the author clearly assumes that “transmitting the faith while assuming that we are in the minority”.” does not mean to give up, but to propose from authenticity, coherence and respectful dialogue. 

One of the great achievements of the book is its ability to put in conversation the contemporary mentality - marked by pluralism, relativism and an often exclusive secularism - with a Christian faith that is not afraid to assume its convictions with strength and joy. Aguiló does not present a faith that fights, but one that convinces. His proposal is not a trench, but one of encounter.

The book is structured in several thematic blocks. In the section dedicated to the Christian humanism and education, Aguiló asks about the place of religion in schools, the compatibility between Christian identity and secularism, and the need to build a “culture of dialogue. Chapters such as ”A faith that makes culture“, ”Christian identity in school management“ and ”Public discourse on identity“ stand out.

Another part focuses on the Christian values and character education. Topics such as “the hidden power of kindness”, “the exercise of authority”, “education and frustration” or “personal vocation and emotional life” show the author's intention to form complete persons, not only technically prepared, but emotionally and ethically mature. This formative, integral and profoundly human dimension of education is one of the main contributions of the book.

In the section on the spiritual dimension, Aguiló dismantles many current prejudices: he affirms that faith is not a “code of obligations and prohibitions,” but a living relationship with God. He invites us to speak clearly but without hurting, and to not “shut up to no one, nor speak only for like-minded or convinced people”. This attitude of openness, so necessary today, finds in Aguiló a lucid and serene formulation.

A question of identity

AuthorAlfonso Aguiló
EditorialRialp : Rialp
Number of pages: 267
Read more
The Vatican

The Pope's catechesis will address Vatican II and evangelization

On the same day that the Consistory with the cardinals began, Pope Leo XIV announced at today's Audience that the catechesis will address Vatican II and its documents. Its teaching is today “the guiding star of the Church's journey,” he said, drawing on the words of recent popes and emphasizing the Church's proclamation of the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.  

Editorial Staff Omnes-January 7, 2026-Reading time: 3 minutes

Pope Leo XIV announced at the General Audience on Wednesday, July 7, that the next catechesis will focus on Vatican Council II through its documents. The announcement was made in the Paul VI Hall before numerous faithful and pilgrims, in the usual languages, including Chinese and Arabic.

“After the Jubilee Year, during which we have reflected on the mysteries of Jesus” life, we are beginning a new cycle of catechesis dedicated to the Second Vatican Council and a re-reading of its documents. This is a valuable opportunity to rediscover the beauty and importance of this ecclesial event," the Pope said.

The reading was an excerpt from St. Paul's Letter to the Hebrews, chapter 13, in which the Apostle writes that «Christ is the same yesterday and today, and will be forever.» He exhorts us “not to be led astray by any kind of strange doctrines.”.

Support for all recent Popes

The papal decision was based on his predecessors in the See of Peter, beginning with St. John XXIII, who convened the Council, and especially St. Paul VI, who concluded it. 

However, Pope Leo XIV's initial quote was from St. John Paul II, who, at the end of the Jubilee in 2000, stated the following: “I feel more than ever the duty to point to the Council as the great grace from which the Church has benefited in the 20th century” (Apostolic Letter Novo millennio ineunte, 57).

“Polar star of the Church’s path”

The Holy Father Leo XIV recalled that, along with the anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, “in 2025 we will commemorate the sixtieth anniversary of the Second Vatican Council.” And “although the time separating us from this event is not long, it is also true that the generation of bishops, theologians, and believers of Vatican II are no longer with us today.”

Therefore, “we feel called not to stifle prophecy and to continue seeking ways and means to implement the intuitions” of the Council, (…) rereading its documents and reflecting on their content. In fact, it is the Magisterium that still constitutes the guiding star of the Church's journey today.”

Benedict XVI: the teachings of Vatican II, “particularly relevant”

“As Benedict XVI taught,” he emphasized in the Audience Leo XIV, “the conciliar documents have not lost their relevance over the years. On the contrary, their teachings are particularly relevant in the face of the new challenges facing the Church and today's globalized society” (First message after Mass with the cardinal electors, April 20, 2005).

He then reminded Pope Francis: Rediscovering the Council helps us to “give primacy back to God, to the essential.”.

Cardinal Luciani (John Paul I): “deeper and more extensive holiness”

The Pope also took notice of Monsignor Albino Luciani. The future Pope John Paul I, «at the beginning of the Council, wrote prophetically: “There is still a need not so much for organizations, methods, or structures, but for deeper and more widespread holiness. (...) It may be that the excellent and abundant fruits of a Council will be seen after centuries and will mature by laboriously overcoming contrasts and adverse situations.‘’.

“Opening ourselves up to the world”

“The Second Vatican Council rediscovered the face of God as Father, who in Christ calls us to be his children. It has looked at the Church in the light of Christ, the light of the peoples, as a mystery of communion and a sacrament of unity between God and his people. It has initiated an important liturgical reform, placing at its center the mystery of salvation and the active and conscious participation of the whole People of God,” Pope Leo XIV recalled.

At the same time, “it has helped us to open ourselves to the world and to welcome the changes and challenges of the modern era in dialogue and shared responsibility. As a Church that wishes to open its arms to humanity, echo the hopes and anxieties of peoples, and collaborate in building a more just and fraternal society.”. 

Saint Paul VI: The time has come to set out

In conclusion, the Successor of Peter stated that “what St. Paul VI said to the Council Fathers at the end of their work remains a criterion of guidance for us today. He affirmed that the hour of departure had come. It was time to leave the conciliar assembly to go out to meet humanity and bring it the good news of the Gospel, in the awareness of having lived a time of grace in which the past, present, and future were condensed (St. Paul VI, Message to the Council Fathers, December 8, 1965). 

The authorEditorial Staff Omnes

The Vatican

Why Pope Leo XIV's First Extraordinary Consistory is so Important

Pope Leo XIV has convened his first extraordinary consistory for January 2026, a key meeting with the entire College of Cardinals that will mark the effective beginning of his style of governance and his priorities for the Church.

Bryan Lawrence Gonsalves-January 7, 2026-Reading time: 4 minutes

The Vatican confirmed on December 20 that Pope Leo XIV will convene an extraordinary consistory of cardinals on January 7 and 8, 2026. It will be the first meeting of its kind during his pontificate. It will also be the first time that the entire College of Cardinals has met since the conclave that elected him.

This is important because an extraordinary consistory is not primarily ceremonial. It is one of the few moments, outside of the conclave, when all the cardinals are in the same room with the Pope. In canon law, it exists for «particular needs of the Church or matters of special gravity.» In practice, it is a tool of governance. It allows the Pope to consult widely, take the pulse of the global Church, and signal priorities in advance.

What a consistory?

A consistory is a formal meeting of cardinals called by the pope to assist him in governing the universal Church. 

An ordinary consistory is usually ceremonial. It is often used to create new cardinals or for certain steps in canonizations. It is usually attended mainly by cardinals who live in Rome; however, it can still be significant due to its nature. Pope Benedict XVI, for example, announced his resignation at a consistory in 2013.

An extraordinary consistory is different. It is designed to consult with the entire College of Cardinals. The word itself points to the idea of «being together.» Historically, it has been an important way for popes to seek advice on doctrine, discipline, and governance of the Church. It is explicitly consultative. The pope remains the decision-maker, but he listens in a structured way.

The last extraordinary consistory with a significant strategic impact was held in February 2014 under the pontificate of Pope Francis, focusing on marriage and the family ahead of the Synod on the Family. This was the only extraordinary consistory convened by the late Pope.

The importance of this consistory

The January 2026 meeting will be the first time most of the cardinals have gathered since the election of Pope Leo XIV. Many had little opportunity to get to know each other before the conclave. That means the College is not yet familiar with the Pope's main pontifical priorities. Therefore, this meeting is not just about the items on the agenda. It is also about relationships, trust, and consistency.

That is why the meeting has symbolic significance. Pope Leo XIV is bringing together a body that is geographically vast and often divided by experience, culture, and priorities. If he succeeds in creating true communion and a viable form of collaboration, he will strengthen his ability to govern and lead the Church. 

The Holy See Press Office said the two days will include “moments of communion and fraternity” as well as time for “reflection, sharing and prayer”. The stated aim is to offer “support and advice” to the pope and to strengthen communion between the Bishop of Rome and the cardinals.

These phrases may seem generic. But in a new pontificate, they point to something specific: Pope Leo XIV is setting the tone for how he will lead. Will he govern through a small inner circle? Or will he try to establish broader consultation and shared responsibility?

The agenda signals the pope’s governing instincts

In a Christmas letter to the cardinals signed on December 12, the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, to which Crux News in Rome has had access, Pope Leo outlines four main points of discussion for the two-day meeting, which will likely address two topics per day.

Firstly, he asked for a renewed reading of Evangelii Gaudium (2013). That document is closely linked to Pope Francis' vision of a missionary Church. Leo XIV seems to say that the Church cannot begin with internal debates. It must begin with the proclamation of the Gospel. If you take this as a starting point, it frames the rest as tools for mission, not as ends in themselves.

Secondly, he asked cardinals to study Praedicate Evangelium (2022), the constitution that reformed the Roman Curia. This is crucial. Many disputes in recent years have not been solely about theology. They have been about authority: who decides what and at what level. If Pope Leo XIV focuses here, he may be testing how much consensus there is to continue Pope Francis' reforms and how they will be implemented.

Third, he emphasized synodality as a key form of cooperation with the Pope on matters affecting the whole Church. This is no minor sign. Synodality has become a defining issue and a point of controversy. By including it on the agenda from the outset, Pope Leo XIV indicates that he wants the College to engage directly with him, rather than treating it as someone else's project.

Finally, he called for theological, historical, and pastoral reflection on the liturgy, emphasizing the need to preserve healthy tradition while remaining open to legitimate development, in line with Vatican II. This issue is often where conflict within the Church is most visible. A pope who addresses it early on may be trying to ease tensions by clarifying principles. Or he may be preparing to make decisions that will require the support of the cardinals. In any case, the fact that he has included it suggests that he knows the issue cannot be avoided.

What this means for the Church

This council will likely be the first clear window into the mind of Pope Leo XIV. It will show what he wants to emphasize, what he considers urgent, and how he expects his closest collaborators to work with him.

It may also expose real limits. The subjects are wide. The time is short. That combination can produce either focus or frustration. A successful consistory will not solve everything. But it can establish a method: honest listening and clear priorities with a shared sense of direction.

In that sense, the extraordinary consistory is not merely procedural. It is the first important institutional act of this pontificate. It is where Pope Leo XIV will begin to define how he intends to govern with the cardinals and what kind of Church he wants them to help him lead.

The authorBryan Lawrence Gonsalves

Founder of "Catholicism Coffee".

Books

Evidence that Jesus is God

This is what I was thinking about when I began to read José Carlos González-Hurtado's book, which brings together many indications of the divinity of Jesus Christ that will not leave those who have never considered the opportunity to know Jesus intimately unmoved.

José Carlos Martín de la Hoz-January 7, 2026-Reading time: 4 minutes

As the old medieval adage states: “Intelligo quia volo et non intelligo quia non volo,” meaning: “I understand because I want to, and I don't understand because I don't want to.” Therefore, it seems that it is not usually worth spending time arguing with agnostics and atheists about the divinity of Jesus Christ.

In this regard, it should be clarified that José Carlos González-Hurtado's work is not controversial, nor is it the result of discussions with argumentative people or those who seek debate for debate's sake.

Really, it is not worth reasoning about the figure of Jesus and the scope of revealed truth when the person in front of us is not interested and does not have the slightest curiosity. It is preferable to wait until a loved one dies, or they suffer from depression, financial ruin, or colon cancer. That is, when they rethink their way of life and their value system is in crisis, then you can ask them if they are interested in knowing Jesus Christ and entrusting their material and spiritual needs to Him, because this is certainly a question that essentially affects the core of the soul. It is only worthwhile to speak directly and propose who Jesus was so that by knowing Him, they can relate to Him and, by relating to Him, grow fond of Him.

Faith and the path of the heart

Cold reasoning can multiply in front of the skeptic who neither wants to believe nor is interested in believing, and who is comfortably settled into a selfish way of life. The path to God is the path of the heart, simply because God is love.

This is what I was thinking about when I began to read José Carlos González-Hurtado's book, which brings together many indications of the divinity of Jesus Christ that will not leave those who have never considered the opportunity to know Jesus intimately unmoved.

The table of truths about Jesus, which are fully supported by numerous sources outside the Church and preserved almost miraculously, is very cleverly put together (64).

Historical and external evidence of Jesus

We must now turn to a very interesting chapter that has given rise to the most serious insinuation in recent years: “whether Christianity was an invention of the early Christian community.” If this were the case, as some authors insisted at the beginning of the 20th century, then the Church could continue its work until the end of time simply by adapting it to the times, as some schools of thought claimed at the end of the Second Vatican Council (69).

Before concluding the first part of this interesting work, our author will focus on two key figures. The first is Feuerbach, who in his book The Essence of Christianity presented one of the most important critiques ever made throughout history: “Did God create man, or did man create God?” Certainly, here is the question in its rawest form: do we or do we not have faith in the existence of God, and of a God who has revealed himself and invites me to know his revelation?. 

The second key author in this final section is Nietzsche, who, dissatisfied with the doubts raised by Feuerbach, encourages Western culture to be consistent and kill God, that is, the false God that men have created and continue to worship out of inertia and superficiality (155).

In seeking arguments in favor of the evidence that Jesus is God, our author will begin by explaining the origin, consolidation, and dissemination of the oral revelation of Jesus and subsequently the written revelation in the New Testament and in the writings of the Church Fathers, all of which has been preserved, conserved, and transmitted by the magisterium of the Church to the present day.

The transmission of revelation in the Church

Certainly, after twenty centuries, we can affirm that we believe the same as the early Christians, for the Holy Spirit has watched over us throughout history so that the treasure of revelation would not be lost. At the same time, we know more about Jesus Christ than the early Christians did, for we have spent centuries passing on to one another what we have learned about Him in our personal relationship with Jesus Christ Himself.

Thus, the central argument of this work is to focus on the figure of Jesus Christ, alpha and omega, lord of history and father of this supernatural and human family that is the Church, universal sacrament of salvation.

The first thing our author does is review the scene of the discouraged disciples of Emmaus, when Jesus Christ himself ignites their hearts simply by demonstrating how He himself had fulfilled all the messianic promises contained in the Scriptures (272-284).

At this point, you may wonder why most Jews did not convert to Christianity (285). This question is logical and very easy to answer, because they have not responded to God's grace. In other words, for a Jew to believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ, the grace of faith and the response of the person are necessary (288).

Evidence of Jesus' Divinity

Next, he will bring up the archaeological argument, as he will indeed provide much scientific evidence that speaks to the divinity of Jesus Christ, reflected in burials and especially around holy sites in the Holy Land such as the Pool of Bethesda, and so many other proven miracles, such as the miracle of the resurrection and the “empty tomb” (313).

He will immediately address the sum of Eucharistic miracles throughout history, for example, those collected by St. Carlo Acutis and others that continue to occur today (353). He will also provide the latest data on the testing of the Shroud of Turin, despite the difficulties of Carbon 14 and Carbon 16 after the atomic bombs (341), and the Holy Face of Oviedo (343).

The evidence that Jesus is God

Author: José Carlos Gonzalez-Hurtado
Editorial: Rocaeditorial
Date of publication: 2025
Pages: 363
Gospel

The beloved son and the adopted sons. Feast of the Baptism of Christ

Vitus Ntube comments on the readings for the feast of the baptism of Christ for January 11, 2026.

Vitus Ntube-January 7, 2026-Reading time: 2 minutes

It seems that all the feasts of the Christmas season are feasts of revelation: from the birth of Christ, to the encounter of the Holy Family with the shepherds and the Magi, through the Epiphany, and now with the Baptism of the Lord. Today the Church celebrates the Feast of the Baptism of the Lord, which marks the end of the liturgical season of Christmas. Today we fix our gaze on Jesus as he approaches to be baptized by John in the Jordan River.

This feast is an extension of Epiphany: another moment of manifestation, another revelation of Christ. The Epiphany we recently celebrated showed Christ to the nations and cultures of the world. However, the Baptism of the Lord reveals something even deeper: the truth of his identity as the beloved Son of the Father. By revealing who Christ is, this feast also reveals who we are called to be.

Today's opening prayer speaks of Christ as the beloved Son and of us as adopted children, reborn through water and the Holy Spirit. We are children in the Son. Christ's baptism invites us to be like Him: the one in whom the Father is well pleased. It reminds us of our deepest identity as children of God. It reminds us that we are eternally loved, that the waters of Baptism have given us new birth, and that Heaven has been opened for us as well. After Jesus was baptized, the heavens opened above Him. This sign of the open heavens reveals that we now have continuous access to the Father; the channel of communication is open. Pope Benedict XVI writes: “Heaven is open above Jesus. His communion with the Father's will, the “all righteousness” that he fulfills, opens Heaven, which by its very essence is precisely where God's will is fulfilled.."

A second significant aspect of this feast is the Father's proclamation of Jesus' identity. This proclamation does not interpret what Jesus does, but who he is: the beloved Son in whom God is well pleased.

The Gospel tells us what the voice of Heaven declares: “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”This is the heart of today's feast, the most important aspect that reveals the essence of Christ's baptism as revelation. The Father's voice reveals the deepest truth about Jesus and, by extension, about ourselves. Benedict XVI explains how we can identify with this truth: “The man in whom he is well pleased is Jesus. He is so because he lives totally oriented toward the Father, living with his gaze fixed on him and in communion of will with him. People of complacency are therefore those who have the attitude of the Son, people configured to Christ.".

Conforming to Christ: this is the great desire and vocation of all God's adopted children. In this, our divine filiation finds its fullest meaning and joy.

The Vatican

On Epiphany, the Pope welcomes “the spiritual search of our contemporaries”

On the Epiphany of the Lord, seeing countless people passing through the Holy Door of St. Peter's in 2025, Pope Leo XIV compared the pilgrims of the Jubilee in some way to the Magi who came to worship Jesus. The Church must “value and direct toward the God who inspires it” the richness of “the spiritual search of our contemporaries.”.

Francisco Otamendi-January 6, 2026-Reading time: 5 minutes

Today, on the solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, Pope Leo XIV compared the passage of countless men and women, pilgrims of hope, through the Holy Door of the Jubilee in St. Peter's, the last to close this very morning, with the pilgrimage of the Magi seeking the Child Jesus, and with “the spiritual search of our contemporaries, much richer than we can perhaps comprehend.”. 

Millions of them have crossed the threshold of the Church. What have they found? What hearts, what attention, what reciprocity? asked Pope Leo XIV in the homily of the Holy Mass of the Epiphany.

“Yes, magicians still exist. They are people who accept the challenge of risking their own journey; who, in a complicated world like ours—in many ways exclusionary and dangerous—feel the need to set out on a journey, in search,” he continued.

The Church should not fear this dynamism, but rather guide it.

The Pontiff then suggested the response we should give to this movement. “The Gospel leads the Church not to fear this dynamism, but to value it and direct it toward the God who inspires it.”.

He added: “He is a God who can baffle us, because we cannot grasp him in our hands like idols of silver and gold, because he is alive and gives life, like that Child whom Mary held in her arms and whom the Magi adored.”.

“Holy places such as cathedrals, basilicas, and shrines, which have become destinations for jubilee pilgrimages, must spread the fragrance of life, the indelible sign that another world has begun,” he said.

Precisely the editorial from the January issue of Omnes, ‘The Examination,’ refers to the response to this “new social, cultural, and ecclesial movement” that is reflected in different cultural manifestations which, in cinema, music, or social media, have revived the search for God or spirituality.

Pilgrims cross the Holy Door of St. Peter's Basilica in the Vatican on January 5, 2026, the last day it remained open before Pope Leo XIV officially closed it on January 6 to celebrate the end of the Holy Year. (Photo CNS/Lola Gomez).

Solemnity of the Epiphany

The morning at the Vatican was marked by the solemnity of great occasions in St. Peter's Basilica. Nearly six thousand people were inside, plus ten thousand faithful and pilgrims in the square, where the Pope prayed the Angelus at noon, and four cardinals concelebrated. The dean of the College of Cardinals, Giovanni Battista Re, the vice-dean, Leonardo Sandri, the Secretary of State, Pietro Parolin, and the prefect emeritus of the Dicastery for Bishops, Marc Ouellet.

The Gospel has described in detail the great joy of the Magi when they saw the star, the Pope began, but also the turmoil experienced by Herod and all of Jerusalem in the face of their search. “Whenever it comes to manifestations of God, Sacred Scripture does not hide these kinds of contrasts: joy and turmoil, resistance and obedience, fear and desire.”. 

Today we celebrate the Epiphany of the Lord, aware that in his presence nothing remains as before, the Pope continued. This is the beginning of hope. God reveals himself, and nothing can remain static. “Something begins on which the present and the future depend, as the Prophet announces: ‘Arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the Lord has risen upon you! (Is 60:1).’”.

Pope Leo XIV celebrates Mass on Epiphany in St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican on January 6, 2026. (Photo OSV News/Yara Nardi, Reuters).

The Jubilee reminds us that it is possible to start over

The magi bring a simple and essential question to Jerusalem: “Where is the king of the Jews who has just been born?” “How important it is,” emphasized Leo XIV, “that those who cross the threshold of the Church realize that the Messiah has just been born there, realize that a community has gathered there where hope has arisen, that a story of life is being realized there.”. 

“The Jubilee has come to remind us that we can start again, that we are still in the beginning stages, that the Lord wants to grow among us, wants to be God-with-us.”.

Finally, the Pope prayed before the Virgin of Hope, brought especially to St. Peter's for these weeks. The Pope had just spoken at Mass about “the great joy of the Magi, who leave behind the palace and the temple to go to Bethlehem; and that is when they see the star again! Therefore, dear brothers and sisters, it is beautiful to become pilgrims of hope. And it is beautiful to continue to be so, together. God's faithfulness will always surprise us.”.

Mary, Star of the Morning, concluded the Pontiff, will always walk before us. “In her Son, we will contemplate and serve a magnificent humanity, transformed not by delusions of omnipotence, but by the God who became flesh out of love.”.

Magicians of the East: “He who gives everything gives a lot.”

In the prayer of the Angelus, Pope Leo XIV recalled that the word “epiphany” means “manifestation,” and “our joy comes from a Mystery that is no longer hidden. God's life has been revealed: many times and in different ways, but with definitive clarity in Jesus, so that now we know, despite many tribulations, that we can have hope., “God saves”: it has no other intentions, it has no other name. Only that which liberates and saves comes from God and is an epiphany of God.

In the Gospel story and in our nativity scenes, the Magi present the Baby Jesus with precious gifts: gold, frankincense, and myrrh, the Pope continued. “These do not seem like useful things for a child, but they express an intention that gives us much to reflect on as we reach the end of the Jubilee Year. He who gives everything gives much.”.

“Craftsmanship for peace, instead of the war industry”

The Holy Father recalled here the poor widow who had thrown her last coins, all she had, into the Temple treasury. “We do not know what the Magi, who came from the East, possessed, but their journey, their risk-taking, their gifts suggest to us that everything, truly everything we are and possess, calls to be offered to Jesus, our priceless treasure.”.

May his Kingdom grow, concluded the Pope, before giving the blessing, “may his words be fulfilled in us, may strangers and adversaries become brothers and sisters, may inequality be replaced by equity, may the industry of war be replaced by the craft of peace. Artisans of hope, let us walk toward the future on another path (cf. Mt 2:12).”.

The authorFrancisco Otamendi

ColumnistsAlberto Sánchez León

Bethlehem: of windows and mirrors

Bethlehem is a key window into Christian life. It is a portal through which we can glimpse Transcendence. Bethlehem is the door, the gateway that introduces us to the mystery of life. And that mystery is revealed in a family in need.

January 6, 2026-Reading time: 2 minutes

Beauty is not only within the reach of artists, but it is true that it is easier for them to contemplate it, discover it, create it... love it. And, in a way, we are all a little bit artists.

One of the keys to grasping the universe of beauty is inspiration. To create beauty, you have to be inspired, you have to rise above, you have to climb. Inspiration is like looking out of a window that reveals something wonderful to us. And the wonderful thing is something that is not us. When modernity discovers the self, it falls in love with the self and then no longer leaves itself. We have been dreaming of the self for many centuries. We do not leave it. And why? Because the modern spirit confused windows with mirrors. 

The window makes the invisible visible, and the medium is art and symbolism. The mirror only reflects; it cannot create, and the medium is the self, which also becomes the end. Therefore, those who do not discover windows can only fall into narcissism or individualism. The window transports us from real things to more real things. The mirror cannot transport us because there is no space, no journey. 

When we travel to a new world through inspiration, the powers of the soul begin to work much more actively, because man is destined to marvel, and wonder “touches” ingenuity. 

The marvelous has to do with truth. If truth is transcendent, that is, outside of me, then the mirror cannot aspire to it. The narcissist cannot be in the truth because he is stuck in self-referentiality, he drowns in it, he cannot unfold because there are no windows to get out of himself. The mirror is myth, Narcissus, subjectivity, solipsism, self-gaze, pure me and only me.

When one breaks with the culture of the mirror, of spectacle (mirror and spectacle have the same etymological root), then the capacity for wonder is born, because one no longer looks at oneself, but rather the force of the other bursts into the self, which ceases to be me and becomes a person.

When we settle into the culture of the window, the person is always capax Dei, capable of marveling at what one is not, at the truth of others and of the Other. And for that very reason, one can relate and behave as what one is: a person... a relationship. Windows invite relationship, mirrors invite solitude. 

Bethlehem is a key window into Christian life. It is a portal through which we glimpse Transcendence. Bethlehem is the door, the portal that introduces us to the mystery of life. And that mystery is revealed in a family in need. There are no mirrors in the window of Bethlehem. Everything there is an epiphany, a window onto Truth, Beauty, and Goodness. 

The authorAlberto Sánchez León

Read more
Resources

Did the Star of Bethlehem really exist?

Was the star of Bethlehem a mere symbol or a real phenomenon observed in the sky? Based on Matthew's account and ancient astronomical records, this article delves into one of the most intriguing questions of the Christmas story.

Alberto Barbés-January 6, 2026-Reading time: 9 minutes

On January 6, the Church celebrates the arrival at the portal of Bethlehem of the Magi from the East, those scholars of the stars who traveled from distant lands to visit the Baby Jesus. Apart from tradition and some later representations, the main source we have about these characters is the Gospel of St. Matthew, written a few decades after the events took place:

«...some Magi arrived in Jerusalem from the East, asking: »Where is the King of the Jews who has been born? For we saw his star in the East and have come to worship him (...). After hearing the king, they set out (for Bethlehem). And then the star they had seen in the East went before them, until it came to rest over the place where the Child was.".

Matthew does not provide us with much information about them. In fact, we are not even sure how many there were. Traditionally, it has been assumed that there were three people, in keeping with the three gifts they brought: gold, frankincense, and myrrh. This number appears in the first known depiction of the Magi, in the Catacombs of Priscilla in Rome, dating from between the second and third centuries. On the other hand, the word Matthew uses to refer to them, magoi (magoi), was generally used to refer to scholars of Persian origin. Be that as it may, looking at the Gospel, we can deduce that they were wise men who came from the East and appeared in Jerusalem because they were looking for the king of the Jews. Furthermore, we can deduce that they were not looking for just any sovereign, but a king announced by the stars and who, moreover, deserved their adoration: We saw his star in the East and came to worship him.

As I said, we don't have much more to say about the Magi, but we can ask ourselves about the star that led them to the Child. Was it really an astronomical object that made these wise men set out on their journey? It could well have been a miraculous event that only they saw, or an allegorical reference, to an angel, for example. But if we can assume that we are talking about a physical phenomenon, what was it? 

What does «star» mean in the biblical text?

When researching the star of Bethlehem, we encounter a small difficulty in Matthew's text itself: the Greek word used (star) is usually translated as star, but a more accurate translation would be star, and could refer not to a star, but to any bright astronomical body, such as a planet or a comet. In any case, it seems clear that Matthew's text refers to a relatively peculiar astronomical phenomenon: the magi did not observe just any star, but saw your astro (his star). 

What phenomenon occurred in the heavens that caused some wise men from the East—probably Persians—to undertake a long journey precisely to Jerusalem?  As is well known, we are not sure of the date of Jesus Christ's birth, but we can say that it must have occurred after 6 BC—the most likely year of Quirinius' census mentioned by Luke—and before 4 BC, the year of Herod's death. So, what phenomena could have been observed in the heavens at that time?

Signs in the sky: three decisive astronomical phenomena

Well, around that time, three interesting astronomical phenomena occurred. The first took place in the year 7 BC, more specifically between May 29 and December 5: the conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn. 

It is true that a planetary conjunction is not something exceptional and does not seem likely to have sufficiently astonished our magicians. But we must bear in mind that the one in 7 BC was not just any conjunction: it had three peculiarities. First, both planets were particularly close to Earth, which made them appear much brighter than normal. Second, it was a triple conjunction. Due to the combined movement of Jupiter, Saturn, and Earth, it appeared that, on its path through the sky, Jupiter overtook Saturn; then Saturn surpassed Jupiter (let's say “escaping” from it) and, finally, Jupiter ended up winning the battle. And finally, and this is perhaps the most interesting thing, this triple conjunction occurred precisely in the constellation of Pisces... And the fact is that, for the Persians, the constellation of Pisces represents Israel.

In summary: in the year 7 BC, the magicians could see in the sky that Jupiter (which for the Persians was a representation of good) fought and won to Saturn (which represented evil) and all of this precisely over the constellation that referred to Israel... 

The second curious phenomenon that could be observed a few months later was Jupiter's occultation behind the Moon. It is not very common, but from time to time the Moon covers a planet. And the important thing is that, as the Moon continues on its path, after a while the occulted planet reappears on the opposite side: it is as if the Moon «gives birth» to that planet... We know that in ancient times, the births planets by the Moon were associated with illustrious births, those of kings or important people. Well, in April of the year 6 BC, the Moon gave birth Jupiter, the same man who a few months earlier had announced his battle against evil in Judea... 

It is logical to think that these two events, so significant and so closely linked to Judah, would have alerted wise men who devoted their lives to observing the stars. That is why we can say that the third event we refer to could have been a real starting gun: this refers to the sudden appearance of an unknown star in the sky.

The Ch'ien-han-shu, or Book of the Han Dynasty, is a Chinese classic that chronicles the history of the Western Han Dynasty. In addition to providing us with a wealth of interesting information about that period, this work records the astronomical events that took place during the reign of Emperor Ai. We are interested in a rather brief note: “In the second year, second month: a hui-hsing emerged in Ch'ien Niu for 70 days. 

The second month of the second year spans from March 9 to April 6 of the year 5 BC, which fits quite well with the possible date of Christ's birth. On the other hand, we know that Ch'ien Niu is one of the constellations in the Chinese sky, which includes several of the stars in the constellation Capricorn. Finally, we know that hui-hsing (literally “broom star”) is how Chinese astronomers referred to comets. 

Was it a comet?

What exactly did Chinese observers see at that time? If we trust what they say, it is clear that it was something that appeared suddenly (that “emerged”) and then disappeared after a little over two months. There are only three possible explanations for a phenomenon of this kind: the explosion of a supernova, the appearance of a nova, or the arrival of a comet in the inner Solar System. The first two possibilities can be ruled out, as both leave physical debris and nothing has been observed at that point in space. Furthermore, as we have said, the expression used by the Chinese (broom star) seems to leave no room for doubt. 

However, it could be argued that comets do not appear suddenly. But that is not entirely true. They are relatively small objects and can only be seen when the sun's rays heat the comet's body, causing the nucleus to evaporate, which creates its classic “tail.” This striking trail, which is the only visible part of comets, appears more or less when they cross the orbit of Mars. All comets are invisible to the naked eye for most of their journey and appear (or emerge) suddenly as they approach Earth.

Finally, we find another difficulty in accepting that the star in Han's book was a comet. As the sentence is written, it gives the impression that the hui-hsing it remained fixed in the sky for 70 days (“it emerged in Ch'ien Niu for 70 days”) and that does not seem consistent with the behavior of a comet, which should move, as we know. But this is not correct: as is evident, a comet can appear fixed in the sky if its trajectory is directed directly—or almost directly—toward Earth. That very thing—the appearance of a fixed point in the sky—is what those who explore possible objects that could collide with our beloved planet fear they will find...

In any case, everything seems to indicate that the hui-hsing from Han's book could be a very good candidate for the star of Bethlehem, especially if we combine its appearance with the other two signs: the conjunction and the illumination of Jupiter. 

But could the star seen by the Magi have been a comet? Some have objected that, in that case, the Gospel would have referred to it as κομήτης (komḗtēs). But we must bear in mind that, undoubtedly, the source from which Matthew took this information, whether oral or written, must have been Hebrew. And in ancient Hebrew, as far as we know, there is no word for comet. Furthermore, we know that Origen already considered the idea that the star of Bethlehem was a comet in the mid-third century.

It has also been said that comets are often linked to misfortune or disaster, but this is not entirely correct. A recent example is the so-called Caesar's Comet, a bright star that visited us in 44 BC, a few days after the death of Julius Caesar. The event was interpreted in Rome as a sign of the emperor's deification.

The Magi did not follow the star at night.

It seems appropriate to make an important clarification here. It is common in iconography to depict the Magi traveling at night and following a star, usually with a tail. But this does not seem to correspond to reality. First, because it would be very strange for our wise men to travel at night: it would be natural and logical to travel during the day... And second, because nothing in Matthew's account leads us to think such a thing: quite the contrary. 

In fact, Matthew's text uses the aorist tense twice when referring to the vision of the star: we sawwe saw)his star in the East. And, further on: the star they sawI saw) in the East. The use of the aorist tense indicates a past event that has been completed, which tells us that the magi saw the star some time ago, when they were in the East, and not that they saw it during their journey to Jerusalem. Or, at least, not during the entire journey. This fits quite well with the Chinese record, which indicates that the star was seen for 70 days. Although authors disagree, it is estimated that a caravan journey from Persia to Jerusalem (about 1,600 km) could not have taken less than three months. That is, without taking into account the necessary preparations, of course.

In short, we can assume that the magi saw the signs we have detailed (the conjunction and birth of Jupiter, as well as the appearance of the comet) in the east and decided to embark on a journey to Jerusalem in search of the king of the Jews. Furthermore, this fits in quite well with another piece of information we have. When Herod—mocked by the Magi—decides to kill all the children in Bethlehem, he indicates that those who must die are two years or younger, according to the time he had carefully ascertained from the Magi. In fact, the first notice, The conjunction of Jupiter occurred two years prior to that date. 

From Jerusalem to Bethlehem: a star that stops?

I believe that what we have seen so far reasonably explains the events of the first part of the magi's journey, that is, the journey to Jerusalem. But what can we say about the second part, that is, the journey from Jerusalem to Bethlehem? According to Matthew, when they set out again, The star they had seen in the East moved in front of them until it stopped over the place where the Child was. According to the text, it is undeniable that the star they saw in this second stage was the same they saw in the East. That is to say: if our theory is correct, the comet that shone for seventy days near the constellation of Capricorn, at a certain moment appeared before them, that is, south of Jerusalem. Is it possible for a comet to do that? Well, it turns out that it is...

We have already pointed out that, if we trust Han's book, our comet remained near the constellation Capricorn for seventy days. We have already mentioned that for this to be possible, the comet must have had a trajectory that would have brought it very close to Earth. Specifically, we can deduce that it must have been a comet with a parabolic trajectory rather than an elliptical one, which means that it was a comet that will not return. This is actually the most common occurrence in our solar system: in fact, of the more than four thousand comets we know of, only five hundred have elliptical orbits. 

Mark Matney, a planetary scientist at NASA, became interested in calculating the trajectory that the hui-hsing from Han's book and came to a rather interesting conclusion. Specifically, he concluded that the comet in question must have passed very close to our planet, even grazing the Moon's orbit. Such proximity would make it possible, at least for a few hours, to see the comet even in sunlight. Let us remember that it was normal for magi to travel during the day... And not only that: a comet so close could move in an almost geostationary manner, like many artificial satellites, stable in the south and showing the way to Bethlehem, and even stopping for a while directly above that city. If Matney's calculations are correct, such an event—the comet stopping over Bethlehem—would have occurred specifically on June 8, 5 BC, between 10:00 and 11:30 in the morning. Of course, Matney's studies cannot categorically affirm that such a phenomenon occurred, but they make it clear that it is a perfectly plausible event. The article in question has the interesting title “The Star That Stood Still.” It can be consulted at here.

In summary: although, logically, we cannot be certain what the Star of Bethlehem was, we do find in the comet described by the authors of the Book of Han an interesting candidate for having been the astronomical trigger for the Magi's journey. 

The authorAlberto Barbés

Physicist and priest.

The Vatican

The Jubilee exceeds expectations: more than 33 million people visited Rome

The Holy Year of Hope proclaimed by Pope Francis and continued by Pope Leo XIV has exceeded expectations. Rome welcomed 33.4 million pilgrims (13 million of whom were young people). The ranking by country is led by those from Europe, 62.6 percent (around 20 million), followed by North and South America.

Francisco Otamendi-January 5, 2026-Reading time: 3 minutes

The Jubilee of 2025 convened by Pope Francis in 2024, with the Bull ‘Spes non confundit’ (Hope does not disappoint) has exceeded its pilgrim forecasts. More than 33 million pilgrims have flocked to Rome to earn the Jubilee. The forecast was 31.7 million pilgrims, so it has exceeded expectations by more than 1.5 million people.

At the time of data closure, more than two weeks ago, the figure was 32.4 million. But with those arriving at the end of December and January, the figure has grown to more than 33 million. The data was provided this morning by Monsignor Rino Fisichella, Pro-Prefect of the Dicastery for Evangelization, Section for Fundamental Questions of Evangelization in the World, at a press conference at the Vatican.

Alongside Archbishop Fisiquella, Alfredo Mantovano, Undersecretary of State for the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, and Roberto Gualtieri, Mayor of Rome and Special Commissioner for the Government, were also present. Francesco Rocca, President of the Lazio Region, and Lamberto Giannini, Prefect of Rome, were also in attendance.

13 million young people

Of the total number of pilgrims, 13 million have been young people. The peak occurred in May, during the conclave in which Pope Leo XIV was elected following the death of Pope Francis, with organizers counting 3.9 million pilgrims. The number of accredited journalists was 90,400.

62.63 percent, Europeans

According to data provided by Monsignor Fisiquella, pilgrims from Europe have topped the ranking of visitors to celebrate the jubilee. Holy Year by 2025, reaching 62.63 percent of the total, or around 20 million people. It is followed by North America (16.54%), South America (9.44%), Asia (7.69%), Oceania (1.14%), Central America and the Caribbean (1.04%). And also Africa (0.95%) and the Middle East (0.46%).

Monsignor Fisiquella emphasized that the Jubilee “has been a year of grace,” marked by “hope.” There have been 35 major events and five openings of the Holy Door in Rome, in addition to all those that have been opened in local churches around the world.

 

©Vatican Media

Closing tomorrow, on Epiphany

Tomorrow, January 6, the Solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, Pope Leo XIV will close the Holy Door in St. Peter's Basilica and bring this Jubilee of Hope to a close.

Some of the main events of the Jubilee, Archbishop Fisiquella pointed out, have also been the Youth Jubilee of Tor Vergata or the Circus Maximus, that of the rulers, the canonizations of Carlo Acutis and Pier Giorgio Frassati, etc. He also pointed out that the Jubilee was a significant stage but not the last one. He referred to the year 2033, which will mark 2,000 years since the Redemption, that is, the Passion, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Pope Leo XIV: “joyful event”

During the general audience on December 31, Pope Leo highlighted three “important events” from the past year. «Some were joyful, such as the pilgrimage of so many faithful for the Holy Year; others were painful, such as the death of the late Pope Francis and the scenes of war that continue to shake the planet.”. 

The jubilee pilgrimage of millions of Catholics around the world in 2025 is a reminder that “our whole life is a journey, whose final destination transcends space and time, to be fulfilled in the encounter with God and in full and eternal communion with Him,” said the Pope. 

The authorFrancisco Otamendi

Read more
The Vatican

What does Leo XIV want to discuss at his first consistory of cardinals?

This meeting is not just about agenda items. It is also about relationships, trust, and consistency.

Bryan Lawrence Gonsalves-January 5, 2026-Reading time: 4 minutes

The Vatican confirmed on 20 December that Pope Leo XIV will convene an extraordinary consistory of cardinals on 7 and 8 January 2026. It will be the first such gathering of his pontificate. It will also be the first time the entire College of Cardinals meets together since the conclave that elected him.

The last extraordinary consistory with major strategic impact was in February 2014 under Pope Francis, focused on marriage and family ahead of the Synod on the Family. This was the only extraordinary consistory invoked by the late pope.

What a consistory?

A consistory is a formal meeting of cardinals called by the pope to assist him in governing the universal Church.

An ordinary consistory is usually ceremonial. It is often used for creating new cardinals or for certain steps in canonizations. It is typically attended mainly by cardinals who live in Rome; however, it can still be significant in nature. Pope Benedict XVI for example, announced his resignation at a consistory in 2013.

An extraordinary consistory is different. It is designed for consultation with the whole College of Cardinals. The word itself points to the idea of “standing together.” Historically, it has been a major way for popes to seek counsel on doctrine, discipline, and Church governance. It is explicitly consultative. The pope remains the decision-maker, but he listens in a structured way.

The last extraordinary consistory with a significant strategic impact was in February 2014 under Pope Francis, focusing on marriage and the family ahead of the Synod on the Family. This was the only extraordinary consistory convened by the late Pope.

The importance of this consistory

The January 2026 gathering will be the first time most cardinals have been together since Pope Leo XIV’s election. Many had little chance to meet before the conclave. That means the College is still unfamiliar with the Pope’s major pontifical priorities. Hence, this meeting is not only about agenda items. It is also about relationships, trust and coherence.

That is why the meeting has symbolic weight. Pope Leo XIV is bringing together a body that is geographically vast and often divided by experience, culture and priorities. If he can create real communion and a workable way of collaborating, he strengthens his ability to govern and lead the Church.

The Holy See Press Office said the two days will include “moments of communion and fraternity” as well as time for “reflection, sharing and prayer”. The stated aim is to offer “support and advice” to the pope and to strengthen communion between the Bishop of Rome and the cardinals.

Those phrases can sound generic. But in a new pontificate, they point to something concrete: Pope Leo XIV is setting the tone for how he will lead. Will he govern through a small inner circle? Or will he try to build broader consultation and shared responsibility?

The agenda signals the pope’s governing instincts

In a Christmas letter to cardinals signed Dec. 12, the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, which Crux News in Rome had obtained, Pope Leo outlines four major points of discussion for the two-day meeting, with discussion likely to be focused on two issues per day.

Firstly, he asked for a renewed reading of Evangelii Gaudium (2013). That document is closely tied to Pope Francis’ vision of a missionary Church. Leo XIV appears to be saying that the Church cannot begin with internal debates. It must begin with proclaiming the Gospel. If he makes this the starting point, he frames the rest as tools for mission, not ends in themselves.

Secondly, he asked the cardinals to study Praedicate Evangelium (2022), the constitution that reformed the Roman Curia. This is crucial. Many disputes in recent years have not been only about theology. They have been about authority: who decides what and at what level. If Pope Leo XIV focuses here, he may be testing how much consensus exists for continuing Pope Francis’s reforms and how they will be implemented.

Thirdly, he highlighted synodality as a key form of cooperation with the pope on matters that affect the whole Church. This is not a small signal. Synodality has become a defining theme and a point of contention. By putting it on the agenda early on, Pope Leo XIV indicates he wants the College to engage it directly rather than treat it as someone else’s project.

Lastly, he called for theological, historical and pastoral reflection on the liturgy, stressing the need to preserve sound tradition while remaining open to legitimate development, in line with Vatican II. This topic is often where Church conflict becomes most visible. A pope who addresses it early may be trying to lower the temperature by clarifying principles. Or he may be preparing for decisions that will require support from Cardinals. Either way, the fact that it is included suggests he knows the issue cannot be avoided.

What this means for the Church

This consistory will likely be the first clear window into the mind of Pope Leo XIV. It will show what he wants to stress upon, what he thinks is urgent, and how he expects his closest collaborators to work with him.

It may also expose real limits. The subjects are wide. The time is short. That combination can produce either focus or frustration. A successful consistory will not solve everything. But it can establish a method: honest listening and clear priorities with a shared sense of direction.

In that sense, the extraordinary consistory is not merely procedural. It is the first major institutional act of this pontificate. It is where Pope Leo XIV will begin to define how he intends to govern with the cardinals, and what kind of Church he wants them to help him lead.

The authorBryan Lawrence Gonsalves

Founder of "Catholicism Coffee".

Read more
Resources

Father Amorós explains the significance of the visit of the Three Wise Men to the Baby Jesus.

The priest reflects on Epiphany as an event that breaks with destiny, invites personal conversion, and proposes a contemporary interpretation of the gifts from the East.

Editorial Staff Omnes-January 5, 2026-Reading time: 2 minutes

On the eve of the Feast of the Epiphany, Father Amorós has published a new video explaining the profound meaning of the mysterious visit of the wise men from the East to the Baby Jesus. Through theological and cultural reflection, the priest invites us to rediscover the Epiphany beyond the folklore and traditions associated with this time of year.

In his message, Father Amorós places the viewer in a powerful historical paradox. While in Rome, Emperor Caesar Augustus—the most powerful man of his time—slept convinced that he was the center of the world, in a cave in Bethlehem, a seemingly insignificant event was taking place that would end up changing history. Three Magi from the East, representatives of the intellectual and scientific elite of the ancient world, did not travel to pay homage to the emperor, but to bow down before a poor Child.

Drawing on a well-known reflection by G. K. Chesterton, the priest explains that the Magi symbolize all ancient wisdom and science, which had to “become small” in order to enter into the simplicity of Bethlehem.

One of the central themes of the video is what he calls “the revolution of the Epiphany.” Recalling a teaching of Benedict XVI, Father Amorós emphasizes that the Magi, astronomers of their time, lived in a culture that believed that human destiny was written in the stars. However, the Gospel account reverses that logic: it is not the star that determines the Child's destiny, but the Child who guides the star. For the priest, this detail contains a particularly timely message: human life is not subject to a blind destiny, but entrusted to a God who created it free.

The video also includes a call to action inspired by Saint Augustine. Amorós recalls that the scribes of Jerusalem knew the Scriptures perfectly well and were able to tell the Magi where the Messiah would be born, but they themselves did not set out on the journey. The saint compared them to landmarks or signposts that point the way but remain immobile. “Faith is not just knowing, it is walking,” emphasizes the priest, warning of the danger of purely theoretical religiosity.

In the final part, Father Amorós updates the meaning of the three gifts of the Magi. Today, gold represents detachment from one's own ego and comfort; incense symbolizes time devoted to prayer; and myrrh symbolizes concrete sacrifice expressed in forgiveness and closeness to those who suffer. Quoting St. Gregory the Great, he concludes that those who truly encounter Christ cannot return to their lives by the same path, but are transformed.

The priest finally encourages viewers to watch the entire video to delve deeper into these mysteries and recalls a central message of Epiphany: God loves mankind and wants them to be happy.

Read more
Vocations

The anecdote about Enrique Shaw that illustrates why he will be a saintly businessman

He wasn't looking for heroism or applause. He made money, yes, and a lot of it, because he owed it to the shareholders too. He came from a family that was very well-off and owned large companies. Enrique Shaw understood that a company should be a human community, not just a machine for generating profits for shareholders alone.

Javier García Herrería-January 5, 2026-Reading time: 5 minutes

The person speaking in this interview is not a priest or a theologian, but a businessman. And not just any businessman. Fernán de Elizalde—an Argentine businessman, trained from the beginning of his career in the culture of “making money at any cost”—is now the general administrator of Enrique Shaw's cause for sainthood. He came to this position almost in spite of himself. “I was one of those who thought that a businessman could not be a saint,” he confesses bluntly. But Shaw changed his perspective, which is why he believes he can also help improve the image that the Church and society have of the business world.

Elizalde defines himself as a former “business shark.” “You had to make money. I'm not saying kill, but almost. That was the environment I lived in,” he explains. For years, he held senior management positions in large companies, until he reported two internal frauds in accordance with corporate ethical codes. “I reported it to the head of the gang without knowing it. And they fired me.» Paradoxically, that experience was the beginning of his rapprochement with Enrique Shaw, in whom he had previously had no interest whatsoever. “To me, he was a sanctimonious man who handed out money that others had earned. I said that, and I said it out loud.».

He never met Shaw personally—he died in 1961—but learning about his life forced him to reexamine all his preconceptions. “I discovered that beneath the tip of the iceberg there was enormous wealth to be gained with good ethical principles. I realized that I had been wrong in my opinion of him.» Since then, his professional and personal life has been marked by one conviction: “You can be a good businessman, make money, be profitable, and at the same time be a deeply Christian person.».

An uncomfortable saint: layman, soldier, businessman

The figure of Enrique Shaw is uncomfortable for many stereotypes. A layman, father of a large family, successful businessman, and trained military man. In Argentina, Elizalde recalls, “military has always been a dirty word.” And yet Shaw was a sailor, and not just any sailor: “He was the youngest graduate in Argentine naval history” and also a distinguished officer during his years in the Navy. He also studied at Harvard Business School.

The Navy gave him training that would shape his entire life. “Discipline, method, order.” Bringing the ship to port while taking care of the vessel and the crew was always his goal in the companies where he worked. 

For years, Shaw was the head of Rigolleau, Latin America's leading glassware manufacturer, owned by the US multinational Corning Glass (bottles, industrial glass, technical glass, products such as the famous Pyrex; in short, a strategic company with thousands of employees).

“I don't want to fire anyone as a first option.”

The anecdote that, for Elizalde, best sums up Enrique Shaw's business ethics occurs when production must be halted and, therefore, the company stops generating income. A categorical order arrives from the headquarters in the United States: lay off 1,200 workers.

“Enrique's response was clear: ‘No.’ He said, ‘We can hold out. We have accumulated profits. Let me present a plan to try to turn the situation around.’” His proposal was concrete and risky: a three-month deadline and authorization to lose up to a certain amount of money, and a firm commitment. “If the time or money authorized is exceeded, then yes, I will make the layoffs you are asking for, but I will do it my way.”.

He traveled to the United States to defend a plan he intended to propose to his counterpart, Amory Houghton, who would later become CEO of Corning Glass. The plan included very specific measures aimed at making the most of employees' time by assigning them useful and productive tasks that are normally put off—maintenance, repairs, filing, technical work—to avoid immediate layoffs. 

The phrase Shaw often repeated sums up his entire philosophy: “I don't want to fire anyone as a first resort.” He wasn't naive or soft, Elizalde clarifies: “If someone had to be fired, he fired them. But he did it well, in a humane, positive way.».

The result was unexpected even for the most optimistic. “Long before the 90 days were up, business activity had recovered. The company was selling, invoicing, and collecting again.» Only 50% of the authorized amount was lost. Then something unusual happened. “Enrique went to the executives and said, ‘We were authorized to lose 100. We lost 50. What do we do with the other 50? I propose distributing it as a bonus to the people.’” He wanted to distribute money at a loss, and his proposal was approved.

“I die happy: working-class blood runs through my veins.”

That gesture explains what happened next. Shortly before his death, Shaw needed blood transfusions. Without anyone asking them to, 256 workers from the company left their jobs and traveled to the hospital in Buenos Aires where he was being treated to donate blood.

“There were lines of men in overalls. The hospital staff didn't understand what was going on. They thought he was a union leader or a political figure. When they were told he was the CEO of a company, they couldn't believe it.

Shaw received the blood of his people, but died shortly afterwards. One of his last statements showed his sense of humor: “I die happy, because today working-class blood runs through my veins.”.

For Elizalde, there is no better definition of lay holiness. “They adored him. Not for his speeches, but for his concrete actions. Because he never humiliated anyone. Because he loved his people.».

Enrique and his wife with their nine children

Suffering without anesthesia

Cancer accompanied Shaw during five years of illness. He hardly took any painkillers. “He would say, ‘I suffer and offer my pain for those who truly suffer. I have everything.’» Elizalde recalls that he was often doubled over in pain during meetings, and no one noticed. “The lack of painkillers was not known to those around him until shortly before he died.».

He wasn't looking for heroism or applause. “He was completely consistent. What he said, he did.» He made money, yes, and a lot of it. He came from one of the most important business families in Argentina and Europe. But he understood business as a human community, not as a profit machine.

An entrepreneur who breaks down prejudices

“The big problem,“ says Elizalde, ”is that people talk without knowing. Even I talked about Enrique without knowing. We Argentines like to ”give our opinion on everything,' and we don't always say things that are true.". 

Enrique Shaw debunks a deeply rooted prejudice: that a businessman, by definition, cannot be a saint. “He proved that it is possible. He was always profitable. And when he wasn't, he changed things to get back on track. But never at the expense of people's dignity.».

That is why his cause for beatification has a value that goes beyond the religious. “The Church is going to declare a businessman, a layman, a father of a large family, a soldier, a saint. That is revolutionary.” Not because of ideology, but because of the concrete example of a coherent life.

Elizalde sums it up with a conviction born of experience: “If you find yourself in a difficult situation, pray. God will give you a hand. It's not magic. The path is marked out.» And Enrique Shaw, businessman and Christian, walked it to the end.

Prayer for private devotion

Oh God, your venerable servant Enrique gave us a joyful example of Christian life through his daily work in his family, his job, his business, and society. Help me to follow in his footsteps with a deep life of union with you and Christian apostolate. Deign to glorify him and grant me, through his intercession, the favor I ask of you... Through Jesus Christ, Our Lord. Amen.

(Our Father, Hail Mary, Glory Be)

With ecclesiastical approval: Archdiocese of Buenos Aires, July 14, 1999.

The Three Wise Men, seekers of Truth

Magicians accept the risk of leaving the known behind to venture into the unknown, with all the effort, vulnerability, and hope that this entails.

January 5, 2026-Reading time: 3 minutes

On January 6—or the first Sunday of the year—the arrival of the Three Wise Men at the cave in Bethlehem is celebrated. These wise men from the East embody the archetype—the figure, symbol, and permanent model—of all those who seek the truth wherever it may be found.

The eternal Truth had been dwelling in our history for only a few days. First, it was revealed to some humble shepherds who slept in the open and who, without effort or searching, found themselves unexpectedly enveloped in Glory (Lk 2:8). But today's solemnity reminds us that, for most people, the encounter with truth is not simply received: it requires a laborious search, a determined advance, and, often, a long journey.

The Three Wise Men symbolize the desire for knowledge and the innate need to attain the object of intelligence: truth. «All men by nature desire to know» (Aristotle, Metaphysics, I, 1, 980a1) and that truth may be known by all who seek it with righteousness. 

Saint Matthew presents us with some restless men, capable of looking at the sky with an openness of soul that allows them to see beyond what ordinary mortals perceive: «We saw his star in the East and have come to worship him» (Mt 2:2). What set them on their long journey was not a fleeting curiosity, but a shared experience that gave rise to a bold hypothesis. In their case, it was a star; in ours, it may be an unexpected event, an inner question, a wound, a joy... anything capable of awakening the desire for meaning.

Jordan Peterson has accurately described this dynamic of thought: «A question that does not address a sufficiently difficult problem will not attract the attention of researchers... The question must exist on the frontier between order and chaos; it must contain a mixture of the truly unknown.».

Magicians dare to cross precisely that boundary. They set out on their journey: they accept the risk of leaving the known behind to venture into the unknown, with all the effort, vulnerability, and hope that this entails. Every true quest is a pilgrimage, and every pilgrimage is always twofold: external and internal.

Once the question had been posed and the journey begun, they arrived in Jerusalem (Matthew 2:1-4). There they gathered information and consulted Herod, the chief priests, and the scribes. This gesture teaches a decisive lesson: no authentic discovery can disregard tradition. Truth is not invented; it is recognized. Only those who rely on what others have understood before can see further. Ignoring the legacy of humanity would be as absurd as setting out on a journey without knowing the map.

These characters do not seek rewards or favors; on the contrary, they arrive offering gifts. Because the truth is, in itself, the greatest reward: it is worth more than all the riches symbolized by gold, more than the sacrifices evoked by myrrh, and more than the humility of incense, which reminds us that we are not the measure of things, but rather that it is the truth that measures us and reveals itself to us.

The scene that crowns his journey—the Child with Mary, his Mother—occurs in the most concrete reality, in direct contact with the real. «Intellectual joy occurs when a new understanding emerges... I know well where to look for it: in unknown territory.» No representation, however elaborate, can replace the power of direct encounter: «It's not the same to see it as to have it told to you.».

When the wise men from the East arrive at their destination, they experience a profound joy: their intuition is confirmed, their search is illuminated, their hypothesis leads to an encounter. Entering the house, seeing the Child, adoring him... each gesture marks the transition from restless reason to humble wonder, from thought to adoration. 

The story ends by saying: “They returned to their country by another route” (Mt 2:12). Those who discover the truth cannot retrace their steps, but their lives are transformed. Epiphany celebrates these great seekers, seekers of truth who were not afraid to risk everything to follow a faint but true light. 

The authorFernando Armas

Read more
The Vatican

“The good of the Venezuelan people must prevail,” says Pope Leo XIV

On this second Sunday after the Nativity of the Lord, Pope Leo XIV referred in the Angelus to the United States“ operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and bring him to justice. The Pope said that ”the good of the Venezuelan people must prevail over any other consideration.".

Editorial Staff Omnes-January 4, 2026-Reading time: 4 minutes

During the Angelus prayer on January 4, the first Sunday of the year, the Pope renewed his congratulations to everyone. Regarding the operation carried out yesterday by the United States to capture the Venezuelan president for trial in New York, Pope Leo XIV stated that “the good of the Venezuelan people must prevail and lead to the overcoming of violence and the pursuit of justice and peace.”.

These were the words of Pope Leo XIV, who is following “with great concern the evolution of the situation in Venezuela.”. 

“The welfare of the beloved Venezuelan people must prevail above all other considerations, leading to an end to violence and the pursuit of justice and peace, guaranteeing the country's sovereignty, ensuring the rule of law enshrined in the Constitution, respecting the human and civil rights of each and every individual, and working together to build a peaceful future of collaboration, stability, and harmony, with special attention to the poorest, who suffer because of the difficult economic situation.”.

“That is why I pray and invite you to pray, entrusting our prayers to the intercession of Our Lady of Coromoto, and Saints José Gregorio Hernández and Sister Carmen Rendiles.”.

The operation to capture Nicolás Maduro

As was announced yesterday, this Saturday a US operation took place, explained in the afternoon at a press conference by President Donald Trump, in which US special forces detained and captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, to bring them to justice, following a bombing of military installations that met with no resistance.

Trump described the operation as “brilliant” and said that both men will be tried in New York on drug trafficking charges. The US will take control of Venezuela until a “safe, proper, and judicious” political transition takes place, he said. He also noted that US oil companies will play a key role in the country's industry.

The offensive has provoked numerous reactions. US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who spoke at the press conference, celebrated the operation as a blow to drug trafficking, while Chavismo warned of the risk of regional destabilization. At the same time, demonstrations by Venezuelans were reported in cities around the world. President Trump has ruled out, for the time being, opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner Corina Machado for an immediate role, considering that she “has no support” in the country.

Silhouettes of people on a bridge as smoke rises near Fort Tiuna, after US President Donald Trump declared that the United States had captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in Caracas, Venezuela, on January 3, 2026. (Photo by OSV News/Leonardo Fernández Viloria, Reuters).

What the Pope said on December 3

On the plane back to Rome after his apostolic trip to Turkey and Lebanon, when asked by journalists about the tensions between Trump and Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, Pope Leo said that the Vatican is in contact with “the bishops and the nuncio” to try to find ways “to calm the situation,” especially because those who suffer most are the ordinary citizens of Venezuela.

However, Leo XIV added that “the voices coming from the United States are changing,” alternating between ultimatums to Maduro and occasional softening of rhetoric. “I don't know any more,” said the Pope, but it is always better to seek the path of dialogue., reported Cindy Wooden of CNS, on the papal flight.

Bishops of Venezuela

The Venezuelan Episcopal Conference has issued a statement in response to the events in the South American nation, rejecting violence, calling for calm among the people, and requesting “that the decisions taken are always made for the good of our people,” Vatican News reported yesterday.

In light of the events unfolding in Venezuela, the Venezuelan episcopate has issued a message expressing its closeness to and support for the people of its country. It calls for perseverance in prayer and rejects any form of violence.

“In light of the events our country is experiencing today, let us ask God to grant all Venezuelans serenity, wisdom, and strength. We stand in solidarity with those who were injured and the families of those who died. Let us persevere in prayer for the unity of our people,” the message reads.

The bishops also ask that the decisions made be for the good of the Venezuelan people: “We call on the People of God to live more intensely in hope and fervent prayer for peace in our hearts and in society. We reject any kind of violence. May our hands be open to encounter and mutual aid, and may the decisions that are made always be for the good of our people.”.  

The coming of Jesus, a double commitment

During the Angelus prayer, the Pontiff emphasized two ideas, among others. The mystery of Christmas reminds us that “the foundation of our hope is the incarnation of God,” and “the coming of Jesus in the weakness of human flesh, while rekindling our hope, also entrusts us with a double commitment, one toward God and the other toward human beings.”.

«Towards God, because if He became flesh, if He chose our human frailty as His dwelling place, then we are always called to think of God from the flesh of Jesus and not from an abstract doctrine.».

And “towards human beings, our commitment must be equally consistent. (...). God calls us to recognize in each person their inviolable dignity and to practice mutual love towards one another.”.

“In this way, the Incarnation also asks us to make a concrete commitment to promoting fraternity and communion, so that solidarity may be the criterion for human relations; to justice and peace; to caring for the most fragile and defending the weak. God became flesh, and therefore there is no authentic worship of God without caring for human flesh.”.

The authorEditorial Staff Omnes

Attentive parents

Rafael Alvira was grateful to his parents, who taught him to put love into everything.

January 4, 2026-Reading time: < 1 minute

Rafael Alvira He was a university professor, philosopher, and writer. A few months before he died, he granted me an interview, and I would like to share some of his ideas. Rafael Alvira was grateful to his parents, who taught him to put love into everything he did.  

Calm, cheerful, and attentive, they strove to make him happy. A married couple who always cultivated the love God gave them and are in the process of beatification.

I asked him how his parents managed to convey that Love: «By cultivating it. Cultivation, culture, worship—all of that means recognizing the gift we have received and responding to it, first by paying attention to understand it, and then by working to offer realities to the One who gave it to us, whatever they may be, always carrying the symbolic weight of love: it always expresses itself symbolically, because being rational, it transcends the analytical level.».

I was curious to know if there was anything that particularly characterized her parents, and I was amazed when her answer once again turned to attentiveness: «My parents» attentive spirit was extremely palpable, to the point that I do remember them resting, as is logical, but I never remember them being inattentive. And then there was their effort to make the most of their gift. Their continuous effort—a smiling and serene endeavor—to help you and make you happy was proverbial.".

The authorMiriam Lafuente

Evangelization

The power of the big screen: Saint John Paul II and cinema

Twenty years after his death, Saint John Paul II is remembered for his view of cinema as a medium of culture, responsibility, and evangelization.

Alejandro Pardo-January 4, 2026-Reading time: 10 minutes

When Karol Wojtyła acceded to the See of Peter in October 1978, the whole world realized that a new era in the apostolic succession was beginning. Just as that young Pope developed a special rapport and complicity with representatives of art, culture, and communication, he also showed a clear affinity for the medium of film. His closest collaborators attest to this. For example, Cardinal Stanisław Dziwisz, his private secretary for forty years, said: “John Paul II loved cinema and watched the important films of the day.”.

For his part, the then Archbishop John P. Foley, who was president of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications for many years, attested that “the Holy Father knows cinema well and has been able to see films by directors from different countries.”.

Finally, Joaquín Navarro-Valls, spokesman for the Holy See during almost his entire pontificate, added: “St. John Paul II liked cinema and knew how to appreciate it, although he saw little of it. In any case, he liked to keep abreast of film production and asked about it, especially about films with historical, biographical, or purely aesthetic content. He particularly liked stories that exposed a universal human theme and proposed a non-trivial solution. He was not immune to aesthetics, but above all he was attracted to human content.”.

A pontificate worthy of the movies

In one way or another, the world of cinema was very present during the pontificate of St. John Paul II. Indeed, during those years, there were numerous encounters with actors, filmmakers, and television professionals on the occasion of audiences, jubilees, or private screenings of films. Names such as Alberto Sordi, Vittorio Gassman, Monica Vitti, Dario Argento, Roberto Benignini, Andrei Tarkovsky, Krzysztof Zanussi, Ettore Bernabei, Ennio Morricone, Martin Sheen, and Jim Caviezel paraded through the Vatican chambers. The same was true of the producers of the series on the Bible, with whom the Pope met on several occasions. Among all these meetings, one that stands out is the one he held, on his own initiative, with a large representation of the Hollywood industry at the Beverly Hills Hotel Registry in September 1987, during his pastoral visit to the United States, which was attended by figures such as Lew Wasserman, Jack Valenti, and Charlton Heston. 

Special mention should be made of the friendship between Saint John Paul II and his compatriot, Polish film director Krzysztof Zanussi, who directed the first biographical film about the life of the new pontiff: From a Far Country (From a distant country, 1981). The biopic by Zanussi was the first, but not the last, because, as George Weigel stated, Karol Wojtyła's own life story—both epic and dramatic—would “defy the imagination of even the most famous screenwriter.” Indeed, in 1984, the American television movie Pope John Paul II, directed by Herbert Wise and starring Albert Finney, and after Wojtyła's death in 2005, other television productions, demonstrating the interest his figure aroused.

In another context, it is worth mentioning the conferences and study days on the seventh art that were promoted during his years at the head of the Church—among which the three editions of the International Congress of Film Studies stand out, as well as the creation of a specific film festival called the Terzo Millenio Film Festival, whose first edition took place in 1991. Finally, it is worth adding another smaller festival, The John Paul II Inter-Faith Film Festival (JP2IFF), which emerged in 2009 to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the Letter to the Artists.

A brief but profound teaching

This extensive introduction serves as context for understanding why Saint John Paul II wanted to pay special attention to cinema and why he devoted a small but very substantial part of his teaching to it. Specifically, the core consists of just over a dozen speeches in which he refers to cinema and television fiction in a monographic manner and which took place between 1978 and 1999, that is, throughout almost his entire pontificate. Some of these speeches were given during meetings with professionals in the sector; others were given at conferences or congresses on cinema; and finally, there are those he dedicated to the seventh art on the occasion of its first centenary. Below is a summary of the most relevant ideas contained in all of them.

Cinema and human mystery

Like other arts, cinema, thanks to the evocative and emotive power of its language and the force of its dramatic representation of human life, contributes, in the words of Saint John Paul II, “to a better and deeper awareness of the human condition, of the splendor and misery of man.” Hence, he insisted: “Cinema is, therefore, a highly sensitive instrument, capable of reading in time the signs that sometimes escape the gaze of a hasty observer. When used well, it can contribute to the growth of true humanism and, ultimately, to the praise that rises from creation to the Creator.”.

It is precisely in the richness of the cinematic medium—images and sounds at the service of a story—that this connection with the viewer is achieved, allowing them to vicariously experience the lives of others in a drama laden with meaning (the cathartic experience alluded to by the Greeks). Thus, this holy Pope explained: “Cinema enjoys a wealth of languages, a multiplicity of styles, and a truly great variety of narrative forms: realism, fable, history, science fiction, adventure, tragedy, comedy, chronicle, cartoons, documentaries... Therefore, it offers an incomparable treasure trove of expressive means to represent the various fields in which human beings are situated, and to interpret their essential vocation to beauty, the universal, and the absolute.” As can be seen, for this Roman Pontiff, cinema, being an ideal vehicle for expressing the transcendent dimension of man, possesses a unique performative and salvific quality, characteristic of all cultural manifestations based on an adequate anthropology, characteristic of those artistic expressions that open themselves to the spirit and show the intimate relationship that exists between beauty, truth, and goodness. Hence, he adds: “When watching films, viewers are prompted to reflect on aspects of a reality that is sometimes unknown to them, and their hearts are questioned, reflected in the images, confronted with different perspectives, and cannot remain indifferent to the message that the film conveys.”.

Cinema as an individual and social educator

On several occasions, Pope Wojtyła uses the term pedagogue o cultural agent, to reinforce the idea that all screens, large and small, have become instances that shape the values that concern individual and social consciousness, supplanting the family, school, and religious education. He once pointed out: “Among the social media, cinema is undoubtedly a widely used and appreciated instrument, and it often sends out messages capable of influencing and conditioning the choices of the public—especially the youngest—as a form of communication based not so much on words as on concrete facts, expressed with images that have a great impact on viewers and their subconscious,” to the point that “through the models of life they present, with the suggestive effectiveness of images, words, and sounds, the media tend to replace the family in the role of preparing for the perception and assimilation of existential values.” Cinema thus becomes a mirror and model of society, and an agent of social cohesion and cultural exchange. Specifically, to the representatives of Hollywood, the main entertainment production and export machine, I pointed out on the occasion of a meeting in 1987: “You help your fellow citizens enjoy leisure, appreciate art, and benefit from culture. You often provide the stories they tell and the songs they sing. You supply them with news about daily events, a vision of humanity, and reasons for hope. Your influence on society is certainly profound. Hundreds of millions of people watch your movies and television programs, listen to your voices, sing your songs, and reflect your opinions. It is a fact that your smallest decisions can have a global impact.”.

Social responsibility of professionals

It is not surprising that, faced with such power, Saint John Paul II demanded a corresponding responsibility. He did so on many occasions, most notably in his speech to the Hollywood film industry. “My visit to Los Angeles would be incomplete without this meeting, because you represent one of the most important factors influencing the United States in today's world. You work in all fields of social communications and thus contribute to the development of a popular mass culture. Humanity is deeply influenced by what you do. Your activities affect communication itself.: providing information, influencing public opinion, offering entertainment (...). You often provide the stories they tell and the songs they sing. You supply them with news about everyday events, a vision of humanity, and reasons for hope. Your influence on society is certainly profound.” He added: “Your work can be a force for great good or great evil. You yourselves know the dangers and the splendid opportunities that lie before you. Communication products can be works of great beauty, revealing what is noble and uplifting in humanity, and promoting what is just, equitable, and true. On the other hand, communication can appeal to and promote what is degrading in people: dehumanized sex through pornography or through a superficial attitude toward sex and human life; greed through materialism and consumerism or irresponsible individualism; anger and revenge through violence or vigilante justice. All the means of popular culture that you represent can build or destroy, elevate or debase. You have incalculable possibilities for good and abominable possibilities for destruction. It is the difference between death and life—the death or life of the spirit. And it is a matter of choice.

Among the most pressing challenges that this Pope points out in his speeches are respect for the viewer—based on human dignity—the transmission of positive values in defense of true humanism, the responsible representation of controversial topics such as violence or sex, the promotion of a true common good, the defense of creative and responsible freedom, and resistance to commercial and ideological interests. 

Ultimately, it is a question of film and audiovisual media professionals responding to the trust that the community places in them. In this regard, the saintly Pope concluded: “Certainly, your profession subjects you a high degree of accountability –before God, before the community, and before the witness of history. And yet, sometimes it seems that everything is left in your hands. Precisely because your responsibility is so great and your accountability to the community is not easily enforceable from a legal standpoint, society relies so heavily on your goodwill. In a sense, the world is at your mercy. Errors of judgment, mistakes about the appropriateness and justice of what is transmitted, as well as erroneous criteria in art can offend and hurt consciences and human dignity. They can usurp sacred fundamental rights. The trust that the community places in you It deeply honors you and powerfully challenges you.".

Responsibility of the viewer

However, the sense of responsibility is not limited to professionals. It is a shared responsibility that also involves those who enjoy audiovisual content, i.e., viewers. It is up to them to develop their critical skills to correctly interpret the messages they receive through the small or big screen, and thus be in a position to make free and responsible use of such audiovisual content. Similarly, this includes parents and educators, in the case of minors, as well as the role of film critics.

The principles underpinning this duty to educate (or be educated) in the use of the media are rooted in an anthropological vision that defends human dignity and free and responsible action. It is no coincidence that Saint John Paul II insisted on this from the beginning of his pontificate. For example, in 1981 he recalled: “Man, also in relation to the mass media, is called to be ‘himself’: that is, free and responsible, a ‘user’ and not an ‘object’, ‘critical’ and not ‘passive’ (...). This is the dignity that requires man to act according to conscious and free choices, that is, moved and induced by personal convictions and not by a blind internal impulse or mere external coercion.” And further on, he continued: “Direct action must be intensified to form a critical conscience that influences the attitudes and behaviors not only of Catholics or Christian brothers and sisters—defenders by conviction or by mission of the freedom and dignity of the human person—but of all men and women, adults and young people, so that they may truly know how to ‘see, judge, and act’ as free and responsible persons, including in the production of and decisions regarding the media.”. 

Specifically, this Pope proposed promoting critical education in cinema and the audiovisual arts, especially in the case of children and adolescents (who are most vulnerable to messages conveyed on screens); the responsibility of parents and educators; and, finally, the role of film critics, who have the mission of helping to shape viewers' critical awareness.

Cinema, a vehicle for evangelization

It is quite logical that someone who understands so deeply the nature of cinema and its ability to penetrate the human soul would think of it as a means of transmitting the contents of the faith. “Cinema, with its many possibilities, can become a valuable tool for evangelization,” he once said. The Church urges directors, filmmakers, and all those who—at any other level—profess to be Christians and work in the complex and heterogeneous world of cinema to act in a manner fully consistent with their faith, courageously taking initiatives even in the field of production to make the Christian message, which is a message of salvation for all people, increasingly present in that world through their professional work.“ Specifically, the stories reflected on the screen can help to bridge the gap between faith and culture. Thus, he invited a group of professionals: ”I trust that your film productions will be a valuable aid to the indispensable dialogue that is developing in our time between culture and faith. In a special way, in the field of film and television, where history, art, and the languages of communication meet, your work as professionals and believers is particularly useful and necessary.".

A perennial invitation

Karol Wojtyła was a pope who showed particular sensitivity toward the medium of film. He understood it deeply in all its dimensions: as art, as industry, and as a means of communication. This is a unique case in recent pontificates. His teaching will remain a source of inspiration. This was recognized by the then president of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, Archbishop Foley: “The Holy Father's messages on cinema can be considered a starting point for reflection and remind us once again how much attention John Paul II has paid to the big screen. It is a call to responsibility, an encouragement to continue along the path that many have taken, especially in light of an indispensable consideration: that cinema is an integral part of a people's culture, representing their desires, fears, and hopes, and that each film remains a testament to this culture, speaking to future generations and bringing forgotten or unknown moments back to mind.” Indeed, this brief but profound teaching will continue to enlighten those who work in the audiovisual industry, with the desire—in the words of St. John Paul II himself—that “the film industry throughout the world reflect on its potential and assume its important responsibility.”.

Saint John Paul II and Cinema Truth, goodness, and beauty on screen

Author: Alejandro Pardo
Editorial: Eunsa
Date of publication: 2025
Pages: 328
The authorAlejandro Pardo

Priest. Doctor in Audiovisual Communication and Moral Theology. Professor of the Core Curriculum Institute of the University of Navarra.

Hispanic culture, heir to the West

Santiago Leyra-Curiá defends the historic mission of Spain and Hispanic culture as guardians of human dignity and the spiritual legacy of the West.

January 3, 2026-Reading time: 5 minutes

As philosopher Julián Marías masterfully explains in his work España inteligible (Intelligible Spain), since the mid-18th century, humanity began to believe in an idea that became dogma: that of inevitable progress. Turgot, Condorcet, and other Enlightenment thinkers imagined that history was automatically advancing toward an ever-better future. But the 20th and 21st centuries have shown us that there are no automatisms in history. Progress may exist, yes, but so does regression.

Perhaps the most serious aspect of this progressive mindset has been that it has robbed us of the identity of each era, as if the present had no value in itself, but only as preparation for an ideal future. Against this undefined horizon, cultures ceased to be understood as projects with their own meaning.

In light of this, I propose that we view our history as a vocation. Spain was never an accident or a simple accumulation of events. It was, and continues to be, a conscious project, a historical will that forges its path through uncertainty.

From its origins, Spain understood its existence as a mission. For centuries it was Islamic and Eastern, but a minority decided to keep it Christian and European. That decision was the beginning of a journey that would shape what we now call Hispanic culture.

When Charles I arrived in Spain in 1517, two visions of empire were being debated. Gattinara dreamed of a universal monarchy based on conquest. But Pedro Ruiz de la Mota proposed something else: a Christian empire, a universitas christiana based on harmony between peoples and the defense of justice. A few years later, one of the greatest contributions to our history would emerge from these roots: the School of Salamanca, whose 500th anniversary we are celebrating this year. This school would certainly continue its legacy through illustrious figures from the sister university of Coimbra, such as Luis de Molina, Francisco Suárez, and the unjustly forgotten Juan de Santo Tomás.

Francisco de Vitoria, Domingo de Soto, Francisco Suárez, Luis de Molina... all of them were pioneers in affirming that man has an inalienable dignity simply because he is a person. Their reflections on natural rights, just law, and the equality of all before God gave rise to what we now call human rights and international law. Long before the Enlightenment, our universities were already debating whether it was lawful to dominate other peoples or strip them of their possessions. And from those debates emerged specific laws: those of Burgos, those of Valladolid, and the New Laws of 1542, which abolished the encomienda system.

It is fair to remember that the seed of human rights was sown there: in Salamanca, in the heart of Hispanic culture.

From the Black Legend to the identity crisis

However, that effort was distorted. Spain's enemies spread a false image: the so-called Black Legend. In it, Spain was presented as intolerant, fanatical, and backward, hiding its defense of human rights and dignity. This manipulation not only succeeded abroad, but also ended up taking root at home. From the 17th century onwards, many Spaniards began to see themselves through the eyes of foreigners, doubting their own identity.

The subsequent history was, in large part, a consequence of that fracture. The loss of Portugal in 1640 marked the beginning of the decline. The European Enlightenment, with figures such as Montesquieu and Voltaire, revived prejudices against Spain, presenting it as a symbol of irrationality. At the same time, our enlightened thinkers—Jovellanos, Moratín, Isla—who were reformists, moderates, and deeply Catholic, were unfairly identified with the excesses of the French Revolution. This confusion slowed down reforms and fueled a climate of mistrust and division.

Then came the Napoleonic invasion of 1808, and with it, a civil war between two Spains: the traditional and the liberal. When Ferdinand VII restored absolutism, the break was final. The American colonies, influenced by this conflict, gained their independence by renouncing their Spanish heritage. The Creoles, descendants of Spaniards, attempted to found new nations by denying three centuries of shared history. Thus began the crisis of Hispanic identity, the consequences of which we continue to experience on both sides of the Atlantic.

During the 19th century, religion went from being a shared faith to becoming an ideological trench: clericalism versus anticlericalism. Later, the disasters of 1898 and 1936—the loss of the last territories and the civil war—accentuated the disorientation. Spain isolated itself and took decades to rebuild. The democratic transition of 1978 restored freedom, but failed to completely liberate the mentality inherited from the Black Legend. We continue to view our history with complexes, without fully recognizing what we have contributed to the world.

The current mission of Hispanic culture: to renew the West

And yet, the West—that West that today seems to doubt itself—is unthinkable without the contribution of Hispanic culture. The West is based on three pillars: Greek reason, which taught us to interpret reality; Roman law, which gave us the concept of justice and legitimate authority; and the Judeo-Christian vision, which revealed to us that every human being is a child of God and a brother to all men. Spain, and with it Hispanic culture, was the point where these three roots came together. From that union arose a civilization capable of spreading a revolutionary idea throughout the world: that of man as a person.

At a time when Europe was beginning to slide toward materialism and the denial of the spirit, Spain insisted that human beings are not things, nor biological mechanisms, but free, responsible beings called to transcendence. That is why many contemporary thinkers—such as Charles Taylor, John Finnis, Alasdair MacIntyre, and Byung-Chul Han—directly or indirectly acknowledge the influence of the Hispanic legacy in their reflections on dignity and human rights.

Hispanic culture, more than a political concept, is a cultural, linguistic, and spiritual community. It is the awareness of sharing a history, a language, a way of looking at the world. It is the feeling of being at home in any Spanish-speaking country. And that community still has much to say to today's world, which is experiencing a profound crisis of morality and meaning.

Recovering the values of Hispanic culture—reason, justice, and the Christian view of the individual—is, in my opinion, an urgent task. Because if we want our civilization to survive, we must once again believe in man as a dignified, free, and responsible being, created out of love.

It has been precisely the Christian faith that, for two thousand years, has given millions of people a worldview in which truth, beauty, and justice have a place. And it was Spain, through its work in the Americas and Asia, that spread that vision across the globe. With mistakes, yes, but also with a greatness that changed the history of mankind.

Spain has always understood life as a mission. It has not been utilitarian, nor has it subordinated man to the state. It has viewed existence as an adventure and has felt sympathy for the defeated. Its literature, since Cervantes, bears witness to this deeply human and compassionate outlook.

If we prolong that spirit and adapt it to our times—free from prejudice, ideology, and inherited complexes—we will be able to offer the world an authentic renewal of the Hispanic project, a Hispanic culture that once again becomes the living heir to the West and defender of human rights. And hopefully Portugal will do something similar in the Lusitanian world. 

Menéndez Pelayo said that “the Catholic faith is the foundation, the essence, and the greatest part of our philosophy, our literature, and our art.” I would add: also of our view of humanity. That is why the Hispanic culture that was and the one that can be again coincide in essence: both are born from the recognition of the dignity of the person.

Our task, in these times of confusion, is simply to continue the historic mission of Hispanic culture without hesitation. To preserve the best of our civilization and, with humility, offer it to the world. Because only by remaining faithful to who we are can we look to the future with hope.

Evangelization

Bonhoeffer, Bartholomew I, and Charles III, three Christian allies of the Pope

In his ecumenical work for Christian unity, Pope Leo XIV had several allies among non-Catholic Christians last year. Among them were:, the theologian and Lutheran pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer, victim of Nazism, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, and King Charles III of England.

Francisco Otamendi-January 3, 2026-Reading time: 4 minutes

From the early months of his pontificate, Pope Leo XIV has given his teaching a clear ecumenical orientation (unity of Christians), as reflected in his papal motto Taken from St. Augustine, ‘In Illo Uno Unum’ (In Him who is One we are One), although it refers to several aspects, as the Pontiff has been developing.

There are no official lists of Christian theologians, other than Catholics, whom Leo XIV cited as Pope of the Catholic Church. However, there have been mentions of some, such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer (1906-1945), a Lutheran theologian and German pastor, a figure in the resistance against Nazism, and a victim of the Nazis at the age of 39. Of course, there is also Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, with whom he met several times in Istanbul, and King Charles III of England, leader of the Anglican Church, among others.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer

In the Christmas greeting to the Roman Curia on December 22, at the end of the speech, The Pope quoted Lutheran theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Here is the full reference: “Your Eminences, Your Excellencies, dear brothers and sisters, the Lord descends from heaven and lowers himself toward us.

As Bonhoeffer wrote, meditating on the mystery of Christmas, ‘God is not ashamed of man’s baseness, he enters into it […]. God loves what is lost, what no one considers, the insignificant, the marginalized, the weak and the downtrodden’ (cf. D. Bonhoeffer, Riconoscere Dio al centro della vita, Brescia 2004, 12). May the Lord give us his own condescension, his own compassion, his love, so that every day we may be his disciples and witnesses,” said the Successor of Peter.

The reference did not seem coincidental. Leo XIV evoked the figure of Bonhoeffer as an example of a Christian faith that does not retreat into the private sphere, but rather assumes specific responsibilities.

Voice of Christian resistance

Dietrich Bonhoeffer was born in Breslau in 1906 and trained as a Lutheran theologian in a demanding intellectual environment. From a young age, he stood out for his biblical depth and his concern for the concrete life of the Church. For him, theology was not just an academic exercise, but a reflection at the service of the Christian community and its witness in the world.

During the rise of Nazism, Bonhoeffer became one of the clearest voices of Christian resistance. He actively participated in the opposition to the regime's exploitation of faith. He maintained that following Christ meant taking risks and committing to the truth, even when this had serious personal consequences.

Consistent faith, witness

His writings, especially The Cost of Discipleship and his letters from prison, develop the idea of ‘costly grace,’ a faith that demands consistency and responsibility. Executed in 1945, Bonhoeffer is now recognized as a Christian witness by Catholics, Protestants, and Orthodox Christians, also for his writings from prison.

The message that Pope Leo XIV wished to convey by quoting the Lutheran pastor can be interpreted in several ways. One of them may be that ecumenism is also built by recognizing holiness and spiritual depth beyond confessional boundaries.

Patriarch Bartholomew I

This same vision was evident during the Pope's apostolic journey to Turkey and Lebanon. In Istanbul, Leo XIV met with the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew I. In his speech, the Pope recalled that Catholics and Orthodox Christians share the same apostolic roots and a common responsibility in the face of current challenges. He also emphasized that unity cannot be imposed, but rather matures through patient dialogue and charity.

Patriarch Bartholomew I, for his part, insisted on the need for a common Christian witness in the face of the ecological and social crisis. Known for his commitment to caring for the environment, he emphasized that the defense of creation is a privileged area for ecumenical collaboration. Both leaders agreed that prayer and joint action are inseparable from theological dialogue.

See here a summary of two or three ideas expressed by Pope Leo XIV during the visit, and also some by Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew I, with whom he imparted a final blessing.

Leo XIV: “Overcoming the scandal of divisions”

“We are all invited to overcome the scandal of the divisions that unfortunately still exist and to nurture the desire for unit for which the Lord Jesus prayed and gave his life,” said the Pope. “The more we reconcile ourselves, the more we Christians will be able to give credible witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which is a proclamation of hope for all.”.

Bartholomew I: “running the race” of Christian unity 

Patriarch Bartholomew told the leaders that with “the fervor of the Nicene faith burning in our hearts,” they must “run the race” of Christian unity in fulfillment of Jesus“ prayer for the unity of his disciples. ”Let us love one another so that with one heart we may confess: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, consubstantial and indivisible Trinity. Amen!".

“The commemoration of Nicaea is a testimony to the profound unity of all Christians in the faith,” he wrote in Vatican News Cardinal Kurt Koch, Prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity.

Charles III of England

Before this trip, Pope Leo XIV had been involved in another ecumenical gesture significant, when praying in Rome with the King of England, Charles III, the highest authority of the Anglican Church. The historic meeting, sober but laden with symbolism, emphasized historical reconciliation and the common mission of Christians in increasingly secularized societies.

The ecumenical dimension of the pontificate was also expressed in the prayer celebrated in the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls together with an Anglican representative, the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, the most senior prelate of the Church of England.

In the background, Saint John Henry Newman

The opening hymn, composed by St. Ambrose of Milan, Doctor of the Church, was performed in an English translation by St. John Henry Newman, who was Anglican for half his life and Catholic for the other half. Newman, a 19th-century figure, was proclaimed a Doctor of the Church on November 1 by Pope Leo XIV. King Charles himself was present at his canonization on October 13, 2019, in St. Peter's Square.

Standing before the tomb of the Apostle Paul, the Pope recalled that the unity of the Church was a central concern of early Christianity and remains an urgent call today.

The authorFrancisco Otamendi

Evangelization

José María Sánchez de Lamadrid: “Called reminds us that we are loved, called to pass on that flame of love.”

On January 12, the heart of Madrid will have Christ alive at its center: with a massive Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament that is part of Calls, an “experience that promises to transform contemporary evangelization” promoted by the Parish of Santo Domingo de la Calzada (Algete) and Alpha Spain, with the support of the Diocese of Alcalá de Henares.

Maria José Atienza-January 3, 2026-Reading time: 5 minutes

Testimonials, music, families, and Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, in which thousands of people are expected to participate. Although this type of event is relatively common in countries such as the United States, where SEEK has established itself as one of the most important Catholic evangelization events, which is unusual in Spain. 

On January 12, 2026, the Movistar Arena in central Madrid will host Calls, “a day of praise, prayer, music, testimonies, and fellowship, to prepare the way for the year 2033, when we will commemorate the 2,000th anniversary of the Passion, Death, and Resurrection of the Lord.”

Omnes spoke with one of the organizers, José María Sánchez de Lamadrid, parish priest of Santo Domingo de la Calzada in Algete, who shared the origins and significance of this historic gathering. 

To get to Llamados, the event that aims to bring thousands of people together in Madrid to worship Christ and strengthen their faith, there has been a journey. What has that journey been like?

–The Lord is always at the beginning of these things. He inspires us, and we do what we can to respond. In our case, in 2013 we began a process of renewal in the parish of Santo Domingo de la Calzada and La Inmaculada in Algete. We did this using Alpha as the driving force behind this renewal. We had started using this method in 2011, and by 2013 it was well established. In its program, Alpha It includes a healing session, which is, in essence, Jesus“ method: Jesus proclaims the Gospel, not in theory, but through his actions. As he reminds John the Baptist when he asks him if he is the Messiah, ”the lame walk, the blind see, the poor are evangelized." Jesus' method begins with the word, with the explicit proclamation of the message: his speeches, his words; and then his deeds. Words and deeds.

2013 was also the Year of Faith, which had been proclaimed by the Pope Benedict XVI. On the occasion of the Synod on the New Evangelization, we held a week of evangelization that coincided with the election of Pope Francis. 

It was during that week of evangelization that we considered how to respond to the human suffering of the elderly, the lonely... A first experiment emerged: Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament in which the sufferings of people are presented. Starting in October 2013, we began to do this on the first Monday of every month. This prayer of mercy has evolved since then. The Lord has inspired us, and we have refined it, fine-tuned it, modified things, and each time, more people come. During the pandemic, it also skyrocketed. YouTube channel And today we have a worship service in which some 800 people are participating in person, and there are approximately 1,500 connections from Spain and other parts of the world. 3,000 people praying to the Lord.

Last year, in response to the Jubilee Year of Hope, We asked ourselves, why not offer a great prayer of mercy? We wanted to do something big to close the Jubilee of 2025 and begin the journey to 2033, the 2000th anniversary of the Lord's death and resurrection, Pentecost, and the beginning of the Church. An event that, as many say, will probably be the event of the century, and many realities in the Church are focusing their efforts there.

Who will we see in Llamados, and why did you choose them? 

–The filmmaker Juan Manuel Cotelo y Olatz Elola, The creators of Blessings will be the masters of ceremonies, the presenters. On the musical side, we will have Hillsong Spain, considered one of the most famous and influential Christian music bands in the world, and there will be Quique Mira and María Lorenzo, Casilda Finat and René ZZ as guests. And they're coming without charging anything. With them, we'll have a kind of panel of experiences, to get ideas.

And, of course, Nicky Gumbel, the initiator of Alpha. Listening to Gumbel is amazing. He is a man of great faith and, although he is not Catholic, for example, last year he ended by asking for a prayer for the conclave at the Leadership Conference. There is a great sense of unity. 

In Spain, we perhaps have a more limited experience of ecumenism. I have many friends from different Christian denominations, and they are people of tremendous faith. Ultimately, we have much more in common than divides us, and we can do many things together, especially in this part of the first proclamation, as Rainiero Cantalamessa reminds us and as the Pope Leo XIV on his recent trip to Turkey, 

Nicky Gumbel isn't here to talk about Alpha; he's here to talk about evangelism, about bringing Jesus to the world. He wants to reach 100 million people through Alpha, and he's focusing the last years of his life on this dream. He's one of those visionaries who dreams big. 

In terms of Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, I believe that, apart from World Youth Day, we have never had such a large gathering for adoration in Spain. And we want to offer that as well. Let it be an occasion for us all to pray together. May it help us to see that we are not alone, that there are many more people of all ages, children, young people, adults, etc., because the event has that family perspective. We will also have the musical support of the Catholic music group Salve.

How does one arrive at such a “crazy” decision as choosing the Movistar Arena as the venue?

–We are very much in agreement with Alpha and Nicky Gumbel He always talks about giving something special to God in 2033. That's how it came about. CallsWe wanted a large venue so that those who are unable to attend the Mercy Prayer regularly could come, and we thought about offering something more. We spoke with Monsignor Antonio Prieto, the Bishop of Alcalá de Henares, and with those responsible for Alpha Spain. 

The first part of Calls is very much inspired by the Leadership Conference that Alpha does in May. Hence the combination of music and testimonies. 

The second part is the prayer of mercy, pure and simple, as we do here every month: putting the Lord at the center, praying, and allowing Him to heal us. 

We wanted a place where anyone who wanted to come could enter. That's why we chose the Movistar Arena, which is an iconic venue in the heart of Madrid, and also a place where culture is generated. Pope Benedict XVI spoke of these courtyards of the Gentiles. So why not put the Lord in these spaces where there are events and music?

If anything is rejuvenating the face of the Church, it is Adoration of the Blessed Sacrament, music, and personal relationship with Christ. In this sense, does Llamados contribute anything new? How can we make the seed of affection effective?    

–I think it's not about stepping on anyone, but rather about adding value. Indeed, thank God, there are many events with different perspectives, from music, such as concerts, to Hakuna, or other Catholic events, and we want to join in.

There is another idea that also inspires us, which is that the Lord, in his public life, worked at different levels, and the transmission of faith also occurs at different levels. From small groups, one-on-one, Jesus and Nicodemus, Jesus and the Samaritan woman; small groups, Peter, James, John, the 12 Apostles, the 72, and then there are the crowds. The Lord uses all these models or ways of transmitting the faith. This encounter is part of one of those great events, we might say, or of “the crowds” that the Gospel speaks of.

Then there is the day-to-day, and what we always strive for is that these types of meetings do not remain an emotional high but rather generate ideas and projects.

May each person who participates think, “How can I prepare for the 2000th anniversary of the Lord's death and resurrection?” That's where the mind and ideas come in. May we come out with our batteries fully charged so that each of us, in our own place, in our own reality, in our parish, in our family, in our school, in our university, wherever we may be, can carry that flame. 

It is not merely rationalistic, which would be only the head, nor is it merely sentimental or emotional, coming from the heart, nor is it merely voluntaristic. Rather, it is putting the Lord at the center, listening to the testimony of other people who are doing much good and who can give us clues in the face of the difficulties of life that we all have, how to carry that flame of faith. That is where the name comes from. Calls, It is a play on words because we are loved and we are called to pass on that flame of love. 

Gospel

No longer comfortable. Solemnity of the Epiphany

Vitus Ntube discusses the readings for the Solemnity of the Epiphany on January 6, 2026.

Vitus Ntube-January 3, 2026-Reading time: 2 minutes

The title of this homily will sound familiar to many Nigerians, evoking the novel No Longer at Ease, by the renowned author Chinua Achebe. Another of his works, Everything is falling apart, is even better known around the world. The expression “no longer comfortable” captures something essential about the holiday we celebrate today.

Today the Church celebrates God's manifestation to the nations: the Epiphany of the Lord. The Magi represent the peoples of the world and, in many ways, the vast majority of Christians today. Attracted by the light of Christ, all peoples and nations are invited to turn to Him. Epiphany is a feast of manifestation, of revelation. But once the revelation has taken place, what follows?

The Christ who has revealed himself to the nations has transformed the nations. When we look at the history of humanity and cultures, we see how the encounter with Christ has reshaped them from within. Epiphany, therefore, is not only about revelation, but also about encounter: an encounter that transforms.

The Magi embody the true Christmas invitation first pronounced by the shepherds: “Let's go to Bethlehem”This journey to Bethlehem is the attitude of Christmas faith, and the Magi continue it. Just a few days after Christmas, today's celebration reminds us of the need to maintain this attitude: to always remain on the path, on the road that leads to Christ.

Earlier, we saw the shepherds set out on this journey. Today's readings reveal what kind of people actually make the journey. Herod, along with the chief priests and scribes, does not go. The Magi, on the other hand, do. Those who were comfortable stayed where they were; those willing to leave comfort and security behind set out on the journey. The Epiphany teaches us to be people who move, willing to go where Christ is found.

"After Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea during the reign of King Herod, wise men from the East arrived in Jerusalem asking, "Where is the King of the Jews who has been born?"".

In the poem The Journey of the Magi In T. S. Eliot's poem, the poet imaginatively recounts the pilgrimage of the Magi and their subsequent reflection on how their encounter with the Christ Child transformed them. They returned to their homeland “no longer at ease.” The encounter with Christ demanded a change; they could not continue in the same personal or cultural disposition as before. Some encounters with Christ unsettle us in the best possible way: they prevent us from remaining as we were, leaving us «no longer at ease» with ourselves.

«This: Did they take us so far for a Birth or for a Death? There was a Birth, we had proof and no doubt. I had seen birth and death, but I thought they were different: this Birth subjected us to a harsh and bitter agony, like Death, our death. We returned to our places, these Kingdoms, but we are no longer at peace here, under the old law. With a strange people clinging to their gods.
How much I would enjoy another death
".

Today is a good day to ask ourselves about our own response to encountering Christ. Are we still comfortable with the “old dispensation”? Are we content to return by the same path we came, or are we willing to embark on “another path”?

"And having received a warning in a dream not to return to Herod, they withdrew to their own country by another route.”(Mt 2:12).

Books

Ideals or illusions? The meaning of life debated in the work of Juan Antonio Estrada

Through a historical journey that spans from Greek philosophy to modern immanentism, the author analyzes whether Christianity continues to be a project of greatness capable of offering emancipation, meaning, and salvation to contemporary man.

José Carlos Martín de la Hoz-January 2, 2026-Reading time: 3 minutes

The Jesuit Juan Antonio Estrada (Madrid, 1945), professor of philosophy at the University of Granada, has published a magnificent compilation of previously published articles on the meaning of life with Trotta, which is worth reviewing, albeit briefly.

As a result of his extensive research, Estrada reminds us of that memorable text by Benedict XVI when he emphasized that the early Church entered into dialogue with Greek philosophy in search of a dialogue between faith and reason.

The result of this dialogue was the so-called realistic philosophy that underpinned Christian humanism until the May 1968 revolution, passing through the renewal introduced by Francisco de Vitoria and the School of Salamanca.

Christianity would be an ideal because it would open the way to identification with Christ by following the necessary steps of an ideal or any project of greatness: “there are three values that are fundamental to any project: meaning, emancipation, and salvation” (14).

Certainly, Jesus“ evangelization ”sharpened the need for personal conversion and individualized the concept of salvation" (60), to which we could add that this took place in a climate of total freedom.

Estrada then draws an initial conclusion: “the focus of religion is no longer worship, but behavior and relationships with others, radicalizing the previous message of the Jewish prophets” (61). 

Certainly, the Gospel scene of the destruction of the temple speaks to us of the new altar in the heart of every Christian who offers up his or her daily life as a sacrifice of immense value, as great as his or her love, and always united to the one true sacrifice of the New Law, which is the Mass. St. Josemaría spoke of not reducing Christianity to going to church: “Christianity arises around a person, not a doctrine or an ideology; it offers a different way of life. The ultimate reference is not the religious system, but the personal following of Jesus” (62).

For much of history, the Ten Commandments revealed to Moses occupied an important part of the moral teaching of the Church from the Middle Ages to the present day, when the new catechism has proposed a morality of holiness for all Christians (65).

Estrada then recalls that “Human history shows humanity’s inability to triumph over evil. The success of revolutions soon turns into new forms of oppression by the victors. We must place our hope in the ongoing struggle against evil and in the action of God, who inspires those who follow Jesus” (69). 

Indeed, what happened to our author is similar to what happened to Juan Azor, author of the Jesuits“ ”ratio institutionis" in the 16th century, who influenced the drafting of the catechism for parish priests or St. Pius V, when the time came to propose holiness as a model for Christian morality, faced with the urgent need for reform of the Church and the Christian people, he simply called them to salvation.

Once again, Estrada places the mystery of the Lord's resurrection at the center of the new morality and the new evangelization when he states: “What is new in the proclamation of the risen Christ is the fundamental reference to his history and his way of life. To emphasize the resurrection while marginalizing the life of Jesus would lead to the devaluation of the earthly Jesus” (70).

For Christianity, it was a unique opportunity to develop within the framework of the Roman Empire, adopting its laws, bureaucracy, and administration, because it was a well-organized society. The price to pay was the distancing of Judaism from its origins (75). 

It is interesting that Estrada made the mistake of admitting a distance between the clergy and monks and the Christian people, and a difference between the various social classes in Christianity. This was surely due to the influence of the Marxist views of his youth (76).

The different theological schools that would emerge in the Church with the birth of universities, depending on the emphasis placed on the balance between faith and reason by St. Thomas, on the effort to emphasize the will in John Duns Scotus and St. Bonaventure, or on the promotion of nominalism with William of Ockham and his contempt for reason (79).

Luther brought about a painful transformation of Christianity, stripping it of the mediations of the Virgin Mary and the saints, of the sacraments to intervene in grace, and of the magisterium to shed light on understanding (81).

Finally, our author will refer to the Catholic reform that took place in Spain with the reform promoted by the Catholic Monarchs and Cisneros and continued by Francisco de Vitoria and the School of Salamanca, which we will celebrate in the year 1526 (86).

Next, he will address the Enlightenment, whose starting point we must place in Descartes (1596-1650) and his discourse on method, when philosophical immanentism began, which would last until Kant (1724-1804).

He then summarizes: “The Kantian system has influenced philosophy, ethics, and religion. But Hegel (1770-1831) is the continuator, reformer, and systematizer of global rationality. His system dominates the entire 19th century and serves as a reference point for Feuerbach, Marx, Kierkegaard, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche” (111).

Ideals or illusions? Emancipation, meaning, and salvation

Author: Juan Antonio Estrada
EditorialTrotta
Number of pages: 204
Year: 2025

We are becoming more and more like each other.

The West is forgetting its Christian roots and jeopardizing the protection of the most vulnerable in the face of practices such as late-term abortion and infanticide.

January 2, 2026-Reading time: 6 minutes

Parts of Europe and Canada have no concept for the future. No one knows what their cultural purpose is anymore.

Most cultures glorify warriors and kings, not those at the bottom. But Christianity took the opposite attitude toward status and placed humility at the center of its theology. The celebration of Christmas makes this even more evident. «God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong» (1 Corinthians 1:27) is a disconcerting and alarming statement for anyone from a non-Christian culture.

Why did Christ become so humble and weak that he allowed himself to be despised and punished from the moment of his birth? Why did he suffer the violence of men, small, weak, and mortal beings? Why did he not repel their wickedness with force? Why did he not reveal his majesty, at least when they seized him to kill him?

This exaltation of Christianity's weakness and humility is something very confusing and incomprehensible to any agnostic, atheist, or pagan.

Christian humanism and the protection of the vulnerable

The moral innovation of Christianity consisted of reconceptualizing smallness and humility and placing it at the center of the social contract, regardless of race, gender, class, or place of birth. With Christianity, the abuse of the weak by the powerful became morally unacceptable.

When a society accepts this Christian emphasis on weakness as a crucial priority, many moral conclusions follow.

The Christian view of weakness offers clear benefits to the weaker sex, which was able for the first time to demand sexual abstinence and respect from men. Feminism has its roots in Christianity.

Under Christian morality, slavery becomes unacceptable, as does the violation of inferiors. Pointing out the vulnerability of women, children, the poor, slaves, and the disabled means defending the need to protect them. We can then speak of «human rights» or «humanism.».

However, this moral system is far from universal. How common were the fundamental principles of Christian humanism in ancient times: that human beings, regardless of gender, place of origin, race, or class, have equal value? It is not difficult to answer that they were not common at all.

Secular humanism is simply Christianity.

Repayment and contemporary ethical challenges

This is the problem for governments that seek to dispense with Christian humanism, busy cutting off the branch that supports them. The very Christian ideas that give them their moral strength have other implications. For example, while feminism is based on the equality of all human beings, despite women being vulnerable because they are weaker and smaller than men, there is another group of human beings who are even weaker. Whether we like it or not, we cannot place the protection of the most vulnerable at the center of our ethical system without concluding that unborn or newborn children should not be killed.

It is clear that human beings find it difficult to abide by moral principles that cause them enormous practical problems, given the widespread practice throughout history of both abortion and infanticide. Christianity established that, despite these practical problems, protecting the weakest is the morally correct thing to do. Even if it is not easy to be a good Christian.

Abortion regulation is at the center of the contemporary culture war because it represents the vanguard of de-Christianization. When pro-life advocates on one side and pro-choice advocates on the other clash over the details of abortion policy, what they are really debating is whether our society should remain Christian. Most of those who consider themselves pro-choice have not really thought through what it would mean to abandon Christianity altogether—that is, to abandon completely the historically strange insistence of Christians that «God chose the weak of the world to shame the powerful.».

But there are some heralds of repaganization who are willing to be radically consistent and who display a frightening forcefulness.

Peter Singer and the extreme logic of secular utilitarianism

One of them is Peter Singer, professor of bioethics at Princeton University, from a Jewish family of Austrian origin (like mine). He is considered by many to be one of the most influential living philosophers in the world. He specializes in applied ethics from a utilitarian and secular perspective, and is a great promoter of the repaganization of the West.

Singer believes it would have been better to give our parents the option of killing us when we were still babies if we showed any serious problems, thus satisfying parents' reasonable preferences for one type of child or another.

Peter Singer is one of the few philosophers who dares to write that we must be willing to follow the logic of abortion to its ultimate conclusion, which is that there is no significant moral distinction between abortion and infanticide, and that the killing of some newborn babies should be permitted by law.

“Human newborns have no sense of their own existence over time,” he explains. “Therefore, killing a newborn is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to continue living.” Singer can make such claims because, as a good atheist, he rejects the notion that there is anything special—sacred—about human beings, regardless of their age or cognitive abilities. He argues that the rights of any living being should be evaluated based on their individual abilities, not on their membership in the human species. This is an anti-Christian argument of overwhelming, but terrible, consistency.

It poses a practical problem when it comes to establishing a legal distinction between permissible and impermissible murder of a child. It is the problem that all abortion legislation must face. If the limit is not set at conception, then some point during gestation or development must be found. Why not, Singer asks, take it a little further, until after birth, until the end of the period when the child is not yet aware of its own existence in time?

«Man is nothing special. He is just a part of this world,» said Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's right-hand man and chief architect of the Nazi Holocaust. But it is not necessary to resort to Nazism to warn of the risks of de-Christianization.

A world that accepted infanticide on a widespread basis would probably resemble pre-Christian Rome. The «first sexual revolution» arose in Roman slave society, where men enjoyed unrestricted sexual access to the bodies of their social inferiors, including slaves, women, and children. Murdered babies were understood as an acceptable consequence of male (or female) sexual “need.”.

Abortion, infanticide, and the loss of Christian morality in the West

On the contrary, Christianity adapted morality to the profound nature of things, including sex. It taught that, in addition to the raison d'être of sex in the biosphere being to generate variation, individuality, and different and unique genetic endowments, sex in humans is also and fundamentally a form of union and rapport between parents for the proper care and education of their offspring, who depend on them for years. Therefore, separating sex from procreation or its mission of union became incompatible with Christian morality. And, of course, so did rape, pedophilia, abortion, and infanticide.

A world that widely accepted infanticide would also resemble the Netherlands, Belgium, or Canada today.

The Netherlands is the only country with an explicit framework for active neonatal euthanasia, which allows the lives of newborns with serious health problems to be ended.

Belgium allows euthanasia for minors of any age. For infants under 1 year of age, there is no explicit protocol as in the Netherlands, but neonatologists and surveys (89% of Flemish doctors in 2020) have supported discussing the legalization of infanticide in serious cases.

The Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) program offers medically assisted suicide not only to the terminally ill, but currently pressures people with disabilities and mental illnesses, and even those simply with low economic resources, to use this «service.» «The last will is sacred,» they argue in Canada. Apparently, modern progressivism cares about what is sacred, but not if it is Christian.

The legalization of infanticide has been debated with surprising calm in the Canadian government. In 2022, Louis Roy of the Quebec College of Physicians testified before the Special Joint Committee that parents should be able to arrange for the death of their children during their first year of life when they “consider” them to have «severe syndromes.».

Canada, the Netherlands, and Belgium continue to slide down the slippery slope of abortion and euthanasia. If infanticide becomes widespread—following the Netherlands, Canada, and Belgium, and then, inevitably, throughout the de-Christianized West—we will know with certainty that Christianity has retreated into the catacombs.

For two thousand years, Christians have kept the jungle at bay by creating Western morality, a clearing in the forest with a view of the sky. If there is no one left to tend the garden, the jungle will reclaim its territory.

Freely adapted from the article: https://firstthings.com/we-are-repaganizing/

The authorJoseph Gefaell

Analyst. Science, economics and religion. Five children. Investment banker. Profile on X: @ChGefaell.

The exam

2026 begins with a renewed “Catholic turn,” inviting us to personally examine our faith and how we live out our Christian commitment in society.

January 2, 2026-Reading time: 2 minutes

This new social, cultural, and ecclesial movement, which some have called the “Catholic turn,” has barely begun, and already there are those who have killed it, buried it, and said its funeral mass. If we consider that Christ spent half his life talking about harvesting and sowing (with all that this implies in terms of waiting and patience), it is amusing that our society Click and Collect I want the change to happen now, immediately, without delay... perhaps to move on to another screen as soon as possible.

2026 begins, and this is undeniable, driven by a certain current of optimism within the Church, produced by the realization that, more in spite of us than thanks to us, there is a part of society that postmodern nihilism can no longer deceive and which, in one way or another, is turning its eyes to faith; or at least to a Christian-based anthropology, guardian of Beauty “ever ancient and ever new.”.

It is no longer just different cultural expressions in cinema, music, or social media that have revived the search for God or spirituality as “a topic to be addressed.” It is also present in a large part of pastoral work, which faces the challenge of responding in a mature and informed way to the questions of thousands of people who are searching and want to find “clear answers” in the Church: concrete commitment, ways of living that move away from the facile optimism of "anything goes," and concern for others that goes beyond slogans.

The ball that we Catholics have on our roof is made of leather, not foam, and when it hits you, it sometimes hurts. Transmitting the deposit of faith means answering the questions that Leo XIV raises in his powerful apostolic letter. In Unity of Faith on the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed: 

"What does God mean to me, and how do I bear witness to my faith in Him? Is the one and only God truly the Lord of life, or are there idols more important than God and His commandments? Is God for me the living God, close to me in every situation, the Father to whom I turn with filial trust? Is He the Creator to whom I owe everything I am and everything I have, whose footprints I can find in every creature? Am I willing to share the goods of the earth, which belong to everyone, in a just and equitable manner? How do I treat creation, which is the work of His hands?”Answering these questions requires each of us to engage in genuine personal examination and adopt a way of life that, while I don't know if it will be part of the cultural “Catholic shift,” will certainly change our lives.

The Vatican

Leo XIV: «The heart of Jesus beats for every man and woman.”

After celebrating Mass for Mary, Mother of God, in the basilica, he blessed the faithful gathered in the square from the window of the papal apartment.

Editorial Staff Omnes-January 1, 2026-Reading time: 2 minutes

Pope Leo XIV inaugurated the new year with a message focused on peace, hope, and inner renewal, in which he invited the faithful to begin 2026 as a true “era of peace and friendship among all peoples.”.

“Dear brothers and sisters, happy new year!” began the Pontiff, framing his message in the passage of time and the responsibility to live it meaningfully. He warned that without a sincere desire for good, “it would be meaningless to turn the pages of the calendar and fill our agendas,” and emphasized that the new year only takes on meaning when it is oriented toward the common good and reconciliation.

Last days of the Jubilee

In his reflection, Leo XIV referred to the Jubilee that is coming to an end, from which, he said, the Church has learned “how to cultivate hope for a new world.” This hope is not abstract, but concrete: “turning our hearts to God, so that we can transform grievances into forgiveness, pain into consolation, and resolutions of virtue into good works.” In this way, he added, God dwells in history and rescues it from oblivion, giving the world the Redeemer.

The Pope focused his message on the figure of Jesus Christ, “the Only Begotten Son who becomes our brother,” and who enlightens “the consciences of good will” to build the future “as a welcoming home for every man and woman who is born.” In keeping with the Christmas season, he turned his gaze to Mary, “the first to feel the heart of Christ beat,” and evoked the mystery of the Incarnate Word, announced “as a heartbeat of grace” in the silence of her virginal womb.

A beating heart

In a passage with a marked spiritual tone, Leo XIV recalled that God, by becoming man, reveals his own heart to us, and that “the heart of Jesus beats for every man and woman”: for those who welcome him, like the shepherds, and also for those who reject him, like Herod. “His heart is not indifferent,” he said, "it beats for the righteous, so that they may persevere in their devotion, and for the unrighteous, so that they may change their lives and find peace.".

The Pontiff invited us to pause and adore the mystery of the Incarnation, which “shines forth in Mary Most Holy and is reflected in every newborn child,” revealing the divine image imprinted on human beings. From this contemplation, he called for a choral prayer for peace on January 1: “especially among nations bloodied by conflict and misery, but also in our homes, in families wounded by violence and pain.”.

He concluded his message by entrusting to Mary, Mother of God and Mother of the Church, the plea for a reconciled world, with the certainty that “Christ, our hope, is the sun of justice that never sets.” Pope Leo XIV then imparted his blessing, extending his wish for peace and hope to the city of Rome and the whole world.

Read more
Evangelization

How did Aid to the Church in Need come about? An interview with its founder

In December 1987, an interview with Fr. Werenfried van Straaten, the founder of Aid to the Church in Need, was published in the magazine Palabra (no. 270). We publish the interview on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of Omnes.

José Miguel Pero-Sanz Elorz-January 1, 2026-Reading time: 7 minutes

Werenfried van Straaten, then secretary to the Abbot of Tongerlo (Belgium), started what from 1969 would be called Aid to the Church in Need.

In the forty years that are now being celebrated, ACN - Pius Sodalitium since 1964 and Universal Public Association of Pontifical Right since 1982 - has distributed more than 1.5 billion US dollars in places where the Church is persecuted or in difficulty: the Church «of the catacombs» in countries ruled by the communists has preference; but in 1959 it began its aid in Asia, and soon after in Latin America and Africa.

Some 600,000 donors currently provide about $50 million annually for the construction of churches; purchase of Bibles and religious books; livelihood and motorization for needy priests; aid to contemplative communities; assistance in refugee camps, etc.

The soul of all this continues to be Fr. Werenfried, Father Tocino as he is called in Germany, who will be 75 years old on January 17. On the occasion of both anniversaries, he has granted PALABRA an interview in which he explains the genesis, life, present and perspectives of his initiative.

Someone has said that Fr. Werenfried is «a force of nature»: an athletic build, fighting the tendency to obesity; disheveled hair, high forehead, matted eyebrows, lively eyes and a smile between mischievous and good-natured. He responds with precision, like someone who is used to setting a goal and walking straight -without deviating through collateral paths- towards it.

Why do they say that ACN was born on a specific date: December 25, 1947?

-For it was in that month of December when, on the occasion of the Nativity, I wrote an article in the little magazine published by our Abbey, entitled «There is no room in the inn», in which I asked for help for the defeated Germans and also asked for reconciliation with the defeated enemy. The response to that appeal exceeded all expectations, and thus began an adventure of charity and love that has reached the present day and encompasses the five continents.

In Germany they call him «Father Bacon». What is the reason for this nickname?

-In one of my preachings to help the refugees of the German diaspora survive, I asked each of the families listening to me to sacrifice a slice of bacon from the family's supply and bring it to the parish, which I would drop by the following Saturday to collect their donations. Operation Bacon had just been born. Thousands of tons of bacon poured into the Abbey and from there it was on its way to Germany. This earned me the nickname «Father Bacon».

Did you think from the beginning that your initiative would become what it is today?

-At no time. In that December of 1947, I made a simple appeal to Christians to love their neighbor, which I have maintained to this day. If this has given rise to the development that our Work has today, we owe it all to God, because it is only He who awakens in the hearts of our benefactors love for the Church in need.

FIRST STEPS

What support did you find in the early stages of your work?

-Stalmans, superior at that time of the Abbey of Tongerlo, where I come from. That of the local hierarchy and of course the support and backing of the Holy Fathers up to our own John Paul Il.

What were the next steps?

-After starting to help refugees, the actions gradually followed one after the other: adoption of priests, motorization, mobile chapels, construction of churches in the German diaspora, until 1952, when Aid to the Church in Need was launched.

An important chapter of your activities was, and I assume will continue to be, the countries of Eastern Europe: What kind of operations do you carry out there?

-Aid to Eastern European countries is mainly for the construction and restoration of churches, aid to seminarians, aid to nuns, publishing of religious and prayer books, maintenance of priests (especially the elderly), etc.

Did you have any relationship with Cardinal Wojtyla?

-Naturally. He has been a witness of the help that our Work has sent to the Church in Poland. Specifically, in the diocese of Krakow, where he comes from, we supported the financing of the construction of the Nowa Huta church.

NEW HORIZONS

I understand that you have subsequently broadened the horizon of your support. In what directions?

-At the express request of Pope John XXIII, following the Second Vatican Council, at which I was a Consultor, we began our assistance to the threatened and needy Church in Third World countries.

How can it be understood that a premonstratensian monk has become one of the great «managers» of the West?

-You cannot understand if you do not have faith. I am simply an instrument of God. He uses me so that fraternal love among Christians does not disappear.

Aren't you also the founder of some nuns?

-In 1966, together with Mother Hadewych, a Belgian nun of the Order of the Holy Sepulcher, we founded the Institute of the Daughters of the Resurrection in Bukavu (Zaire). In 21 years of existence, the Institute already has more than 100 professed sisters and a large number of novices and postulants.As a priest and religious, the goal of our pastoral activity is to form saints, men and women, who truly live for God and for their neighbor by following to the letter the two great commandments.

«UN OF CHARITY».»

What kind of people help them?

-The team of my collaborators in the 13 secretariats of the Work, as well as the 600,000 benefactors we have throughout the world, is made up of people from all walks of life: priests, religious, laity, humble and powerful, we all form a large family that has come to be called the «United Nations of Charity.

Would you care to illustrate your work with a specific case, with an illustrative anecdote?

-I think I could list ten thousand examples. Every year we receive 8,000 requests for help, and we help in about 6,000 cases. Some requests do not fall within our field of pastoral aid, and we have to refer them to other organizations. You ask for concrete examples. Take church construction. Recently a Bishop from Latin America came by and asked us for help for a large cathedral in honor of the Mother of God. I reflected and indicated to him that it would be better to build a modest church and with the money saved, to build a catechetical center. This would make the Mother of God much happier. That is what he did, and we gave him a subsidy, which otherwise we would certainly have refused him. A Bishop in India wrote to me that if he wanted to build a piggery, then some Catholic agencies would finance a real palace for him. But if he wanted to get money for a building for the Lord, he could only turn to «Aid to the Church in Need».

DIFFICULT TIMES

And difficulties have you not encountered?

-There have always been more than enough difficulties. In the meantime, I have found that it was easier to overcome the opponents outside the Church than within it.

Specifically after the Second Vatican Council, you seemed to be an annoying character for some people. What did they have against you?

-After the Second Vatican Council, our Work was a hindrance, especially for Vatican diplomacy and other forces in the Church, which misunderstood the «aggiornamento» of the Holy Father, as if it were possible to establish compromises with atheist regimes. They wanted to put an end to our Work and they almost succeeded.

How did it all work out?

-The Cardinals and Bishops of the persecuted Church stood energetically by our side and intervened on our behalf with the Holy Father. Pope Paul VI discussed this with me for a long time and confirmed the necessity of our work. He assigned our Work the official status of a «Pium Sodalitium» and placed it under his personal protection.

ORGANIZATION

From a legal point of view, what type of personality does ACN have?

-Canonically, since 1984 we are a Public and Universal Organization, established by the Holy See, subordinated both to the canonical regulations and to the Statutes approved by the Holy See. In Civil Law we are a public utility organization, which makes its means available, directly and exclusively, for charitable purposes.

How is it organized?

-A.I.N. is made up of 13 national secretariats that report to the Head Office in Königstein (Federal Germany). In addition to the International Information Department, there is the Projects and Grants Allocation Commission, which is in charge of studying all the requests received, and the Financial Department, which issues the payment orders of the accepted requests.

What was your last annual budget and how was it distributed in percentage terms by sector?

-In 1986, $41,473,189 was raised and distributed, in percentage terms, as follows: Church persecuted 39.4 %; Church threatened 54.7 % and refugees 5.9 %.

With some charitable organizations, people have doubts about the destination of their alms. They suspect that, to some degree, they may finance guerrillas or pastoral initiatives of dubious doctrinal rectitude. What kind of precautions does the AlN take to assure its benefactors that nothing of the sort will happen?

-For a petition to be considered, it must be accompanied by the official endorsement of the Bishop of the diocese from which it originates, or by the religious Superior on whom the petitioner depends. The aids are also sent by the same way.WE WORK NON-STOP

You are now only the Spiritual Assistant. What does that mean?

-Yes, in 1981 I stepped down from my position as Moderator General of the Work and have limited myself to the position of Spiritual Assistant. This is my task in the Work, to be the shepherd for those hundreds of thousands who for us are not only a possibility of help for others, but who also seek inspiration for their own spiritual concerns. The Spiritual Assistant has, according to the Statutes, the task of overseeing that the Organization is faithful to the doctrine of the Church and that the joint activity of the Work serves the previously determined purposes. At the end of 1988, at the age of 75, I am thinking of leaving this position in other hands. As Founder of the Work, I have, according to the Statutes, the right to participate in all Assemblies, to speak at any time and, if necessary, to appeal decisions. This appeal can only be contested by the General Council, and this with a two-thirds majority. Thus it is assured that the Work, at least as long as it lives, will continue to work in the spirit of the Founder.

Would you mind describing one of your working days?

-A normal working day would be like this: I get up at 6 a.m., celebrate Holy Mass, have breakfast and at 8 a.m. I am in the office. There I work until 10 a.m. on the Spanish edition of the «Bulletin» for Christmas. At 10 a.m. a journalist comes for an interview about the Anniversary. This lasts until 11 o'clock. Then comes a Bishop from Asia and later a Sister from Peru. At 12 noon I start answering the letters from benefactors until 1 p.m. (I do about ten); then I have lunch at my work table, I have to lose weight, I go to bed for half an hour and then I continue with the letters. Later I discuss with my collaborators a film about the Work, I inform the French propagandists about the new spiritual lines in the conference room, I talk on the phone with countless people, I have dinner with a priest from Poland in the evening. I work in the office until about 11 p.m. on a sermon to Mary. I rarely go to bed before midnight.

You will be 75 years old in January, how do you ensure the continuity of your company in the future?

-As long as I live and preserve my physical and spiritual integrity, I will maintain the authority that the Statutes give me, and later, well, if God wills our Work, then He will take care of getting good collaborators, and I, for my part, will help Him in the search.

The authorJosé Miguel Pero-Sanz Elorz

Ecclesiastic, journalist and writer from Bilbao (1939), Doctor of Philosophy and priest of Opus Dei.

Resources

Behold the handmaid of the Lord

In the silence of Nazareth, a young woman gives an answer that continues to challenge us today. Far from taking away her freedom, her commitment opens a path to fulfillment, trust, and new life.

Rafael Sanz Carrera-January 1, 2026-Reading time: 4 minutes

Each Advent, the liturgy leads us to a specific place: Nazareth. A simple house. An unknown young woman. And a word that, spoken in that silence, resonates today with an uncomfortable force: «Behold the handmaid of the Lord» (Luke 1:38).

It is striking that, at a time when freedom and personal dignity are being championed, such a brief expression arouses a visceral discomfort in many women, especially young women. The word «slave» evokes images of oppression and loss of dignity, and it seems difficult to reconcile it with the figure of Mary, a model of freedom, strength, and human fulfillment.

However, Advent does not shy away from difficult questions: it illuminates them. 

1. What does it really mean? doulē?

The Gospel of Luke was written in Greek, and the word Mary uses is doulē, feminine form of doulos. In the civilized world of the first century, it could legally refer to a slave, but in the Bible this word takes on a luminous and surprising twist.

The Septuagint calls «servants of the Lord» to Moses, David, and the prophets, not to degrade them, but to indicate that they belong uniquely to God. Saint Paul bears this title with apostolic pride and repeats it 17 times in his letters as a confession of identity. Mary herself, in her Magnificat, says again «has looked upon the humility of his servant», revealing that this word does not diminish her, but rather defines her spiritually.

In Scripture, doulē It does not express oppressive servitude, but rather loving belonging, radical availability, and a liberating surrender. It is the great Christian paradox: those who surrender themselves to God do not lose their freedom, but rather see it elevated to its highest expression. Advent begins here: in the certainty that God's will does not crush, but rather enriches.

2. Handmaid of the Lordin the tradition

Throughout the centuries, Handmaid of the Lord It became one of the most cherished expressions in Christian spirituality, especially for women who found in it not an echo of oppression, but a name of their own. For them, this phrase described a specific way of being before God: open, available, capable of welcoming grace with a fullness that does not nullify, but transforms.

Saint Catherine of Siena signed her letters as «servant and slave of the servants of God,» and there was no trace of resignation in her words, but rather the joy of knowing that she belonged entirely to Christ. Saint Teresa of Calcutta spoke of herself as «a pencil in the hands of God,» a simple and powerful image of a life that allows itself to be written by Love. For centuries, thousands of nuns embroidered Handmaid of the Lord in their habits, making it clear that their identity consisted of being a space available where grace could act.

Why did this expression, so disconcerting to some today, fascinate so many Christian women? Because in it they discovered something deeply feminine: the ability to give oneself without losing oneself, to give oneself without diluting oneself, to make room for another to live without renouncing one's own dignity. When a woman loves, she does not shrink: she expands. She does not cancel herself out: she becomes fruitful. She does not disappear: she blossoms. In that capacity to welcome and give life—both physically and spiritually— Handmaid of the Lord acquired a luminous meaning: to reveal a freedom that arises precisely from surrender.

Mary perfectly embodies this mystery. Her «let it be done» concentrates the spiritual maturity of one who understands that surrendering oneself is not giving oneself up, but allowing God to be God. In her, Handmaid of the Lord It is not a gesture of inferiority, but a declaration of identity: Mary belongs entirely to God, and that is why God can come out to meet the world through her.

3. A contemporary malaise... and an opportunity

It is not surprising that, in a culture deeply wounded by violence against women, trafficking, and abuses of authority—including within the Church—the word «slave» provokes rejection. This sensitivity is not the enemy of faith; it is a cry that asks to be heard with respect and welcomed with patience, because it arises from real wounds.

Faith does not seek to avoid that pain, but to face it at its root. Understanding the doulē Mary demands, first, that we lament and firmly reject structures that oppress and strip away dignity. If the Gospel is not capable of being outraged by injustice, it loses its liberating power. Only by embracing the legitimacy of this historical rejection can we approach the purity of the ‘yes’ of Nazareth, which has nothing to do with coercion or submission.

Precisely for this reason, Advent urges us to enter into the text without fear, to discover its heart. When Mary says «Here is the handmaid of the Lord.», it is not absorbed or nullified. No one forces it. No one conditions it. No one pushes it. His word is born of a freedom so pure that it can only spring from love. And it is this freedom that allows the Incarnation: his availability opens up a space in history where God can become man.

Mary's «slavery» is not submission, but motherhood: a yes so profound that it becomes a dwelling place for Life. God does not hide her; he reveals her. He does not diminish her; he magnifies her. He does not use her; he exalts her with the greatest dignity ever granted to a human creature. His «let it be done» does not destroy her; it fulfills her.

This contemporary discomfort, far from forcing us to water down the Gospel, can become a precious opportunity. Instead of changing the text, we can help people discover what it really means, showing that biblical language does not speak from the oppressive categories we reject today, but from a logic of love that liberates and transforms. 

The free slave

On her hurried journey to the hill country of Judah, Mary reveals the secret to us: her «servitude» is the purest form of freedom. It is the tone of a heart that has discovered that true greatness does not consist in asserting oneself, but in opening oneself; not in possessing, but in giving oneself; not in controlling, but in letting God do his work.

To say today Handmaid of the Lord is to embrace a freedom deeper than that promised by the world: the freedom of one who no longer needs to protect himself from God because he has learned that in Him there is no threat, but home. 

Those who truly utter these words do not diminish themselves: they expand. They do not disappear: they reveal themselves. They lose nothing: they receive everything. And in the secret of that «let it be done,» the same creative spark is always ignited: the possibility of new life, the divine irruption that transforms the everyday, the silent beginning of the Incarnation.

God saw the humility of his servant... and the world dawned differently. Happy Advent to all! handmaid of the Lordtoday. May your «let it be done» —perhaps uttered in the discretion of a prayer or in the harshness of a difficult decision— continue to open doors through which light can enter the world.

The authorRafael Sanz Carrera

Doctor of Canon Law

Read more
Pope's teachings

Artisans of unity and peace. Leo XIV in Turkey and Lebanon

Leo XIV brought a call for unity and peace to Turkey and Lebanon, inviting Christians to overcome polarization, rediscover the centrality of Christ, and become authentic artisans of peace.

Ramiro Pellitero-January 1, 2026-Reading time: 7 minutes

Leo XIV's first trip outside Italy had two mottos: One Lord, one faith, one baptism (Turkey, November 27-30) and Blessed are the peacemakers (Lebanon, November 30–December 2).

In both places, it is worth asking yourself about the what and the how of his thoughtful and unifying, yet incisive message, addressed not only to Christians, but to the entire population and to the heart of each individual, without ignoring the problems.

The Pope said in Ankara: “The occasion of this trip, the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, speaks to us of encounter and dialogue, as does the fact that the first eight ecumenical councils were held in the lands of present-day Turkey.

In Beirut, he proposed “bear witness to the enduring truth that Christians, Muslims, Druze, and many others can live together and build a country united by respect and dialogue".

“Only together are we ourselves.”

Upon his arrival in Turkey (where Christians represent only 0.3% of the population), Leo XIV met with the authorities at the presidential palace in Ankara (cf. Speech, 27-XI-2025). He pointed out that a society is alive if it is pluralistic, if it overcomes the polarizations that today threaten and fragment human communities. 

That is why it is necessary to overcome the “false logic” that emphasizes the distinctions between religions and communities of believers and choose, instead, the “culture of encounter” between the different sensibilities of Turkish identity. Otherwise, we would be adding to the “globalization of indifference,” which Pope Francis opposed from the heart of the Mediterranean.

For this reason, and because we are all children of God, compassion and solidarity must be considered criteria for development. We all form the “human family,” like a bridge (an image that is recurring these days, due to the bridges that connect Europe and Asia via Turkey) that unites our destinies and experiences.

"However –warned the Bishop of Rome–, It is not from an individualistic culture, nor from contempt for marriage and fertility, that people can obtain greater opportunities for life and happiness.". 

This is a deception perpetrated by consumerist economies; because, he added with special reference to family life and the contribution of women, “Only together can we truly become ourselves. Only in love can we deepen our inner selves and strengthen our identity. Those who despise fundamental bonds and do not learn to accept even their limitations and fragilities become more easily intolerant and incapable of interacting with a complex world.". 

The “smallness” and Christocentrism of faith

The following day, a prayer meeting was held with the clergy, consecrated persons, and pastoral workers (cf. Speech at the Holy Spirit Cathedral, Istanbul, November 28, 2025).

From Ur of the Chaldeans, Abraham traveled to southern Turkey (present-day Harran) and set out for the Promised Land. Christian communities lived in the lands of present-day Turkey during the time of the apostles and the Church Fathers. Today, the Catholic community is small, but God has chosen the path and logic of smallness.

“Therefore, I encourage you to cultivate a spiritual attitude of confident hope, founded on faith and union with God.”Signs of this path, already underway, are pastoral care for young people, ecumenical and interreligious dialogue, the transmission of faith to the local population, and pastoral service to migrants and refugees.

On the occasion of the 1700th anniversary of the First Council of Nicaea, Leo XIV issued three challenges. First, “embrace the essence of Christian faith and being. That is, “always seek, even within different perceptions, spiritualities, and cultures, the unity and essentiality of the Christian faith centered on Christ and the Tradition of the Church". 

Second, rediscover in Christ the face of God the Father, without falling into the temptation of Arianism, which reduces Christ to his human form. Finally, the mediation of faith and the development of doctrine. Thanks to the First Council of Nicaea and the First Council of Constantinople, the faith was deepened and the Symbol (Creed) that we pray today in Sunday celebrations was established. 

The latter, the Pope observed, teaches us the lesson that “It is always necessary to mediate the Christian faith in the languages and categories of the context in which we live.”, distinguishing “the core of faith from the historical formulas and forms that express it, which are always partial and provisional”As Newman explained, this is the “internal development of a living organism, which brings to light and better explains the fundamental core of faith". 

Christian unity, universal brotherhood, witness of Catholics

On the same day, November 28, the Pope presided over an ecumenical prayer meeting near the archaeological excavations of the ancient basilica of St. Neophytus in Iznik. He emphasized the temptation of Arianism: “the risk of reducing Jesus Christ to a kind of charismatic leader or superman, a misrepresentation that ultimately leads to sadness and confusion". "But –argued– If God did not become man, how can mortals share in his immortal life? This was at stake in Nicaea and is at stake today: faith in the God who, in Jesus Christ, became like us so that we might ‘share in the divine nature.’ (cf. 2 Peter 1:4),” as St. Irenaeus and St. Athanasius emphasized.

In fact, the following day he met with Bartholomew I, Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, and together they signed a joint declaration recognizing in the Nicene Creed the faith that unites us, 60 years after a similar declaration signed by Paul VI and Athenagoras. 

On Saturday, November 29, Mass for the first Sunday of Advent was held in Istanbul. During the celebration (cf. Homily at the Volkswagen Arena, 29-XI-2025), Peter's successor illustrated two “images” of our being Church, suggested by the liturgy of the day: the “high mountain on top of the mountains” (cf. Is 2:2) and “a world where peace reigns”(cf. Is 2:4). He proposed the witness of holiness (through vigilance over ourselves and the cultivation and living of faith through prayer, the sacraments, and charity) as a source for promoting unity in the Catholic community, in ecumenical relations, and in encounters with brothers and sisters of other religions. 

Along these lines, the following day (cf. Address at the conclusion of the Divine Liturgy, On November 30, 2025, in the Patriarchal Church of St. George (Istanbul) and before the bishops of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, Leo XIV proposed renewing efforts to build peace, combat the ecological crisis, and use new communication technologies responsibly. 

The anchor and the cedars, the coin and the rose

In Lebanon, Pope Prevost was welcomed by large crowds. During his meeting with the authorities (cf. Speech in Beirut, 30-XI-2025), praised the resilience of that people, and encouraged them to continue building peace. He pointed out three means: “the language of hope” – in the face of pessimism and feelings of helplessness, instability, and conflict – the “culture of reconciliation” and the contribution of everyone (especially young people and women) from local cultures.

The following day, he met with bishops, priests, consecrated men and women, and pastoral workers at the Shrine of Our Lady of Lebanon in Harissa (cf. Speech, 1-XII-2025). He encouraged them to create, without naivety, a climate of trust in the regenerative power of forgiveness and mercy. 

Here, too, he used various images. That of the “anchor” (which appeared in the logo for his trip, taken from Francis“ catechesis), which assures us of our union with Heaven; the strong and deep roots of the “cedars”; the “Syrian currency”, found by a priest in the alms bag along with Lebanese coins, because “Giving to each other enriches us all and brings us closer to God.”; the “Golden Rose”(papal gift to the shrine), symbolizing the perfume of Christ that spreads Christian life amid difficulties and wounds.

Recalling his prayer before the tomb of Saint Charbel (December 1, 2025), Leo XIV exclaimed: “How much of your history can sustain the difficult path to the future!" (Farewell Ceremony, December 2, 2025).

On the same day, he used the image of the vigorous cedars –symbol of unity, fertility, and hope—in the meeting with young people (cfr. Speech in Bekerké, December 1, 2025): “You know well that the strength of the cedar lies in its roots, which are usually as extensive as its branches. The number and strength of the branches correspond to the number and strength of the roots.”. That is why he encouraged them to join the “the humble, hidden, and honest work of so many doers of good”, of the entire tree in all its beauty.

He told them that, in order to build peace, “The true beginning of new life is the hope that comes from above: it is Christ!”; that “You don't truly love someone if your love has an expiration date, if it lasts only as long as the feeling does.”, because “A love with an expiration date is a mediocre love.”The Bishop of Rome added: “Strong and fruitful relationships are built together, on mutual trust, on that ‘forever’ that beats in every vocation to family life and religious consecration.”He concluded by pointing out the means: the power of Christ, the example of the saints, recourse to prayer, and devotion to the Virgin Mary (the rosary).

Peacebuilders, grateful and committed

During the ecumenical and interfaith meeting in Beirut (cf. Speech in Martyrs' Square, 1-XII-2025), Leo XIV pointed out, in the words of Benedict XVI, that dialogue with other religions “is based primarily on theological foundations that challenge faith” (E. A. Ecclesia in the Middle East, 19). Specifically, in line with the statement Nostra Aetate of the Second Vatican Council, insisted on “the very core of interfaith dialogue: the discovery of God's presence beyond all boundaries and the invitation to seek Him together with reverence and humility".

Along with the cedars, “the olive tree” (revered by Christianity, Judaism, and Islam) is characteristic of Lebanon. It symbolizes “resilience and hope, reflecting the steadfast commitment needed to foster peaceful coexistence”Its oil is balm for wounds (reminding us of God's compassion) and nourishment for light (which we must give through faith, charity, and humility). 

"In an increasingly interconnected world –concluded the Pope– You are called to be peacemakers: to confront intolerance, overcome violence, and banish exclusion; illuminating the path toward justice and harmony for all through the witness of your faith.". 

As a culmination of those intense days, during Mass at the Beirut Waterfront (cf. Homily, December 2, 2005), Peter's successor invited us to cultivate attitudes of praise and gratitude. Contemplating once again the beauty of Lebanon—now overshadowed by temptations of disenchantment and desolation, uncertainty and disorientation in the face of so many difficulties—he pointed to the small lights that shine in the night, like sprouts of life and hope, inviting gratitude and commitment.  

Jesus praises the Father “because it reveals its greatness precisely to the small and humble, to those who do not attract attention, who seem to count for little or nothing, who have no voice".

"At the same time –warned Leo XIV– this gratitude must not remain an intimate and illusory consolation. It must lead us to a transformation of the heart, to a conversion of life, to consider that it is precisely in the light of faith, in the promise of hope, and in the joy of charity that God has planned our life. And so, we are all called to cultivate these buds, not to lose heart, not to give in to the logic of violence or the idolatry of money, not to resign ourselves to the evil that is spreading.".

The Vatican

The Pope highlights the three most important moments of 2025

Before the final countdown to the new year, Christians should take a moment to remember all of God's blessings from the past year and reflect honestly on how they responded to those graces, said Pope Leo XIV.

OSV / Omnes-December 31, 2025-Reading time: 2 minutes

By Cindy Wooden, OSV

Before the final countdown to the New Year, Christians should take a moment to remember all of God's blessings from the past year and reflect honestly on how they responded to those graces, said Pope Leo XIV.

New Year's Eve is a time to remember God's great love and «ask forgiveness for all the times we have failed to treasure his inspirations and invest in the best possible way the talents he has entrusted to us,» the Pope said on December 31 during his weekly general audience.

Thousands of visitors and pilgrims, bundled up against the cold winter morning, gathered in St. Peter's Square for the last audience of 2025.

The milestones of 2025

Pope Leo highlighted three “important events” from last year: “some joyful, such as the pilgrimage of so many faithful on the occasion of the Holy Year; others painful, such as the passing of the late Pope Francis, and the scenes of war that continue to shake the planet.”.

Before welcoming the New Year, he said, «the Church invites us to place everything in the Lord's hands, entrusting ourselves to his providence and asking him to renew, in us and around us, in the coming days, the wonders of his grace and mercy.».

The jubilee pilgrimage of millions of Catholics around the world in 2025 is a reminder that «our whole life is a journey, whose final destination transcends space and time, to be fulfilled in the encounter with God and in full and eternal communion with Him,» said the Pope.

And when passing through one of the Holy Doors during the Jubilee, asking for forgiveness, he said, «express our ‘ yes ‘To God, who with his forgiveness invites us to cross the threshold of a new life, animated by grace, modeled on the Gospel, inflamed by love» for our neighbor.

Crossing the Holy Door, he said, «is our ‘yes‘ to a life lived with commitment in the present and oriented toward eternity.».

The love of God

Pope Leo ended his speech by quoting St. Paul VI's speech at the general audience at the end of the Holy Year of 1975: «God is Love! This is the ineffable revelation with which the Jubilee, through its teaching, its indulgence, its forgiveness, and finally its peace, filled with tears and joy, has wanted to fill our spirit today and our lives tomorrow. God is Love! God loves me! God was waiting for me, and I have found him! God is mercy! God is forgiveness! God is salvation! God, yes, God is life!».

Pope Leo XIV prayed that the certainty of God's eternal love and mercy would accompany us «in the transition from the old year to the new, and then always, in our lives.».

The authorOSV / Omnes

Read more

12 months, 12 apostles, 12 petitions

A new year lies ahead of us, filled with questions and uncertainties. With faith, we face it with hope, asking for twelve graces from the twelve apostles.

December 31, 2025-Reading time: 3 minutes

The year 2026 is upon us, with 12 months ahead filled with uncertainty. What will the new year bring? Faith invites us to live with hope and to ask for graces through prayer. Today, I invite you to join me in asking for 12 graces from the 12 apostles.

January

We begin with the first in hierarchical order, Peter. The month in which we celebrate, as we do every year, the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, will be a good opportunity to pray for Pope Leo XIV, his successor. In his hands lies the helm of a Church with many internal wounds, which must bear witness to love and unity in an increasingly polarized world. With Peter's intensity and insistence, let us ask for the grace of communion so that the world may believe. 

February

We continue with Andrew, the first disciple to say yes to the Lord's call. It was he, in fact, who introduced Jesus to his brother Peter, making him an example of missionary spirit. In this month in which we celebrate the Feast of the Presentation of the Lord, the day of Consecrated Life, let us pray that many may continue to respond to the call to vocation and that He may help each one of us to continue to introduce Him to those who do not yet know Him.

March

With Matthew, the tax collector who left his former life behind to follow Jesus, we will enter into Lent, a time of conversion and change of life. Let us ask for the grace to stop looking at ourselves and to look at those who live on the margins of society and close to us: the poor, the sick, those in prison, those who live alone, young people without hope...  

April

With John, Jesus' beloved disciple, the only one of the twelve who remained at the foot of the cross and the first of them to arrive at the empty tomb, we will enter into the Easter Triduum to contemplate the Passion, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus. In the face of hatred, war, and violence, let us pray for peace and for the ability to be transmitters of the joy of the Gospel.

May

Led by the most discreet apostle, who plays a minor role in the Gospel stories, James the Less, we arrive at the month of Mary, the humble girl from Nazareth who accepted God's plan for her life by bringing the Savior into the world. Let us offer our prayer this month for families, that, like the Holy Family of Nazareth, they may continue to be a preeminent place of welcome and protection of life in simplicity. 

June

When Judas Thaddeus asked Jesus during the Last Supper, «Lord, why have you revealed yourself to us and not to the world?», he was leaving us a lesson for this month in which we celebrate Corpus Christi. Let us ask for the gift of being able to see Him in the mystery of the Eucharist so that we may continue to fulfill the commandment to love one another as He loved us.

July

This month, together with Saint James the Greater, and playing on his nickname, we can remember our elders in a special way, as we celebrate World Grandparents' Day. May those of us who are elderly live in peace as we grow older, knowing that we are vulnerable and in need of help; and may those of us who are not yet elderly know how to accompany and honor those who have gone before us.

August

In this month traditionally associated with vacations, the figure of the apostle Simon «the Zealot» urges us not to become complacent, but to live the Gospel in a radical way. Let us pray that the People of God—lay people, religious men and women, priests, and bishops—may not lose their apostolic zeal, because the world is thirsty for God, as the psalm says, «like parched, dry land without water.».

September

With the apostle Philip, who worried about how to feed so many people before Jesus multiplied the loaves and fishes, let us remember the migrants and refugees whose journey is celebrated this month. May God multiply our gifts so that we may welcome them generously, protect them, promote them, and integrate them.

October

During the month of Missions, with the testimony of Thomas the Apostle, we can ask God to enable us to see Him, despite our unbelief, so that we can proclaim as he did: «My Lord and my God!» and thus lead many, through our testimony, to the light of faith.

November

Led by Bartholomew or Nathanael, of whom Jesus said, «Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is no deceit,» we will enter into Advent, a penitential season. Let us pray for the Church, that it may be a community of faithful «in whom there is no deceit,» capable of recognizing its mistakes and asking for forgiveness when it errs, so as not to be a scandal to the world.

December

And with Judas Iscariot, the traitor, we will arrive once again at Christmas to recognize our need for redemption. We need God to be born again and again in our hearts. Poor Judas could do nothing but despair. Let us ask the Lord for the virtue of Hope to give thanks, looking back on the year that is ending; and to face the new year with enthusiasm because He will be with us, as He said to his apostles, «every day, until the end of time.».

The authorAntonio Moreno

Journalist. Graduate in Communication Sciences and Bachelor in Religious Sciences. He works in the Diocesan Delegation of Media in Malaga. His numerous "threads" on Twitter about faith and daily life have a great popularity.

Newsroom

The most read news stories on Omnes in 2025

2025 has been a year of growth for Omnes, and we would like to welcome 2026 by looking back at the best news stories from the year that is coming to a close.

Editorial Staff Omnes-December 31, 2025-Reading time: < 1 minute

Throughout this year, Omnes has brought you daily news from a Catholic perspective. Here is a selection of the key information published on our website over the past twelve months.

Mariano Fazio on his friendship with Francisco

Ignacio Belzunce and his legacy of good humor and dedication

The faith of Whitney Houston

Interview with the Prelate of Opus Dei, on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the priestly ordination of St. Josemaría Escrivá.

Jacques Philippe speaks of hope in times when everything seems to be going against Christians.

How to make a good visit to the Blessed Sacrament

Proposals by philosopher Byung-Chul Han on today's society and prayer

Confession in times of efficiency

The Pope speaks to young people at the Jubilee

ColumnistsValle Rodriguez Castilla

Why openness to life is at the heart of hope in the 21st century

Openness to life speaks the language of hope. Without it, closeness, care, welcome, and responsibility cannot be sustained.

December 31, 2025-Reading time: 4 minutes

The Jubilee of Hope is coming to an end. In recent days, the Holy Doors of St. Mary Major, St. John Lateran, and St. Paul Outside the Walls have been closed, along with those of many other jubilee churches around the world. Finally, on January 6, the Solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, the closing of the Holy Door of St. Peter's Basilica in the Vatican will mark the definitive end of this ordinary Jubilee.

Throughout this Holy Year, we should ask ourselves: what has become of our hope? Has it truly filled our hearts?

The late Pope Francis, in proclaiming this year of grace through the bull Spes non confundit (Hope does not disappoint), on May 9, 2024, he shared with us his deepest desire: a desire for hope for everyone, because—as he himself recalled—«everyone hopes.» This is how his message began: «Francis, Bishop of Rome, Servant of the Servants of God, to all who read this letter, may hope fill your hearts.».

In that same bull, like a true roadmap, the logic of hope was outlined based on its two dimensions: grace and sign. The transition from one to the other prevents hope from becoming static, dull, resigned, or contingent. It is a hope that is always alive. This living hope is what truly fills the heart.

It's not enough to just have hope; you have to show it.

God's love is the source of all hope. Hope is, above all, grace. Pope Leo reminded us of this on the Ninth World Day of the Poor, November 16, 2025: «Christian hope does not disappoint because it is founded on God's love poured into our hearts by the Holy Spirit.».

But Christian hope must not only be lived inwardly: it must also be made visible. True hope calls for signs that embody and express it. «Attaining the hope that God's grace gives us» is necessary, but not sufficient; it must be rediscovered in the signs of the times. This is what Francis affirmed in Spes non confundit: «The signs of the times, which contain the longing of the human heart for God's saving presence, need to be transformed into signs of hope» (SNC, 7).

Our signs of hope

What are these signs of the times that today call to be transformed into signs of hope? They are these: peace; the desire of young people to have children; closeness to prisoners; care for the sick; accompaniment and encouragement of young people; responsible welcome of migrants; integration of exiles, displaced persons, and refugees; recognition of the value of the elderly; and, finally, the living memory of the poor (SNC, 7).

This is, we could say, the rosary of hope. Its signs:  peace, openness to life, prisoners, patients, young people, migrants and refugees, seniors y poor These are our hopes: the same ones that the heart of Christ on earth (whoever that may be), and with him the whole Church, goes over and over, prays and offers... even to the point of giving his life? Yes, even to the point of giving his life.

Good hope, the most urgent sign

These signs are not isolated: they form a true rope team. One leads to the other. At the forefront, paving the way for hope, is peace: a peace whose demand, said the Pope, «challenges us all» (SNC, 7): «all»: all peoples and every person. Peace as the origin, as the environment for all action and every intimacy, as a vital destination.

And, following this universal requirement, another particularly urgent one emerges: openness to life. «It is urgent that, in addition to the legislative commitment of States, there be convincing support from religious communities and civil society, because the desire of young people to bring new sons and daughters into the world, as the fruit of the fertility of their love, gives a future perspective to every society and is a source of hope: because it depends on hope and produces hope,» Pope Francis exhorted us in this letter.

Openness to life speaks the language of hope. Without it, it can hardly even be uttered: proximity, accompaniment, stimulus, care, welcome, recognition… We need to recommit to life as memory and as promise, to recover the back-and-forth swing between hope and good hope.

The 21st century, the century of hope

In this sense, the 21st century is the century of hope. Its most fundamental question is one of hope: whether or not to pass on life.

The French philosopher Rémi Brague, in his book Anchors in the sky —also collected by José Granados in Hope, from the future to the fruit— argues that, just as, for other reasons, the 19th century was the century of charity and the 20th century was the century of faith, ours is the century of hope.

It is because the decisive question of our time revolves around the fruitfulness of being: to generate or not to generate. Today we choose whether or not to transmit life. This crisis does not arise simply from a change in lifestyle; it arises, above all, from a deeper transformation: being and good are no longer perceived as inseparable. In our time, the coming of a human being into the world is no longer seen as a good in itself, but becomes dependent on conditions.

Crossing the threshold of hope

The Holy Door is closed. But we are all called to cross the threshold of hope in order to remain within it.

In these final days of the Jubilee, as our gaze turns to a manger where a Child brings hope, transforming the sign of the empty cribs On a hopeful note, it could be a good ending, the best ending, one that does not disappoint.

For this to happen, may hope become incarnate; may bodies be places of hope; may hopes be those of each day; may we all cross the threshold, even with the Holy Door closed. May we be within hope, fully within it. May we all be hope and may we be able to manifest it. May hope fill our hearts... And may we want to sing about it.

The authorValle Rodriguez Castilla

Licensed in Pharmacy. Expert in affective-sexual education, Gender and Theology of the Body.

The Vatican

Why Christians pray the Te Deum on December 31

TheTe Deum is one of the oldest hymns in the Christian tradition, which the Pope, now Leo XIV, will sing solemnly and publicly in St. Peter's on December 31, in thanksgiving. Its name comes from its first words: Te Deum laudamus (We praise you, God). Since the early centuries, the Church has prayed it in praise and gratitude to God.

Francisco Otamendi-December 31, 2025-Reading time: 5 minutes

Unlike other shorter or more personal prayers, the Te Deum is public and choral in nature. It is the entire Church—represented by the Pope—that raises its voice to acknowledge God's greatness, profess the Christian faith, and give thanks for His providential action throughout time, especially at decisive moments in its liturgical and historical life.

Origin and historical background

The Te Deum dates back to the late fourth or early fifth century. For a long time, its composition was attributed to Saint Ambrose and Saint Augustine, and it was even rumored to have been improvised during Saint Augustine's baptism in Milan. 

Modern historical and philological studies consider the hymn to be the result of early liturgy, and mention Nicetas of Remesiana (414), bishop of the Balkans, although this has not been proven, as well as Saint Ambrose of Milan, a great composer of Latin hymns.

Seniority

The structure of the Te Deum clearly reveals its antiquity: it combines formulas of biblical praise, Trinitarian and Christological confessions of faith, and final supplications taken from the language of the psalms. It is, in a way, a prayerful summary of the faith of the early Church. 

Very early on, the Te Deum was incorporated into the Liturgy of the Hours, especially into the Office of Readings on Sundays and solemnities outside of penitential seasons. From there, it also became a hymn for extraordinary occasions.

Theological and spiritual content

The anthem can be divided into three main parts.

The first is universal praise: all creation—angels, heavens, apostles, martyrs, and the Church spread across the earth—glorifies God the Father, recognizing his holiness and majesty.

The second part is a profession of faith in Christ, true God and true man, who took on our flesh, conquered death, and reigns gloriously at the right hand of the Father. This Christological core connects the Te Deum with the great symbols of faith.

The third part takes on a tone of confident supplication: the Church asks to be protected, guided, and saved, relying not on its merits, but on divine mercy. Therefore, the Te Deum is not only a song of thanksgiving for the past, but also a prayer of hope for the future.

The Last Judgment, by Michelangelo, Altar Wall of the Sistine Chapel, Vatican (Wikimedia commons).

The Te Deum on the last day of the year

The custom of singing or praying the Te Deum on December 31 is deeply rooted in Catholic tradition. On that day, the Church pauses to reflect on the year that is ending and, before making any human assessment, gives thanks to God.

It is not a matter of ignoring difficulties, failures, or suffering, but rather of recognizing that God has remained faithful at all times. The Te Deum allows us to look back on the past with the eyes of faith: everything has been under divine Providence. That is why, even in years marked by crisis, the Church does not give up giving thanks. 

Saints and thanksgiving

Some saints who, in addition to Saint Ambrose, have given special importance to thanksgiving include, among others, St. Augustine, for whom giving thanks to God is a central attitude of Christian life, not just a liturgical act, and wrote that gratitude is inseparable from faith. Saint Thomas Aquinas, author of the prayer ‘I thank you, Holy Lord, almighty Father, eternal God, because to me, a sinner, ...’. 

Also St. Alphonsus Maria de Liguori, St. Bonaventure, St. Ignatius of Loyola, who used and spread the phrase ‘Soul of Christ, sanctify me’.... Or St. Teresa of Jesus, who invited us “not to lose such good company,” referring to Christ present in the soul.

Saint John of the Cross, who taught us to give thanks to God in the night and in spiritual dryness. Saint Thérèse of Lisieux, who lived thanksgiving with filial trust and simplicity. Or Saint Josemaría, who added the ‘etiam ignotis’ (for what we do not know) in his thanksgiving to God the Father Almighty, Eternal, and Merciful.

We must mention here the great Apostle of the Gentiles, Saint Paul, who is in a way the great theologian of thanksgiving in the New Testament. And Saint Francis of Assisi, whose ‘Canticle of the Creatures’ is a great cosmic thanksgiving, as has been written, and for whom gratitude is the natural response of a humble heart.

On other solemn occasions

Throughout history, the Te Deum has been reserved for moments of special importance, such as the election of a new Pope and the beginning of his pontificate; major jubilee celebrations; canonizations and ecclesiastical events of special significance; or the end of councils, synods, or significant assemblies.

In countries with a Christian tradition, it has also been sung in civil contexts: at the end of wars, after the signing of peace treaties, or during decisive events in the life of a nation. In all cases, the meaning is the same: to publicly acknowledge God's action in history.

The Te Deum and the Pope, December 31 

The Successor of Peter, as Shepherd of the universal Church, prays the Te Deum on behalf of the entire People of God. Traditionally, he does so every December 31 in Rome, emphasizing that the Church does not rely on human strategies, but on praise and trust in God.

You can consult here The booklet for the celebration of the Te Deum (p. 33 ff.), in thanksgiving for the past year, which will be presided over by the Holy Father Leo XIV on December 31, on the eve of the Solemnity of Mary Most Holy, Mother of God.

We praise you, O God – Latin text

We praise you, O God: we acknowledge you as Lord.
Forever, all the earth worships the Father.
All angels, all heavens, and all powers,
cherubim and seraphim proclaiming with unceasing voice:
Holy, Holy, Holy Lord God of Hosts.
The heavens and the earth are full of the glory of your majesty.
Glorious choir of the Apostles,
praiseworthy number of prophets,
The army praises the martyr candidate.
The Church confesses you throughout the world,
Father of immense majesty;
we worship your true and only Son;
Sanctum quoque Paraclitum Spiritum.
Your Rex gloriae, Christ.
Your Father is eternal, and so is the Son.
You, who will freely accept man,
You did not despise the Virgin's womb.
You, defeated by the sting of death,
apostles to the believers of the kingdom of heaven.
You shall sit at the right hand of God, in the glory of the Father.
You will believe that he is coming.
We beseech you, come to the aid of your servants,
whom I redeemed with precious blood.
May I be counted among your saints in glory.
Save your people, Lord, and bless your inheritance.
Rule them and lift them up forever.
For each day we bless you.
And we will praise your name forever and ever.
Deign, Lord, to keep us sinless on this day.
Have mercy on us, Lord, have mercy on us.
Have mercy on us, Lord,
we burned as we had hoped in you.
In you, Lord, I have hoped: do not confound me forever.

You can consult the Text in Spanish.

The authorFrancisco Otamendi

Read more
The World

The year comes to an end and the Vatican reports that 17 pastoral workers have been killed

Fides Agency warns of persistent violence against the Church, noting that in 2025, 17 pastoral workers have been killed, with Africa at the top of this tragic list.

Editorial Staff Omnes-December 30, 2025-Reading time: 2 minutes

The sacrifice of those who devote their lives to serving others continues to exact a heavy toll in blood. According to the latest data compiled by Fides Agency, the number of missionaries and pastoral workers killed violently has risen alarmingly in recent decades, with a total of 1,362 documented victims from 1980 to the present.

A historic upward trend

The breakdown by period reveals a worrying trend in overall violence against church personnel:

  • 1980-1989: The following were recorded: 115 missionaries violent deaths, although Fides warns that the figure is «undoubtedly underestimated» as it is based only on reported cases.
  • 1990-2000: The figure shot up to 604 killed, almost six times the previous record.
  • 2001-2025: So far this century, the list amounts to 643 pastoral agents (adding to the 17 deaths in the last year), consolidating an average of persistent violence in mission areas.

The dramatic increase in the 1990s was largely due to the horror in Central Africa. In 1994 alone, the Rwandan genocide claimed the lives of at least 248 ecclesiastical victims: 3 bishops, 103 priests, 47 non-priest religious, 65 religious sisters, and 30 members of Institutes of Consecrated Life.

An X-ray of violence in 2025

During 2025, 17 missionaries (priests, religious sisters, seminarians, and laypeople) lost their lives violently. Africa and America continue to alternate as the regions of greatest risk:

  • Africa (10 killed): It is the continent hardest hit, with six priests, two seminarians, and two catechists killed. The deaths were concentrated in Nigeria (5), Burkina Faso (2), Sierra Leone (1), Kenya (1), and Sudan (1).
  • America (4 killed): The deaths of two nuns in Haiti, a priest in Mexico, and a priest of Indian origin in United States.
  • Asia (2 killed): A layman and a priest were killed in Myanmar and the Philippines, respectively.
  • Europe (1 killed): A priest lost his life in Poland.

Far from withdrawing from the peripheries, these data reflect a Church that maintains its commitment in the most dangerous areas, where pastoral work too often becomes a final testimony of dedication and martyrdom.

The Vatican

An Analysis on Pope Leo XIV’s 4 Favourite Films

Pope Leo XIV highlights four classic films that celebrate human dignity, proposing love, family sacrifice, and responsibility toward others as the definitive ways to find meaning in life.

Bryan Lawrence Gonsalves-December 30, 2025-Reading time: 5 minutes

Recently when Pope Leo XIV was asked to his four favorite films. He replied quite directly, stating that they were “It’s a Wonderful Life” (1946), “The Sound of Music” (1965), “Ordinary People” (1980), and “Life Is Beautiful” (1997).

For context this question was posed to him on November 15th, during an event organized by the Vatican’s Dicastery for Culture and Education in close collaboration with the Dicastery for Communication and the Vatican Museums.

Seen together, the four films reveal an interesting moral connection. Each is centered on human resilience and the affirmation of life in the face of profound suffering. Their protagonists are placed in moments of emotional, social or existential crisis or they are confronting despair, war, guilt, oppression, and are forced to rediscover meaning when stability and certainty have been stripped away.

Each of these films also explore how love and responsibility to others grounded in moral integrity became the formula in which life regains meaning. Thus, it promotes a resolution which celebrates the dignity of life. Instead of choosing despair or suicide, the characters in these films show how suffering can be endured and even transformed through one's family, relationship with others, via sacrifices and when based on hope.

It's a Wonderful Life

In the film, “It’s a Wonderful Life”, George Bailey, played by actor James Steward, considers ending his life as he gets ready to jump into a cold river below during Christmas. The reason? Years of personal sacrifice with nothing to show for it with his moral strength exhausted due to a world ruled by money. Through no fault of his own, Bailey faces the risk of losing his house, wealth, reputation and being seen as a failed father all because his business partner, accidentally misplaced business funds, needed to sustain their bank. An angel, named Clarence, taking the form of a human, is sent to Bailey who shows him what the world would look like if he was never born. Seeing that his parents, wife and the local community who he supported over the decades would be worse off had he never existed. He is determined to keep living.

In essence, the film is about the true strength and power of empathy in the context of social fraternity. Its core message “No man is a failure who has friends”, remains a touching line and a firm reminder of the importance of friendship and community support in times of personal or economic struggle.

The Sound of Music

When viewing “The Sound of Music”, most audiences regard it primarily as a story about family values set against the backdrop of the early stages of World War II. Yet beneath its familiar surface lies a quiet form of social and moral resistance, embodied above all in Maria, portrayed by actress Julie Andrews. She is not merely a playful, free-spirited governess who delights in song, but a woman who deliberately chooses joy as an act of defiance during the grim period of Austria’s Anschluss, as Nazi Germany absorbs the country.

The film’s musical numbers become expressions of human freedom and emotional integrity, rooted in the warmth and stability of family life, suggesting that even in times of fear and political darkness, singing together in harmony with loved ones can still sustain hope and point toward a life worth preserving.

Ordinary people

In “Ordinary People”, the quiet anguish of suburban American life becomes the setting for a profound meditation on suffering, guilt, and the human need for mercy. The film follows Conrad Jarrett played by actor Timothy Hutton, burdened by the trauma of surviving a boating accident that killed his older brother, and by the emotional coldness that follows him home.

It is ultimately a film about the necessity of truth and reconciliation. Healing begins only when suffering is named and shared and by the film's conclusion, the audience understands that in most cases, redemption is not dramatic or triumphant but fragile and real.

In the film's case, Conrad's father learns to love his son without conditions, while Conrad learns to accept his survival as a gift rather than a guilt he needs to reckon with. Reminding viewers that grace often works silently, over time and when we respond positively towards the truth.

Life is beautiful

“Life Is Beautiful” is set against the horror of the Holocaust seen through the radical lens of paternal love and self-sacrifice. Guido Orefice played by actor Roberto Benigni, is a Jewish father, who confronts an environment of systematic dehumanization not with denial, but with a deliberate act of moral imagination. He transforms their concentration camp into a “game” so that his young son might be spared terror and despair.

The film resonates deeply with the theology of redemptive suffering: Guido accepts suffering freely, not to escape evil, but to shield the innocent from its full weight. His humor, much like “Sound of Music”, is a form of resistance rooted in love.

The film’s power lies in its quiet martyrdom. Guido’s final act is not survival, but total self-gift, mirroring the Christian understanding that love is proven not only in words, but in sacrifice. The film affirms that even in the most godless circumstances, human dignity can be preserved through love, and that hope, when grounded in self-giving, can become a means of salvation for others.

Taken together, Pope Leo XIV’s choice of films forms something like a quiet moral syllabus for the modern age. None of these works deny the reality of suffering, nor do they offer escape through power, wealth, or ideology.

Instead, they insist that meaning is recovered through relationship, responsibility, and self-gift, through fidelity to others when circumstances make such fidelity costly. Whether it is George Bailey rediscovering his worth through community, Maria resisting tyranny through joy, Conrad learning that true truth and love require confronting grief, or Guido transforming horror into an act of paternal sacrifice, each film affirms that human dignity is preserved not by control but by love.

From this perspective, Pope Leo XIV's selections reflect a pastoral vision deeply attuned to a world marked by isolation, despair, and moral exhaustion. They suggest that, in an age tempted by cynicism and fragmentation, the most radical response remains the same as ever: to choose life, to bear one another's burdens, and to trust that even the most discreet acts of love can redeem a wounded world.

The authorBryan Lawrence Gonsalves

Founder of "Catholicism Coffee".

Christmas on repeat

In a world that demands more than ever advancement at all costs, progress for progress' sake, the feverish economization of time, there is something deeply necessary about stopping just to return.

December 30, 2025-Reading time: 3 minutes

Stranger Things will mark Christmas 2025 with the premiere of its latest episodes, in a highly intelligent commercial maneuver to turn the phenomenon that is already part of the «emotional map» of an entire generation. It is not difficult to imagine that, in a few years' time, many will watch it again every December, not so much for the plot as for the precise memory of that Christmas when they discovered it for the first time. Thus, the series will end up functioning almost as an anchor: it will not be revisited. Stranger Things, we will return to «that Christmas.».

Those of us born in Spain during the 1980s experienced something similar, although without an algorithm to predict it. We too carry with us a small Christmas canon that does not respond to aesthetic criteria or film buff hierarchies, but rather to pure emotional sedimentation. Our sentimental Christmas archipelago, you might call it, consists of films we have seen over and over again, almost always on the same days, which have ended up merging with the liturgical calendar of the year.

At the top of my list—personal and subjective, of course—would be A Charlie Brown Christmas (1965), which a certain pay TV channel aired every December, with that spindly tree injecting us with a good dose of gentle sadness every year and teaching us that Christmas could be melancholic without ceasing to be real.

After Mickey's Christmas Carol (1983), many people's first encounter with Dickens, with ghosts that were more laughable than frightening and whose opening, If you hear it after all this time, it will give anyone who listened to it as a child a pang of nostalgia. Soon after, the problems would arise: Gremlins (1984), which shed supposedly Christmas lights on the chaos of those slimy creatures coming out of the presents; and Home Alone in its two parts (1990–1992), authentic domestic rituals where laughter was repeated exactly the same every year, with no wear and tear except for the old VHS tape on which we watched it.

Tim Burton also snuck into that Christmas, perhaps not so much as a director as a builder of imaginary worlds, infiltrating our domestic December with his twisted fairy-tale aesthetic. Edward Scissorhands (1990), with that artificial snow and that wounded tenderness; and The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993), both gothic and festive at the same time, became part of our Christmas memories as naturally as carols or tinsel.

They entered that same ecosystem. The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992), an unlikely blend of humor, tenderness, and redemption, and El príncipe de Egipto (1998), which, while not strictly Christmas-themed, was deeply solemn, biblical, and grand, enough to fit in with those days when everything seemed to have to be important. Closing my own canon, Wallace & Gromit: A Grand Day Out (1989), a must Christmas film that crept into our imagination with very British humor and an air of quiet after-dinner conversation.

Then they would arrive Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Avatar and other monumental sagas. We enjoyed them, of course, but they no longer affect us in the same way. Those films would end up being the territory of the next generation, the one that grew up stuffed with event premieres and planned marathons. For us, the canon was already closed.

And there is no clear conclusion to any of this. There cannot be. How can you put an end to a column that has been nothing more than a frozen snapshot of days gone by? Returning to those films every Christmas does not open up any future or promise any renewal.

It is, at heart, a deliberate and self-indulgent splash in the puddle of the past. Something sterile, unproductive, repetitive. A complete waste of time. And perhaps, for that very reason, so human.

Because in a world that demands more than ever advancement at all costs, progress for progress' sake, the feverish economization of time, there is something deeply necessary about stopping just to return. Without learning anything new. Without updates cultural activities of any kind. Without growing. Solely for the almost childish pleasure of returning.

The authorJuan Cerezo

The Vatican

The Pope's ‘Robin Hood’: the work of Konrad Krajewski, Leo XIV's almsgiver

Giuseppe with new shoes or hundreds of Ukrainians waiting in Zaporizhia (Ukraine) at 5 a.m. for something to eat. Sister Renata Jurczak, or the homeless in the free clinics under the colonnade of St. Peter's. They are witnesses to the work of the Apostolic Almonry, with the Pope's ‘Robin Hood' (Cardinal Krajewski), ten missions already in Ukraine.

Francisco Otamendi-December 30, 2025-Reading time: 6 minutes

The Pope's latest aid through the Office of Papal Charities, and from the man popularly known as the Pope's Robin Hood, Cardinal Konrad Krajewski, was financial support to several countries before Christmas. And on Holy Family Sunday, three trucks loaded with humanitarian aid from the Korean company Samyang Foods, for Ukrainian families in devastated war zones, “where there is no electricity, water, or heating.”. 

The story of Giuseppe was told by Polish Cardinal Krajewski himself. On World Day of the Poor, a homeless man in Rome received a pair of new shoes from the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development (its current name). The gesture was not only a material gift, but a symbol of dignity restored for someone living on the streets.

In addition, on November 16, a lunch for around 1,300 people living in poverty, social exclusion, unemployment, migration, or homelessness, invited by Pope Leo XIV.

Pope Leo XIV welcomes guests and blesses the food at a luncheon marking the Jubilee of the Poor on November 16, 2025, in the Vatican Audience Hall. In the foreground is Cardinal Konrad Krajewski, prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development. (Photo CNS/Vatican Media).

The atmosphere was filled with fraternity and Neapolitan music, and the guests enjoyed a simple but dignified menu, including vegetable lasagna, breaded steaks with potatoes, and dessert, served by volunteers from the Vincentian Family and other collaborators in a gesture of welcome. Leo XIV emphasized in his remarks that this gesture was “much desired by his beloved predecessor, Pope Francis,” expressing a spirit of gratitude and fraternity. 

Another clinic in San Pedro, San Martino, for medical care

But the charity of the Pope and the Church is not limited to Christmas lunches or dinners. On Sunday, November 16, Pope Leo XIV inaugurated a new medical center under St. Peter's Colonnade to care for the most in need. This is the new San Martino clinic, created in collaboration with the Health and Hygiene Department of the Vatican City State.

Ten years after the opening of the Madre de la Misericordia Clinic, the center of the Office of Apostolic Charity that offers free medical care on a daily basis to those living in poverty, marginalization, or need, this new space was inaugurated. The goal? To improve service and expand the range of health services provided on a daily basis.

Two thousand healthcare services per month

Now, the two clinics together provide more than 2,000 free medical consultations each month, thanks to the work of some 120 volunteers (doctors, nurses, and technicians), according to Vatican sources.

Approximately 10,000 poor and needy people from around 139 different nationalities have been assisted by these services. In addition to general and specialized medical consultations, these centers offer free dental care, blood tests and X-rays, removable dental prostheses, glasses and hearing aids, and free medication. 

Services for homeless people

On the other hand, services are provided for homeless people. The Madre de la Misericordia clinic, along with showers and barbershops, is a point of reference for those who live on the streets around St. Peter's Square. In addition to care under the colonnade, there are mobile medical units and services that visit outlying areas of Rome to provide medical care to other vulnerable sectors. 

“The Face of Jesus”

These are places where people are welcomed and cared for, restoring dignity to those who knock on the door of the Alms Office. They are people in need, “in whom we do not see a homeless person, a poor person, but the face of Jesus,” emphasized Cardinal Krajewski, Almoner of His Holiness.

Cardinal Krajewski at the bakery where the Albertine Brothers (pictured) bake bread for the needy in Zaporizhia, eastern Ukraine, on April 8, 2025 (OSV News/courtesy of Bishop Jan Sobilo).

Hunger lines: gratitude in Ukraine

In a recent mission by the Cardinal Krajewski in Ukraine, also transporting ambulances, people expressed their gratitude by shaking hands or nodding to show the importance of aid in wartime.

Monsignor Vasyl Tuchapets, Greek Catholic bishop in Kharkiv, publicly expressed his gratitude to Pope Leo XIV and, by extension, to the Office of Papal Charities for the food packages delivered with the message “Gift from Pope Leo XIV to the people of Kharkiv.”. 

The bishop pointed out that these food boxes can sustain a person or couple for weeks, providing concrete help to families who have lost everything due to the war.

Sister Renata Jurczak: “shouting for joy”

Meanwhile, Sister Renata Jurczak, who runs a home for single mothers in Kharkiv, said that receiving calls offering financial support or supplies “made her scream with joy.” This meant resources for food, generators, and classes for children who would otherwise have no access to educational or recreational activities.

 She and other nuns expressed how important it is to feel “the Pope's closeness” through this direct aid, she said in America Magazine in January 2023.

Kharkiv, welcoming single mothers and refugees, normality for children

Sister Jurczak and three other Orionite sisters from Kharkiv are hosting 25 people in their home, mostly single mothers, but also refugees and families who lost everything in eastern Ukraine due to the Russian invasion. 

“We are very grateful to the Holy Father; it will really make a difference,” she said. Sister Jurczak added that she will use the papal money mainly for diesel supplies. “The electric generators run on diesel, and we use them constantly. The children have online classes; when there is no electricity, they have no school,” she said. They also need generators for cooking.  

The Vatican money, she adds, offers a bit of normal life to the neighborhood children, but also to the teachers who stay at home because they cannot work in their usual jobs. They teach karate, music, and English to the children, and now we will be able to pay them for their work, Sister Jurczak said.

Other countries and international aid

Although Ukraine has been one of the most visible focal points in 2025, the Office of Papal Charities has also sent aid to other regions affected by emergencies (wars, humanitarian crises, and poverty), following the Pope's calls not to abandon the most vulnerable around the world.

For example, in previous years we have sent vans, ambulances, and support to countries such as Syria, Lebanon, and various areas of Africa and Asia, a service that continues. 

Cardinal Prefect Krajewski at a press conference at the Vatican on October 9, 2025, to present «Dilexi Te» («I Have Loved You»), Pope Leo XIV's Apostolic Exhortation. (Photo CNS/Pablo Esparza).

Where do the funds come from?

The question now, in conclusion, is to ask where the funds to meet these needs come from. What is the annual budget of the Office of Papal Charities headed by Prefect Krajewski?

Unlike a state department in a country, the Office of Papal Charities does not receive a fixed budget allocation. In practice, according to Vatican sources and the official agency, its funding comes from the following sources:

– Specific donations that go to Peter's Pence with the intention of helping the poor. Peter's Pence is a traditional worldwide collection made by Catholics around the world to offer direct support to the Pope in his pastoral and charitable mission.

– Funds that the Pope decides to allocate to charity through the Óbolo or other special income.

– Extraordinary contributions in emergencies (conflicts, natural disasters, humanitarian crises).

Therefore, its capacity to provide assistance depends on the specific funds allocated by the Pope each year and on the donations received. 

2024 Report on St. Peter's Pence

According to Vatican sources, donations collected in 2024 amounted to €58 million, €6 million more than in 2023. €13.3 million was allocated to 239 social and assistance projects in 66 countries from all continents. You can find more information here.

The Vatican's annual report indicates that the Pope, through the Roman Curia, donated another €37.3 million to charitable works (€6.2 million of which came from the Óbolo), which, added to the €13.3 million allocated directly to assistance projects, amounts to a total of €50.6 million invested in charity.

The authorFrancisco Otamendi

Father S.O.S

Is Sagrario the best psychiatrist?

Spiritual health belongs to God, and mental health belongs to the doctor. Although spiritual life can promote health, replacing professionals with Jesus Christ can manifest ignorance, lack of spiritual training, or a pathological spiritual stance.

Carlos Chiclana-December 30, 2025-Reading time: 3 minutes

Sometimes people tell me that the best psychiatrist is Sagrario. To which I usually reply: yes, and also the best gynecologist and the best orthopedist. They don't find it funny, but God does, who is the best comedian.

But what could be hidden behind this reference to Jesus as a psychiatrist? Perhaps it is that people turn to psychiatrists to resolve issues that are not so much about mental health as spiritual health, to address problems in life that are not medical; or that they are asked to remove suffering that is necessary to go through as a complete human being who is developing. Science tells us that a true spiritual life—regardless of religion—facilitates better mental health through the consequences of acceptance, letting go, connection with oneself, transcendence toward nature and people, and the capacity for understanding and compassion.

Some persist in explaining to me why Jesus Christ is indeed the best psychiatrist, while I imagine Jesus Christ saying, “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's,” and that he has not come to resolve inheritance issues or other human affairs. 

God can perform miracles and heal any illness, but He usually encourages us to go to the doctor, use the means at our disposal, attend to His ordinary presence in the hands of others, and not ask for what we ourselves are responsible for resolving, healing, or attending to. It does not seem that the adolescent Jesus resolved the difficulties of Joseph's craftsmanship. 

Seeing Jesus as responsible for resolving my health issues would be like considering the guardian angel to be the best courier service because he delivered letters to Saint Gemma, or Padre Pio to be the best anti-aircraft gun because he appeared in the air to some bomber pilots and drove them away from his village. To God what belongs to God, and to the doctor what belongs to the doctor, and let everyone scratch their own backs.

Can a mentally ill person be loved by God and love God? Some people are very surprised when I tell them that there are canonized saints who had mental health problems: Saint Louis Martin, Teresita's father, spent three years in an asylum; Saint Camillus de Lellis was a compulsive gambler; St. Josemaría suffered from insomnia; Josephine Bakhita had symptoms of post-traumatic stress due to the abuse she suffered; St. Mary of Egypt had a sex addiction; and St. Oscar Romero had obsessive-compulsive disorder. In short, they were normal people like you and me, who loved God and needed a doctor.

Can a relationship with God promote mental health? There are four ways in which a personal relationship with God could facilitate mental health:

1.- You are good. God loves you just because you are. You are His favorite, loved before, and you don't have to do anything special for God to love you. He already does, even if you don't ask Him to. He invites you to the feast of Love, and if you want, you can join in and enjoy yourself. This is very powerful for your self-esteem, for the way you relate to others and develop your style of attachment, and for your self-confidence: how can you not be calm, confident, and optimistic when God himself is in love with you! You are a worthy, valid, unique, authentic person. 

2.- You have energy, and that energy is good. Human beings develop, enhance their abilities, are capable of having ideas, inventing, creating art, transforming matter. Grow, multiply, and rule the earth! You have inherited all that power from God. Take advantage of it. Don't stand still. Develop your talents. Learning all this in catechesis will encourage you not to be afraid of progress, of your own strength, of your freedom, of being aware that you can direct your own life. Of course, let your actions personalize you, authenticate you, and enhance your own identity, far from the culture of success and comparison.

3.- You have limitations, so take care of yourself. God loves you and loves your projects, but at the same time reminds you that you are not God and that it is therefore necessary to take care of yourself, to rest, to manage your expectations, to set limits, to ask yourself what is good for you, and to realize that not everything is right for you. 

4.- You need to be transformed. Like the Trinity, human beings are relational; thanks to interpersonal relationships, your identity develops further. It is no longer a question of your freedom ending where mine begins, but rather that my freedom is improved, enriched, and enhanced thanks to the encounter with yours, in daily contact with so many people. It is not only God who transforms me, but the presence of God in each of the people with whom I interact challenges me to be present and to practice loving others as myself, with the paradox that by giving myself, I possess myself more.

There are many psychiatrists, but there is only one Salvador. 

Photo Gallery

Pope Leo XIV presides over the Angelus prayer

December 26, 2025, in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican. Pope Leo XIV presided over the Angelus after Christmas.

Editorial Staff Omnes-December 29, 2025-Reading time: < 1 minute

What good are my prayers in the face of leukemia? A story from Torreciudad

Leukemia led Fernando down a path of pain, friendship, and tested faith, lived naturally and sustained by his devotion to the Virgin of Torreciudad.

December 29, 2025-Reading time: 4 minutes

No one wakes up knowing that today will change their life, or that it will be their last and they will suffer a fatal heart attack at the age of 50, without any previous heart problems, as happened to Monsignor José Antonio Álvarez Sánchez, auxiliary bishop of Madrid, a few months ago. Or that you are going to lose your legs at the age of 26 in a multiple collision while unloading a van, as happened around that time to a worker on Antonio López Street. Or that you are going to die, along with three other people, in the collapse of a building on Hileras Street, also shortly after the start of this academic year.

These are events that surprise and overwhelm you, because life is pure novelty and there is little or nothing we can do about it. Or rather, what we can do is accept and trust in God's incomprehensible will. These tragedies in Madrid, and all tragedies in general, reveal our fragility, contingency, and exposure. Although we naively live, in many cases, as if this did not concern us and our end would never come. That is, as if it did not affect us at all and we were above life.  

But death does not always take you by surprise. There are cases in which life leads you down a narrow, winding, uphill path that brings you closer to your end. It is as if God wants you to prepare yourself in greater detail and with more care for your journey to the afterlife. This is the case of another Madrid native, Fernando, a freelance painter who is no longer with us.

Fernando and the race against leukemia

Almost every Sunday, Fernando would run an “eight at eight” (8 km at 8 p.m.) through Moratalaz with his friends and then stay for the “after party,” recounting the week over sparkling water, a non-alcoholic beer, or a beer. He also frequently participated in popular races such as the San Silvestre, the half marathon, or “Madrid corre por Madrid» with that group of runner friends. Until, in 2023, leukemia knocked on his door.

The shock was much less severe for him than for the rest, as he had the opportunity to start this new journey soon, along the “path of his healing,» thanks to his optimistic attitude toward life, accompanied by the same people he saw every Sunday, as well as many other friends and family members. It was a time of great unity and hope, and he and his family were well supported and cared for.

In October 2024, the “runners» brought him a statuette of the Virgin of Torreciudad, purchased after a few days of retreat at a house near the shrine, which stood at the head of his bed throughout his stay in the hospital and to which he entrusted himself. This led him to increase his faith and his trust in God and the Virgin Mary, as he said in a testimony: “I thought I was in heaven, with the Virgin at my bedside, my friends praying for me, and my wife and children by my side giving me their love.”. 

Until the first crisis of pain arrived, and in that acute phase Fernando thought: ”There were many dark nights where the pain became unbearable, where faith was put to the test. Where is God now? Why doesn't the Virgin Mary at my bedside help me? What good are my prayers if only fentanyl and morphine bring me relief, that is, only science helps you and prayers don't?” as he later told his friends.

“However, the hospital had a secret weapon,” according to Fernando... The daily visit from the hospital chaplain with communion, which he requested, and the regular conversations with this close priest, led him to achieve great peace: “I said to myself, how lucky I am that the Lord comes to visit me in the hospital, just like my family and friends.”.

Hope alongside the Virgin of Torreciudad

His devotion to the Virgin Mary also helped him through difficult times...: “Anxiety and pessimism began to creep in... There were days when I didn't know how or didn't want to project an image of joy and peace around me. There were days when I responded badly to those around me. But at this point in my stay, when I was alone at night because my wife had gone home, I stayed with the Virgin at my bedside and took advantage of those moments to chat with her for a while. I have to confess that, at times, I would get angry with her, which would prompt me to immediately call my wife to apologize for my bad language, and everything would be fine”...

Over time, Fernando improved and was discharged from the hospital in January 2025. His family and friends were delighted and hopeful when, after a second bone marrow transplant, the results of the follow-up tests showed 0.00 traces of cancer cells. But it was only a mirage along the way. After a few months of improvement, malignant cells began to reappear, leading to a phase in which multiple tumors appeared throughout his body, which were treated with radiation. Then in July, after contracting COVID-19, his leukemia flared up and doctors lost control of the disease.

On July 31, he was admitted to the emergency room at Marañón Hospital, and after some tests, it was confirmed that there was no possible treatment to cure him, nor any medication to slow the disease. The only option left was palliative care, such as sedation, not euthanasia, which was administered in his final moments. He passed away on August 13. 

Fernando, as a freelancer and entrepreneur, shaped himself as a person. This made him strong and resilient in the face of adversity. It taught him to value what was truly important in his life: God, his family, and his friends. Ramón, a close friend of his, highlights how normally he talked about his therapies and doctor's appointments, as if they were normal everyday activities that had nothing to do with him, even when he was going through the most difficult moments, as his friend recounted: “This is very difficult to find in a dying person who knows they don't have long left.» Fernando remains present among his loved ones, his wife, family, and friends, above all because he was a model of consistency in his daily life, downplaying his illness and living very naturally, which for others would have been a tragedy. The conversation continues with him.

The authorÁlvaro Gil Ruiz

Professor and regular contributor to Vozpópuli.

Read more
Books

Is religion obsolete?

In light of Christian Smith's sociological analysis, this article questions the supposed decline of Christianity and defends its continued relevance as a personal relationship with God.

José Carlos Martín de la Hoz-December 29, 2025-Reading time: 4 minutes

Christian Smith (1960), professor of Religious Sociology at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, United States, is a specialist in the transmission of faith to new generations and the influence of Christian faith on social relations.

In this work, he will exhaustively quantify the sociology of religion to provide us with accurate data so that we can agree with or contradict his interesting conclusions (29). 

The first conclusion of this work, derived from the exposition, tables, analyses, and reference authors, would be that sociologists of religion in the United States are closer to reality than Spanish sociologists of religion who, as we have had occasion to point out on other occasions, are heavily influenced by the political ideologies of the Spanish transition and the present day.

The critical realism of this professor of Sociology at the University of Notre Dame in the United States is not perfect, nor does it coincide 100% with reality, simply because only God has a complete vision of reality, since He scrutinizes the interior of our consciences and knows our deepest thoughts and the truth of our intentions. However, his realistic view and the minimal ideology with which he approaches problems certainly make it more relevant and, above all, capable of providing guidelines for reconnecting with God on a personal and family level (41).

Christianity is not obsolete: faith as a personal relationship

Christianity is certainly not obsolete, nor will it ever be, because even though people today may be less religious or less observant, or may have a weaker doctrinal and liturgical formation than in other times, they will always have the power of obedience to be found and loved by Jesus Christ our Savior, as St. Paul said to Timothy: “God desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim 2:3-4).

On the other hand, there is and always will be an infallible bridge through which Jesus Christ connects with each of the men and women he has created and to whom he has given an immortal soul. This bridge, which can be crossed at any time, consists in the fact that we are “the image and likeness of God” (Gen 1:36). Therefore, through understanding and the heart, Jesus Christ passes through every day and invites us to a personal relationship with Him, to heaven on earth and heaven in heaven, as can be seen in our personal lives.

Christian anthropology

Now that we are celebrating the 500th anniversary of the founding of the School of Salamanca, since Francisco de Vitoria OP began teaching at the Faculty of Theology of the University of Salamanca in 1526, we must look at how the Salamanca master developed the concept of the dignity of the human person and, specifically, the fundamental concept of freedom throughout his classes, rulings, and lectures. 

What is obsolete, therefore, is a concept of man and anthropology that may have been interesting at other times in history and facilitated coexistence and the construction of social order, but must now give way to anthropological models more in line with the thinking of our time.

Precisely for Victoria, man is essentially relationship, as God is in her intimate life: three subsistent relationships: the subsistent relationship of Fatherhood, the subsistent relationship of Sonship, and the subsistent relationship of Love. Hence, man, the image and likeness of God, is also essentially relationship with God and with others. 

In fact, man matures in the most important of relationships, which is that of love. Let us not forget that “God is love” (1 John 4:8) and therefore, what we do is give love in our relationships as a fruit of the love received in our relationship with God.

Secularization, education, and the future of faith

Now let's return to Professor Christian Smith's analysis to note some of his interesting observations about the importance of promoting this anthropological concept we have just discussed. 

Indeed, our author repeatedly returns to the subject of prayer and the things that young and old alike talk about with God in their prayers. Logically, drawing on the Spanish tradition of the Golden Age of Castilian mysticism and the universal call to holiness for all Christians from the Second Vatican Council (Constitution “Lumen Gentium” n.11), he proposes a renewed Christianity based on a personal and real relationship between Christians and God. Therefore, if there is a personal relationship, Christianity is alive; if not, it is dead and quickly disappears from the horizon of life (49).

Christian Smith will certainly tell us that the intellectual and educational level of believers has risen enormously over the course of the 20th and 21st centuries. Certainly, in Western civilization, the education we can impart to Christians is much higher and deeper than in other periods of history, and in that sense, it is assumed that in the coming years the doctrinal formation imparted by priests and pastoral agents will be more attractive and profound than it is today, and that this will have an impact on the appeal of Jesus Christ: for in order to love Jesus Christ, it is necessary to know him better. (99).

The way the chapters of the book are titled is interesting: “The 1990s, the beginning of the end,” which includes the technological revolution and the internet as accelerators of the divorce between neoliberalism and Catholicism (137).  Certainly, in Europe, the process of secularization had begun earlier, and what it has really shown is that Christianity, being a personal relationship, cannot remain a set of ideas or a package of beliefs.

We will conclude with Jesus“ own question: ”When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?" (Lk 18:8). Certainly, if in liturgical and sacramental life, people will always find the beginning or nourishment for a life of knowledge and love of Jesus Christ and the communal experience of faith that will also break the strong individualism of our time.

Why religion became obsolete

Author: Christian Smith
Editorial: OUP USA
Year of publication: 2025
Pages: 440
Evangelization

Marie de Saint-Exupéry: much more than the mother of the author of ‘The Little Prince’

The years 2024 and 2025 have commemorated the French aviator and writer Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. Solid biographies and other texts highlight the figure of his mother, Marie Boyer de Fonscolombe (1875-1972), Marie de Saint-Exupéry, a resilient Christian woman who saw three of her children die, full of faith and dedication to others.

Francisco Otamendi-December 29, 2025-Reading time: 5 minutes

Olivier d'Agay, great-nephew of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, who disappeared in 1944 while piloting an Allied aircraft in World War II, said in an interview in June this year that his great-uncle would have mixed feelings. 

On the one hand, joy, upon seeing the success of his Little Prince of Asteroid B-612. But on the other, sadness, “because humanity did not advance” (‘La Crónica de hoy’). 

We do not know if the writer and pilot's mother, Marie Boyer de Fonscolombe, would be sad. But it is very true that Marie was much more than the aviator's mother, according to his biographers, who highlight her resilience and deep faith.

Strength in the face of the death of her children

Because Marie de Saint-Exupéry bore with fortitude the death of her husband Jean, who died suddenly in 1904, and of three of her five children (Francois at age 15, from rheumatic fever (1917); Marie-Madeleine, in 1926, from tuberculosis; and the poet pilot, Antoine, in 1944).

These losses had a profound impact on his life, but he survived them with persevering faith and intense dedication to others until his death in 1972. 

Ideals, culture, and faith

Marie Boyer de Fonscolombe She was born into a family of ancient French nobility deeply marked by ideals, culture, and faith, which strongly influenced her upbringing and values. She received part of her education from the Sisters of the Sacred Heart in Lyon.

The biographies by Stacy Schiff and Persane-Nastorg, cited at the end, and the family works collected by Olivier d'Agay, show that Marie raised her children—particularly Antoine—in an environment that was unusual for its time: a combination of moral rigor and great inner freedom.

A very young widow at 28, with five children to care for, she did not opt for a rigid or authoritarian upbringing. On the contrary, she encouraged imagination, artistic sensitivity, and personal reflection.

Faithfulness to the call

She instilled in her son Antoine a constant conviction: life only has meaning when it is lived as a calling, not as a comfort. This advice was not formulated as theory, but as example. Marie insisted on the importance of fidelity to one's conscience, even when it involved risk or misunderstanding. This attitude is at the root of the sense of duty that Antoine showed as a pilot and writer, and which runs through works such as ‘Wind, Sand and Stars’.

Biographies note that Marie never discouraged her son's difficult decisions—not even his dangerous vocation as a pilot—even though they caused her fear. Her constant advice was not “avoid danger,” but “be faithful to what you are called to do.”.

At this point, Schiff emphasizes that Antoine found in his mother a figure of unconditional support, capable of sustaining without possessing, and guiding without dominating.

A life of quiet, deep, and hopeful faith

One of the most striking features of Marie de Saint-Exupéry is the discretion of her faith. She was not a woman of religious discourse or spiritual prominence. However, all biographies agree that her life was sustained by a firm Christian faith, inherited from her family and assumed in a personal and mature way.

This faith was manifested above all in her hope, tested by extreme circumstances. Marie outlived her husband and three of her children, as we have seen, coping with the disappearance of Antoine in his plane in Corsica during World War II.

Instead of retreating into bitterness, his response was a persistent trust in God and in the ultimate meaning of life, even when that meaning was not visible.

The biography Marie de Saint-Exupéry, l’étoile du Petit Prince describes her spirituality as a faith marked by pain. It is not a naive religiosity, but a hard-won, silent hope, sustained by prayer and the conviction that death does not have the last word. This certainty was decisive for her inner balance and her ability to continue giving herself to others.

In the vision that transmitted For Antoine, faith does not appear as a closed system of answers, but rather as an orientation toward the light, even in the middle of the night. This attitude helps us understand The Little Prince, where hope is not imposed, but rather proposed as a quest.

Service to others in the world wars

If there is one point on which all sources clearly agree, it is that Marie lived her faith through service. Her spirituality was eminently practical.

During World War I, she trained and worked as a nurse, caring for wounded soldiers in military hospitals. It was a sustained, demanding, and physically demanding commitment.

After the war, and especially after the death of her daughter Marie-Madeleine, she intensified her dedication to others. She collaborated with aid organizations, the Red Cross, and local initiatives to help the sick and vulnerable. During World War II, now elderly, she once again became involved in caring for and supporting civilians affected by the conflict.

Biographies emphasize that this service was not an escape from personal suffering, but a conscious response to it. Marie seemed convinced that pain can only be transformed when it is shared and directed toward the good of others.

This logic had a profound effect on Antoine, who in his writings emphasizes brotherhood, responsibility, and the value of sacrifice for something that transcends us.

Below are some quotes from Marie de Saint-Exupéry, with formulations from familiar sources. 

“Faith does not consist in having no nights, but in walking toward the light.”

In a letter addressed to one of her children, Marie expressed her faith not as an easy certainty, but as a persevering quest, in terms that biographies summarize as follows: “Faith does not consist in having no nights, but in walking toward the light even when you cannot see it.” The idea is reflected in biographies.

“We have not lost those we love; they have gone before us.

In a summary very close to the original text, also from familiar sources, after the death of one of her children, Marie wrote words that express her Christian hope: “We have not lost those we love; they have gone before us.” And this hope led her to an even greater dedication to the service of others.

On God and Interiority

According to explanations from family testimonies collected by Olivier d'Agay, Marie insisted to Antoine that a relationship with God is not imposed from outside, but is discovered in the depths of one's innermost being. Every human being carries within them something that transcends them; that is where God waits, she said. Antoine would say in The Little Prince: ‘What is essential is invisible to the eye.’.

These ideas are drawn from biographies such as Marie de Saint-Exupéry, l’étoile du Petit Prince, by Michèle Persane-Nastorg, Éditions du Triomphe, Paris, 2023; the aforementioned Olivier d'Agay, Stacy Schiff's ‘Saint-Exupéry: A Biography’, which offers in-depth family context, and literary and non-literary articles in digital format (Aleteia) or in academic journals in particular.

The authorFrancisco Otamendi

Gospel

Caring for the Christ within us. Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God

Vitus Ntube comments on the readings for the Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God, corresponding to January 1, 2026.

Vitus Ntube-December 29, 2025-Reading time: 3 minutes

After singing yesterday's Te Deum In thanksgiving to God, and as we find ourselves at the end of the Octave of Christmas and at the beginning of a new calendar year, the Church presents us with the feast of Mary, Mother of God. This is no coincidence. It invites us to delve deeper into what St. Paul refers to when he speaks of “the fullness of time”: “When the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of a woman". (Galatians 4, 4)

The Church does not focus solely on Mary's physical motherhood, but above all on her spiritual disposition. We remember that woman who raised her voice and said: “Blessed be the womb that bore you and the breasts that nursed you.”She praised the conception and nursing of Jesus. Our Lord redirected her attention to the true blessedness that comes from caring for the Word of God in our lives: “Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it.”(cf. Lk 11:28). Mary is blessed not only because she conceived Christ in her body, but because she welcomed the Word of God into her heart. And yet this spiritual primacy does not diminish the beauty and truth of her physical motherhood.

On a day like this, it is worth contemplating what Mary's physical motherhood really implies. If we take Jesus“ humanity seriously, then we must take Mary's motherhood equally seriously. Jesus "He grew in wisdom, stature, and favor.” (Luke 2:52). He was breastfed by his mother. Every mother knows the special joy and tenderness that accompany the act of caring. Mary's motherhood and Christ's sonship are profoundly real. She gave him her own body and blood, as well as her time, her attention, and her sleepless nights. Caring is slow, patient, demanding work... and deeply rewarding.

Celebrating the feast of Mary, Mother of God, is celebrating the joys of motherhood. I like to imagine, in a literary way, a correspondence between Mary and her cousin Elizabeth, something similar to Memoirs of Two Young Wives by Honoré de Balzac, in which two friends, Louise and Renée, share their experiences. At one point, Renée tells her friend Louise about her experience of motherhood. She writes: “Giving birth is nothing; breastfeeding is giving birth every moment. […] Nothing can be seen or felt in conception, not even in pregnancy, but breastfeeding, my dear Louise, is a happiness that never ends. You see what milk becomes: it turns into flesh, it blossoms on the tips of those sweet little fingers, like flowers, and so delicate; it grows on the fine, transparent nails, it unfurls in the hair, it wiggles and wriggles on the feet. [...] Oh, Louise, breastfeeding is a transformation that can be seen hour after hour, dazzling to the eye! It is not with your ears but with your heart that you hear the child's cries; you understand the smile in his eyes or on his lips or in his restless little feet, as if God had written letters of fire in the air for you.".

It is not unreasonable to think that Renée's experience, so beautifully expressed, was no less so for Mary. These were some of the things that Mary kept in her heart and pondered (cf. Lk 2:19).

Mary's joys in caring for and accompanying Christ to his full stature can also be ours as we begin the new year. Here, then, is our first resolution for the year: to care for the Christ within us.

The Vatican

Families suffering in wars, close to the Pope's heart

On Holy Family Sunday, the last Sunday of 2025, the Pope prayed during the Angelus for families suffering because of war, for children, the elderly, and the most vulnerable, and also for peace. “Let us entrust ourselves together to the intercession of the Holy Family of Nazareth,” he invited.  

Editorial Staff Omnes-December 28, 2025-Reading time: 3 minutes

In the Angelus On the last Sunday of the year, the feast of the Holy Family, the Pontiff encouraged us to “in the light of the Lord's Christmas, continue to pray for peace. Today, in particular, let us pray for families suffering because of war,” and he encouraged us to entrust ourselves to “the intercession of the Holy Family of Nazareth.”.

A test for Jesus, Mary, and Joseph

At the beginning, Pope Leo XIV referred to the Gospel episode of the “flight into Egypt” and the massacre of the Holy Innocents. “Today we celebrate the Feast of the Holy Family, and the liturgy offers us the story of the “flight into Egypt” (cf. Mt 2:13-15, 19-23),” he said. 

“It is a moment of trial for Jesus, Mary, and Joseph. Over the resplendent picture of Christmas, the disturbing shadow of a mortal threat is cast, almost unexpectedly, originating in the tormented life of Herod, a cruel and bloodthirsty man, feared for his cruelty, but precisely because of this, deeply lonely and obsessed with the fear of being dethroned.”. 

Nativity scene at St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City on December 25, 2024. (Photo by OSV News/Gregory A. Shemitz).

Death of children of Jesus' age

“When he learns from the magi that the ‘king of the Jews’ has been born (cf. Mt 2:2), feeling threatened in his power, decrees the death of all children of the age of Jesus. 

In his kingdom, the Pope emphasized, “God is performing the greatest miracle in history, in which all the ancient promises of salvation are fulfilled, but he is unable to see it, blinded by the fear of losing his throne, his riches, his privileges.”.

This “hardness of heart further highlights the value of the presence and mission of the Holy Family, which, in the despotic and greedy world represented by the tyrant, is the nest and cradle of the only possible answer to salvation: that of God, who, with total generosity, gives himself to men without reserve and without pretension.”. 

“The world always has its ‘Herods’”

Unfortunately, the Pope reflected, “the world always has its ‘Herods’, its myths of success at any price, of unscrupulous power, of empty and superficial well-being, and often suffers the consequences with loneliness, despair, divisions, and conflicts.”. 

Let us not allow “these illusions“ to stifle the flame of love in Christian families,” he urged. “On the contrary, let us protect the values of the Gospel in them: prayer, frequent reception of the sacraments—especially confession and communion—healthy affections, sincere dialogue, fidelity, simple and beautiful realism in words and good deeds every day.”. 

Praise of Saint Joseph, obedient to the voice of the Lord

The Pope has also praised Saint Joseph. “The gesture of Joseph, who, obedient to the voice of the Lord, brings his wife and child to safety, is revealed here in all its redemptive significance. In fact, in Egypt, the flame of domestic love grows, to which the Lord has entrusted his presence in the world, and gains strength to bring light to the whole world.”.

Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, walks in procession on Christmas Eve in front of the Basilica of the Nativity in Bethlehem, West Bank, on December 24, 2025. (Photo by OSV News/Ammar Awad, Reuters).

“A caress from the Pope”

Alms-giving Cardinal Konrad Krajewski has recently reported on “a small caress” from Leo XIV.

This has taken the form of financial aid to various parts of the world, to support families who, like Jesus's, “are traveling the painful road of exile in search of refuge.” Three trucks carrying humanitarian aid have arrived in the areas most affected by the bombings in Ukraine. Thus, Cardinal Krajewski concludes, Leo XIV “not only prays for peace, but also wishes to be present with families who are suffering,” according to the Vatican agency.

The authorEditorial Staff Omnes

Read more
Culture

Fernando Delapuente, engineer and artist, reflected the joy of living 

The Official College of Physicians of Madrid offers a retrospective on the prolific painter who reflected the joy of life in his paintings.

Editorial Staff Omnes-December 28, 2025-Reading time: 3 minutes

Fernando Delapuente Rodríguez-Quijano (Santander, 1909 – Madrid, 1975) painted 1,246 pictures and numbered them all. He was the perfect combination of engineer and artist: meticulous and organized, yet completely free in his creativity. The Illustrious Official College of Physicians of Madrid is hosting an exhibition, organized by the Methos Foundation, which brings together 70 of these pieces in a retrospective on the pictorial evolution of “a very original guy.”. 

This is how Andrés Barbé, curator of the exhibition, explains it. Delapuente was the fourth of six siblings; he began studying law at his parents“ urging, ”but only lasted one semester.“ He enrolled in industrial engineering and, when he was in his second year, in fine arts. ”Politically uncommitted,” he lived through the war in a checa (a type of prison) and later took refuge in the Cuban embassy. ”He became a professor of drawing at the school, but what he really liked was painting," and he resigned from his professorship. He founded an engineering and architecture firm and, among other projects, designed the campus of the University of Navarra and was commissioned to design Torreciudad... But painting was always there.

The exhibition is organized into six areas that reveal the evolution of his painting. An initial, more academic phase, until he traveled to Italy in the 1950s, which completely changed his career path. In Ravenna, when he saw the sunrise reflecting on the mosaics of a basilica, he had, as he himself said, a “conversion to color and became a Fauvist [of Fauvism].” In the “do whatever you want” spirit of this type of style, Delapuente uses color, but unlike other painters, he does so with very defined lines. He moved from ochres and earth tones to focusing on Van Gogh, Matisse, “people who use color.”. 

That is why the second part is Italy, and the third, Paris, with more gray tones, because the City of Love does not have the light of Rome, and Delapuente painted what he saw. This section features one of his few paintings with people, as the artist almost completely renounced figurative art to paint cities, lands, or seas. In fact, despite having obtained brilliant grades in anatomy, when he includes a person in a scene, he does so in an almost childlike way, without hardly working on it. This “urban fauvism” is what leads the curator to define Delapuente as an “innovative man.”. 

“What mattered to him,” Barbé argues, “was the urban structure, although here he also does whatever he wants,” moving buildings around or placing together those that are distant in the real city. "Or he also paints buildings that no longer exist.". 

Love for Madrid

An example of the artist's fondness for the city is the last part of the exhibition—after the seascapes and country scenes—which is the city of Madrid. He could be called, according to the curator, the painter of Madrid. “But the idealized Madrid that he liked.” “My Madrid,” said the artist, in which there were not as many people or cars as in his later years. 

Barbé has located more than 120 paintings he did of the capital. In that Madrid he loved so much, Fernando Delapuente died at the age of 66 from a heart condition he had suffered from all his life, but which never prevented him from living a passionate, intense, and enthusiastic life.

“He was a very normal man. Very sociable. Very neat; he wasn't the typical scruffy artist. Endearing. He had supernaturalized his life; he was a member of Opus Dei and created friendly, positive, pleasant, and decorative paintings that look great. He had character. He was a man of friends; he had many. He lived life to the fullest, and this is reflected in his paintings. He was orderly, systematic, and a very hard worker.”.

A very carefully curated exhibition

This exhibition, which has been in preparation for over a year, consists entirely of loans from private individuals. Pieces have been brought in from Pamplona, Bilbao, Granada, Almeria, Valencia, and, above all, Madrid. The curator explains that Delapuente often painted the same subject. In other words, identical works (each with its own nuances), which he then sold. He has many seascapes, the curator acknowledges, and of different seas with their different colors. “At the end of his life, he became very much like Turner,” explains Barbé. This can be seen in his oil on canvas. Strong sea with seagull, from 1975, the same year he died.

Where to watch it

The exhibition is a tribute to Delapuente on the 50th anniversary of his death. It is a tribute in a clean and clear space, the exhibition hall of the College of Physicians, located in the heart of Madrid's art scene (Santa Isabel, 51). 

It will be open until January 17, 2026, Monday through Friday from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m., and Saturdays from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Admission is free.

Read more
United States

Tammy Peterson: “I never imagined the depth of the changes that would come into my life with my conversion.”

Tammy Peterson is a public figure who has influenced thousands of people, not only as the wife of renowned intellectual and psychologist Jordan Peterson, but also because of her own profound story of faith.

Javier García Herrería-December 28, 2025-Reading time: 7 minutes

Tammy Peterson's path to conversion to Catholicism emerged from the darkness of illness and despair. After being diagnosed with a rare and aggressive form of cancer, Tammy faced months of pain, surgery, and a long recovery. It was during this period of extreme fragility that, on the recommendation of a friend, she began to pray the rosary.

What began as a search for comfort turned into a spiritual encounter that culminated in his baptism and full entry into the Catholic Church. His story is a moving example of how faith can flourish even in the most difficult circumstances.

How was your relationship with your parents?

—My father was a businessman and was always very busy. He had a very open mind and instilled in me a lot of courage and strength to try things that were unknown or seemingly beyond my reach. Thanks to him, I inherited an open mindset, and I am truly grateful to the Lord for that.

My mother was also by my side, but she didn't fully trust my father. Years later, I understood why: she had probably been abused by her own father, who died very young. He was a man with depression, and it was clear that he wasn't well. I always noticed that my mother distrusted my father to some extent, and that was difficult for me growing up. My father had friends who would stay at the office after work to drink together, and my mother was always suspicious of what might happen there. Many people face problems like these, and it's not easy to integrate them into your own life. Still, my father was a great person, and I feel very fortunate to have had him.

My mother had early-onset dementia. She began to get sick at age 50 and passed away at 70. At the time, she and my dad were living in Vancouver, while I was in Toronto. I would travel to help them: I would find a caregiver, clean, organize their medications, and make sure they were both eating well. Fortunately, all four of us siblings helped out. We were all there to support my father, who cared for my mother until the end. 

At one point, the medication made my mother paranoid again. She began to suspect my father once more, and I felt the same way I did in my teens, when she also mistrusted him unfairly. In a way, it was like a blessing from God that allowed me to see clearly that this paranoia came from my mother, not my father. And I thanked him inwardly, because he showed me something important.

Finally, they changed my mother's medication and she stabilized again. The two remained together until her death. It was only a brief episode, but a significant one, because it taught me something essential and allowed me to become very close to my father during the last twenty years of his life, which ended at the age of 93, just a couple of years ago.

Now I see it as God's grace: we receive what we need to learn just when we need it. 

How would you describe your spiritual life in your youth and before rediscovering your faith?

—I grew up in a Protestant church environment. When I was little, both of my grandmothers were active members of the Protestant faith. My paternal grandmother played the piano at church. And my maternal grandmother sang in the choir. They were both great role models for me. 

When I was little, I went to Sunday school at church, but I don't remember my parents being there. I had three older brothers, who I think also went. Apart from attending Sunday services, we didn't pray at home, not even to say grace before dinner or bedtime prayers.

In the summer, we participated in activities at an Adventist church. And as a child, I also went to some camps with different types of churches, something that didn't matter to my parents at all. 

As a teenager, I was a very curious girl. We lived in a very remote place, and I used any excuse—no matter how insignificant—to skip church. When I left home and started college, I attended church during my first year. But when the next year began, the minister started with the same sermon he had given the year before, and I took that as an excuse to stop attending. 

It's funny how many excuses a person can come up with when they're really just looking for ways to avoid something.

I recall those times and all those little excuses I used without understanding why I really didn't want to go to church, or why it might be beneficial for me to do so, regardless of the time, who was there, or where the church was located. None of that was essential.

How is your life now that you have returned to the faith?

—The only truly important thing I have learned is that I go there, sit down, put my feet firmly on the ground, and thank God for being alive, for having one more day to do what He wants me to do. That is what I have learned. I understood it when I was six years old, and I have lived that way ever since.

How has my life changed? It's interesting. One day, while my husband Jordan and I were talking about the transformations I had experienced since returning to the faith, we wrote a list of virtues that had emerged in me since my conversion. We came up with a total of thirty virtues that I have received since that moment. 

(Tammy looks for a piece of paper and begins to read it.). 

I will review some of them: I am more like a little girl, more fun, less cynical, less volatile, less concerned with control and power; more patient and kind; more focused on the well-being of others; more hospitable, more obedient, more present, more beautiful, warmer; more discerning, more elegant, more serene, more resilient, more compassionate; more socially adept; a better mother; easier to negotiate with; more willing to listen and converse; more precise with my words; I think more deeply; I am more creative; easier to work with; a better leader; more attractive; more confident in my courage, more courageous with confidence, and more thoughtful.

These are many of the ways my life has been transformed since my conversion. It is truly extraordinary. I never imagined the depth of the changes that would come into my life...

You have been through cancer. How has your faith helped you get through it?

—I don't know if I could have gotten through my cancer experience without God's help. It was truly an amazing experience. I left everything in God's hands, and I learned something fundamental: we don't have to worry about the thoughts we don't want to have. Before, I let my mind wander uncontrollably, but now I understand that I can choose what to think about. If a thought is inappropriate, I simply fight to make it go away. It's a lesson that has helped me understand the superficial nature of certain thoughts and how to let them go.

Before my conversion, I grew up Protestant, but my grandmother converted from Catholicism to Protestantism. When I was a child and entered a church, I wondered where the Virgin Mary was, because she wasn't evident there, and that confused me. Later, during my conversion, I had a profound experience: a Mexican grandfather from New Zealand helped me reconnect with my Catholic faith. He prayed with me in Spanish and told me that my grandmother was with me. This made me feel that I had repaired a historical rift in our family, and it allowed me to see the Catholic faith as something that had always been present, even if I hadn't fully understood it since I was a child.

During my illness, Queenie, a good Catholic friend, taught me how to pray the Rosary. Learning and praying the Rosary gradually brought me closer to Jesus as my savior. Today, I continue to pray it every morning; it helps me stay on God's path and not my own. The beauty of the Catholic Church—the priests, the icons, the vestments—also taught me to be more humble, for beauty reminds us of God's greatness and humility, and helps us pause and focus on Him.

What other things have surprised you about Catholicism?

—Confession was a profound experience of forgiveness for me. Some time ago, I learned the techniques Al-Anon and the Twelve Steps, a program of spiritual principles and practical actions originally developed by Alcoholics Anonymous. That's how I learned to know myself better and share my mistakes, but Catholicism allowed me to go deeper, freeing me in Confession from past burdens that I couldn't forgive myself. The Eucharist, for its part, is a concrete practice that teaches us to receive God's grace, even on the most difficult days. Practicing prayer and communion prepares us to accept grace when we really need it.

Our society has become increasingly divisive and superficial, sometimes incapable of nuance. The Church, on the other hand, teaches us to be humble, attentive, and open. Prayer and listening to God's will guide us to act in a right and loving way, even amid the confusion and division we see around us. Daily practice, though simple, allows us to draw closer to God and live according to His will. Even small acts—sitting and looking out the window, breathing consciously, giving thanks for the light and life God gives us—are ways to cultivate spirituality and humility in our daily lives.

Parenting also reflects this. Observing my three-year-old granddaughter taught me the importance of guiding without imposing, of supporting and correcting without becoming oppressive. Respect and patience in relationships are extensions of the spiritual practice that the Church teaches us. This applies not only to the family, but also to society in general, especially in times of polarization and division. 

Now, I have a podcast to spread these ideas. I speak mainly to young women, helping them find their way, reconcile faith with their lives, understand the importance of family and motherhood, and navigate the modern feminist narrative with Christian awareness. I try to teach them that they can aspire to a full and meaningful life without renouncing their faith or their deepest calling.

What role did your husband play in your conversion?

—My husband has been a key influence on my faith and conversion. Through his example, dedication, and support during my most difficult years, I learned to listen, observe, and trust God in every decision and challenge. His support was instrumental during my diagnosis and treatment, and he taught me the value of practical and patient love in everyday life.

This entire experience—the cancer, the conversion, the family, the parenting, the service to others through the podcast—has taught me that living the faith is not just an act of prayer, but a daily commitment to do what is right, to guide others with love, and to seek God's grace at all times. It's about small daily steps, conscious acts, humility, and gratitude. And above all, it's about recognizing that God accompanies us every step of the way, guiding us and strengthening our lives, even in the deepest trials.

Debate

Saint Teresa, Rigoberta Bandini, and a God who is family

The familiar reality of the Trinity is revealed in the home, in everyday life, in liturgy, and at work.

Beatriz Gallástegui Baamonde-December 27, 2025-Reading time: 9 minutes

One of the most famous representations of the Trinity is Rublev's icon. Although it is not a narrative icon, but rather a contemplative one, I would like to focus on two details: God is family, he is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, represented by three figures with youthful faces who seem to be enjoying peaceful dialogue. These three figures share a table. Is there anything more familiar than sharing a table? God is family, and God is familiar.

“Three persons and one beloved / among all three there was [...] / one love three have / whose essence was said to be: / that the more one loved / the more love there was” (St. John of the Cross). God is unique, but not solitary. This is the essence of God: a family that never stops loving each other. The Trinity is a constant overflowing of love. It is because of this overflowing of Trinitarian love that God created the earth and humankind. 

Continuing with the metaphor of the table, God the family overflows with love and dwells among us and within us. “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us,” says St. John in his Gospel. Further on: “If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.”.

The place par excellence of God's family is the human heart, as the Catechism beautifully reflects. The Trinity, God's family, has made its home in our hearts, where heaven and earth meet. God overflows in my heart. The image of Rublev's icon is happening in my heart.

The indwelling of the Trinity in the heart

The indwelling of the Trinity within my heart is something so universal that not only is it beautifully expressed by Saint Augustine of Hippo or Saint Teresa when speaking of the dwellings, but it is also intuited and sung about by Rigoberta Bandini in her song “Too Many Drugs.” She states that she is always “trying to understand things that have to do with being” and concludes that “in the end, it all comes down to looking, that inside I have a royal palace, full of rooms to skate in.”. 

If we learn to look within our hearts, we find ourselves in the Home of the Trinity, in the dwelling place of the Triune King, and with His grace, we have a palace full of rooms to skate in.

And once God is in my heart, does the overflowing love cease? No. This loving union in our hearts overflows and spills out, because the Trinity continues to overflow. And this heart, yours and mine, inhabited by the Trinity, where does it manifest the overflow of its love? In the thousands of little charms that home has (to paraphrase Silvio Rodríguez and his song “A dónde van”). If God is family, he will continue to overflow and leave his mark on the familiar. 

The Lord walks among the pots and pans.

Today I came home from work as usual, with my computer bag, gym bag, and lunch box under my arm. After saying hello to my roommate, we decided to have dinner together. Yatekomo and a salad with whole wheat bread was the menu laid out on a white Ikea table, with a Chinese esparto grass placemat. We talked about our day, our plans for the future, and some deep concerns, and then we went to bed.

As I have in mind the indwelling of the Trinity, and its overflowing and expression in my reality, I am left thinking that “the Lord walks among the pots and pans.” I look at Rublev's table and then at my Ikea table and think about the charms of home. What would the Saint say now about the yacht? Does the Lord still dwell among the ready meals, the endless schedules, the infinite agendas, and the prefabricated tables? I certainly want to think so, and I will try to explain it.

After creating the world and humankind (we have agreed that He did so out of an overflow of His familial love), the Trinity gives us some keys to participating in that loving current. Genesis tells us that God placed humankind in the Garden of Eden “to work it, cultivate it, and care for it.”.

A digression: a broader view of the concept of work

I would like to make an important point here. We need to get rid of the idea of work that comes to mind, that thing I get paid for or where I am exploited, that thing my resume says I know how to do... and I encourage the reader to take a much broader view of the concept of work. Perhaps the definition of work we learned in high school physics class fits here: work is anything that exerts a force and produces a displacement or transformation.

Therefore, brushing my teeth, making the bed, raising my hand to greet someone on the street, putting on my socks, picking up my little boy, letting my grandfather lean on me, playing paddle tennis, eating, writing a poem, organizing the ideas in my head... everything is work, and we must consider it as such. End of parenthesis.

A divine conversation

God the family (r) tells us in Genesis to care for and cultivate the earth, to make it familiar, to take the world and make it our own, to turn it into a home. This is an important key. God the family (r), from Rublev's icon, is happening in my heart and asking me to do the same in my concrete, everyday reality.

We can imagine (purists abstain) God the Father chatting lovingly with the Son and the Spirit during that long after-dinner conversation, being a Father who loves surprises, saying to his Son: “Have you seen that soup Mary has made? She's worshiping me with it, it smells spectacular from here. Have you noticed Javier's crying? That's what I call crying with gusto; his tears bring me glory. And what about the disastrous report Teresa has presented? But she has made an effort... even disasters can worship me. And what about how well Victoria has dusted today? Have you seen it, Jesus? It was inspired by the Holy Spirit... what a rascal.”.

God the Father is the God of surprises, who every day gives us the world to care for and cultivate and give him a great surprise, which is to worship him. He is chatting at that table, waiting to see how, with its fruits, transformed by our work (in the broad sense, not just our profession), we worship him and fulfill his command: to care for and cultivate the Garden of Eden.

From home to home: from table to table

Another key that our family God gives us through his Son, which has a lot to do with family, is Holy Mass. “Gathered around your table” is a song we all recognize. At Holy Mass we are all gathered together, as God's family, around a table where there is room for everyone, as in the best families. 

On the table we have bread and wine. I want to pause here. If God were not a God of surprise, he would have instituted Holy Mass with wheat and grapes, fruits of his own that the earth produces (though not without our work), but he wanted to make even more evident that he is a God of surprise who wants to need our transformation, our work, to come and dwell in him. With all the risks that this entails: that the bread may be defective, that the wine may be spoiled, and so on and so forth.

God does not want my perfection, but my love, my worship with what I have, working for love and giving it to him. He will come and dwell in it, and more than that, he will become bread and wine on a table to feed me. Is there anything more familiar than feeding your family with bread and wine?

At Mass

Our family God gives us the key in Holy Mass. The family Trinity overflows from your heart into the reality you touch. And you touch reality because you have “seen everything” in Holy Mass. What can we see in Holy Mass?

1. Holy Mass takes place in a sacred space., usually in a church. There is the Trinity overflowing and we worship it through specific decorations, lighting, light entering the building, sculptures or images, layout, cleanliness... and when Holy Mass ends, we all hear the words “Go in peace,” leave here and tell others what you have seen.

In Latin it is more precise, it says “Ite Misa est”, go out into the world to tell what you have seen, to do the same, to expand the family (and family values). God tells me: my Trinitarian presence is made visible through you. And one arrives home or at work and can then think about the arrangement of things, their harmony, whether there is light, whether there is cleanliness... I have learned that the harmony of the space I inhabit leads me to worship God, to make the space familiar. You are something like King Midas, that everything you touch, everything you work for out of love, God inhabits.

2. There are specific vestments for Holy Mass., The vestments of the priest, the altar, the pulpit, specific linens that have their purpose, their care for the Trinity. There are specific colors for festivities, higher quality vestments for solemnities, there are details that make up the Home.

We are flesh, just like God, who became flesh in Christ. Flesh needs to be clothed, sheltered, it has touch, it is capable of caressing. It is therefore fitting to follow the instruction when leaving, “Ite Misa est,” go and tell what you have seen, clothe yourselves in harmony, make yourselves beautiful, welcome the destitute as I have welcomed you, caress, heal wounds, clothe those who have no clothes, sew on a button, iron a shirt, fold some sheets, lay a tablecloth, even if it is plastic, have festive rituals because a friend, a son, a brother is coming.

3. In Holy Mass there is a specific meal, bread and wine.. I have already mentioned that it is a substance processed by man and not wheat and grapes. But the food of Holy Mass is special; it is the kiss of God, the family that nourishes us. The first thing each of us receives at birth is the kiss-food of our mother. We immediately seek to suckle from the breasts of our blessed mother.

Rigoberta sings it again in that provocative (not as much as a human Virgin breastfeeding a God) and profound song: “You who held your body tightly to my head, wanting to cry, but with strength... I don't know why our breasts are so scary, without them there would be no humanity and no beauty.” There, the act of kissing and eating merge into one, just as in Communion. 

And after hearing the “Ite Misa est”? Kiss, because “all the kisses we give, all taste like You” as Siloé says. They all taste like Communion to me; that is where they originate. Show affection, and if the kiss is affection, at home that kiss is mediated by culinary culture. This culinary culture has a lot to do with domestic rituals, activities that allow us to glimpse the purpose of the family and feel its unity.

4. The times of Holy Mass are specific, There is a time for silence, a time for listening, a time for praying together, a time for walking to the table... What can this teach us? To cultivate time. Moving from time to ritual: this is expressed very well in a chapter of The Little Prince, when the Fox says to the Little Prince: “It would be better if you always came at the same time. If you come, for example, at four in the afternoon, I will begin to be happy from three o'clock. But if you come at any time, I will never know when to prepare my heart... Rituals are necessary.”.

Time can and should be tamed, cared for, cultivated, made into a home. Cosmic rhythms (day, night, seasons) harmonize with bodily rhythms (growing, eating, sleeping), and the internal time of the home is added. “Ite Misa est,” go forth, recount and tame what you have experienced, think about the importance of family time, of Sunday aperitifs where you always go, of coffee at the office at 12 noon, of celebrations, of home time, tamed, familiar, specific to each person. Only by taming time will we have it. Because the opposite of haste is not slowness, but having time.

Having time is the condition that makes care, study, imaginative daydreaming, and creation possible. While a fast-paced and saturated life weakens us, having time and room for maneuver is part of the health of good rhythms.

Home, a performance that brings love into play 

Home is a performance that brings into play love and our talents for the encounter with the Beloved. With the thousands of charms that home and family have, we arrive at the contemplation of the Home par excellence, which is the Trinity. It is our way of

participate from the Son at the table of Rublev's icon. And only those who begin here below to recognize this Beauty will recognize the Beauty of Heaven, which satisfies without satiating, where we will finally be enveloped by Trinitarian love, seated together at the table.

Love as attention

Finally, I believe there is one characteristic that must be cultivated for all of this to make sense: love as attention. Simone Weil describes this concept. He talks about love and how it requires “putting down roots” in the other person and in reality, and for this, attention is essential. Only those who are capable of paying attention are capable of a loving gaze and are able to see beyond. 

With an attentive, loving gaze, reality becomes beautiful, and we find traces of Beauty in everything, even in the midst of the greatest suffering. Loving attention makes us fly, makes us see that things are no longer “because they have to be that way,” but rather I glimpse the loving torrent of the Trinity and I want to join it. Attention to detail is no longer a kind of obsession or OCD, but is born of love and acceptance of reality.

It is this attentiveness that makes the beloved disciple the only one who recognizes the Risen Lord. St. John says: “Then the disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, ”It is the Lord!'".

Attention that appears in the Resurrection

That attention is the same as that which appears in the Resurrection: “Then the other disciple, who had reached the tomb first, also went in, and he saw and believed.” What was it that he saw and believed? What on earth must he have seen in the tomb to believe in that way?

A priest gave me an explanation: through the attentive gaze of the beloved disciple, he saw the folded shroud. We know that the Jews were very clear about the Passover ritual, with its cups and psalms at every turn. We also know that Jesus left the last cup undrunk, which he drinks on the Cross just before his death. We also know that depending on how you fold your napkin, you indicate whether you are coming back or whether you have already left the banquet.

Juan saw the folded shroud, a sign that a guest was returning to the banquet. Jesus left the Last Supper unfinished on Holy Thursday, completing it with his Resurrection. An attentive eye can see this. There is great significance and charm in folding a napkin, and we will only be able to see these beautiful charms of home by cultivating our gaze.

Attention, at its highest level, is the same as prayer; it is contemplation. Therefore, by cultivating an attentive, loving gaze, we can say with St. John of the Cross that “my soul has been employed, and all my wealth is at its service; I no longer keep livestock, nor do I have any other occupation, for my only exercise is in loving.”.

The authorBeatriz Gallástegui Baamonde

Read more
Culture

Passion for Rilke

Although no one questions the significance of Rainer Maria Rilke's work, his personality has been equally decisive in the interest his poetic universe arouses.

Carmelo Guillén-December 27, 2025-Reading time: 4 minutes

Although no one questions the significance of Rainer Maria Rilke's work, his personality has been equally decisive in the interest aroused by his poetic universe. His life experiences fed his biography and creative sensibility: his complex relationship with his mother, the influence of various women, the reinvention of his identity—from changing his name to inventing a fictional nobility—and his constant travels throughout Europe. Born in Prague, he chose German as his literary language and, on occasion, French. 

Beyond these circumstances, his writing is based on an essential conviction: “The creator must be a world unto himself, finding everything in himself and in the nature to which he has adhered.”, as he expressed in the first of his Letters to a Young Poet, where he summarizes his ideal of inner life and his ethics of art: silence, patience, and fidelity to oneself. In the third of these letters, we read: “Go inside yourself. Explore the reason that drives you to write (...) Would you die if you were denied the ability to write?”It is not about writing to be read, but to be.

A spirituality without dogma

From this premise, his poetry seeks to convert existence into spiritual substance: to transform lived experiences—love, death, loneliness—into revelation. Hence his status as a metaphysical poet, a reference point for those who dare to look inward.
Although he was not a Catholic author in the strict sense, his work retains a reinterpreted Christian imprint. As Gonzalo Torrente Ballester observed: “Rilke's thinking, although not Catholic, presupposes Catholicism. It presupposes it historically, as a cultural achievement (...). It is Christianity without Christ.”In Rilke, God is not an external presence, but a creation of the soul; an inner reality that arises from human experience and is elevated through poetic language.

To which Torrente Ballester himself adds: “Rilke's poetry, prose, and letters frequently refer to God; but God, for Rilke, is something that man creates. Reversing biblical terms, man, according to Rilke, creates God in his own image and likeness. This idea is not unique to Rilke. (...) We find it in Scheler, in Unamuno, in Antonio Machado. From such a God, Christ cannot be the Word.".

This context is key to understanding his spirituality, which inherits Christian symbols but reformulates them from within, stripping them of dogma. The divine is not an external presence, but a construction of the soul, a reality that springs from human experience and is elevated through poetic language.

Duino Elegies

One of the highlights of his work is the Duino Elegies (1923), written over more than a decade and born, according to the author himself, from a visionary experience facing the Adriatic Sea. In them, the figure of the angel acts as a central symbol: not the biblical angel, but a being of unbearable intensity, an image of the absolute, which terrifies the poetic self with its perfection. In the first elegy we read: “Every angel is terrible. / And so I hold back, stifling the cry / of a dark sob, Oh! To whom / can we / turn then? Not to angels, nor to human beings either...".

This tension between the longing for the transcendent and the impossibility of sustaining its brilliance sums up his spiritual drama: the desire for the eternal in the face of human fragility. His poetry thus inhabits that boundary between the earth and what transcends it. It offers no certainties, but suggests revelations. Instead of consolation, it proposes a radical acceptance of mystery, since “beauty is nothing more than the beginning of the terrible".

To exist in song

Another essential example is Sonnets to Orpheus (1923), composed in a few days as a tribute to a young woman who had died. The cycle celebrates the transformative power of song, embodied in Orpheus, who was able to tame death with his lyre. In Sonnet II, Rilke writes: “Singing is existence. For God, it's easy. / But when are we?”. Here, a key idea is condensed: singing—creating, describing the world—is not an aesthetic act, but an ontological one. For the god, existing comes easily; for humans, living and singing are almost heroic tasks. Poetry, understood in this way, is not decoration: it is resistance and devotion.

Added to this is what could be called a poetics of the moment: the idea that the ephemeral contains the eternal if one knows how to look. In a letter written in 1921, Rilke notes: “You have to love the ephemeral. That is where the eternal lies hidden.”This attitude toward time distances him from both nihilism and transcendent hope. For Rilke, redemption lies in living fully, in transforming every experience into consciousness, and every consciousness into words.

The panther

Perhaps no poem of his better sums up than The panther that tension between the prison of the visible and the longing for the invisible. The animal, locked behind the bars of its gaze, turns in circles, oblivious to the outside world, but with a latent strength that still vibrates: “Only sometimes does the curtain of his eyelids rise / silently. An image travels inward, / traverses the tense calm of his limbs / and, when it falls into his heart, it melts and fades away.”Like the panther, the poet lives in a cage: that of language, that of his era, that of his body. But from that space, as Rilke teaches us, he can rise—even if only for a few moments—toward eternity. 

The panther

In Le Jardin des Plaintes. Paris)

His gaze has grown weary from so much observing.

those bars before him, in an endless parade,

that nothing else could enter it anymore.

It seems to you that there are only thousands of bars

and that behind them no world exists.

Meanwhile, time and again, he moves forward, drawing

with their narrow footprints,

the movement of their nimble, gentle legs

shows a resounding dance

around a center where he remains alert

an impressive will.

Only sometimes does the curtain of her eyelids rise

silent. An image travels inward, 

run through the calm tension in your limbs

and, when it falls into your heart, it melts and vanishes. 

Read more
The Vatican

Enrique Shaw: the Vatican confirms that it is possible to be a holy businessman

On the 18th of this month, the Vatican confirmed that Pope Leo XIV approved a miracle attributed to the intercession of an Argentine layman, the now venerable Enrique Ernesto Shaw, clearing the way for his beatification.

OSV / Omnes-December 26, 2025-Reading time: 5 minutes

In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus tells his disciples that “it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.” These words have resonated for centuries as a warning and a challenge, not because salvation is impossible for the rich, but because it is demanding. On December 18, the Vatican confirmed that an Argentine layman, Enrique Shaw, met that challenge.

He announced that Pope Leo XIV had approved a miracle attributed to the intercession of the venerable Henry Ernest Shaw, thus clearing the way for his beatification.

Shaw, husband and father of nine children

Shaw, who died in 1962 at the age of 41, was neither a priest nor a religious figure. He was a husband, father of nine children, naval officer, and businessman, and died in a situation of financial solvency, or wealth. However, his life, lived with an unusual consistency between faith and action, has made him one of the next candidates for glory in Argentina.

Born in 1921 at the Ritz Hotel in Paris to an Argentine family, Shaw grew up in a privileged environment, but chose a path marked by discipline, service, and prayer. He spent most of his childhood in Argentina, but lived for a year in the United States with his father and brother after his mother died when he was four years old. It was there that Shaw received the sacrament of confirmation. 

Although his father was a non-practicing Catholic, he fulfilled a promise he made to his dying wife to raise their children in the faith.

More biographical details

Shaw remains the youngest graduate of Argentina's naval academy, having entered at the age of 14. When he retired at the age of 24, he had reached the rank of lieutenant.

Shaw returned to the United States several times, but one decisive trip was in 1945, when the Argentine Navy sent him to study meteorology. He arrived in New York on September 2, 1945, the day World War II ended, with a change of heart. 

The connection between the economy, business, and the Gospel

During the trip, Shaw spoke several times with Monsignor Reynold Hillenbrand, a priest from Chicago known for training Catholic leaders through social engagement and pastoral work.

Monsignor Hillenbrand convinced Shaw that he would never be “just another worker,” but that he could make a difference as a businessman.

Under Hillenbrand's guidance, Shaw left the Navy and entered the business world, convinced that economic life was not separate from the Gospel, but rather one of its most demanding areas. This connection attracted the attention of Pope Leo XIV, who was in Chicago. 

Leo XIV: it is possible to be both a businessman and a saint

In a message to Argentina's 31st Industrial Conference, the Pope wrote that Shaw's life shows that it is possible to be both a businessman and a saint, that economic efficiency and fidelity to the Gospel are not mutually exclusive, and that charity can penetrate even industrial and financial structures.

He studies at Harvard and runs Rigolleau.

Shaw founded the Christian Association of Business Executives of Argentina. Inspired by his education at Harvard Business School—where he studied by invitation despite not having applied for admission—he also helped found his country's Pontifical University.

At the same time, he took over the general management of his wife's family business, Cristalería Rigolleau, had nine children, led the men's section of Catholic Action in Argentina, and helped found the local Caritas office. At Rigolleau, Shaw established a pension fund and health care system for the company's 3,400 workers, providing medical care, financial support in case of illness, and loans for important life events.

More than 260 workers donated blood for him.

All this happened before Shaw died of cancer at the age of 41, after a six-year battle. Some 260 workers donated blood to help the man who knew them by name, often asked about their families, and carried a small notebook to jot down their needs.

Shortly before his death, Shaw thanked them: “I can tell you that now almost all the blood running through my veins is the blood of workers. That is why I identify more than ever with you, whom I have always loved and regarded not only as executors, but also as executives.”.

Company: community of people, human dignity

Shaw understood the business world not as a profit machine, but as a community of people. Convinced that work should serve human dignity, he promoted labor relations based on dialogue, justice, and respect, even amid the intense social and political conflicts of Argentina in the 1950s.

His convictions led him to take concrete action. Shaw promoted the concept of family wages in Argentina, a pioneering effort to ensure that wages reflected not only productivity but also the real needs of family livelihoods. For Shaw, wages could never be abstract figures; they had to enable a dignified life.

Arrested for belonging to Catholic Action

His public fidelity to the faith came at a price. In 1955, during severe religious persecution following the burning of churches and the confrontation between the state—led by President Juan Domingo Perón—and the Church, Shaw was arrested twice for his involvement in Catholic Action. He endured the opposition with serenity, never separating his personal piety from his public responsibility.

With the support of his fellow Argentine, Pope Francis, Shaw's cause advanced slowly but steadily. However, what finally opened the door was a healing that medicine could not explain.

Its cause: the inexplicable healing of a child

On June 21, 2015, a 5-year-old boy suffered a devastating brain injury after being kicked by a horse near Suipacha, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires. Doctors warned the family that his condition was so serious that surgery might not be advisable. Faced with a bleak prognosis, the parents entrusted their son to Shaw's intercession.

The boy survived and today, now a teenager, leads a normal life with no lasting effects. The Church formally recognized the healing as miraculous and published the decree on December 18, with the approval of Pope Leo XIV.

Fernán de Elizalde, administrator of the cause, told Infobae that at the critical moment, the child's father prayed: “I exchange your holiness for the health of my son.”.

Vocation of the laity

The approval marks a significant moment not only for Argentina, but for a global church increasingly focused on the vocation of the laity. Shaw's life offers a concrete answer to one of Christianity's persistent tensions: how to live with wealth, power, and responsibility without losing one's soul.

—————–

– Inés San Martín is vice president of Marketing and Communications for the Pontifical Mission Societies in the United States. She writes for OSV News from Rosario, Argentina. 

This information was originally published in OSV News, and can be found at here.

—————

The authorOSV / Omnes

Read more
The Vatican

Leo XIV: «Let us not be overcome by indifference toward those who suffer, for God is not indifferent to our miseries.»

During Christmas Mass and the "urbi et orbi" blessing, the Pope emphasizes the fascination with the Child Jesus. moves you toward devotion to others. 

Javier García Herrería-December 25, 2025-Reading time: 6 minutes

On the morning of December 25, inside St. Peter's Basilica, the Pope offered a homily placing the Christmas celebration in its most universal and human dimension, recalling that «throughout the world, Christmas is a celebration of music and song par excellence,» a time when joy is expressed as a proclamation that crosses peoples and cultures and draws us out of indifference toward our neighbors.

But that joy, he explained, is neither superficial nor evasive. It springs from God's gift itself, a gift that is not imposed, but calls and waits. «God's gift is fascinating, it seeks acceptance and moves us to surrender,» he said, emphasizing that its strength lies precisely in its vulnerability. It is a gift that «surprises us because it exposes us to rejection» and that «attracts us because it snatches us from indifference.» In that tension—between attraction and risk—the authenticity of the Christian faith is at stake.

Divine filiation

The Pope then delved deeper into one of the central ideas of his homily: divine filiation not as an abstract concept, but as a concrete capacity to live differently. «Becoming children of God is a true power,» he said, although he warned that this power is stifled when the heart is closed. That gift, he said, «remains buried as long as we remain indifferent to the cries of children and the frailty of the elderly, to the powerless silence of victims and the resigned melancholy of those who do evil without wanting to.».

Indifference, rather than visible sin, is presented as the great enemy of the Gospel.

Helping others

In this context, the Pope recalled some words of «beloved Pope Francis,» quoted expressly to re-evoke the «joy of the Gospel.» He recalled how Francis warned that «sometimes we are tempted to be Christians while keeping a prudent distance from the wounds of the Lord.» In the face of that temptation, Jesus« direct call resounded strongly: »Jesus wants us to touch human misery, to touch the suffering flesh of others." Faith, he insisted, is not lived from a place of sterility, but from contact.

This contact becomes even more urgent because, as the Pontiff reminded us, the Incarnation has changed God's language forever. «Since the Word became flesh, now flesh speaks, crying out the divine desire to meet us.» And that flesh today has concrete names and faces. «The Word has pitched his fragile tent among us,» he said, inviting us to look at the most painful realities of the present.

Seeing the fragility of others

He made direct reference to the situation in the Holy Land: «And how can we not think of the tents in Gaza, exposed for weeks to rain, wind, and cold, and those of so many other displaced persons and refugees on every continent, or the makeshift shelters of thousands of homeless people in our cities?» Fragility, he emphasized, is not an idea, but a real condition: «Fragile is the flesh of defenseless populations, tested by so many wars, ongoing or ended, leaving rubble and open wounds.».

In one of the most profound passages of his homily, the Pope linked this compassionate gaze with the birth of true peace. «When the fragility of others pierces our hearts, when the pain of others shatters our solid certainties, then peace begins.» Not a peace built on balances of power, but «the peace of God,» which «is born of a sob that is welcomed, of a cry that is heard.» It is a peace that «is born amid ruins that cry out for a new solidarity» and that is nourished by «dreams and visions that, like prophecies, reverse the course of history.».

Urbi et Orbi blessing

From the central loggia of the facade of St. Peter's Basilica, the Pope gave the blessing. urbi et orbi Christmas message focused on peace understood not as an imposed balance, but as a task that arises from personal conversion.

Before the faithful gathered in the square and the millions of people who followed the event around the world, the Pontiff clearly stated: «Sisters and brothers, this is the path to peace: responsibility.» He emphasized that real change begins when each person abandons the logic of accusation and assumes their own share of blame. If everyone, he said, «instead of accusing others, first acknowledged their own faults and asked God for forgiveness,» and if at the same time they knew how to «put themselves in the place of those who suffer» and were «in solidarity with the weakest and most oppressed,» then, he said with conviction, «the world would change.».

Jesus Christ, peace of the world

The Pope rooted this call in the heart of the Christian mystery, recalling that peace has a face and a name. «Jesus Christ is our peace,» he proclaimed, explaining that he is so «first and foremost because he frees us from sin» and because «he shows us the way to overcome conflicts, all conflicts, from interpersonal to international ones.».

He insisted that there can be no authentic peace without prior inner liberation, since «without a heart free from sin, a forgiven heart, one cannot be peaceful men and women and builders of peace.» That is why he recalled that «Jesus was born in Bethlehem and died on the cross: to free us from sin.» In this context, he strongly affirmed that «He is the Savior» and that, sustained by his grace, «each of us can and must do our part to reject hatred, violence, and confrontation, and to practice dialogue, peace, and reconciliation.».

A review of some places

On Christmas Day, the Pontiff wanted to send a message of closeness to Christian communities living in contexts of particular suffering. «I wish to send a warm and paternal greeting to all Christians living in Middle East«,« he said, recalling his recent meeting with them during his first apostolic journey. From this pastoral closeness, he raised a specific plea to the Lord, saying: "We implore Him for justice, peace, and stability for the Lebanon, Palestine, Israel, and Syria".

The blessing was also extended to the European continent, explicitly entrusted to the «Prince of Peace.» The Pope asked that Europe preserve «a spirit of community and collaboration,» that it remain «faithful to its Christian roots and history,» and that it continue to show «solidarity and hospitality to those in need.» In this context, he invited everyone to pray «in a special way for the troubled Ukrainian people, that the roar of weapons may cease,» a sober request that resonated strongly amid the silence of the square.

The Pope's prayer then embraced all the victims of armed conflicts around the world, entrusting them to «the Child of Bethlehem.» He implored «peace and comfort for the victims of all the wars being fought in the world, especially those that have been forgotten,» and for those who suffer «because of injustice, political instability, religious persecution, and terrorism.» With special attention, he remembered «in a special way our brothers and sisters in Sudan, South Sudan, Mali, Burkina Faso, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo«, putting a face to tragedies that are often silenced.

In the context of «these last days of the Jubilee of Hope,» the Pope invited us to pray «for the beloved people of Haiti«, calling for «an end to all forms of violence in the country» and for the nation to be able to move forward «on the path of peace and reconciliation.» He also turned his gaze to Latin America, asking that «the Child Jesus inspire those with political responsibilities» so that, in the face of current challenges, «space is given to dialogue for the common good and not to ideological and partisan exclusions.».

Asia also featured prominently in the blessing. The Pontiff asked the Prince of Peace to «enlighten Myanmar with the light of a future of reconciliation,» which «restores hope to younger generations» and «guides all the people of Myanmar along the paths of peace,» accompanying those who live «without a home, without security, and without confidence in tomorrow.».

He also implored that «the old friendship between Thailand and Cambodia» and that the parties involved continue to strive «for reconciliation and peace.» His prayer also extended «to the peoples of the South Asia and Oceania«, hard hit by «recent devastating natural disasters» that have severely affected entire populations.

Closing of the Jubilee Year

In the final part of his message, the Pope issued a direct warning to consciences, calling on people not to give in to one of the great evils of our time: «Let us not allow ourselves to be overcome by indifference towards those who suffer, because God is not indifferent to our miseries.».

And, recalling that «in a few days the Jubilee Year will come to an end,» he offered a word of hope that transcends the closing of the celebrations: «The Holy Doors will be closed, but Christ, our hope, remains with us always.» With an image of great spiritual power, he concluded by affirming that «He is the Door that is always open, which leads us into divine life.».

Photo Gallery

Leo XIV giving the «Urbi et orbi» blessing»

From the central balcony of St. Peter's Basilica, December 25, 2025.

Editorial Staff Omnes-December 25, 2025-Reading time: < 1 minute