Pope's teachings

The Social Dimension of the Gospel (about the trip to Cyprus and Greece)

On the verge of his 85th birthday, the Pope made a whirlwind trip, a veritable marathon, to Cyprus and Greece from December 2 to 6. There he highlighted the profoundly human, social and, one might say, Mediterranean dimension of the Christian message. 

Ramiro Pellitero-January 2, 2022-Reading time: 8 minutes

At the same time, the Pope strengthened ties with Greek Christians - in countries that are increasingly welcoming more and more Catholic citizens - and encouraged the participation of all of us to meet the challenges facing Europe. 

Patience, fraternity and welcome

In his meeting with the Catholic faithful of Cyprus (Maronite Cathedral of Our Lady of Grace, December 2, 2011), Francis expressed his joy at visiting the island, following in the footsteps of the Apostle Barnabas, son of this people. He praised the work of the Maronite Church - of Lebanese origin - and stressed mercy as a characteristic of the Christian vocation, as well as unity in the diversity of rites.

Taking his cue from the story of Barnabas, he pointed out two characteristics that the Christian community should have: patience and fraternity. 

Just as the Church in Cyprus has its arms open (welcomes, integrates and accompanies), Francis noted, this is "an important message" also for the Church in the whole of Europe, marked by the crisis of faith. "It is not good to be impulsive, it is not good to be aggressive, nostalgic or complaining, it is better to go ahead reading the signs of the times and also the signs of the crisis. It is necessary to begin again and proclaim the Gospel with patience, to take the Beatitudes in hand, especially to announce them to the new generations.".

Referring to the father of the prodigal son, always ready to forgive, the Pope added: "This is what we wish to do with God's grace in the synodal itinerary: patient prayer, patient listening of a Church docile to God and open to man." A reference also to following the example of the Orthodox tradition, as also emerged in the meeting with the Orthodox Archbishop of Athens, Hieronymus II. 

And on fraternity, in an environment where there is a great diversity of sensitivities, rites and traditions, he insisted: "We should not feel diversity as a threat against identity, nor should we be wary and worried about the respective spaces. If we fall into this temptation, fear grows, fear generates distrust, distrust leads to suspicion and, sooner or later, leads to war.". 

Therefore, it is necessary, together with "a Church that is patient, discerning, never frightened, that accompanies and integrates."also "a fraternal Church, which makes room for the other, which discusses, but remains united and grows in the discussion.".

The same ideas of patience and acceptance were also underlined the same day with the civil authorities. He evoked the image of the pearl that the oyster makes, when, with patience and in the dark, it weaves new substances together with the agent that has wounded it.on the return flight he would speak of forgiveness - in addition to praying and working together, and of the task of theologians - as ways to advance ecumenism.

A comforting and concrete, generous and joyful announcement

The following day Francis held a meeting with the Orthodox bishops (cf. Meeting with the Holy Synod in their cathedral in Nicosia, December 3, 2011), which offered a contribution of light and encouragement for ecumenism. Following the name of Barnabas, which means "son of consolation" or "son of exhortation", the Pope pointed out that the proclamation of the faith cannot be generic, but must really reach people, their experiences and concerns, and for this it is necessary to listen and know their needs, as is common in the synodality that the Orthodox Churches live.

On the same day (3-XII-2021) he celebrated Mass at the GSP stadium in Nicosia. In his homily, the Pope exhorted the faithful to encounter, seek and follow Jesus. In order to make possible the "carrying wounds together" like the two blind men in the Gospel (cf. Mt 9:27). 

Instead of shutting ourselves up in darkness and melancholy, in the blindness of our hearts because of sin, we must cry out to Jesus who passes through our lives. And we must do so, in fact, by sharing our wounds and facing the journey together, coming out of individualism and self-sufficiency, as true brothers and sisters, children of the one heavenly Father. "Healing comes when we carry wounds together, when we face problems together, when we listen and talk to each other. And this is the grace of living in community, of understanding the value of being together, of being community.". In this way we too will be able to proclaim the Gospel with joy (cf. Mt 9:30-31). "the joy of the Gospel frees us from the risk of an intimate, distant and complaining faith, and introduces us to the dynamism of witness".

Francis still had time that day for an ecumenical prayer with the migrants (in the parish of the Holy Cross, Nicosia, December 3, 2011), telling them with St. Paul: "You are no longer strangers and aliens, but fellow citizens with the saints and family of God." (Eph 2:19). Responding to the concerns that had been brought to him, he encouraged them to preserve and cultivate their roots. At the same time, they should confidently open themselves to God in order to overcome the temptations of hatred - their own or a group's interests or prejudices - with the strength of Christian fraternity. In this way, it is possible to make dreams come true, to be the leaven of a society where human dignity is respected and where people walk, free and together, towards God.

Involving everyone in Europe's challenges

On Saturday, December 4, Francis arrived in Athens, capital of Greece, cradle of democracy and memory of Europe. At the presidential palace, he openly acknowledged: "Without Athens and without Greece, Europe and the world would not be what they are: they would be less wise and less happy." "This way." -he added-"have passed the Gospel roads that have linked East and West, the Holy Places and Europe, Jerusalem and Rome.". "Those Gospels which, in order to bring to the world the good news of God the lover of mankind, were written in Greek, the immortal language used by the Word -the Logos- to express itself, the language of human wisdom turned into the voice of divine Wisdom".In his meeting with the Orthodox Archbishop of Athens (4-XII-2021), Hieronymus II, the Pope evoked the great contribution of Greek culture to Christianity at the time of the Fathers and the first ecumenical councils. 

Christianity owes much to the Greeks, as well as democracy, which has given rise to the European Union. However," the Pope noted with concern at the presidential palace, "in our days we are facing a regression of democracy, not only on the European continent. 

He invited to overcome the "democratic skepticism"The result, among other factors, of authoritarianism and populism, consumerism, fatigue and ideological colonization. He insisted on the need for the participation of all, not only to achieve common objectives, but also because it responds to who we are: "social beings, unrepeatable and at the same time interdependent".

Quoting De Gasperi - one of the builders of Europe - he called for the pursuit of social justice on various fronts (climate change, pandemics, common market, extreme poverty), in the midst of what seems a turbulent sea and "a long and unfeasible odyssey".in clear reference to Homer's story. 

He evoked the Iliadwhen Achilles says: "He is as hateful to me as the gates of Hades who thinks one thing and manifests another." (IliadIX, 312-313). He continued in the key of Greek culture and, under the symbol of solidarity of the olive tree, exhorted to take care of migrants and refugees in Europe. 

With reference to the sick, the unborn and the elderly, Francis took the words of Hippocrates' oath, in which he commits himself to "regulate the tenor of life for the good of the sick", "abstain from all harm and offense". to others, and to safeguard life at all times, particularly in the womb. He pointed out, in a clear allusion to euthanasia, that the elderly are the sign of the wisdom of a people: "Indeed, life is a right; death is not; it is welcomed, not supplied.".

Also under the symbol of the olive tree, he expressed his gratitude for the public recognition of the Catholic community and called for a strengthening of fraternal ties among Christians. 

Encounter between Christianity and Greek culture

In order to strengthen the bonds between Christianity and Greek culture, and in the light of St. Paul's preaching in the Areopagus of Athens (cf. Acts 17:16-34), the Pope pointed out some fundamental attitudes that should shine forth in the Catholic faithful: trust, humility and welcome (cf. Meeting with bishops, priests, men and women religious, seminarians and catechists, Cathedral of St. Dionysius, Athens, December 4, 2011). 

Far from becoming discouraged and lamenting fatigue or difficulties, we must imitate the faith and courage of St. Paul. "The Apostle Paul, whose name refers to littleness, lived in confidence because he took to heart these words of the Gospel, to the point of teaching them to the brethren in Corinth (cf. 1 Cor 1:25,27).

The apostle did not say to them, 'you are getting everything wrong' or 'now I am teaching you the truth,' but began by embracing their religious spirit." (cf. Acts 17:22-23). Because he knew that God works in the heart of man, Paul "He welcomed the desire for God hidden in the hearts of these people and kindly wanted to transmit to them the wonder of faith. His style was not imposing, but propositional.".

On this point, Francis recalled that Benedict XVI advised paying attention to agnostics or atheists, especially since. "When we speak of a new evangelization, these people are perhaps frightened. They do not want to see themselves as an object of mission, nor do they want to give up their freedom of thought and will." (Address to the Roman Curia, December 21, 2009). 

Hence the importance of welcome and hospitality from an open heart to being able to dream and work together, Catholics and Orthodox, other believers, also agnostic brothers and sisters, all of us, in order to cultivate the "mystique" of the fraternity (cf. Evangelii gaudium, 87).

On Sunday, December 5, the Pope visited the refugees in the reception and identification center of Mytilene. He asked the international community and everyone to overcome individualistic selfishness and to stop building walls and barriers. He quoted the words of Elie Wiesel, who survived the Nazi concentration camps: "When human lives are in danger, when human dignity is at stake, national boundaries become irrelevant." (Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, December 10, 1986). 

With an expression that has become famous, the Pope added, referring to the Mediterranean Sea:"Let us not allow the mare nostrum to become a desolate mare mortuum, nor let this meeting place become a scene of conflict! Let us not allow this 'sea of memories' to become the 'sea of oblivion'. Brothers and sisters, I implore you: let us stop this shipwreck of civilization!"

Conversion, hope, courage

In the homily of that Sunday (cf. Megaron Concert Hall(Athens, 5-XII-2021), Francis took his cue from the preaching of St. John the Baptist in the desert to appeal to conversion, a radical attitude that God asks of all of us: "To become is to think beyond, that is, to go beyond the usual way of thinking, beyond the mental schemes to which we are accustomed. I think of the schemes that reduce everything to our self, to our claim to self-sufficiency. Or in those schemes closed by the rigidity and fear that paralyze, by the temptation of 'it has always been done this way, why change? To convert, then, means not to listen to those who corrode hope, to those who repeat that nothing will ever change in life - the usual pessimists; it is to refuse to believe that we are destined to sink in the quicksand of mediocrity; it is not to surrender to the inner ghosts that appear especially in moments of trial to discourage us and tell us that we cannot, that everything is wrong and that being saints is not for us".

For this reason, he added, together with charity and faith, it is necessary to ask for the grace of hope. "For hope revives faith and rekindles charity.". This message was also present, in a different language, on the last day of his meeting with the young Athenians. 

In a speech full of allusions to Greek culture (the oracle of Delphi, the journey of Ulysses, the song of Orpheus, the adventure of Telemachus), Francis spoke to them of beauty and wonder, service and fraternity, courage and sportsmanship (cf. Meeting with young people at St. Dionysius School, Athens, December 6, 2011). 

Amazement," he explained, "is both the beginning of philosophy and a good attitude to open oneself to faith. Amazement before the love of God and his forgiveness (God always forgives). The adventure of serving with real and not only virtual encounters. In this way we discover and live as "beloved children of God" and discover Christ who comes to meet us in others.

When he said goodbye to them, he proposed "the courage to go forward, the courage to risk, the courage not to stay on the couch. The courage to risk, to go out to meet others, never in isolation, always with others. And with this courage, each of you will find yourselves, you will find others and you will find the meaning of life. I wish you this, with the help of God, who loves you all. God loves you, be courageous, go forward!! Brostà, óli masí! [Forward, all together!".

Read more
The Vatican

Beginning of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity

Before the beginning of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, January 18-25, the Holy See has presented some suggestions for implementing the ecumenical dimension of the synodal process in the local churches.

David Fernández Alonso-January 1, 2022-Reading time: 2 minutes

On Tuesday, January 18, the Octave for Christian Unity, technically known as the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity 2022, begins in the northern hemisphere and will conclude on Tuesday, January 25. On this occasion, Cardinal Mario Grech and Cardinal Kurt Koch invite all Christians to pray for unity and to continue walking together.

In a joint letter sent on October 28, 2021, to all bishops responsible for ecumenism, Cardinal Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, and Cardinal Grech, secretary general of the Synod of Bishops, presented some suggestions for implementing the ecumenical dimension of the synodal process in the local churches. "In fact, both synodality and ecumenism are processes that invite us to walk together," the two cardinals wrote.

Synod in an ecumenical spirit

The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity 2022, prepared by the Near East Council of Churches, under the motto "We have seen his star appear in the east and have come to pay him homage" (Mt 2:2), offers a good opportunity to pray with all Christians for the Synod to take place in an ecumenical spirit.

Reflecting on the subject, the two cardinals affirm: "Like the Magi, Christians also walk together (synodos) guided by the same heavenly light and facing the same darkness of the world. They too are called to worship Jesus together and to open their treasures. Mindful of our need to be accompanied by our brothers and sisters in Christ and of their many gifts, we ask you to walk with us during these two years and we earnestly pray that Christ will lead us closer to Him and that we will thus draw closer to one another."

For this reason, the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops and the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity offer this prayer, inspired by the theme of the Week 2022, which could be added to the other proposed intentions, and which can help to join the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity:

Heavenly Father,
as the Magi went to Bethlehem guided by the star,
may your heavenly light also guide the Catholic Church during this synodal period, so that she may walk together with all Christians.
Like the Magi they were united in their worship of Christ,
bring us closer to your Son, so that we may be closer to one another,
let us be a sign of the unity you desire for your Church and for all creation. We ask this through Christ our Lord.
Amen.

Read more
The Vatican

The three paths to lasting peace

While the number of deaths caused by wars and conflicts continues to rise and military spending in the world is increasing at an exorbitant rate, Pope Francis reminds us in his Message for the World Day of Peace (January 1, 2022) that only through dialogue, education and work can we hope for lasting peace.

Giovanni Tridente-January 1, 2022-Reading time: 3 minutes

The figures are dramatic: according to the latest available data, in June 2021 there are more than 4.5 million official deaths due to wars and conflicts of all kinds in various parts of the world. It is enough to listen again to Pope Francis' Urbi et Orbi on Christmas Day to have an estimate of the global situation in all regions of the planet. 40 million people are food insecure, according to Save the Children estimates. Of these, 5.7 million are children under the age of five who are on the brink of hunger, an increase of 50% over 2019.

To this must be added the impact of the climate crisis: floods, droughts, hurricanes, forest fires... not to mention the numerous problems caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, to the detriment above all of the most vulnerable, who have seen their problems multiply. At the same time, military spending is increasing dramatically, reaching $2 trillion worldwide.

In this context, the Church is celebrating the 55th World Day of Peace on January 1, 2022, which looks at the global situation of the planet not only in terms of armed conflicts, but also in terms of the concrete resolution of the many threats to the future of humanity.

It is not by chance that, in his message written for the occasion, Pope Francis proposes in an unusual way three alternative instruments "to build a lasting peace". And when we speak of peace we also mean rebirth from the rubble and hope for a better future for all those who suffer all kinds of violence and abuse. The "three paths" proposed by the Pontiff refer to: dialogue between generations as the basis for the construction of shared projects; education for freedom, responsibility and development; work, as the full expression of human dignity.

In the Pope's intentions, these are aspects that are at the basis of a true "social pact", which must be designed through a disinterested "craftsmanship" - as he had already indicated in previous messages - that must involve each individual and, therefore, the whole collectivity.

Why is "dialogue between generations" important for peace? Because it is through free and respectful confrontation that mutual trust is generated - Francis reflects - we listen to each other, we come to an agreement and we walk together. The different generations, which have often been divided by economic and technological development, must once again become allies, and this is possible through dialogue "between the custodians of memory - the elders - and those who carry history forward - the young".

To build together a path to peace, we cannot ignore education, precisely to make citizens more aware of their freedom and responsibility. In this regard, we must reverse the course that allocates an exorbitant investment to military spending while depriving education of significant slices of funding. Indeed, investment in education contributes to resolving the many fractures in society if this approach is truly part of a "global pact" that expands the many cultural riches and involves families, communities, schools, universities and all institutions.

Finally, work, "an indispensable factor in building and preserving peace", precisely because it is an expression of "commitment, effort, collaboration with others", "the place where we learn to make our contribution to a more livable and beautiful world". However, there are many injustices in this world, denounced by the Pope: precariousness, the lack of prospects for young people, the lack of legislative recognition of migrant workers, the absence in many cases of welfare systems and social protection. In this sense, therefore, the Pontiff's invitation is to "unite ideas and efforts to create the conditions and invent solutions, so that every human being of working age has the possibility, through his work, to contribute to the life of the family and of society".

Read more
Resources

On the road to Emmaus: getting to know the Bible in depth

Knowing the Bible is an essential element in the deepening of the Christian life. It is a matter of seeing in what way God has made himself known, that is to say, how God wants us to understand these "dark pages"..

José Ángel Domínguez-January 1, 2022-Reading time: 4 minutes

Knowing the Bible in depth involves getting into the scenes.

One foot in front of the other on the gray stone of the streets of Jerusalem. Thus began Cleophas and his friend the way 160 stadia (30 km) that would take them back to their village. It was very early, the first day of the week and the walk would last until sunset, but mostly it was made costly by the weight on the heart. In silence they crossed the streets and left behind the City of David and Herod's Palace. The friend of Cleopas was desolate and in his head the emotions of the last few days over the crucifixion of the master, and the broken illusions of the last three years. Above all: the fear of never seeing Jesus again. They were returning to their village, to the bland comfort of their home, but without Him.

The road left the Holy City and descended westward through the hills of Judea, under a sun that did not quite shine as it usually does in the Holy Land. They had been going for a few hours now and were asking each other what kind of life they would lead now that Jesus was dead and buried. Without realizing it, they have caught up with another traveler on the same road. Neither Cleophas nor his friend is in a sociable mood, but the Wayfarer exudes an air of elegance and simplicity, as if familiar. And there is something in his voice that tugs at their heartstrings.

They talk about the subject that hurts them the most: the Messiah and the frustration of having lost him. The Wayfarer then speaks to them from the Scriptures. But not like the scribes and Pharisees, but as one who has authority, as someone who is telling you his story. Cleopas and his friend listen to the story that the Wayfarer tells them as one who listens to his own life, and their hearts begin to burn... Then, when evening comes, arriving at their village, Emmaus, in the breaking of the bread, they recognize Jesus, and they recognize themselves, as disciples of the risen Messiah. They run, they almost fly, back to the Cenacle, because the emotion does not fit in their chest, and they need to tell it to the four winds.

The scene of the disciples of Emmaus is repeated in the life of every person. On many occasions we are faced with the prospect of a monotonous life, without great prospects. It is then that the encounter with Jesus takes us out of the gray scenario. In the Scriptures, or in the Holy Land (the Fifth Gospel), Jesus is the one who encounters us.

To live the Scriptures as one of the characters was always one of the counsels of St. Josemaría Escrivá, founder of the Opus Dei. The problem is that, for many, the pages of the Bible are presented as something distant, obscure or irrelevant. This can be especially true of the Old Testament, where we find some of the most difficult passages to understand. But also the New Testament presents us with a "disturbing question" when narrating the violent death of the Son of God.

Before its release in 2003, Mel Gibson's film "The Passion" had already raised a whirlwind of criticism. Leaving aside the more ideological and media aspects of the discussion, the main accusations against the feature film about the last earthly hours of Christ centered on its excessive violence. IMDB placed it among the films recommended for those over 18 (with a 10/10 "Violence & Gore" rating) and the MPAA assigned it an "R" rating, i.e., "restricted audience" for the same reason.

This "disturbing question" we were talking about ran through the media and public debate. Beyond the film itself, there arose, as so often before, the question of violence in religion (Sacks, 2015).

Other historical circumstances converged to make the question sound pressing. For example, the terrorist attacks of 9/11 served in some forums as an incentive to criticize the "strong" or "dogmatic" values of monotheistic religions (Rorty-Vattimo, 2005).

As Girard comments, in this case terrorism has hijacked religious codes for its own end. But the question remains: does religion demand violence? The message of salvation that Christ made present cannot be separated from the Cross, God the Father "did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all" (Rom 8:2). As can be seen, this affirmation continues to be a cause of scandal for many today: is not the Christian God an Almighty God? Is he not the God of all mercy (Ps 59:18)? Why then so much violence? Violence is a category that runs through the New Testament and, with greater intensity, through the Old Testament. The question that Christians hear today could be posed as follows: Is the God of the Bible violent?

This is a topic that current Christian theology has confronted from very diverse perspectives, which coincide in facing the presence in Sacred Scripture of what Benedict XVI, in his Apostolic Exhortation "Verbum Domini", called "dark pages of the Bible". Relatively often the Bible "narrates facts and customs such as, for example, fraudulent schemes, acts of violence, extermination of populations, without explicitly denouncing their immorality". What should be the reaction of today's Christian when encountering such passages?

Indeed, we Christians should "always be ready to give an answer to anyone who asks us for a reason for our hope" (cf. 1Pt. 3:15), which leads us to take this "disturbing question" as an incentive to deepen our knowledge of God. But our knowledge "needs to be enlightened by God's revelation" (Catechism of the Church, 38). It is therefore a matter of seeing in what way God has made himself known, that is, how God wants us to understand these "disturbing questions" (Catechism of the Church, 38). dark pages.

It is for this reason that the study of the Bible is presented to us as an essential element in the deepening of Christian life. At the same time, the Christian roots of Europe, and of a large part of today's culture, call for a systematic, scientific and profound knowledge of the Bible, which is the most important element for the deepening of Christian life. best-seller of History, the first work to be reproduced and printed, both in time and quantity.

The authorJosé Ángel Domínguez

Read more
Newsroom

The 10 news items that have marked this 2021 in Omnes

Omnes was born, as the multiplatform media it is today, in January 2021. One year later, it has become a benchmark for information and analysis on the Church and current affairs.

Maria José Atienza-December 31, 2021-Reading time: < 1 minute

2021 has been full of interesting news and opinion pieces in Omnes.

Here is a selection of the key information published on our website over the last twelve months:

Analysis of the Motu Proprio Traditionis Custodes and the Explanatory letter to all bishopsby Juan José Silvestre

Studying Theology changes your life

Montse Gas's article on Family and Religion

Interview with Jaime Mayor Oreja on the occasion of his participation in the 10th St. Josemaría Symposium

Revisionism or forgiveness? The current view on the evangelization of America

What is the meaning of the four times "The Lord be with you" in the Mass?

The interview with Carlos Metola, postulator of the cause for the beatification of Carmen Hernández, co-founder of the Neocatechumenal Way.

Interview with Jacques Philippe, one of the best-known spiritual authors of our time

Antonio Moreno's endearing letter

Benedict XVI and Hans Küng. The difficult friendship

Initiatives

A million minutes a day with Jesus

The initiative 10 minutes with Jesus has reached 100,000 subscribers on its YouTube channel. Every day, more than 200,000 people directly receive these short meditations, which are already available in 5 languages.

Maria José Atienza-December 30, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

10 minutes, 100,000 subscribers on YoutubeIn total, 1 million minutes of prayer from hundreds of thousands of people around the world. What was born almost by chance from the hand of several young priests in August 2018, has reached, in just over three years to all countries of the world, in 5 languages.

Every day more than 200,000 people receive the meditation or listen to it through the various platforms on which it is broadcast. 10 minutes with Jesus is present. At present, meditations are conducted in Spanish, English, Portuguese, French and German.

Its promoters have grown and there are now 60 priests who, each day, comment on a passage from the Gospel using current examples to highlight a central idea of Christian life. In the 10 minutes with Jesus the Gospel is proposed in a fresh, simple and attractive way.

Its promoters point to three key points in the expansion of this prayer initiative:

A need not covered until then, which was to make prayer anywhere and facilitating its realization through platforms known and used by all kinds of people.

A way of communicating that places at the center of the message the person of Jesus Christ and his Gospel without burdening, with a profound language, but without technicalities and from the hand of a priest who himself is praying while speaking to the "you" who listens to the 10 minutes.

In fact, what started to spread through Whatsapphas reached a diffusion and growth so large that a structure had to be designed to sustain the growth. Today, meditations are sent through 340 Whatsapp groups (more than 80,000 unique devices) and YouTube views are close to 18 million.  

Pope calls for "creative courage" from families

December 30, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

The family is a key element, situated at the nucleus of the originator of healthy persons and societies, and at the heart of a living Church. Hence, social tensions and crises of all kinds always end up manifesting themselves in the family, or, conversely, the processes that test the stability of society begin in the family.

This is very clearly the case today in relation to the family as such, devalued and subjected to pressures that distort it, as well as for each family in particular. 

Pope Francis follows the course of families with attention and interest and, in the context of the year dedicated to the family "Amoris laetitia", he has published (precisely on the Solemnity of the Holy Family, December 26) a letter addressed to all the families of the world. It is offered as a "Christmas gift for you, the spouses: an encouragement, a sign of closeness and also an opportunity to meditate.".

The text is characterized, among other features that could be mentioned, by its closeness to the royal families, which is a demonstration of a continuous and not sporadic attention or due to a particular conjunctural situation. One of the expressions of this closeness is the language used, which is easily understandable, and the choice of a length that is accessible to all recipients.

Together with them goes the practical sense with which he shows a good knowledge of the situations and challenges of families; with them he reviews aspects of everyday life and suggests keys, sometimes small but effective, to articulate the gift of one to another in the context of daily family life. On this basis, he reviews the difficulties and opportunities opened up by the pandemic, the work and economic problems, especially of many young families, the challenges involved in courtship, the role of mature marriages, and the contribution of grandparents.

A second feature is the emphasis on stressing that Christian spouses are not alone: God always accompanies them, both at advantageous crossroads and in times of difficulty. This is a conviction that results from Christian faith. From it we know "that God is in us, with us and among us: in the family, in the neighborhood, in the place of work or study, in the city we live in.".

Marriage itself, a great and not always easy journey, is linked, as a true vocation that makes spouses one with each other and with Jesus, to the certainty that "God accompanies you, he loves you unconditionally - you are not alone!"

On this basis, families will be able to make a valuable contribution to society and to the Church. The Pope encourages them, therefore, to act with "creative courage" both in the Church and in their communities, as well as in determining the general direction of mankind, where they have a "creative courage". "the mission to transform society through its presence in the world of work and to ensure that the needs of families are taken into account.".

It is therefore desirable that this letter reaches many families who will use it, in effect, as an opportunity for meditation.

The authorOmnes

Sunday Readings

"That Child has done all 'what has been done'". Second Sunday of Christmas

Andrea Mardegan comments on the readings for the Second Sunday of Christmas and Luis Herrera offers a short video homily. 

Andrea Mardegan-December 30, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

We have in our eyes the Child born in Bethlehem, who is in the arms of his Mother and St. Joseph. We continue to meditate on this mystery hidden for centuries in the heart of God. Wisdom says of herself: "He who created me made me pitch my tent and said to me, 'Set your dwelling place in Jacob and take Israel as your inheritance. Before the ages, in the beginning, He created me; forever and ever I shall not cease to exist. In the holy Tabernacle, in His presence I worshiped Him, and so I settled in Zion.".

Today, contemplating that child lying in the manger, nourished at his mother's breast, cradled by the paternal arms of Joseph, we know that it is the Wisdom of God, his Word that became flesh, like us, with all the frailties of the creature, dwelt with us, to allow us to become, with him, sons in the Son. 

Today with Paul we believe that, with the ineffable event of the Incarnation, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, in Him "he has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in heaven.". Moreover, that "in Him He chose us before the creation of the world that we should be holy and blameless in His presence for love.".

And the Father's blessing consists in the immensity of his love which is manifested in the birth among us of the Son. And that we too should be his adopted children is "the loving design of his will, to the praise and glory of his grace, whereby he hath made us well-pleasing in the Beloved."

The prologue of the letter to the Ephesians presents us with an attempt to express in great and beautiful words the ineffable mystery of God's infinite love for us. Aware that his words are not enough, Paul prays "to the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory." to grant us "a spirit of wisdom and revelation for a thorough knowledge of him; enlightening the eyes of your hearts that you may know what is the hope to which he calls you, what are the riches of glory left in his inheritance to the saints." 

To achieve this, we return to meditate on John's prologue, which reminds us that this Child is the Word of the Father and that He is the Word of the Father. "was next to God" y "was God". That Child who suckles the mother's milk has done everything "what has been done". He is life and light. He did not make us children through flesh and blood, but through his flesh and blood shed for us. He dwelt among us, we saw his glory, he filled us with every grace that overflowed from him, he revealed to us the truth and the true face of the Father.

That is why they nailed him to the cross, as a blasphemer, those who could not bear the revelation of this merciful and meek face of God who healed the wounds and weaknesses of our flesh and blood with his flesh and blood.

The homily on the readings of Christmas Sunday II

The priest Luis Herrera Campo offers its nanomiliaa small one-minute reflection for these readings.

Vocations

"At 14, I ran away from God. At 21, he found me again."

Although he turned away from God in his adolescence, the example of his parents and several of his friends led him to rethink his life and enter the Seminary.

Sponsored space-December 30, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

Fr. Cezar Luis Morbach is a priest of the Diocese of Novo Hamburgo, Brazil. He is studying for a doctorate in Systematic Theology at the Pontifical University of Santa Croce in Rome, thanks to a scholarship from CARF. At the age of 14 he began a life far from God, but the Lord found him again at the age of 21.

Cezar Luis Morbach is the fourth of five children. His family, very religious, worked in the fields and he helped them in the various agricultural activities. "I received from my parents the example of honesty, simplicity, but, above all, faith and love for God. My parents have always helped people in need".  

The example of his parents, along with the testimony of friends who entered the Minor Seminary of the Diocese of Santo Angelo, awakened in him the desire to have a seminary experience.

However, he postponed this decision and in 1999, at the age of 14, he left his parents' home to live with his sister and family in search of a better life.

"After 8 years of work and after having started university courses in mathematics, after a period of "escape" from God, He met me again, through a childhood friend, on the eve of his priestly ordination," he recounts.

He gave up his job, his university course, his plans to have a family, a girlfriend, friends... "I left everything to join the Propaedeutic Seminary, in the city of Novo Hamburgo". He was ordained on December 20, 2013.

"Ongoing formation is always urgent and necessary for the clergy and for the lay faithful. Although it is a necessity, not everyone seeks it, not even among the clergy. Therefore, once I have completed my doctoral course at Holy Cross, I will assist in the academic formation of the seminarians of the Diocese, the clergy, as well as in the pastoral and academic formation of the lay faithful, according to the new Pastoral Plan of the Diocese," he explains.

Read more
Integral ecology

"It is worthwhile to alleviate the suffering of the terminally ill."

Students of the Psychology Degree at Villanova University participate in an initiative together with the Hospital de Cuidados Laguna to help and accompany terminally ill patients in the last stage of their lives and thus complete their academic training. Professor Alonso García de la Puente and university student Rocío Cárdenas spoke to Omnes.

Rafael Miner-December 29, 2021-Reading time: 6 minutes

It is Christmas time, a time to share moments with family and friends, even if they are virtual, but many cannot fully enjoy it. The Psychology Degree of the Villanueva University has launched an initiative in which several students and their teacher visit terminally ill patients.


The project is integrated into the Service Learning Program (ApS), which combines academic learning and community service processes in a single project. In this program, 42 students are trained to work on real needs of the environment with the aim of improving it and acquire competencies, skills and ethical values, strengthening their civic-social commitment.

"The academic environment is often devoid of the real thing, in books everything works, but sitting in front of a patient is a different event, a unique experience," explains the head of this project, Alonso García de la Puente, who is a professor at the Universidad Villanueva and director of the psychosocial team of the Laguna Care HospitalThe students attend the center. "It's an impressive experience," says Rocío Cárdenas, a fourth-year psychology student at the university.

Alonso García de la Puente (Mérida, 1984), has a degree in psychology, studied at the Pontifical University of Salamanca, was in the business world for a while, but eventually completed a master's degree in psycho-oncology and palliative care at the Complutense University. Professor De la Puente has been working for eight years at the Hospital de Cuidados Laguna, which specializes in caring for the elderly and treats and cares for patients with advanced diseases. He has been at Villanueva University for three years. This is how he explained the initiative to Omnes, which includes some comments from Rocío Cárdenas.

- How did you come up with the idea of combining your teaching at Villanueva with the direction of the psychosocial team in Laguna?

The subject of Villanueva came up in a talk I gave to a group of young Catholics. One girl was impressed and told her mother, dean of the Faculty of Psychology, about it. I was invited to give a talk on palliative care at the University. The dean and even the Rector were there, and then they asked me if I would like to collaborate with them as a professor. That was the beginning of my journey as a professor at Villanueva, in 2019.

- Tough pandemic times. How would you sum up your years at Laguna? How many people have you cared for in that care hospital?

It is the most life-changing thing in my life history. In my team, we see about 600 people a year, plus their families, which is twice as many. For each person, we see an average of two family members.

We all remember that when we left the university, the feeling was: I don't know anything. A lot of knowledge, but not knowing how to put it into practice or apply it. The University has a very nice program, Learning and Service (ApS), for volunteering, linked to the subjects. It consists of putting into practice what you are learning, that is, learning in practice by giving a service to society.

In this case, we are thinking of making an agreement between Laguna and the university, so that students can come. My subject is Health Psychology. We selected a patient, who has knowledge of his illness, who is able to speak, and the students began to come. Some came in person, and the rest connected online. It was a real laboratory for practicing the subject.

- Tell us a little about the students' experience in the project.

It is a unique experience for them, to be able to face a patient, and especially this type of patient in an end-of-life situation; it transforms them professionally and personally on most occasions. They learn from experience, they integrate from reality. For the hospital, it means being able to share our culture of care. Expanding a compassionate outlook, a discipline to continue to look at the challenges of a chronified society with a long life expectancy. For the students it is very enriching.

Gradually, students move from thinking about themselves, what am I going to say to the patient, etc., to thinking about the patient and being patient-centered, through dignity therapy.

Rocío CárdenasThe patient was the first one the whole class saw, the first contact. It was very shocking, not only from a psychological point of view, but especially from a human point of view. Knowing his condition, we saw the need to be much closer and more caring with him. The project allows young people like us to connect with the experience of death. We have seen a person in his early 50s whose life is ending because of an illness. [Rocío Cárdenas also adds: "A personal experience of mine has been to consider that the work to which God can call me has been that love. That is, to bring heaven forward to those people who are dying"].

- We continue our conversation with Professor García de la Puente: What does dignity therapy basically consist of?

It is a therapy that has a series of structured questions, like a guide, but that allows us to inquire into the patient's life, making a vital review, so that we can connect their self. When people reach the end of their life, or are very ill, they may think that they are no longer who they were. With dignity therapy, the person is able to see that there is a continuum in their life, that they are still the same person, and it connects them to their self. It is also a way to connect with others, with their family, with society, and to realize that this has existed throughout life, how they have been able to help, how they have contributed...And it also connects you with the transcendental: who I am, and what I leave behind me. The legacy that is left, that story is transcribed just as the patient has told it, it is given to him, it is edited, and he distributes it to whomever he wishes, or says to whom he wishes it to be given, thus leaving a sense of legacy, of connection with the transcendental.

For the students, apart from psychology and learning, it is a task that we try to carry out from Laguna. This center not only wants to take care of people, but to take care of a culture, which we are losing, and that we live in a society that is sick, that is having a bad time. The pandemic has pushed it to the limit, and we have realized what was happening, although we were not doing anything to fix it. It's this phenomenon of independence, of people not needing anybody. This is also something that the students learn. We realize that we are not independent, but co-dependent, that we live in a society in which we have to trust, that we have to take care, that suffering exists. And that we should not despair.

- Are you referring to the euthanasia law?

I am referring to that law. In the end, these things tell us about the kind of society we are, Facing the end of life puts you far in front of the truth. Because at the end of life, everything accessory disappears. Your car, who you are, your last name, the neighborhood you come from, your job, even your physique has changed. Nothing you had belongs to you anymore. Through this, people also realize that it is worth caring, that it is worth continuing to learn, to continue studying, to try to alleviate the suffering of these people, not to cut it off, to kill it, but that one can truly train in compassion, in humanism, and accompany the person in suffering, and make that suffering tolerable, because we cannot eradicate it, but we can learn to make suffering tolerable.

- What is your opinion on the lack of specific training in palliative care in Spain? You state that 45 percent of patients in Spain die without receiving palliative care. How do you assess this figure?

Spain does not yet have a specialty in palliative care. This is a huge problem, because when there is no specialty, there is no formal training in palliative care, and there is no recognition, neither socially nor administratively. This figure of 45 percent means that almost half of the population dies in poor conditions.

Many people die suffering, and without receiving the necessary care to work through their suffering at the physical, emotional, social and spiritual levels. Palliative care brings a new look at the patient's vision, moving from a biomedical model to a biopsychosocial and holistic model, treating and looking at the patient from all parts, integrating and attending to them. There are many countries where there is a palliative care law. Chile, for example, has just passed a comprehensive palliative care law. We are a support team, and this means that we come in at the last moment, when little can be done for the patient. Palliative care should come in much earlier, even at the time of diagnosis of the disease.

Professor Alonso García de la Puente and his wife have a baby girl who is only a few months old, it is 8:30 in the morning, and we do not keep him more than a quarter of an hour. But we would have chatted for a good while longer.

Evangelization

Aid to the Church in Need: 75 years at the side of communities threatened by their faith

Next year, Aid to the Church in Need will be 75 years old. It is currently developing more than 5,000 pastoral projects around the world.

Maria José Atienza-December 29, 2021-Reading time: 4 minutes

Your campaigns remind us that, today, more than half of the world's population lives in countries where religious freedom is not respected. They also remind us of those priests, nuns, lay people, children and the elderly who are persecuted and sometimes killed for the simple reason of being Christians.

Thanks to the contributions channeled by Aid to the Church in Need, many Christians are able to survive in these countries under these adverse conditions.

This Pontifical Foundation was founded Werenfried van Straaten in 1947, to help the Catholic Church in countries of real need, the thousands of refugees and Christians persecuted in the world because of their faith.

In Spain, Omnes spoke with its director, Javier Menéndez Ros, who also highlights the advance of aggressive secularism in nations with a Christian tradition and the total absence of public aid for their projects.

- Aid to the Church in Need reminds us that the difficulty of living the faith remains a topical issue. How is ACN structured to provide this help?

In Spain we have our main office in Madrid and more than 25 delegations throughout Spain with 29 employees and more than 210 volunteers in total.

In the world our head office is in Konigstein, Germany and we have 23 international offices, which carry out the awareness, prayer and charity campaigns in which we raise funds for the nearly 5,500 pastoral projects we cover each year in 145 countries around the world.

 - What are the main needs of these communities?

In the pastoral field, which is the one we attend to, Catholic dioceses in countries with few resources need practically everything: support for priests, nuns and lay people committed to catechesis, means of transportation, help with means of communication for evangelization, reconstruction of churches and religious houses, etc.

Let us not forget that Covid has only worsened the situation of poverty and need already suffered by these communities.

- In this regard, has the assistance you provide changed?Aid to the Church in Need to the various Christian communities with the Covid pandemic? 

In most cases our type of aid is the same, but in emergency situations and at risk of survival of Christians, the needs, worsened by the pandemic, have been for health products and basic commodities.

- How are projects born? What are the projects in which you collaborate?Aid to the Church in Need currently?

The pastoral projects that are requested from us arise from the need of a priest, religious or lay person who needs anything from a bicycle, to a bible or a Youcat, or a radio station for catechesis, or who cannot support themselves as priests and we send them mass stipends. With the approval of their respective bishop, they send their project requests to our headquarters and they are processed there.

We are currently engaged in 145 countries with all these types of pastoral projects, paying special attention to Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America, in that order.

- How and who collaborates withAid to the Church in Need?

ACN, or ACN by its international acronym, has more than 345,000 benefactors in the world. Most of them are individuals who, in the 23 countries where we have offices, give us the gift of their prayers and donations. We do not receive any support from government agencies.

-Aid to the Church in Need publishes every year a report on religious freedom in the world, what is the evolution of this religious freedom? 

In our last report on Religious freedom 2021 we conclude that the situation of religious freedom in the world is in a very dangerous decline. No less than 67% of the world's population (5.2 billion people live in countries where religious freedom is not respected.

- At present, what dangers do the most threatened Christian communities face?

The most threatened Christian communities, as they are suffering in sub-Saharan Africa with the tremendous advance of jihadism, in the Middle East with the traces of wars, Daesh and the wave of refugees, or in Asian countries such as Pakistan, India or China, face even more persecution, which leads to massive emigration to safer areas and the possible decline and even disappearance of some of these communities.

- Speaking of this freedom in nations of Christian history, do you think it is on the decline? 

Clearly Christian humanism, with which the history and culture of Europe and America is steeped, is in clear decline and is being replaced by an aggressive secularism that is increasingly virulently attacking the most sacred principles and symbols of our faith and morals.

Recent examples such as the burning of Catholic churches in France or Chile have gone unnoticed by public opinion and are nothing but very worrying signs of this anti-Christian aggressiveness.

Sunday Readings

"Lay Jesus in the manger of our lives". Solemnity of St. Mary, Mother of God

Andrea Mardegan comments on the readings of St. Mary, Mother of God and Luis Herrera offers a short video homily. 

Andrea Mardegan-December 29, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

The new year begins with the priestly blessing of the book of Numbers: "The Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 'Speak to Aaron and his sons and say to them, "Thus shall you bless the children of Israel, saying to them, 'The Lord bless you and keep you, the Lord make His face shine upon you and grant you His favor, the Lord reach His face toward you and grant you peace.' Thus shall they call upon my name upon the children of Israel, and I will bless them.".

Thus the Church asks and communicates God's blessing for all her children, and for all the days of the year that is beginning. And she makes us glimpse that, with the birth of his Son, the Lord has made his face shine among us and has made himself present in our history as the Prince of Peace. From him can come the true peace that we implore today for all the peoples of the earth, through the intercession of the Queen of Peace, his Mother. 

We, as shepherds of Bethlehem, approach the Mother of God and contemplate her with her husband Joseph. From them we learn to lay Jesus in the manger, which in time will become a cradle, and then a bed: among the objects of daily family life and of our work. Jesus in the places of the house, among the games of childhood, the tools of work.

The times of family and social life are inhabited and lived by the face of God made visible in the human face of the Son of God, son of Mary. Let us look at Mary, Joseph and the child and learn from them to listen to the words of God from the mouths of unknown shepherds sent by angels to watch this prodigy: God-filled normality.

We are amazed by God's visits with his messengers and by the greatness of the poor who welcome and manifest it. We keep this amazement in the chest of our heart, to draw it out and nourish it during the days of the whole year, of our whole life, like Mary. 

We look at Joseph with Mary. When the eight days prescribed for circumcision were completed, he was given the name Jesus, as the angel had called him before he was conceived in the womb. "He was named Jesus."The evangelist uses the third person passive. The angel had said to Mary: you shall call him Jesus; and so also to Joseph: you shall call him Jesus.

The formula in the third person reveals the mutual trust of the spouses, their profound unity. It was not Mary alone who gave him the name, nor Joseph alone; they did it together. There was a concurrence of both, as had already happened with Elizabeth and Zechariah when they gave the name to John.

Thus Joseph becomes the legal father of Jesus, and Mary manifests that she is the mother of Jesus in a unique way compared to all women in the history of men.

Homily on the readings of St. Mary, Mother of God

The priest Luis Herrera Campo offers its nanomiliaa small one-minute reflection for these readings.

Do we really have social sensitivity?

The underhanded marginalization of motherhood means that many women are not free, but are under great pressure, to choose life over abortion.

December 28, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

– Supernatural Redmadre Foundation made public on December 14, 2009, the Maternity Mapwhich analyzes public aid to maternity and, specifically, to pregnant women in vulnerable situations offered in 2020 by the Spanish public administrations as a whole. In that report there is a scandalous and very sad fact: The total investment destined in 2020 by the set of public administrations in support of pregnant women in difficulties was 3,392,233 euros, while the aid for abortion was 32,218,185 million. Spending by public administrations as a whole in Spain on support for pregnant women has increased by only 2 euros since 2018.

Given this fact, one might wonder if there are people who think that abortion is a dish of pleasure for anyone. Because if the answer is no, what do we do if we do not help those women who want to become mothers and are experiencing difficulties to do so? Are we facing ideological imperatives beyond all logic and, of course, human sensitivity? Everything points to yes, since at the same time that abortion is promoted and financed, legal obstacles are put in the way of pro-life associations to inform and offer help to women who go to abortion clinics.

On the other hand, this data belies the idea that our political class, on whom these aids depend, has a developed social conscience. If this were the case, a law would have been enacted by now to combat social exclusion due to maternity, because in many cases, opting for maternity entails difficulties in obtaining a job, and even in keeping it. The underhand marginalization of motherhood means that many women are not free, but are under great pressure to choose life over abortion.

At the same time there is an alarming lack of vision for the future. Two days after the report we have learned that Spain has lost population for the first time in the last five years. According to data from the National Statistics Institute (INE), Spain currently has 47.32 million people, a decrease of 72,007 inhabitants compared to 2020.

All that we are living in this sense is well defined by the holy pope, John Paul II, who coined the term "culture of death" in his encyclical Evangelium Vitae. In it he points out that "with the new perspectives opened up by scientific and technological progress, new forms of aggression against the dignity of the human being emerge, while at the same time a new cultural situation is being delineated and consolidated, which gives attacks on life an unprecedented and - it could be said - even more iniquitous aspect, giving rise to further and more serious concerns: broad sectors of public opinion justify certain attacks on life in the name of the rights of individual freedom, and on this presupposition they seek not only impunity, but even authorization on the part of the State, in order to practice them with absolute freedom and also with the free intervention of health structures". (Evangelium Vitae, num. 4).

More recently, Pope Francis, with his characteristic clarity, declared on the flight back to Rome from Slovakia last September: "Abortion is more than a problem, abortion is murder. Without half-words: whoever performs an abortion, kills". Then he asked himself two questions: "Is it right to kill a human life to solve a problem? (...) Second question: is it right to hire a hitman to solve a problem? (...) That is why the Church is so hard on this issue, because if she accepts this it is like accepting daily homicide".

Now, in the midst of Christmas, is a good time to reflect on this.

The authorCelso Morga

Archbishop emeritus of the Diocese of Mérida Badajoz

The Vatican

The humility of service, in order to be truly useful to everyone

In Pope Francis' traditional Christmas message to the Roman Curia, which is usually a time for reflection, the Holy Father dwelled on the temptation of "spiritual worldliness."

Giovanni Tridente-December 27, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

The illnesses, temptations and afflictions that compromise the "organism" of the Roman Curia - the group of cardinals and bishops who collaborate with the Pope and the Holy See - have always been at the center of the annual greetings to which Pope Francis has accustomed us since his election. It has always been, in short, a moment of verification and reflection, almost like an introspective analysis to better understand "who we are and our mission".

This year, too, the Pontiff was no exception, and he focused on a specific temptation, which he has already identified on other occasions as "spiritual worldliness," the overcoming of which, however, benefits the general service offered by the various Vatican dicasteries to the universal Church.

Back to humility

The key to avoid running the risk of being "generals of defeated armies rather than mere soldiers of a squadron that continues to fight," as he already indicated in his Evangelii gaudium, is to return - and with a certain diligence - to humility, a word and an attitude unfortunately forgotten today and emptied of moralism. And yet, humility is precisely the first door of God's entry into history.

In his speech, which was not brief, Pope Francis reiterated to his collaborators that one cannot "spend one's life hiding behind an armor, a role, a social recognition", because sooner or later this lack of sincerity will take its toll and show all its inconsistency, besides being, in the Church, a serious setback: "if we forget our humanity we live only by the honors of our armor".

Overcoming pride

What, then, should a humble Roman Curia be like? Surely it should not be ashamed of its frailties, for "knowing how to inhabit our humanity without despair, with realism, joy and hope". The opposite of humility is "pride", which goes hand in hand with the "most perverse fruit of spiritual worldliness" which are "securities". While the latter show a lack of faith, hope and charity, pride is "like chaff", which besides generating a sterile sadness, deprives the Church of "roots" and "branches".

Remember and generate

The roots bear witness to the link with the past, with Tradition, with the example of those who have preceded us in evangelization; the shoots are emblems of vitality and projection into the future. With this awareness, a humble Church and Curia are capable of "remembering", treasuring and reliving - Pope Francis added in his reasoning - and of "generating", that is, looking forward with a memory full of gratitude.

The humble, in short, "push towards what they do not know", "accept to be questioned" and open themselves to the new with hope and trust. Without this attitude, one runs the risk of falling ill and disappearing: "without humility, neither God nor one's neighbor can be found".

Basically, if our proclamation preaches "poverty", the Curia must stand out for its "sobriety"; if the Word of God preaches "justice", the Roman Curia must shine for its transparency, without favoritism or entanglements, was the Pope's warning.

The Synod test bed

An immediate testing ground to highlight concrete humility is precisely the synodal journey that the Church is undergoing and that the Roman Curia is called to support as a protagonist, not only because it represents the organizational engine but above all because, as the Holy Father has reiterated, it must "set an example".

Also for the Pope's collaborators, therefore, humility must be declined in the three key words Francis used during the opening of the synodal assembly last October: participation, communion and mission.

A participatory Roman Curia is one that places "co-responsibility" in the first place, which also translates for those in charge into a more helpful and collaborative spirit.

It is a Curia that creates communion, because it is centered on Christ through prayer and the reading of the Word, is concerned for the good of others, recognizes diversity and lives its work in a spirit of sharing.

Finally, it is a missionary Curia, which shows passion for the poor and the marginalized, also because it is evident that even today, and precisely in a synodal phase in which we want to listen to "everyone" indiscriminately, "their voice, their presence, their questions" are missing.

A humble Church is, therefore, a community of the faithful "that places its center outside of itself", aware - Pope Francis concluded - that "only by serving and only by thinking of our work as service can we be truly useful to all".

Christmas gift

Christmas time is a good time to reflect on gifts: a gift has the quality of gratuitousness, that is, it shows unselfish love. It means that gratuitousness qualifies love: love is only such if it can be said to be gratuitous. And there is no greater gift than the Child born in Bethlehem.

December 27, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

We associate the word Christmas with a decorated tree with dozens of gifts to unwrap around it, or with a beautifully lit fireplace with socks on top of which to bring out the various presents. The real gift, as we all know, is not the material object, but the desire to share something of ourselves or to improve some aspect of our loved ones. More than the material object, the wrapped gift helps us to give the surprise and wonder that today seem to be the most difficult emotions to experience.

The wonder of anticipation, of the imagination that dreams, invents and creates, is in that colorful paper that wraps the gifts. Just as the cloths that wrapped Jesus protected and safeguarded the Gift of a God made man, or rather, infant, child, defenseless and unarmed, when we unveil the gift of his paper, we remove the veil - we "unveil" it - and that same gesture reveals it to us as a gift.

The moment of the gift is never just the object itself, but the sharing together of the moment in which the surprise of the receiver meets the hope, for the giver, of having understood something important about the soul of the one before him. The cloths with which Mary wraps her Son to give him to humanity in the manger are not meant to hide Jesus, but to protect him. In the same way, the paper of our gifts protects our love from the haste and superficiality with which we too often ruin many of our relationships throughout the year.

The gift has the quality of gratuitousness, that is, it shows a disinterested love. It means that gratuitousness qualifies love: love is only such if it can be said to be gratuitous. But when gratuitousness is embodied in a gift, it expresses a love that, without wanting anything in return, thinks that others should behave in the same way. If I welcome into my home the son of a friend who comes to my city for a competition, I expect him to thank me. This does not mean an obligation to give some kind of "reciprocity" (which is possible, but not in terms of duty, otherwise we would be in the scenario of a mere barter, or even a "mafia" relationship), but the recognition that this behavior has been humane and therefore, when my friend is able, he will also do something similar in his city.

That's why, at Christmas - it can be Epiphany, St. Nicholas or St. Lucia: it doesn't matter..... - all of us, even if we are atheists, agnostics or even of other religions, exchange gifts. Because, even if we don't believe that Christmas is the Savior's birthday, we all feel that Christmas is the birthday of each and every one of us.

The authorMauro Leonardi

Priest and writer.

Vocations

"The world is changing and the Daughters of Charity were born to be inserted in it."

Interview with Sister Mª Concepción Monjas Pérez, Visitatrix of the Daughters of Charity in Spain on the occasion of the creation of the new canonical province. Spain Center which joins the previous Madrid-Santa Luisa and Madrid-San Vicente lines.

Maria José Atienza-December 27, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

On November 27, the feast of the Miraculous Virgin, the Daughters of Charity of St. Vincent de Paul welcomed a new canonical province to the Order: Spain Center.

In total, the new province is made up of a thousand religious working for the poorest in the autonomous communities of Madrid, Castilla y León, Castilla-La Mancha, Murcia and La Rioja.

This new province also marked the beginning of the work of the Provincial Council presided over by Sr. Mª Concepción Monjas Pérez as Visitatrix. On this occasion, Omnes interviewed the new Visitatrix who pointed out, among other things, the emergence of "new forms of poverty" in which the Daughters of Charity work and the future based on the shared mission with the laity.

Daughters of Charity

- How does the new province assume the development of its foundational charism? Why was it decided to create this province?

The Province assumes the development of its foundational charism as the provinces of Madrid-Saint Louise and Madrid-Saint Vincent have been doing so far: with a deep ecclesial sense, with a very great concern for meeting the needs of our time and being very attentive to the needs of the poor. All this always in accordance with the legacy of St. Vincent and St. Louise.

The Daughters of Charity are undergoing a reorganization. There are 12,800 of us in the world and the decrease in the number of Sisters has led the Superiors General to reorganize the provinces. It is an organization that aims to keep apostolic vitality very much in mind.

The world changes at great speed and the Daughters of Charity were born to be inserted in it and to make the Gospel and charity present in the midst of people who suffer.

- You have pointed out the need for renewal of structures without forgetting the charism itself. How do you concretize this renewal today? What are the present and future challenges of the Daughters of Charity?

This renewal is posed by the current situation itself: the situation of migrants, the situations of violence of all kinds, the violation of human rights?

All this is what urges us to live this renewal, which is basically an updated response to what St. Vincent wanted to do in the 17th century: to continue to be a presence of God's mercy in the midst of a world of suffering. Of course, this renewal requires collaboration with the laity who are a fundamental part of our action and also with the Church.

Synodality is the key to continue making the Vincentian charism a reality in the midst of the world. We have just celebrated a General Assembly and it has presented us with some very important challenges to respond to the human rights that have been violated: the care of the common home, the care of creation, the mysticism of living together in collaboration and fraternity and the transmission of the faith with the Gospel to young people. These would be our four challenges for the present and for the future.

- How can we encourage vocations to a life of dedication and service such as that of a Daughter of Charity?

It is difficult to answer this question because the truth is that this vocation is very current and yet we find it difficult to pass it on and transmit it. This is one of the great challenges: to be able to transmit this passion for God and for humanity to young women. We are looking for ways to make it a reality.

-The Daughters of Charity are one of the best known and most loved communities for their work in caring for the most vulnerable. How is this activity structured and developed today? Are there new forms of poverty, new vulnerabilities?

We are currently detecting new forms of poverty such as the situations in which migrants live, human trafficking and gender violence. We have created an interprovincial community in Melilla to respond to all these border situations and we are very attentive to everything that arises in our fields of service.

St. Vincent asked us to be very attentive to the poor because that makes our structures more agile: we organize and reorganize them according to the needs. I would say that today, the strong point is the "shared mission" with the laity in all fields of service.

The Vatican

Moving from "I" to "you". The Pope's encouragement in his letter to families.

On the Feast of the Holy Family, the Holy Father Francis invited families to take care of "the details of relationships", "to listen to and understand each other", and to look to the Virgin Mary, in order to move from "the dictatorship of the 'I' to the 'you'". Moreover, in a letter addressed to spouses, he reminds them to "keep their gaze fixed on Jesus".

Rafael Miner-December 26, 2021-Reading time: 7 minutes

After the Marian prayer of the Angelus, on the feast of the Holy Family that the Church celebrates this Sunday, and before people from many countries in Peter's Square, such as Poles, Brazilians and Colombians, Pope Francis encouraged families to listen to and understand each other. "Every day, in the family, we must learn to listen to and understand each other, to walk together, to face conflicts and difficulties," he said. "This is the daily challenge, and it is won with the right attitude, with small attentions, with simple gestures, taking care of the details of our relationships."

To achieve this, the Holy Father invited us to look at the Virgin Mary, "who in today's Gospel says to Jesus: 'Your father and I were looking for you. Your father and I; not I and your father: before 'I' there is 'you'! To preserve harmony in the family, we must fight against the dictatorship of the 'I'".

In this regard, the Pope stated that "it is dangerous when, instead of listening to each other, we blame each other for our mistakes; when, instead of caring for others, we focus on our own needs; when, instead of talking, we isolate ourselves with our cell phones; when we accuse each other, always repeating the same phrases, staging an already seen play in which everyone wants to be right and in the end there is a cold silence."

Breaking silences and selfishness

As he has done on various occasions and countries, Francis added the convenience of making peace at night. "I repeat a piece of advice: at night, after all, make peace. Never go to sleep without having made peace, otherwise the next day there will be a 'cold war'. How often, unfortunately, conflicts are born within the walls of the home as a result of too long silences and unhealed selfishness! Sometimes it even comes to physical and moral violence. This breaks the harmony and kills the family."

The Pope also revealed a "real concern" about the "demographic winter," "at least here in Italy," he noted. "It seems that many have lost the aspiration to carry on with children, and many couples prefer to remain without or with only one child. Think about it, it's a tragedy."

"A few minutes ago I saw on the program 'In His Image' how they were talking about this serious problem, the demographic winter," the Holy Father added. "Let us all do what we can to recover our conscience, to overcome this demographic winter that goes against our families, our homeland and even our future."

"Protecting our roots"

At the beginning, following the Gospel proposed by the liturgy of the day, the Pontiff affirmed that "we are reminded that Jesus is also the son of a family history", as "we see him traveling to Jerusalem with Mary and Joseph for the Passover"; and "then he makes his mother and father worry, who cannot find him"; while "once he is found, he returns home with them".

Hence the Pope's affirmation: "It is beautiful to see Jesus inserted in the network of family affection, being born and growing in the embrace and concern of his own. This is important for us too: we come from a history interwoven with bonds of love and the person we are today is born not so much from the material goods we have enjoyed, but from the love we have received."

Francis then pointed out that "we may not have been born into an exceptional and problem-free family", but "it is our history" and "they are our roots", and exclaimed: "If we cut them off, life dries up!", since "God did not create us to be solitary drivers, but to walk together. Let us thank him and pray for our families. God thinks of us and wants us to be together: grateful, united, able to protect our roots."

"Close to every person, to every marriage."

The Holy See issued this morning a Letter dated December 26, which the Holy Father addressed to couples around the world on the occasion of the Year of the Family Amoris laetitia, in which he encourages them to continue walking with the strength of the Christian faith and the help of St. Joseph and Our Lady, reports the official Vatican agency.

In the letter, signed at St. John Lateran, the Pope conveys a message of closeness and hope to wives and husbands, noting that "I have always kept families in my prayers, but even more so during the pandemic, which has severely tested everyone, especially the most vulnerable. The moment we are going through leads me to approach with humility, affection and welcome to every person, every marriage and every family in the situations they are experiencing".

The Holy Father goes on to emphasize that this particular context "invites us to make alive the words with which the Lord calls Abraham to leave his homeland and his father's house for an unknown land that he himself will show him", Francis affirms that all of us "have experienced more than ever uncertainty, loneliness, the loss of loved ones, and we have been impelled to leave our securities, our spaces of control, our own ways of doing things, our own desires, in order to attend not only to the good of our own family, but also to the good of the family itself, the loss of loved ones and we have been impelled to leave our security, our control, our own ways of doing things, our desires, in order to attend not only to the good of our own family, but also to the good of society, which also depends on our personal behavior.

"You are not alone!"

Francis then launches a message of accompaniment, recalling that they are not alone, "since God is in us, with us and among us: in the family, in the neighborhood, in the place of work or study, in the city we live in". And he draws a parallel with the life of Abraham, since the spouses also leave their homeland, as is implied in the same courtship that leads to marriage and to the different situations of life. "God accompanies them, he loves them unconditionally, they are not alone!

Moreover, addressing spouses and especially young people, the Pope writes that their children "watch them attentively" and look to them for "the witness of a strong and trustworthy love." "Children are a gift, always, they change the history of every family. They are thirsty for love, recognition, esteem and trust. Fatherhood and motherhood call them to be generative in order to give their children the joy of discovering themselves children of God, children of a Father who from the very first moment has loved them tenderly and takes them by the hand every day."

"Vocation to marriage, a calling".

At one point in the Letter, the Pope encourages us to remember that "the vocation to marriage is a call to steer an uncertain but safe ship through the reality of the sacrament, in a sea that is sometimes rough", so he understands if at times, like the apostles, we feel like crying out: "Master, do you not care if we perish?

However, "let us not forget that through the sacrament of marriage, Jesus is present in that boat. He cares for you, he remains with you at all times in the swaying of the boat tossed by the sea," the Pope emphasizes.

The Holy Father stressed the importance of "keeping your gaze fixed on Jesus", since "only in this way will you find peace, overcome conflicts and find solutions to many of your problems". "Our human love is weak, it needs the strength of the faithful love of Jesus. With him you can truly build the 'house on the rock'".

"Excuse me, thank you, sorry."

As he has done in other circumstances, Francis once again asked families to keep in their hearts the advice to the engaged couple that he expressed in these three words: "permission, thanks, forgiveness". And he encourages them not to be ashamed "to kneel together before Jesus in the Eucharist to find moments of peace and a mutual gaze made of tenderness and kindness. Or to take each other's hand, when you are a little angry, to get an accomplice's smile".

Without forgetting that "for some couples the cohabitation to which they have been forced during the quarantine has been particularly difficult", the Pope states that "the problems that already existed were aggravated, generating conflicts that have often become almost unbearable", for which he expresses his closeness and affection.

The Holy Father also refers to the pain of the breakdown of a marital relationship and the lack of understanding. Francis asks them "not to stop seeking help so that conflicts can somehow be overcome and do not cause even more pain between you and your children. The Lord Jesus, in his infinite mercy, will inspire you to move forward in the midst of so many difficulties and afflictions. Do not cease to invoke him and to seek in him a refuge, a light for the journey, and in the ecclesial community a "fatherly home where there is room for everyone with his or her life on his or her shoulders" (Evangelii Gaudium, 47).

The Pope also reminds us that "forgiveness heals every wound" and that "forgiving one another is the result of an interior decision that matures in prayer".

Family education, family pastoral care

Before addressing young people and grandparents, the Holy Father assures them that "educating children is not easy. But let us not forget that they also educate us. The first field of education remains the family, in small gestures that are more eloquent than words".

"On the other hand, as I have already pointed out, awareness of the identity and mission of the laity in the Church and in society has increased. You have the mission to transform society through your presence in the world of work and to make sure that the needs of families are taken into account. Also married couples should 'come first' within the parish and diocesan community with their initiatives and creativity, seeking the complementarity of charisms and vocations as an expression of ecclesial communion; in particular, 'spouses together with pastors, to walk with other families, to announce that, even in difficulties, Christ is present.

"I therefore exhort you, dear spouses, to participate in the Church, especially in the pastoral care of the family. For 'co-responsibility in mission calls [...] married couples and ordained ministers, especially bishops, to cooperate fruitfully in the care and custody of the domestic Churches'. Let them remember that the family is the 'basic cell of society' (Evangelii gaudium , 66)".

Young people, boyfriends, grandparents...

The Pontiff addresses the young people who are preparing for marriage, telling them that "if before the pandemic it was difficult for engaged couples to plan a future when it was difficult to find a stable job, now the situation of job uncertainty is even greater. In this context, he added: "I invite engaged couples not to be discouraged, to have the 'creative courage' of St. Joseph, whose memory I wanted to honor in this Year dedicated to him. In the same way, when it comes to facing the path of marriage, even if you have few means, always trust in Providence, because 'sometimes difficulties are precisely those that bring out resources in each of us that we did not even think we had'."

Before taking his leave, Francis sends a special greeting to the grandfathers and grandmothers "who during the time of isolation were deprived of seeing and being with their grandchildren, to the elderly who suffered even more radically from loneliness". And he does not hesitate to reaffirm a concept expressed on several occasions: "The family cannot do without grandparents, they are the living memory of humanity, 'this memory can help build a more humane, more welcoming world'."

Living vocation with joy

With the wish that "St. Joseph inspire in all families the creative courage, so necessary in this change of era that we are living", and that "Our Lady accompany in their marriages the gestation of the 'culture of encounter', so urgent to overcome the adversities and oppositions that darken our time", Pope Francis also encourages to live with joy the vocation. "The many challenges cannot rob the joy of those who know that they are walking with the Lord. Live your vocation intensely. Do not let a sad countenance transform your faces."

The Pope bids them farewell with affection "encouraging them to continue to live the mission that Jesus" has entrusted to them, persevering in prayer", and asks them to "please do not forget to pray" for him, just as he himself does "every day" for the spouses and their families.

Latin America

The family: the first and last refuge 

On the eve of the Feast of the Holy Family, it remains for us to contemplate Jesus, Mary and Joseph, so that we may learn to return always and every time to the family.

Luis Gaspar-December 26, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

The end of the year is usually a time to reflect on what we did and did not do during the last twelve months. It is also a time for celebration. The arrival of Jesus at Christmas makes us all a little bit children again and we renew our illusion in the expectation of the Savior. And to make it clear that Jesus came into the world by the hand of a father and a mother, at Christmas time we celebrate the feast of the Holy Family, because without Mary and Joseph it is impossible to imagine the manger.

It is the Holy Family that also reminds us of that divine halo of families, that permanent reminder that parents, yours and mine, are close collaborators of creation.

The family is undoubtedly the first and last refuge, which is why it is also the object of the materialistic offensive that seeks to dehumanize it and turn children into mere products, and parents into mere reproducers. 

St. John Paul II warned in 2004: "The attempt to reduce the family to a private affective experience, socially irrelevant, to confuse individual rights with those proper to the family nucleus constituted by the bond of marriage, to equate cohabitation with marital unions, is one of the many attacks that seek to alter the structure of society". He then emphasized that "the attacks on marriage and the family are becoming stronger and more radical, both in their ideological version and on the normative front". 

In the midst of this constant onslaught, the family continues to stand firm, clinging together. It is that unity that will keep it going. 

Mariángeles Castro Sánchez, from the Institute of Family Sciences of the Austral University of Argentina, describes it as follows: "the ideal of unity in the family demands that we overcome the tendency of disengagement that today challenges us as a society, in the understanding that we will not be able to grow without a principle of unity that implies the integration and consolidation of a common life project". 

The question then arises: Is the family really that important? And the answer comes from José Pons, Counselor of the Spanish Association of Large Families: "There is no doubt that the family is the school of solidarity, responsibility, creativity and innovation. What is not learned in the family can hardly be learned at school, at university or at work. In the family we learn to share, to resist, to value. The family is more than ever the first cell, the first school and the basis of society. If the family fabric is weakened, society is irremediably weakened".

On the eve of the Feast of the Holy Family we are left to contemplate Jesus, Mary and Joseph, persecuted and threatened by a king who wanted to do away with them, who wanted to kill the child. With other protagonists, this persecution is still going on more than two thousand years later. The key is to "always and always return to the family. In the certainty that being part of this fundamental and primary unit will allow us to face challenges, resist storms and, why not, survive shipwreck" (Mariángeles Castro Sánchez). 

The authorLuis Gaspar

Read more
Family

Christian marriage: transforming human love into supernatural love

The author reviews some of the main keys to the vocation to marriage, which are found in the teachings of St. Josemaría Escrivá.

Rafael de Mosteyrín Gordillo-December 26, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

St. Josemaría's outstanding valuation of marriage is already present in St. Paul (1 Tim 4, 3-5), but it is rediscovered and developed in its message, as a path to holiness.

His teachings go beyond the merely speculative sphere. St. Josemaría is above all a pastor and teacher of Christian life. And not only has spoken of the possibility of becoming saints in the married state, but has guided - first personally, and then through others - thousands of people along this path of sanctification. In this sense, he has contributed to the spread, within the Church, of the call to holiness in the married state. For this reason, his teaching undoubtedly constitutes an important contribution to the sanctification of the Church. milestone in the history of spirituality.

As a consequence of the sacrament, husband and wife can transform human love into supernatural love. Marriage is therefore a manifestation and revelation of Christ's love for the Church.

Most Christians are called to sanctify themselves in family life. But, we may ask, what concrete strengths and capacities are found in man and what gifts must he receive for the development of the spiritual life to take place?

The perfection of the Christian life is not a mere external imitation, but seeks identification with Christ. We have tried to present what holiness in family life consists of and what changes in those who seek it.   

St. Josemaría teaches that the foundation for the sanctification of Christian family life is the sense of divine filiation. Freedom, in turn, is a gift for attaining the goal of identification with Christ, which is developed through the practice of the theological and moral virtues.

Divine filiation and freedom are a permanent condition of the subject who wants to grow in his love for God, and is thus disposed to develop the virtues.

The sense of divine filiation, united to the exercise of freedom, is the basis for growth in the virtues that configure the Christian to Christ.

The Christian vocation therefore develops with the grace of God, but also with the theological and moral virtues. The transcendence of the end to which man is called makes it necessary for him to expand the strengths or virtues with which he is endowed.

The theological virtues should inform the whole of family life, which is called to be a school of holiness. Faith illuminates existence. It implies knowing oneself to be situated in a history that God governs and directs. It allows us to overcome the experience of pain and the threat of death, which does not have the last word.

Hope is the virtue that directs the human capacity to desire towards God and, in turn, trusts in divine help, which makes it possible to overcome difficulties and reach the goal. Charity, which makes unlimited love for God possible, is the most important virtue in the Christian spiritual life.

Marital holiness is achieved to the extent that one seeks to grow harmoniously in the moral or human virtues, so that they may be the support of the theological virtues. All the virtues must be manifested in conjugal love and mutual help.

If the Christian develops the virtues in the fulfillment of his family, professional and social duties, and also in the exercise of his own rights, he is on the way to becoming identified with Christ. The ordinary Christian is called to sanctify himself precisely by sanctifying his ordinary life.

Identification with Christ must inform the whole of the realities that determine life through charity, justice, fidelity, loyalty, etc. It is an ideal that necessarily calls for the exercise of the virtues in order to overcome selfishness.

Authentic conjugal love is oriented towards fruitfulness and mutual help. Married life is based on the virtue of chastity, which enables spouses to overcome selfishness and to please God with their love that is clean and always open to life. Care for one's spouse and for one's children is a necessary element of the sanctification of each of the spouses in marriage. St. Josemaría shows the necessary complementarity of the spouses, and the irreplaceable contribution of women to marriage and family life.

St. Josemaría admired the faculty of begetting, with absolute fidelity to the Magisterium of the Church. Each child is a divine blessing and he praises large families when they are the fruit of responsible parenthood.

He warns, on the contrary, that blinding the sources of life brings unfortunate consequences for personal, family and social life.

The Christian materialism -The text, deeply transmitted by St. Josemaría, proves to be a valid starting point for a proper understanding of the richness of Christian marriage, a reality of the natural world. high to supernatural dignity. In marriage the matter of sanctification is conjugal love. The test of the authenticity of this love is that it be open to life.  

The authorRafael de Mosteyrín Gordillo

Priest.

Integral ecology

For an ecological Christmas

At Christmas we celebrate something as natural as the birth of a Child who took on our human nature and forever changed the way we understand it.

Emilio Chuvieco-December 25, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

Perhaps when reading this title, some readers have decided not to continue reading, because they will have thought something like "here they are, these environmentalists who are always here with their nonsense". I hope that this article will contribute something to those who have overcome this first impulse.

I agree with those more critical readers that the adjective "ecological" is applied with occasion and without occasion to things that cannot always really be considered part of what Pope Francis (and other previous pontiffs) call "integral ecology."

I also agree that the label is applied to things that not only cannot be considered very "natural," but are openly at odds with the ultimate nature of people and other created beings.

Here I am going to apply the term ecological to a holiday that has a deep religious meaning, Christmas, as natural as we celebrate the birth of a Child who took on our human nature and changed forever the way we understand it.

Since the Son of God became incarnate, human nature also became divine nature, hence the incarnation supposes - in the last analysis - the "deification" of matter, of which all living beings are made.

Although this is not the place to deal with it theologically in detail, it should be pointed out that the Incarnation of the Second Person of the Trinity has a profound ecological implication. Not only does it confirm what the first chapter of Genesis already indicates, that everything created by God is good, but also, in one way or another - and with what we now know about the evolution of matter - it assumes that Nature (created matter) is part of the human body of the incarnate God.

Christmas, in this sense, is the most ecological feast, because as a result of the birth of Christ, all material realities acquire a new dimension: for a Christian they are not only the image of God (all creatures reflect the Creator), but they also have a certain sacred character. To despise the material in any way is to fail to recognize the Incarnation, as did the docetists and Gnostics, historically the first heresies of Christianity.

In this regard we can recall some words of St. Josemaría: "The authentic Christian sense that professes the resurrection of all flesh has always, as is logical, confronted disincarnation, without fear of being judged as materialism. It is licit, therefore, to speak of a Christian materialism that boldly opposes materialisms closed to the spirit" (Conversations with Bishop Escrivá, 1968, no. 115). In short, the first environmental dimension of Christmas is to recognize that the human and divine person of Jesus gives a new meaning to our appreciation of Nature, of the environment that surrounds us, which from then on not only reflects in a much deeper way the image of the Creator, but also forms part of the body of the Redeemer.

The second "ecological" dimension of Christmas is of a more practical order. We know that superfluous consumption is the main cause of environmental degradation of the planet. Every thing we buy or eat, every trip we take, involves the use of a certain amount of resources and energy. Of course we need to consume, whatever is reasonable for our needs, but consuming because "it touches", without stopping to consider the utility or convenience of what we are going to buy, does not make much sense, neither environmentally nor Christianly.

Let us remember that poverty is a key virtue in Christianity, and that poverty is not not not having, but not wanting to have when we can have. We celebrate the birth of Jesus, who freely chose to do so in a stable, showing that happiness does not depend on material well-being. It seems reasonable to rejoice in his birth, but the celebration need not be centered on unbridled consumption.

These days, everyone suddenly discovers something "must-have" to buy, something that will undoubtedly make their life much happier, that will allow them to improve on almost every front of their humdrum existence. That's how they sell it to us, and that's how we accept it. And then they blame it on the system (which it certainly is), as if we human beings were automatons or guided by a hidden destiny that forces us to buy with or without occasion.

Perhaps it is an exercise of Christian rebellion to refuse excessive consumption, to make the joy and festivity of these days compatible with frugality and simplicity of life.

Consumerism is basically a reflection of the spiritual emptiness in which so many people find themselves, as Pope Francis pointed out in Laudato Si: "The emptier a person's heart is, the more he or she needs objects to buy, possess and consume" (n. 204). We try to fill an inner longing with material goods that have no capacity to do so, that only bring us momentary joy. After all, we know that the happiness of shopping is short-lived.

I end with a part of the dialogue between the little prince and the fox who wanted to be his friend: "Men no longer have time to know anything. They buy everything ready-made in the stores. And since there are no stores where they sell friends, men no longer have friends" (Antoine De Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince, 2003). If we meditate on this carefully, we will surely end up recognizing that the deepest part of our lives, what really makes us happy, cannot be bought with money.

The authorEmilio Chuvieco

Professor of Geography at the University of Alcalá.

The World

Bethlehem at Christmas. This is how these days are lived in the land where Jesus was born.

Bethlehem is a small town, close to Jerusalem, with a 2% Christian population and which has been mercilessly hit by the absence of pilgrimages due to the pandemic.

Maria José Atienza-December 25, 2021-Reading time: 6 minutes

Friar Luis Enrique Segovia Marín, OFM, is the superior of the Convent of St. Catherine "ad Nativitatem" in Bethlehem, in the Franciscan Custody of the Holy Places. He is part of the community in charge of guarding the place where Jesus was born. Today, Bethlehem is a small town, close to Jerusalem, where only 2% of the population is Catholic Christian. Hit by violence in recent years, the absence of pilgrimages due to the pandemic has made the harsh living conditions of this Palestinian Christian community in Bethlehem even more difficult.

Omnes was able to talk toLuis Enrique Segovia, who points out the need to support the presence of the Christian community in the birthplace of Christ in order to continue to be "living stones" of the faith.

- Every year, the whole world contemplates "a Bethlehem" on these feasts... How is the feast of the Nativity of Our Lord lived where He was born? How is the liturgy of Christmas Eve and the day of the Nativity celebrated?

In Bethlehem, the place where Jesus was born, every year, everyone waits with joy in the Manger Square and its surrounding streets, adjacent to the Basilica of the Nativity.

Neighbors, visitors and locals welcome the Catholic authority with joy and Christmas songs, while local bands of boyscouts and rows of friars, who come from all the communities of the Custody, make way for the procession amidst the sound of drums and applause from the local people.

The celebrations properly begin in November, on the last Saturday of the month, the first Sunday of Advent, in which four candles are lit in the Grotto of the Nativity and, symbolically, they are moved to the four cardinal points. With this celebration we point out that Mary is, in a certain way, the mother who prepares for the birth It is a remote preparation, that is the meaning of this ritual.

In Bethlehem we also celebrate Catholic Christmas on December 25, Orthodox Christmas on January 7 and Armenian Christmas on January 18. We have three Christmases, so we are not talking about Christmas Day but the Christmas season. This creates a beautiful mosaic of people, joined by Muslims, who join our joy on this holiday.

However, the days when everyone in Bethlehem unites in celebration are December 24 and 25. On December 24, the Latin Patriarch, Bishop Pierbattista Pizzaballa, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, the highest representative of the Catholic Church in the Holy Land, performs a procession between his see in Jerusalem and Bethlehem, signaling the beginning of the liturgical acts of Christmas.

Pierbattista Pizzaballa on the feast of the Nativity in Bethlehem

- The presence of Christians in the Holy Land remains a challenge today. What is the life of the Catholic community in Bethlehem? 

Bethlehem, the town where most Christians believe Jesus was born, becomes for many a place of pilgrimage during Christmas celebrations.

However, the number of Christians living there is decreasing. It is estimated that one hundred years ago about 40% of Bethlehem's population was Christian. Now the majority is Muslim and only about 2% of the Palestinian residents profess the faith of Christ.

Political and economic instability has pushed them to migrate to more prosperous places and, for this reason, the small community that still remains wants to be known and seeks support in order to prevent Christianity from disappearing precisely from the place where Jesus Christ lived and founded the Church.

The city of Bethlehem is mostly composed of Muslims, which is more than 95% and the rest are Christians. The reason: many of them have had to emigrate out of the territory, looking for better living conditions and a more secure future for their children.

Life for local people is unpredictable. You don't know when there will be a war, an intifada, an aggression or violence in general. Those who have experienced this do not want it for their children, but on the contrary, they want them to live in a calm, peaceful, serene way.

The Custody of the Holy Land has the great challenge of maintaining the presence of Christians in the Holy Land, because there is the fear that, over time, our churches and shrines will become museums because the living stones are, and always will be, the Christians.

- The Covid pandemic has hit the Holy Land in one of its main sources of livelihood: the pilgrims. How are they coping with this crisis? Do they feel spiritually accompanied by their brothers and sisters in faith? 

If there is one thing that the coronavirus has brought, besides death, it has been the restriction of mobility. For this reason, tourism has been one of the sectors hardest hit by the pandemic. This has affected the Christians of the Holy Land, especially the city of Bethlehem, which is mainly and professionally dedicated to pilgrimages and which, having been completely suppressed, are still having a really hard time.

Tourism is the main driver of Bethlehem's economy, and had its peak at Christmas time and Easter. The people living there, a whopping 80% of them, depend on tourism for their income and have now been without any income.

For the second year, the hotels, restaurants and religious stores, which at this time of the year host a large part of their clientele, are part of a deserted city. All is silence and desolation. There is no expectation that this can change, the economic losses are many and everything is paralyzed.

In the city center, many stores and restaurants remain unopened in the absence of tourists. Only the local population can be seen walking through the streets.

In the religious sphere, most Christmas events and celebrations will continue to be limited to a small number of people, depending on the infection rate.

The celebrations must be carried out under strict hygiene measures, priority will be given to "remote" monitoring and they will be broadcast virtually and on television to prevent meetings and avoid the risk of contagion.

Tourism is the main driver of Bethlehem's economy, and had its peak at Christmas time and Easter. The people living there, a whopping 80% of them depend on tourism for their income and now they have been without any income.

Luis Enrique Segovia Marín, OFM.

- The presence of the Franciscan Custody is key for the Holy Land to remain the Holy Land and to be a place of pilgrimage and encounter with God. 

The Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land has existed for 800 years and has always taken up the challenges facing our Christian faithful.

Over the years, the Custody has built hundreds of apartments for our Christian families in Judea and Galilee. During this pandemic, all of our Christian families were confined to their residences, which caused severe financial problems. In a gesture of solidarity, the Custody forgave the monthly rent payments for their apartments for one year. In addition, the Custody accompanies families in difficult economic situations or with health problems.

During this period of pandemic, God's providence has never failed us to do these works of charity. I must say "the Lord is also with us".. When we are together, so happy, the Lord is with us, he is also with us when we have moments of difficulty. He never abandons us, he is always near us.

We may or may not see it, but it always accompanies us on life's journey, especially in the bad times.

Second, the Franciscan Custody decided not to close the schools and classes will continue. on line for our students; our parishes have continued to provide social and health support to many families, providing food baskets for the indigent and for the many families in their respective parishes.

The Basilica of the Nativity is also a parish, administered by the Franciscans, and is the central place of the Christian community of Bethlehem. Like all places of prayer, it has been open since the beginning of November. Christians are welcome to come to the church, subject to health and safety precautions.

Celebration in the Nativity Grotto

- What is the relationship of the Catholic community and, specifically, of the Franciscans, with other religious communities, Muslims and other Christians with whom they live?

It is very serene and respectful, because religions do not have to be the wall that separates people or societies.

However, there is a reality that we must not forget and that is that the presence of Christians in the Holy Land is decreasing every year at a dizzying rate.

The Custody has social projects to support Christian families, builds houses and schools and takes care of university education. Everything that is possible in favor of Christian families. But, if there is no awareness of wanting to stay and be missionary in their own land, everything we do will not be enough. That is why Christians have a special mission to transmit the faith to us.

There is the fear that, with time, our churches and sanctuaries will become museums, because the living stones are and will be the Christians.

Luis Enrique Segovia Marín, OFM.

Despite the pandemic situation we continue to live in, our presence has continued in the holy places of our redemption. At the Holy Sepulcher, Bethlehem, Nazareth and the other shrines we have intensified our prayer for the whole world.

Resources

The hero's relief

On the occasion of the approaching Christmas season, the author relates an event that, with a certain sympathy, will make us reflect on an important aspect of our lives.

Juan Ignacio Izquierdo Hübner-December 24, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

Taking advantage of the fact that my friend Carlos was passing through Pamplona, I let him invite me to a downtown terrace for coffee. We sat down with the calm and unhurriedness of a silly Saturday afternoon, accompanied by a clear sky and that breeze from here that carries a spectral cold (even so, the terrace was full. Things that only happen in Pamplona). But we had a good coat. So after catching up -he told me about his work and I told him about my studies-, I took advantage of the fact that we were in confidence to unburden myself about certain concerns that sometimes pinch my good mood:

- I'm tired of the model of love that is being sold to us everywhere: it has the glitter and the size of soap bubbles. Many fall in love, go back and forth, and in the end nobody gets married....  

- Stop it, man, calm down," Carlos interrupted me while he put his cup on the plate with a soft blow. Don't get tragic: instead of complaining, we have to move. Like my nephew Miguel.

- The one studying Economics?

- Yes, he did. But he graduated a year ago... man, we needed to talk, eh! 

Well, a few weeks ago the kid had an inspiration.

- Is that so?

- After graduating, Miguel started working at the age of 24 in a consulting firm in Madrid. As he likes to go around greeting people, he is a guy who has endeared himself to his colleagues. About 25 people work (or maybe live) in his apartment. The bosses are at the back, in individual offices, and the employees share the living room, with half-height partitions dividing the tables.  

- As an American film.

- As it is. Apparently the work environment is not so gray. Miguel says that they even decorated something for Christmas: a little tree that you find as soon as you get out of the elevator and red ribbons on the window overlooking the city. 

- That's something.

- One morning the boss summoned the gang to the meeting room next to his office. The most awake ones managed to sit around the table, the others remained standing, forming a second and third row between the chairs and the walls. Miguel arrived a few minutes late, approached the room with his backpack over his shoulder and pressed himself against the door frame to listen.  

The chief gave his speech, "does anyone have any questions?" Cri-cri and "come on, let's get to work!". But before anyone could move, Miguel stepped in:

- Excuse me, I would like to give a warning. Taking advantage of the fact that we are all... 

- Of course," said the boss, disguising his curiosity with a polite bonus.

25 pairs of eyes were fixed on my nephew. And Miguel, holding back his emotion, let him go:

- I am getting married.

People looked at each other and discomfort spread through the room. Miguel became nervous, "maybe it wasn't the right time", and withdrew the smile he had so candidly offered. On the other side of the table, a woman in her 40s, who was particularly uneasy about the situation -perhaps because of her appreciation for my nephew-, asked the question that, it seemed, many shared:

- But, Miguel, why so young?

- Man," I said, interrupting Carlos in a frayed mood, "that woman could have said it more clearly. The woman could have said it more clearly. What Miguel probably meant by those words were other, crueler words: "You're not being reckless, or at least a little naive in pretending to dress up as a hero?" 

- Don't be dramatic," Carlos corrected me. Besides, at that moment, as I was telling you at the beginning, Miguel received an inspiration: he opened his backpack to take out his iPad, looked for something and showed the screen to his colleagues as if he was lifting a trophy. Suddenly the tension turned into warmth. It was a family photograph: in the center, two very elegant grandparents wearing Christmas hats; next to them, 7 smiling married couples; and filling every crack of the screen, some 35 or 40 grandchildren of varying stature and mischievousness. And while holding the photo, Miguel, with a tone of confidence, answered: 

- That's how I would like to live Christmas when I grow up, like my grandfather. And to get there, I'd better start early, right? That's why I'm getting married so young.

- Remarkable," I commented, "And how did people react?

- Several nodded, others smiled and the woman who had asked stood up, put a hand on my nephew's shoulder and congratulated him. 

Read more

Deciphering Christmas

If it is seen in its true sense, if we are sincere when we celebrate it, Christmas, that God made Child, is a reason to be truly joyful, not one day, but many.

December 24, 2021-Reading time: 11 minutes

Christmas morning dawned a bit chilly, although sunny. Don Enrique bundled up, as usual, more than usual, to go downstairs to get the newspaper and bread for breakfast: undershirt, micro-cropped shirt, wool sweater, thick cloth coat, gloves and scarf. More than enough, no matter how wintry it is on the Mediterranean coast. As he was about to leave the house, the voice of Carmelina, his late wife, resounded inside him:

-The cap, Enrique, because all the heat from your body goes through your head!

Despite the fact that he was not cold and always came home sweating, Don Enrique shrugged his shoulders, returned to the coat rack on which hung his gray plaid English cap, pulled it on and closed the door behind him.

Don Enrique was widowed last summer. The coronavirus ended the life of Carmelina, who was heart-sick, after 43 years of happy coexistence. Continuing to obey her advice was a way to continue to feel her close, to honor her memory.

As she was very cold, Enrique kept turning the heating up one degree higher than his body demanded and did not dare set foot on the floor without his sheepskin slippers. This obligation had caused him more than one annoyance when, plagued by his prostate problems, in the dark of night, the slippers disappeared from the usual radius of action. Until he found them with his fingertips and put them on, he would not get up, no matter how urgent the matter was.

The absence of his wife had greatly affected his character. He used to be an affable and attentive person, but, since his misfortune, he had become surly and, at times, even rude.

On the way to the kiosk where he bought his newspaper every morning, Don Enrique was thinking about last night's dinner. It is true that all his children and grandchildren were there, it is true that the dinner was good, but he did not feel like celebrating anything that year and he found his sons-in-law's jokes less funny than any other. To make matters worse, little Aitana threw up on his jacket when her mother put her in his arms to take the picture with grandpa and upload it to Facebook. That smell of sour milk wouldn't leave his pituitary! She was left with the consolation that, after Christmas Eve, the Christmas festivities are gradually descending in intensity until people seem to come to their senses at the beginning of January.

-Hello Juan, good morning.

-Good morning, Don Enrique, Merry Christmas!

-Yes, yes, Merry Christmas again, you told me that yesterday. Come on, cut the crap and give me the paper.

-But what newspaper, Don Enrique, didn't I remind you yesterday that on Christmas Day there are no paper newspapers. You will have to read it on the Internet.

-Internet for you and your bitch... I'm going to shut up.

-Okay, okay, Don Enrique, don't get angry. Take a magazine with you today, if you want. I have some very good ones here: look at this one on history, this one on science, this one on celebrities, this one...

Among the wide range of magazines on display, Don Enrique noticed one with an image of an Egyptian hieroglyphic on the cover. He had always liked archeology and it seemed the least bad option to replace his traditional morning reading.

-Thank you, my friend, and Merry Christmas! -the newsboy wished him as he handed him back his change.

-And Christmas! It's already... it's already over. Now, if anything, wish me a happy new year.

-Well, Don Enrique, today is Christmas, so we can still say it.

-Okay, okay, you're a pain in the ass! There you go," he said goodbye with a face of few friends, the same face with which he entered the nearby bakery.

-Merry Christmas, neighbor, what a bad face you have today. Was the turkey bad for you last night? -said Puri, the sales clerk, jocularly.

-What a mania to wish Merry Christmas after Christmas Eve! -replied the pensioner. Yes, it has already been Christmas, we have already eaten ham and nougat, we have already sung Christmas carols, and those of us who are still alive have been together. What more do you want?

-Well, they say Merry Christmas, but I'm not sure why. My boss tells me to treat customers well at this time of the year, which is when he makes the most money of the year.

-Come on, give me my bread soon, otherwise there will be a queue, and then your boss will scold you for entertaining customers.

Back at home, while he was having his morning coffee and toast with oil and garlic, Don Enrique opened the magazine because of the hieroglyphics report. It turned out that it had nothing to do with archaeology, but was one of those magazines about parapsychology and mysteries, and explained how the ancient Egyptians deciphered minds. It seems that, according to alleged studies by an Israeli university, they were able to read thoughts through the musicality of the sentences of their interlocutors. Supposedly, our brain is prepared to emit and receive through oral language, much more information than, in principle, we are aware of. Encrypted, below the words, depending on the intonation of the speaker, each of us is capable of emitting a series of waves outside the audible spectrum, which contain much more information than we would like to share. In other words, human beings, in origin, cannot lie, and language, as we know it today, would be a way of manipulating communication, masking it with loud sounds to prevent others from knowing what we really think. Scientists thought that this was, in fact, the great rupture of humanity that the oral tradition transmitted for millennia and that would later crystallize in the stories of Adam and Eve in Genesis. The first sin would be none other than the lie, the lack of communication between man and his fellow man, the barrier that separated humanity and broke the primordial harmony in which we were created.

That string of pseudo-scientific tales, together with the fact that he had been up all night, led the old man to fall into a stupor from which he only woke up after the phone rang.

-Mmm. Hello," he answered sleepily.

-Dad, Merry Christmas, how are you? (if he tells me he won't stay with the kids, he'll go to put the washing machine on and iron for who knows who).

The sensation of the answer was the strangest. Along with his daughter's voice asking him how he was, Don Enrique did not hear, but "felt" another superimposed sentence in which she threatened not to do his laundry if he did not take care of his grandchildren.

-Good morning, daughter. Yes, I'll stay with the children, but don't be like that!

-What do you mean, "Don't put me like that, Dad? And how do you know I'm calling to ask you to stay as a babysitter (thank goodness she said yes, because my mother-in-law's option makes me sick).

But what do you say about your mother-in-law if she's a sweetheart? Go on, bring them here, I can't wait to see them.

Of course she's a sweetheart, Dad. What's that all about? Who said otherwise (I didn't say anything about my mother-in-law, did I? Last night I drank more wine than I should have and my tongue gets loose...) Are you staying with the kids then? Are you sure you're all right? You look strange...

-Come on, come on, yes, I'm fine. I'm waiting for you.

They both hung up the phone with the feeling of having experienced one of the strangest calls of their lives.

Half an hour later, her daughter Carmeli appeared with her two offspring, Pablito, 10, and Aitana, 2. The eldest immediately jumped on her neck:

-(I love coming to your house because you let us eat everything my mother forbids us to eat and I steal the coins that fall out of your pants and stay under the cushion of your armchair).

-Hello Pablo, I think it's great," said the grandfather, affectionate and surprised by the attack of sincerity.

-I'm sorry, Dad," apologizes Carmeli, "it's an appointment with my husband's work and the nanny called us this morning to tell us that his parents have tested positive and she couldn't come. (It's better, because this way I save a little money and, to tell the truth, I'll be more relaxed with him than with that little girl. By the way, what a garlic smell, how can I say it without offending him?)

-Good morning, daughter, I'm not offended. I'm alone at home and I don't bother anyone with my garlic rubbed on my bread.

-Ah... I was just going to tell you, how good your house smells of Mediterranean diet (jeez, did I say that out loud? I'm not tasting last night's wine again). We will be back soon. Aitana has her potito in her bag (it sucks industrial food, I know, I wouldn't eat it; but where do I find the time to make her a homemade stew).

-She said goodbye, and finished bringing the cart in which little Aitana was sleeping into the house.

Seeing the esoteric magazine on the table, he began to connect the dots between the origin of these voices and the supposed human ability to decipher what others think; and he decided to continue testing it.

-Well, Pablito, what do you want to do today? Do you want to go for a walk?

-Of course, Grandpa, whatever you say," the grandson pleased him audibly, although the phrase was coded: (what a drag to go out with Grandpa and his sister to watch the ducks, what I want to do is lie on the couch and watch cartoons).

At the grandson's more than sincere response, Don Enrique's eyes widened enormously and he smiled as he confirmed that he still possessed that primitive gift that the report spoke of, to "listen" to the truth that others hide. So, neither short nor lazy, he decided to go out into the street to continue investigating how far he was capable of guessing thoughts.

-Well, come on, Pablo, don't take off your coat, we're leaving, and don't worry, it will only be for a while and I'll make it up to you by buying you some sweets.

There's no need, Grandpa, I already ate a lot last night (if I pretend not to be interested, they buy me the most expensive knick-knacks. It always works).

The old man repressed his laughter as best he could when he heard his grandson's coded answer as he took the cart with the little girl and closed the door of his house behind him.

When he reached the doorway, he passed Paco, the neighbor in the room, who greeted him cordially:

-Merry Christmas, Enrique (I'm going to be nice to him and his grandchildren to see if he forgets that I still owe him the lottery that we bought half and didn't win). What two handsome children you have with you. How well accompanied you are!

-Oh Paco, Paco. I thought you were absent-minded, but it seems to me that what you are is a bit clingy and a ball," he answered while he pinched the cheeks of his astonished face in response to that answer. Let's see when you pay me the 10 euros you owe me.

Pablito looked at his grandfather with a strange look on his face, as he went out into the street with a smile that was unusual for him lately, while he looked around for people to chat with. On his way to the park, the chestnut seller greeted him from afar:

-(Let's see if the old man with the grandchildren will buy me something, I haven't had a single customer all morning).

To which Don Enrique responded by standing in front of her, looking her up and down and saying: "Old me? You're old and the chestnuts you sell are old!", after which he continued on his way as if nothing had happened.

As he passed in front of the parish church, he saw Andrew, the young priest whom he had not seen since his wife's funeral. So he approached him to continue testing his new powers.

-Merry Christmas, Don Enrique," greeted the parish priest.

Puzzled that he had heard nothing more than those four words, the old man replied:

-Merry Christmas... and what else?

-Merry Christmas and that's all, is that not enough?

-Well, you see, people sayMerry Christmas, but in reality they say it just for the sake of saying it. Some just want to be nice, others want to take advantage of the commercial pull of Christmas, of the good feelings... What do you gain by congratulating me, because, besides, Christmas Eve is already over?

-Hahaha. It's true that Christmas is used a lot to sell smoke, and that's why many find it an empty holiday, but its meaning is very deep. When I sayMerry ChristmasI meanMerry Christmas.

As he said those words for the second time, Don Enrique felt a great emotion, like a pleasant shiver that ran down his spine and a tingling that tickled his temples. A lot of ideas from the priest's mind then flooded his heart:

(Say Merry Christmas, Don Enrique, is to wish all the best. I know. I know it is hard to learn to live without the one who has been everything in our lives, I know the mind rebels against God whom we blame for taking away the people we love. But Christmas is the answer to that grumpiness, for not only is God not cruel for allowing death, but He has decided to come Himself in person to conquer it and free us from it. By becoming a child at Christmas, He is putting Himself in our place, taking on our pain, our suffering... And opening heaven to us so that we can all meet again, one day, with Him who is all love and with all our loved ones. And that is why we do not say it only for Christmas Eve, but from today until well into January, because Christmas is so great that we have to celebrate it for weeks and congratulate ourselves for it. I know it is difficult to say all this here, in the middle of the street and in just two words, Don Enrique, but how I would like you to understand all that it means to sayMerry Christmas,)

Don Enrique received, overwhelmed by its depth, the priest's message. It is true," he reflected, "that the death of his wife had embittered his existence and that he thought that God, if He existed, would be a monster for having taken her away. And it is true that, if Christmas is only the feast of consumption and being together, it loses its charm when there is no money or health or when there are no people we love. But if we look at it in its true sense, if we are sincere when we celebrate it, it is a reason to be truly joyful, not just one day, but many.

The conversation had awakened little Aitana, who was waking up in her overalls. When she realized that she was next to her grandfather and saw the Christmas decorations outside the temple, she gave him the best of smiles and, with her half tongue, let out an affectionate "Felí Navidá" in which the grandfather deciphered that she was saying without saying: (I like to look at you and listen to you, I like to be with you and that you tell me stories and take me to see the ducks. I miss grandma, but being with you I forget that she is not here, I love you more grandpa!)

-Very good, little one, you seem to have understood," replied the young parish priest, giving the little girl a little hug. Merry Christmas! You see, what two beautiful words, Grandpa?

-Two words, yes," replied the old man, "but what two dense words. Thank you for explaining them a little better.

-Thanks to you, if I have hardly said anything....

On his way home from the walk, Don Enrique fed his grandchildren and sent them to take a nap on the sofa. While he was watching the news on TV, and still reflecting on the priest's words, he dozed off and the phone rang:

-Mmm, hello," replied the old man sleepily.

-Dad, good morning, how are you?

-Well, here I am a bit surprised. But what do you mean, good morning, good afternoon?

-No dad, it's 11 o'clock in the morning, did you not sleep well because of the dinner? Well, anyway, I'll call you to see if you can stay with the children, I'm having lunch with my husband's work...

Don Enrique looked at the sofa and it was empty, there was no trace of his grandchildren's visit, and on the table were the remains of the breakfast he had been eating while reading the magazine. His daughter was calling him now to ask him to stay with the children because, in reality, they had never been there. He understood that his last hours, his ability to decipher minds, his conversation with the neighbor, with the one with the chestnuts, with the priest... all that had been just an amusing dream, albeit a very revealing one.

-Yes, daughter, yes, bring them here, I'm looking forward to seeing them. And here they will be better than with any nanny, right? And better than with your mother-in-law! hahaha

-Of course, dad, as with you, with nobody. Thanks, I'll be there in a while.

-You're welcome, daughter, you're welcome. And Merry Christmas!

-That's right, Dad...", replied the daughter strangely, "Merry Christmas!

When he hung up the phone, Don Enrique got up and, without putting on his slippers, went to the heating panel and turned it down one degree. He then took the portrait of his wife whose frame presided over the sideboard, kissed it and whispered affectionately: Merry Christmas Carmelina!

Instantly, his wife's reply resounded inside him: "Merry Christmas to you too, Enrique (but just know that you're going to be cold!)".

The authorAntonio Moreno

Journalist. Graduate in Communication Sciences and Bachelor in Religious Sciences. He works in the Diocesan Delegation of Media in Malaga. His numerous "threads" on Twitter about faith and daily life have a great popularity.

Spain

Closing ceremony of the VIII centenary of Saint Dominic of Guzmán

The Jubilee of the VIII Centenary of St. Dominic de Guzman closed on Wednesday, December 22, with a Eucharist presided over by the Apostolic Nuncio to Spain, Bishop Bernardito Auza, in the parish of Our Lady of the Rosary of the Philippines, in Madrid.

Maria José Atienza-December 23, 2021-Reading time: < 1 minute

The Dominicans of Spain closed this time of celebrations in which the figure of the saintly founder of the Order of Preachers has become more topical than ever and in which exhibitions, congresses and, above all, Eucharistic celebrations around the world have been, despite the restrictions due to the pandemic, moments of unity and reflection for the whole Dominican family.

The Holy Mass to close the Jubilee Year in Spain was presided over by the Apostolic Nuncio, who was accompanied by Friar César Valero, Vicar of the Province of the Rosary in Spain, and Friar Jesús Díaz Sariego, Prior of the Province of Hispania.

Members of all the branches of the Dominican Family were present: nuns, friars, sisters, lay people, young people and members of the priestly fraternities.

During the Mass, Bishop Bernardito Auza defined St. Dominic de Guzman as "....a luminous star in the middle of the Churchwas truly the light of the world. He was so, not only by his wisdom and goodness or by the works he accomplished, but by the gift he received closely united to the mother of God".

In addition, the Nuncio of His Holiness thanked the members of the Dominican family "for the work practiced by the Dominicans stimulating the encounter between faith and reasonnourishing the vitality of the Christian faith and promoting the Church's mission of drawing hearts and minds to Christ, our Lord".

During the celebration, the choir Schola Antiquaplayed the Mass of St. Dominic's own, taken from the Exemplara book with all the Dominican liturgy that was made in the 13th century, and of which there is a copy in the Convent of San Esteban de Salamanca.

The World

Christmas and other devotions in Africa

Christmas Eve, Christmas, Ash Wednesday and Lent are some of the liturgical dates that Christians on the African continent are most concerned about.

Martyn Drakard-December 23, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

Among African Christians, major Christian feasts are celebrated in grand style. In her best-known book, Memories of Africa, Karen Blixen describes a typical Christmas Eve mass at the French mission near Nairobi, accompanied by the shy Kikuyu boy Kamante, who lent a hand to everything on his farm, but who, while receiving medical treatment at the Scottish Presbyterian mission had been warned of the statue of a woman at the Catholic mission and was afraid to attend, but was won over by the festive atmosphere, the Christmas crib "fresh from Paris", the hundreds of candles and the gaily dressed congregation, and lost all his fear.

The tradition of midnight mass continues to thrive here, although some parishes in the larger cities have suspended them for fear of insecurity. They are prepared ahead of time and awaited with great expectation. A nativity is a big event in Africa, and the Nativity of the Child Jesus has its unique flavor, which never disappoints, and the faithful want to be there at midnight to welcome the 25th once again.
But Christmas is a day of gifts, the day of the year when all family members gather to celebrate, a day of stories and memories.

In Africa, "family" means the extended family, which is usually quite large. And "Christmas" means the week leading up to New Year's Day, a time of rest, of visits from relatives, neighbors, friends, of generosity and open hospitality. It is also a time of quick profits for private means of transportation, buses, public cabs that double their fares counting on the desperation of city dwellers to get home to town in time for the holiday. It is the only time of the year when a noisy and frenetic capital city like Nairobi experiences peace and quiet.

The long Easter Vigil Mass is also widely observed, but perhaps most significant is the Good Friday Passion. Kampala, the Ugandan capital, for example, hosts an ecumenical Stations of the Cross through the city center. In addition, each Catholic church holds its own Stations of the Cross, culminating in Good Friday ceremonies, and many try to fit in a viewing of Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ.

In the villages, the Stations of the Cross take up a large part of the day, and a man (or a woman, if there is no man to volunteer) carries a heavy cross for several kilometers through the village, across fields and ridges, as if to say: Jesus Christ carried his; what I suffer is little in comparison. And this, often in the middle of the rainy season.

But perhaps most striking of all is the seriousness given to Ash Wednesday as it is celebrated in Catholic churches. It is not a feast of obligation and yet it may be the day of the liturgical year that attracts the most people, and not just Catholics. On this day parish priests have to organize many more Masses. And what is the attraction? The ashes and what they seem to symbolize: contrition, sin, forgiveness, the transitory nature of this present life and death; and also affirming one's identity as a Catholic. People are moved by the words: Man, dust thou art and unto dust shalt thou return. It has become such a tradition that employers not only allow their employees time off to attend Mass, but some even remind them to attend. It also happens that, if the faithful miss the Mass proper, they go to the priest in the evening to ask for "ashes".

Africans do not deprive themselves of fasting during Lent, and not only of giving up sweets and chocolate during this period. The Church's prescription on the amount of food that can be consumed on fast days makes little sense here, as does the abstention from meat. For most of the faithful meat is already a luxury. Most of the population eats when they are hungry, if they can, and have long been accustomed to eating one meal a day, simply because they cannot afford two meals or more. However, whether the fast is out of necessity or devotion, the faithful take it seriously, and it can include not drinking water for many hours. Lent here takes place during the hottest and driest season of the year, just before the rains around Easter.

Finally, death is treated with great solemnity. It is a serious social and community duty to ensure that the deceased receives a "dignified farewell" to the afterlife. When circumstances permit, relatives and friends attend the wake. Sometimes their praises are sung at the funeral service, literally in some places, and there is dancing; eulogy and speeches praising their life, their contribution to the community or country, and their virtues will occupy much of the day. Anything else is considered disrespectful and shameful.

Africa may be backward and outdated in many ways, but in the main it may have got it right.

Sunday Readings

"I kept all those things in my heart." Holy Family Sunday

Andrea Mardegan comments on the readings for Holy Family Sunday and Luis Herrera offers a brief video homily. 

Andrea Mardegan-December 23, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

After two days of vain attempts, we returned with Joseph to the temple determined to go where the women could not enter. We asked the angels of the Lord to protect us. We found our way: I knew the temple well, the back streets and the deserted streets. I covered my face a little and they paid no attention to me. We arrived at a hall where the teachers used to meet to discuss the Scriptures. We heard his unmistakable voice. We looked at the scene in amazement: he was sitting as the teacher of teachers, and all around him. Different feelings mingled in Joseph's heart and in mine.

Joy and gratitude to God for finding him safe and sound, and then amazement: shouldn't he have waited until he was an adult? There he was revealing himself as the teacher of the wise men of Israel, and he was only twelve years old. Joseph and I realized that Jesus knew much better than we did the things we had taught him. Why had he not told us anything, and made us suffer so much? Jesus "listened to them and asked them questions" and the teachers "they were amazed by his intelligence and his answers.".

We had the secret joy that other people, and with authority, had known and admired a little the ineffable mystery of our son. But Joseph became afraid: now they praise him, but what then? Herod consulted priests and scribes to know where the Messiah was going to be born and deceived the magi to kill Jesus. And he killed the children of Bethlehem... Maybe some of them can remember and make a calculation of the years that have passed... He said in my ear: "Let's leave as soon as possible. Let's blend in with the crowd.

I listened to him, recovered my strength and took a step forward without worrying about the temple doctors, proud to be the mother of this prodigy. I thought: you listen to him so attentively, but now he listens to me. "Son, why have you done this to us? See that your father and I, in anguish, were looking for you.". I named Joseph before me, the father of the family, who had supported and guided me during those three days. Jesus knew that we were very close and that is why he responded to both of us: "¿Why did you seek me, did you not know that I must be about my Father's business?"

We did not understand his answer. We thought: aren't the things of your Father also in Nazareth and in Joseph's work? But we remained silent. We understood that he was too far above us. Besides, mixed with his divine origin, there was also something of human adolescence. Better to wait. We will talk to him again at a propitious moment. Later. At home. And it worked. He came back to us. He was docile and lovingly available. "And he grew in wisdom, and in age, and in grace." I "kept all these things" in my heart.

The homily on the readings for Holy Family Sunday

The priest Luis Herrera Campo offers its nanomiliaa small one-minute reflection for these readings.

Photo Gallery

A girl takes a picture of a Christmas tree with New York in the background.

A girl in Jersey City takes a photo of a Christmas tree with views of New York City on the horizon. Christmas days are eagerly awaited to be enjoyed as they once were, together with family and friends, but with caution.

Omnes-December 23, 2021-Reading time: < 1 minute
Spain

Spanish bishops offer their collaboration to create humanitarian corridors

The bishops have expressed their willingness to offer their collaboration to government administrations to promote the establishment of humanitarian corridors at all levels (municipal, regional, national).

Maria José Atienza-December 22, 2021-Reading time: < 1 minute

The bishops belonging to the Episcopal Commission for Social Pastoral and Human Promotion of the Spanish Episcopal Conference have published a communiqué with this offer, echoing the words of Pope Francis in the audience of Wednesday, December 22.

In this meeting, the Holy Father made a humanitarian appeal to all countries and dioceses that make the Catholic Church present in Europe, to respond in solidarity and collaborate in taking charge of the relocation of so many migrants and refugees in the Mediterranean region.

the bishops have called for a joint collaboration, similar to "what is done in other European countries, while promoting new models of sustainable and legal reception, based on community sponsorship with which to offer migrants and refugees a dignified, stable and inclusive reception, according to our capacities"..

The Spanish prelates are intimately familiar with the humanitarian drama of families and migrants or those seeking international protection. It is not in vain that Spain is one of the hot spots for the entry of migrants into Europe, especially through the Strait of Gibraltar and the Canary Islands.

In these days of deep significance for migrants, the prelates recalled that "God continues to knock on our doors as Christmas approaches" and called on "our Christian communities and society as a whole to responsibly welcome those who need us with a heart that looks into the eyes of the people".

The bishops have encouraged the administrations to "seek stable and fair solutions that promote legislation and economic means focused on orderly migration processes and concrete channels of reception and hospitality that allow them to realize their life project in Europe and Spain".

Latin America

Pope to travel to Canada to meet with indigenous people

The Canadian Bishops' Conference has invited Pope Francis to visit the region, which he has accepted, as part of the process of national reconciliation with the indigenous people of this country.

Fernando Emilio Mignone-December 22, 2021-Reading time: 4 minutes

On October 27, the Holy See announced that Francis will travel to Canada, invited by the Conference of Bishops, as part of the process of national reconciliation with the indigenous people of this country. It is a visit explicitly requested by Canadian indigenous leaders, who in a 2015 report recommended that the Pope personally apologize on Canadian soil for past historical wrongs: he, they said, should apologize to survivors, their families and indigenous communities for the role of the Catholic Church in the spiritual, cultural, emotional, physical and sexual abuse of indigenous people in Catholic-run residential schools. 

June 8 Omnes reported "discovery" in KamloopsBritish Columbia, of some 200 unidentified graves, perhaps of native wards. The forgotten cemetery was next to a former Canadian government boarding school run by Oblates of Mary Immaculate, a religious order that missions in western and northern Canada. That news set off a hot summer. Christian churches burned and vandalized, demonstrations, children's slippers adorning public places, statues toppled, pleas for forgiveness from government and Catholic authorities: that's the precedent for this next papal adventure. With parresia.

Before Francis comes to Canada, others will go to Rome. Even so, a visit to the Vatican by a joint delegation of Canadian bishops and indigenous leaders from December 17-20 has recently been postponed. That delegation would meet with Francis, who would hear from the lion's mouth what the indigenous leaders had to say to him, and plans for the papal pilgrimage would continue. The delegation's visit to the Vatican would likely take place in the spring of 2022. And Pope Francis' trip would follow.

There have been three pontifical trips to Canada: John Paul II toured the entire country in September 1984, returned exclusively to meet with indigenous people in 1987 at Fort Simpson (population 1,500) in the Northwest Territory, and was at WYD Toronto in 2002, which drew the largest crowd in our history: 800,000 people. 

When Francis comes, it will be the fourth papal trip in four decades, and the second to meet with our first nations. This in a multicultural country par excellence, with more than fifty indigenous cultures and languages, many of them at high risk of disappearing (spoken by less than ten thousand people, sometimes only hundreds). 

Perhaps half of the nearly two million Canadians with Aboriginal roots are baptized Catholics. 

Colonization

The words of Francis at the Angelus on June 6 give an idea of the end of the trip, which may take place in 2022: "I follow with sorrow the news from Canada about the shocking discovery of the remains of 215 children, pupils of the Kamloops Indian Residential Schoolin the province of British Columbia. I join the Canadian bishops and the entire Catholic Church in Canada in expressing my closeness to the Canadian people, who have been traumatized by this shocking news.

The sad discovery heightens our awareness of the pain and suffering of the past. The political and religious authorities of Canada continue to collaborate with determination to shed light on this sad event and humbly engage in a path of reconciliation and healing. These difficult times are a strong call for all of us to move away from the colonizing model and also from the ideological colonizations of today, and to walk together in dialogue, mutual respect and recognition of the rights and cultural values of all the daughters and sons of Canada. We commend to the Lord the souls of all the children who died in Canada's residential schools and pray for the grieving families and Native Canadian communities."

Note the call to stay away of today's ideological colonizations. This is not the first time that Francis has pointed out that governments and other influential "colonizing" actors crush the cultural values of defenseless populations. 

A current Canadian example. Justin Trudeau's center-left Liberal Party was re-elected with a parliamentary minority on September 20. It promotes abortion and other "reproductive rights" in countries culturally less materialistic, individualistic and hedonistic than Canada. Thus, on June 4, 2019, Trudeau announced that "the Government of Canada will increase its contribution to 1.4 billion Canadian dollars annually, starting in 2023, to support the health of women and girls around the world. This is a ten-year commitment. This historic investment will support sexual and reproductive health and rights and maternal, newborn and child health - with $700 million dedicated specifically to sexual and reproductive rights, starting in 2023."

Now, in the current crisis, it is precisely the Canadian government that is being blamed for not respecting the values of our First Nations in the past.

Burning of churches

This columnist visited in 2020 a beautiful and historic church in the town of Morinville, Alberta: Saint Jean Baptiste. Well, on June 30, 2021, it was reduced to ashes. The Filipino parish priest, Father Trini Pinca, sent me photos showing the burnt tabernacle and the large host incinerated in its pix. 

Five other Catholic churches were incinerated in June and July 2021, in the three western provinces, and many others, also Anglican, damaged or vandalized.

The reaction of the "premier" of the province of Alberta to the burning of the Morinville church was immediate: Jason Kenney declared on visiting the ruins that "it appears to have been a criminal act of violence inspired by hate." But Trudeau was more ambiguous. On July 2, the prime minister described the vandalism and arson attacks on Canadian churches as "wrong and unacceptable," later adding that the anger directed at the Church was "totally understandable."

Bishop Paul Terrio, bishop of the Diocese of Saint Paul, Alberta, where Morinville is located, said Alexander First Nation was one of the first communities to contact him after news of the St. Jean Baptiste fire broke. "It was a very touching and personal message, expressing their grief and sorrow and offering any contribution and help possible" (Edmonton Journal, Aug. 28). Father Pinca is raising funds to rebuild the church; in the meantime, he says Mass in a high school gymnasium.

Read more
Spain

The other Christmas portals

The Caritas campaign for these days recalls the situation of social exclusion in which 11 million people in Spain find themselves.

Maria José Atienza-December 22, 2021-Reading time: < 1 minute

11 million people, 2.5 million more than in 2018, will live these days a difficult Christmas. They are the other portals of millions of homes in our country in which a deep imprint of hopelessness lingers and to which Caritas wants to arrive, especially at this time of the year.

This Christmas every portal matters is the slogan of the campaign that Caritas Spain is launching these days with the aim of "giving birth to the best that we are and sharing it with the rest of the people".

In this line, Caritas encourages us to look at others and "spend our lives in rebuilding a different and better society than the one we have", helping those who have less to "build a community that cares for and celebrates the encounter and life from love, from solidarity and compassion that inhabit us".

Solidarity carol

This year the singer Pastora Soler was in charge of performing the traditional Christmas carol of Cáritas Española. 

The carol has had the collaboration of the San Pablo CEU University Foundation, which has promoted the project. The income obtained through the visualizations of the carol will go entirely to Caritas Spain.

Who does Christmas bother?

If someone is bothered by the presence of religious Christmas motifs, it is because, perhaps, they have a problem, a real disease of our times: intolerance.

December 22, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

Christmas is approaching once again this year. Nowhere more than in the millions of cards that we Christians exchange at this time of the year are so many wishes for peace, love and happiness for all concentrated in a few lines. Who can be bothered by this message?

A few weeks ago, "guidelines for inclusive communication" were leaked, with the support of EU Equality Commissioner Helena Dilli, inviting European civil servants to avoid language that might offend the sensibilities of citizens. Among other considerations, it was recommended to replace the expression "Merry Christmas" with "Happy Holidays", or to dispense with the use of Christian names to exemplify certain situations.

A democratic society must be built on a balance between respect for religious and belief plurality and the state's position of neutrality. This balance favors public order and tolerance, which is important for the proper functioning of inclusive societies. The neutrality of the State implies that it should not take a position that prevents minorities - religious or otherwise - from realizing their legitimate ideals.

If the European Union is committed to respecting diversity and promoting tolerance (Art. 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights), it should not promote self-censorship of anyone - even if it is a Christian majority - but encourage everyone to express, respectfully, their most intimate beliefs and desires, both in public and in private.

I have never been offended by the presence of symbols of other religions wherever I go. The Buddhist Pagoda in Battersea Park in London does not bother me at all. In Jerusalem I have entered with admiration and respect the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosques and prayed at the Wailing Wall, together with Jewish believers. I have visited Orthodox and Protestant churches in Moscow or Zurich, and also the magnificent Mormon temple in Washington D.C. I have never felt insulted by the religious expressions of others, no matter how different their beliefs may be from mine.

Sincerely, I believe that only those who want to make religion invisible have an interest in using the easy argument of diversity and respect for minorities to launch this kind of cancellation messages. Plurality - which undoubtedly includes Christians - should not offend anyone. And if someone is upset, it is because perhaps he or she has a problem, a real disease of our times: intolerance.

Equality Commissioner Dilli herself retweeted Commission President Von der Leyden on December 2 last year, congratulating the Jewish community on Hanukkah. I think it's great that she does so. That is why I am waiting for her tweet to congratulate, at least with the same enthusiasm, Christmas to all Christians.

The authorMontserrat Gas Aixendri

Professor at the Faculty of Law of the International University of Catalonia and director of the Institute for Advanced Family Studies. She directs the Chair on Intergenerational Solidarity in the Family (IsFamily Santander Chair) and the Childcare and Family Policies Chair of the Joaquim Molins Figueras Foundation. She is also Vice-Dean of the Faculty of Law at UIC Barcelona.

Read more
Latin America

Encouraging a beautiful tradition in the family

The tradition of the Nativity Scene contest organized in Ponce, Puerto Rico, is intended to reflect Pope Francis' desire to "encourage the beautiful tradition of our families".

Javier Font Alvelo-December 22, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

Immersed in early December 2019 in the preparation of a Nativity Scene Contest in the busiest shopping center in the city of Ponce, Plaza del Caribe, we received with special joy the publication of the Apostolic Letter on the meaning and value of the Nativity Scene, with which Pope Francis wants to "to encourage the beautiful tradition of our families who in the days before Christmas prepare the nativity scene, as well as the custom of placing it in the workplace, in schools, in hospitals, in prisons, in squares..."(Admirabile Signum n. 1). 

We encouraged families to participate by valuing teamwork and offering the opportunity for the winners to receive their award and a gift from the hands of the Holy Kings of Juana Diaz. In addition, the winning works would be temporarily exhibited in the Museum of the Holy Magi in Juana Diaz, the only one in the world dedicated to these saints. This not only allowed many other people to contemplate these scenes represented in painting or in three-dimensional form, but it would also awaken in the participants themselves concrete purposes of generosity, as we discovered at the conclusion of this year's third edition of the Nativity Contest. 

Sofia Valeria, a 16 year old girl who won one of the painting categories with a work full of tenderness, informed us of her desire to donate her valuable work to the Museum. She, like all the participants, was asked to write down on the Registration Form "¿?What is the newborn baby God telling me?", seeding the good advice of Pope Francis that in the making of nativity scenes ".what counts is that it speaks to our life". (Admirabile Signum n. 10). With this work, Sofía Valeria expressed her desire to achieve that "the viewer is able to see and feel the bright and warm light that Jesus emits. A light that embraces us and guides us to God.".

In the case of Maria Paula, another 16 year old who came in second place with a painting of a nativity scene in which she was included with her 7 siblings, she expressed that she placed the 3 youngest ones closer to the Baby God ".since it is the children who are closest to Jesus"and the 4 eldest, who all sing, I draw "on the way to the stable, because for Christmas we have to travel a long road called Advent (...) with masks, which represent the current difficulties that should never hinder our approach to Jesus this Christmas.". 

The exhibition of nativity scenes also awakened other expressions in the artisans who were selling outside and to many passers-by. The craftswoman Carmen approached the exhibition to ask: ¿?how can i help?". We told him that his work offered for the fruits of it was enough, but that generous soul came back after a while with one of his beautiful works on paper and donated it: "this is what I know how to do and what I want to donate".

A lady who had entrusted the healing of her son from cancer or his march to Heaven to the Holy Magi came forward to narrate how God granted her a special grace when on the feast of the Three Kings following the death of her son she was able to cross paths with the Magician King Melchior, who stopped before her during a procession and filled her with hope with his attentive and profound gaze. 

That more intense look at Bethlehem, capable of filling us with hope and joy, is what we encourage in every family through this beautiful tradition. 

The authorJavier Font Alvelo

Puerto Rico

Read more
Sunday Readings

"The light of the Child enveloped them". Solemnity of the Nativity of the Lord

Andrea Mardegan comments on the readings for the Nativity of the Lord and Luis Herrera offers a brief video homily. 

Andrea Mardegan-December 22, 2021-Reading time: 2 minutes

Mary and Joseph wondered if, like the conception, the birth of Jesus would also have a miraculous character. The "in pain you will give birth" of Genesis was a consequence of original sin. However, He is the Son of God! But He is also the son of Adam and Eve... One aspect worried Mary: the midwives of Nazareth would intervene in the birth. They could steal her secret. She was a virgin: she had not had sexual relations with a man. They could get to know beforehand the divine origin of the Child. But without the capacity to understand it, without being called to it by God. She would have felt violated in her intimacy.

The midwives already intended to intervene to give birth to that Child everyone was talking about, intending to be the first to investigate the similarities and dissimilarities with Joseph, and perhaps find the similarities with someone else they suspected. "Let us wait. Let us pray," Joseph suggested, "God will help us, as He has done so far."

And then came the news of the empire's census. A woman about to give birth was not obliged to make a two-hundred-kilometer trip to register. She could have gone later, or even given up. But talking and praying, Mary and Joseph understood that the census was God's answer: it gave them the opportunity to get away from Nazareth: "Let's go!". They decided together. For Mary, it was worth the effort at stake. They remembered Micah's prophecy: the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem! They were moved: Bethlehem was the land of David, from whom Jesus was descended. "Everything is coming back!". Joseph was confident: "It is my homeland, there are many relatives of my father. They will help us."

They made the accounts without the host. The Nazarenes renewed their criticism, saying that it was dangerous to make a long journey before giving birth, and that to run such a risk to obey the Romans was out of place; moreover, to the land of David, who was punished by God for taking a census.

They did the math even without the Bethlehemites. The arrival of a woman about to give birth seemed strange to them. They did not want complications with blood, which made them unclean. And some murmuring had reached them from Nazareth. Joseph and Mary found themselves rejected. No one helped them, initially.

Only at the end did Joseph find such housing for the animals. They were happy, because they were alone. But with a lot of inconveniences. They supported each other. No blame was exchanged. The light of the Child enveloped them. Warned by the angels came the shepherds, considered by all as sinners, for it was their fault that the Messiah had not yet come. They understood that their Son had wanted to be born among the excluded, the impure.

Homily on the readings of the Nativity of the Lord

The priest Luis Herrera Campo offers its nanomiliaa small one-minute reflection for these readings.

Education

UFV and Ratzinger Foundation announce the VI Open Reasoning Awards

The Francisco de Vitoria University in collaboration with the Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI Vatican Foundation has announced the 6th edition of the Open Reason Awards.

Maria José Atienza-December 21, 2021-Reading time: 1 minute

TheVI Open Reason Awards of international character, aim to promote academic research and innovation in the spirit of Benedict XVI's proposal to broaden the horizons of reason.

This proposal is based on the use of reason which, starting from its specific science, opens its horizons to understand man and the world in its totality through dialogue with philosophy and theology.

The call is addressed to university professors and researchers, individually or as a working group. The awards will recognize transdisciplinary works that show, from their scientific area, an openness to an integrating principle.

The very basis of these VI Open Reason Awards point out that it is necessary "not only the dialogue with other sciences, but the relationship with Philosophy and/or Theology at that point where the questions for a meaning that science itself cannot satisfy are found. Works that explicitly question and incorporate reflection on anthropology, epistemology, ethics and meaning in their particular science, in the categories of Research and Teaching".

The researchers may submit scientific publications that take up the challenge of addressing the anthropological, epistemological, ethical and meaning questions of their particular science or discipline.

For their part, the teachers Those who opt for this distinction may present academic programs explaining in detail how the anthropological, epistemological, ethical and meaning questions are integrated in the teaching of the particular science or discipline.

Two prizes of 25,000 euros will be awarded in the Research category and two prizes of 25,000 euros in the Teaching category.

Entries may be submitted until March 13, 2023 and the shipment is made through the platform ready for delivery on the awards website.

 

Read more
The Vatican

The answer to doubts about the application of Traditionis custodes

The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments has published the answers to the most frequently asked questions about the application of Traditionis custodesThe two key points expressed by Pope Francis in the motu proprio and in the letter that accompanies it are recalled and concretized in the motu proprio.

Juan José Silvestre-December 21, 2021-Reading time: 5 minutes

On Saturday, December 18, the answers given by the Congregation for Divine Worship to various questions were published. dubbia that had been raised after the publication, on July 16, 2021, of the motu proprio Traditionis custodes on the use of the Roman liturgy before the reform of 1970. The Congregation has carefully examined the questions raised from various quarters, has informed the Holy Father and having received his consent now publishes the answers to the most recurrent questions.

In reality, the responses do nothing more than recall and concretize two points that are clearly expressed in Pope Francis' motu proprio and the letter that accompanies it:

The only expression of the lex orandi

First of all, that the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Popes Paul VI and John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council, are the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite (cfr. Francisco motu proprio Traditionis custodes1). In fact, the motu proprio Traditionis custodes, aims to re-establish in the whole Church of the Roman Rite a single and identical prayer that expresses its unity following the books published after the Second Vatican Council, which are in line with the whole tradition of the Church. As the Holy Father reminds us: since liturgical actions are not private actions, but celebrations of the Church, which is the sacrament of unity, they must be carried out in communion with the Church (cfr. Sacrosanctum concilium, n. 26). A communion that implies remaining in the Church not only with the body, but also with the heart. This is the direction in which, as the Congregation reminds us, we want to move, and this is the meaning of the answers published here. Hence, in them we find concrete indications in relation to this first point. We highlight the following:

The liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council, are the sole expression of the lex orandi of the Roman rite.

Juan José Silvestre. Professor of Liturgy at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, Rome.

Only in canonically erected personal parishes is the Bishop authorized to grant, according to his discernment, the license to make use only of the Rituale romanum (last editio typica 1952) and not the Pontificale romanum preceding the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council. Thus, Confirmation cannot be celebrated even in the personal parishes according to the Pontificale romanum The formula for the Sacrament of Confirmation was modified for the entire Latin Church by St. Paul VI.

In the celebration that makes use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 the readings will be proclaimed in the vernacular language (cfr. Motu proprio Traditionis custodes3 & 3). In order to carry out this indication, and taking into account that the 1962 Missal contains in a single book the texts of the Mass and the readings, the latter are to be done using the translations of Sacred Scripture for liturgical use, approved by the respective Episcopal Conferences. Furthermore, it is forbidden to publish a lectionary in the vulgar language that corresponds to the readings of the 1962 Missal. In this way, one of the most precious fruits of the liturgical reform of the Second Vatican Council, the Lectionary, is protected. There will be only one Lectionary, which is the one published after the Council's liturgical reform.

In order to grant authorization to celebrate with the 1962 Missal to a priest ordained after the publication of the motu proprio, bishops must request authorization from the Congregation for Divine Worship. The reason for this is clearly specified in the response: the only expression of the lex orandi of the Roman rite are the books promulgated by Paul VI and John Paul II in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council: it is therefore absolutely desirable that priests ordained after the publication of the Motu proprio share this desire of the Holy Father.

To provide for the good of those rooted in the above form.

The second point to be recalled and made more concrete concerns the fact that the indications on how to proceed in the dioceses are dictated primarily by the principle of providing for the good of those who are rooted in the previous form of celebration and need time to return to the Roman Rite promulgated by Saints Paul VI and John Paul II (cfr. Francis, letter accompanying the motu proprio Traditionis custodes). In line with the previous statement, the answers read: 

The indications on how to proceed in the dioceses are dictated primarily by the principle of providing for the good of those who are rooted in the previous form of celebration.

Juan José Silvestre.Professor of Liturgy at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross, Rome.

"Efforts must be made to accompany all those connected with the preceding celebratory form towards a full understanding of the value of the celebration in the ritual form given to us by the reform of the Second Vatican Council, by means of an adequate formation that will allow us to discover how it is a witness to an unchanged faith, an expression of a renewed ecclesiology, a primary source of spirituality for Christian life."

"Under normal circumstances, the parish church is excluded as a place where the celebration with the Missale romanum 1962 Missal because it is thereby affirmed that the celebration of the Eucharist according to the preceding rite, being a concession limited to such groups, is not part of the ordinary life of the parish community. In the event that it is not possible to find a place other than a parish for the celebration with the 1962 Missal, the diocesan bishop may ask the Congregation for authorization for it to take place in a parish church. If the impossibility of using another church, oratory or chapel is ascertained with scrupulous care, authorization may be granted. In the latter case, it does not seem appropriate that such a celebration be included in the parish Mass schedule since only the faithful who are part of the group participate in it. These faithful are in no case marginalized by these dispositions, since they are only reminded that this concession is made in view of the common use of the one and only Mass. lex orandi of the Roman Rite and not an opportunity to promote the preceding rite".

"As regards the priests, deacons and ministers who participate in the celebration by making use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 must always have the authorization of the diocesan bishop. Authorization that, in the case of the priest, is valid only for the territory of the diocese where he exercises his ministry and that he will have to ask for himself, if he is substituting another authorized priest".

Celebrate the renewed liturgy with dignity and fervor

We believe that the motu proprio Traditionis custodesthe letter that accompanied it and now the answers to these questions. dubbia are in line with what St. Paul VI pointed out: "It is in the name of Tradition that we ask all our children, all Catholic communities, to celebrate the renewed liturgy with dignity and fervor. The adoption of the new Ordo missae was not left to the discretion of the priests or the faithful: and the Instruction of June 14, 1971 provided for the celebration of the Mass in the old form, with the authorization of the Ordinary only for elderly or sick priests who offer the Divine Sacrifice. sine populo. The new Ordo was promulgated to replace the old one, after mature deliberation, following the indications of the Second Vatican Council".

As this recent document of the Congregation for Divine Worship recalls, "one fact is undeniable, the Council Fathers felt the urgency of a reform so that the truth of the faith celebrated would appear more and more in all its beauty and the people of God would grow in full, active and conscious participation in the liturgical celebration" therefore, the document continues, "we are all called to rediscover the value of liturgical reform while safeguarding the truth and beauty of the Rite given to us. We are aware that a renewed and ongoing liturgical formation is necessary, both for priests and for the lay faithful".

The publication of the motu proprio Traditionis custodesthe accompanying letter and now from the answers to the dubbia, clearly expressed the Holy Father's wish: the only expression of the Holy Father's desire is the lex orandi of the Roman Rite is contained in the liturgical books promulgated by the Holy Popes Paul VI and John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of the Second Vatican Council. For this reason, a liturgical formation is encouraged that accompanies the understanding and experience of the richness of the liturgical reform desired by the Second Vatican Council, which has been able to value all the elements of the Roman Rite and has favored the participation of the entire People of God in the liturgy, the primary source of authentic Christian spirituality.

Twentieth Century Theology

Kierkegaard's multiple influences on theology

Kierkegaard's intense personality and complex work has been the occasion of many awakenings of Christian authenticity in great Protestant and Catholic authors, and has shed light on an enormous number of subjects. 

Juan Luis Lorda-December 21, 2021-Reading time: 7 minutes

Text in Italian here

There are three 19th century Christian thinkers who fascinate 20th century theology: Newman, Dostoyevsky and Kierkegaard. Curiously, they arrive by almost common channels to Germany and France, and to the Christian universe as a whole. All three have "dramatic" biographies, or parts of them. In Newman, his conversion. In Dostoyevsky, his whole life. In Kierkegaard (1813-1855), the second part and especially the end of his short life (1846-1855), when he fully assumes what he considers his mission: to make Christians Christians who are not Christians. 

A dramatic life

Only his (long) stay at the university has, in general, a carefree and youthful tone, where he enjoys life, friends, beer and opera (and courses). Although always threatened by "melancholy" (depression) and with the imprint of a serious Lutheran upbringing and the death of five brothers. 

The period of falling in love with Regina Olsen, also quite dramatic, gives way to the mission. Even breaking up with her is his way of burning the ships and starting his mission, partly inspired by Socrates and partly by Christ. Like Socrates, he feels called to challenge his fellow Danes with irony to make them realize that they are not Christians. He goes ahead and wants to be "Christian" and work for Christ, and he knows that this path leads to the cross. He experiences it in the contradictions and difficulties he suffers until he dies physically, psychically and economically exhausted. 

A conflict of interpretations

Of course, all this made his life and personality increasingly intense. He was very conscious of being "intense". And this, while admiring us, is a barrier to understanding him, because most of us are not like that. Moreover, he made it difficult. As part of the exercise of his Socratic irony (the reason for his doctoral thesis), he wrote under different pseudonyms in his early works. It is not a mere game, they really want to represent different positions, in which he seems to place himself perfectly, but the critics do not. 

His work has generated a "conflict of interpretations". Attracted by his opposition to Hegel, by his uncompromising defense of the personality of the "individual" and by his concept of "anguish" (existential), he is considered to be the inspiration for the existentialism of Heidegger and Sartre. But this would have surprised and disappointed Kierkegaard. Because, for Heidegger or Sartre, existentialism is to assume that there is no God and, therefore, that one has to get by in existence without expecting anything. And for Kierkegaard it is the opposite: the true realization of the existence of the individual is when he places himself before God, when he overcomes the aesthetic stage (living in search of tastes) and the ethical stage (trying to be moral or decent on his own) to recognize himself as a sinner and needy before God (religious stage). Thus he finds himself (resolves his anguish), thus he becomes an individual and thus he becomes a Christian.

Influence on personalism 

Instead, he would have been thrilled to learn that his defense of the individual had a direct effect on the "philosophers of dialogue." For Ebner, and later for Buber, it was a spiritual revival, an intellectual and personal conversion. Both explicitly acknowledge this. For Martin Buber it was also a great inspiration for his social thought, to oppose fascist and communist totalitarianism, which in some way follow Hegel, where the individual becomes only a piece or a moment in the construction of society, which is the true end and subject of politics. With Ebner, the influence of Kierkegaard enters into the set of personalist ferments that renew Catholic morality and, with Buber, also into Christian anthropology. 

On the other hand, it would be unfair not to recognize here the role that the convert and intellectual Theodor Haecker played in the reception of Kierkegaard in the German-speaking world. He immediately grasped the power of his message, translated it and introduced it. Through him, many German-speaking thinkers encountered Søren Kierkegaard. Moreover, Haecker wrote remarkable essays about him, such as Kierkegaard's hump

The renewal of Protestantism 

Kierkegaard saw that the Christians in Denmark were perfectly well off and called themselves Christians because they registered their names in the civil registry, because they participated sporadically in ceremonies and because they tried to live with standards of public decency. Everything was Christian by inertia, but without any tension, without any drama, without any cross. At one time that society had been transformed by Christianity, but then everything went the other way around: Welfare had transformed Christianity into a harmless decoration. 

It was precisely this critique that provoked the awakening of the conscience of many Protestant theologians, especially Karl Barth. Liberal Protestant theology had done precisely what Kierkegaard criticized: it had ironed out all the uncomfortable aspects of Christianity to make it acceptable to an affluent society, turning it into a vague openness to "the divine" and an inspiration of solidarity (Schleiermacher) for people who sought to be upright citizens. 

Reading Kierkegaard, Barth realized the dissolution that this entailed. It is not reason with the culture of each epoch that must judge faith (because it dissolves it). On the contrary: it is faith, revelation, that will judge all epochs and everything human, in order to convert them into Christians. This is Barth's famous change between the first and second editions of his commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Although, later on, the mature Barth would not feel so close to Kierkegaard, as his ecclesial awareness increased. Kierkegaard, in the end, turns out to be quite individualistic. We will see this later.

Kierkegaard's Christianity

Between the difficulty of interpreting Kierkegaard and the intellectual tics of the histories of philosophy, one can find presentations where it is omitted that he is a Christian or mentioned as a secondary feature, or even drawn as an anti-Christian, more or less close to Nietzsche, because of his criticism of the established church. 

There is a small book published by Aguilar (My point of view1988), with a translation (probably from Italian) by the poet José Miguel Velloso. In passing it must be said that the history of Spanish translations of Kierkegaard is "endless". And it is obligatory to mention Unamuno, who wanted to learn Danish in order to read him directly and imitated him as much as he could. Velloso's translation (despite its Italian debt) has some advantages: first, it reads very well; second, it brings together three key writings of Kierkegaard where he states how he feels Christian and how he understands his mission. The longest one, My point of viewThe text, dated 1846, was edited posthumously by his brother (bishop of the Church of Denmark). In addition, the brief text This individualin which he argues that to become fully an individual is also to become a Christian. Then, very briefly as well, About my work as a writer (1849) y My position as a religious writer (1850). These writings, signed by him without a pseudonym, leave no doubt about the intensity with which Kierkegaard wanted to be and bear Christian witness. They are like his intellectual testament. 

Kierkegaard and Christ 

Of course, Kierkegaard is not a conventional Christian. It was precisely his mission to oppose turning Christianity into a social convention. He had received an intensely Christian and pious upbringing from his father, although this point is sometimes exaggerated. He kept it in his heart all his life. 

The most exciting thing is that one can observe a kind of growing identification with Christ, especially in his last period. In this he is very reminiscent of Dostoyevsky. He not only admires the figure of Christ and moves his devotion, he also identifies with him when he suffers the misunderstandings that his mission leads him to.

When I consulted José García Martín, a Spanish specialist in Kierkegaard, he wrote to me: "Regarding her adhesion to Christ, I must say that it was total and existentially committed from her spiritual conversion, although without reaching a 'blood martyrdom', although she did sacrifice her life and fortune. In fact, we can consider her the most significant and determining figure in her life and work".

By the way, this author has a remarkable essay on the reception of Kierkegaard in Latin America. Many articles that can be found online, and, among them, an excellent Introduction to the Reading of Søren Kierkegaard

Cornelio Fabro, the Diaries and the Exercise

To access Kierkegaard's soul there are, certainly, those little works that we have mentioned in My point of view. And there are their Diaries. Only a selection is available in Spanish. 

In this field and in that of the general Christian interpretation of Kierkegaard, the Thomistic philosopher Cornelio Fabro has played a very important role. He made a very meritorious Italian translation in many volumes, as well as many studies and an excellent introduction to the diaries, which occupies an entire volume of the Italian edition and gives a clear-sighted overview of his life and work. There is an interesting recorded interview, which can be found online. Fabro also made an Italian edition of his Exercising Christianity

The exercise of Christianity (1848) is one of Kierkegaard's great Christian works. It was published under the pseudonym Anticlimacus. As we have said, pseudonyms in Kierkegaard's work often introduce difficult changes of perspective. But here he uses the pseudonym because, as it were, he does not see himself up to speaking in his own name. In the preface he clarifies: "In this writing [...] the demand: to be a Christian, is forced by the pseudonym to the highest degree of ideality [...]. The demand is to be heard; and I understand what is said as said only to myself - that I should learn not only to seek shelter in 'grace,' but to trust in it with regard to the use I make of 'grace'". I quote from the first volume of Guadarrama's meritorious translation of several of his works (1961).

Ecumenical Kierkegaard 

Observing these mentions of 'grace', as well as his criticism of the established Protestant church, some understood him to be close to Catholicism. 

The question is complex. Perhaps it would be better to say that Kierkegaard is an "ecumenical" character, not quite fitting in with anyone, although he has a message for everyone, because he touches on some authentic and central aspects of Christianity: a passionate love of Christ, an awareness of the need for God in the human being, and a longing for his salvation. 

Kierkegaard failed to perceive the beauty of the liturgy and its profound relationship to the being of the Church. That experience did not belong to his world. He saw an established church that blended with traditional Danish society and whose most authentic center was preaching. 

He had prepared himself at the university to become a pastor; it was his father's dream, and, at different times, he strongly desired it and took steps. He was also attracted to and exercised preaching in various ways, leaving a curious and complex legacy of "edifying sermons". But he soon realized that his mission was much more solitary and Socratic Christian. It was not from within the system, but rather from outside, from where he had to challenge and die for the cause. 

Conclusion 

One of the most surprising things in the immense bibliography on Kierkegaard is the work of the American philosopher Jon Stewart. In addition to several monographs written by him, he has directed a very large series of collaborations on the influence of Kierkegaard in all aspects of thought, including theology (3 volumes). From the Catholic point of view, we have mentioned Cornelius Faber, and the classic essays of Régis Jolivet should also be mentioned. In philosophy, Mariano Fazio has a Guide to Kierkegaard's thoughtwhich can be consulted online, and the corresponding voice in the online encyclopedia Philosohica. And Sellés, a study on the anthropology of Kierkegaard. 

Of course, there is much more. Kierkegaard is an author who needs introductions in order not to get lost in the labyrinths that he himself set up and in those set up by his commentators. Without ever forgetting that My point of viewwith its extensions, is really his point of view.

Read more
The World

Rémi Brague

Interview with the French thinker Remi Brague (Paris, 1947), emeritus professor of philosophy at the Sorbonne. Last November he took part in the Congress of Catholics and Public Life organized by the Asociacion Catolica de Propagandistas and the CEU. In the conversation with Omnes we spoke about philosophy, the opposition to classical languages and of freedom. With a smile, Brague firmly states: "The world is good in spite of everything". In his opinion the great temptation is that of despair".

Rafael Miner-December 20, 2021-Reading time: 6 minutes

Original Text of the article in Spanish here
Translation: Martyn Drakard

It was a half-hour conversation but it left its mark. Like a "distant disciple of Socrates" (Prof. Elio Gallego), the philosopher Remi Brague "is capable of telling truths with emphasis and impact like someone telling a child a bed-time story, quietly but effectively", Professor Jose Perez Adan once wrote.

 "In the program of the Congress I am introduced as a historian, but this is not quite true because I am a philosopher who reads historical works, and I see around me an interpretation of the modern world, which is to erase the past and start from scratch, just as the International does"is his opening remark.

 "I am a philosopherhe specifies, "and it is very flattering for all my colleagues to be thought dangerous, people who may be subversives just because they are in search of the truth", he says.

 Regarding your presentation, you say that "cancel culture" belongs more to the world of journalism and communications than to the world of philosophy.

-What I meant is simply that history can appear to be one story after another, which provides useful material for journalists who don't really know what to say. I am not a journalist, I am only a philosopher who is compelled to view things from a philosophical angle, and this present movement deserves to be examined from both a philosophical and historical point of view.

 In the program of the Congress, they introduce me as a historian, which is not true because I am a philosopher who enjoys reading historical works. History interests me in so far as it is an indication of something broader, and therefore in my explanation I begin with a few extraordinary facts and then proceed to something more wide-ranging and comprehensive, and my conclusion is that the modern world is trying to start again from scratch, to erase the past just like the International. But this approach goes back much further than that. It starts with the struggle against ancient prejudices, which Descartes places on the individual plane: "I have to get rid of my childhood prejudices". And from the individual plane it spreads to the collective in what we know as the height of the Enlightenment. And later with the French Revolution, and so on and so forth.

 In your explanation you referred to those movements that oppose classical languages. In Spain, philosophy has been removed as a compulsory subject in high school. What do you think this means?

It means two things. First, concerning classical languages. They play a very important part in the cultural history of the Western world, in Europe and the overseas territories. For the first time in history, a civilization has set out to form its elites by means of the study of another culture.

 For example, Chinese culture is based on the study of the Chinese classics, whereas European civilization has formed its elites through the study of ancient Greek, and this is the case in Salamanca, Paris, Oxford, Cambridge, Uppsala and everywhere.

 The elites were taught to think of themselves as degenerate compared to Greek civilization which was idealized. The Greeks were as brutish and deceitful as anyone else. An interesting example. There is an Arab author of the 10th century called Al-Razi, who writes: "The Greeks were not in the least interested in matters of sexuality", because for him the Greeks meant Aristotle, and that was everything. He had no idea of the writings of Aristophanes, not to mention the public baths. The study of Greek had the advantage of giving the minds of Europeans, despite all their arrogance, a healthy inferiority complex.

 What about the suppression of philosophy?

  I am a philosopher, and it is very flattering for my fellow philosophers to be considered dangerous; a group of people who can be subversive just because they seek the truth. The worst enemy of falsehood is truth. It is very interesting that these people, perhaps quite unwares, admit they don't want philosophy. What they are really saying is: we don't want to seek the truth.

 You say that in one way or another our culture should go back to a kind of Middle Ages.

 Let me repeat what I said at the beginning. I do not idealize the Middle Ages. What interests me about this period are its thinkers, my "colleagues from the past", if you wish: the philosophers. They could have been Judeo-Christians, but also Christians or Muslims. For example, there are many interesting things in Maimonides, one of my great loves, as French grammar would have me say...

 What I find especially interesting, if I am to choose just one thing, is the adaptability of the transcendental properties of being. The world is good. Technically, yes, of course; but it can also be expressed very simply: The world is good in spite of everything. This is an act of faith. Because when one looks at oneself, he can see he is not so beautiful as he thought at first.

 Please explain this act of faith...

  • Yes. As a consequence of this act of faith the world is the work of a benevolent God who loves the good and has given us the means to solve our personal problems. To begin with, he has given us intelligence and freedom and has made us capable of desiring the good, of really wanting it. Given that we are incapable of attaining it by our own means, He has given us the economy of salvation. But this is the point where God intervenes, where we really need Him, in the economy of salvation.

This is important because we do not need God to tell us: "Leave your moustache as it is or cut off your beard". We don't need God to tell us: "Don't eat pork, or "Ladies, wear a veil". We have hairdressers and barbers and tailors. We are intelligent enough to decide how we dress, what we eat, etc. In Christianity, God intervenes only when he truly has to, when it is really necessary. God does not get in our way, meddle or impose himself and tell us 'Do this or that or the other thing', but makes us see that we are capable of understanding what is good for us.

Let us speak a little more about classical culture. You referred to it in your presentation.

Very often people who are against the study of classical languages are on the left of the political spectrum. For them, Latin and Greek are the distinctive feature of the educated classes, namely those who can afford themselves to learn just for the love of culture, as compared to the working classes, etc. Of course, there is a grain of truth in this.

 All the same, this line of reasoning shows only one side of the truth, which is much more complex. First, some thinkers who can be considered among the most radical precursors of the revolutions of modern Western history and thought received a classical education, which didn't stop them from being the main agitators, each one in his own way. Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud had studied in what were known as the "Classical gymnasiums" (as opposed to the scientific gymnasiums). Charles Darwin studied in universities where a knowledge of Latin and Greek were taken for granted. Not to mention Nietzsche, perhaps the most radical of all, who was a professor of Classical Philology.

Of course, one might argue that they became what they became not because of their classical education, but in spite of it.

 Can you give modern man some words of optimism and hope when he notices all these ideas are making him depressed? Perhaps it is a rather theological question...

 I wish to change gear and go into top theological gear. I will speak of the devil. Our image of the devil is often one disseminated by the public relations department of hell. Unfortunately, it is the one given by probably the second greatest English poet after Shakespeare, that is John Milton. The devil as a kind of rebel who wanted to take the place of God. It would be odd for me to while away my time chatting with the devil; it would be a big mistake to call the devil by phone. The devil is clever enough to understand this, and therefore it is a deceptive, Promethean image. On the other hand, in the Bible the devil appears as the one who makes man believe that he doesn't deserve God to take an interest in him, that he is not worthy enough. For example, the first chapters of the book of Job are exactly that.

 In the New Testament. In the fourth gospel, the devil is a liar, the one who would have us believe that God will not forgive us, that His mercy is finite. The great temptation is despair.

 And the Church gives us a well-constructed system, namely the sacraments, confession, the Eucharist... If we take this seriously, the ball is in our court, and now it is up to us.

Read more

Christmas in the Brotherhood, Christmas in your home, Christmas in your soul.

Every year, brotherhoods and confraternities mount wonderful scenes of the Birth of the Son of God. Scenes that, in addition, have to have their place in the soul.

December 20, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

These are hectic days, even though the health situation is trying to slow them down. Also in the brotherhood you can feel that it is Christmas: carols, living nativity scene, the Royal Page who collects the letters of the little ones, special attention to needy families. A continuous hustle and bustle. At the end it calms down and you return home, collected, to assemble your Nativity in which to prolong the Holy Night in your home and your soul.

If you want I can help you to assemble it.

The first thing is to ensure a good structure. It will not be seen, but it is the basis on which everything else is based. The legs of that structure are already prepared and defined in the aims of the Brotherhood: the Formation that the brothers must receive, the Charity that they must live and the Public Worship, liturgical, that is rendered to God in the name of the Church, by the person and in the form determined by her. The fourth leg, also comes in the Rules, check it out, is the effort to bring the Christian spirit to society.

These legs are assembled with the tail of freedom, because only from freedom can one love and obey, for there is no greater expression of freedom than obedience: to the Church, to the Pope, to her pastors. 

On that support you can now spread the planks of human virtues - fortitude, sobriety, work, loyalty, sincerity and so many others - that will support the building of your inner life.

Now, in this solid structure, we can put, with constant care, the cork mountains, the houses, the river, the arid landscapes and the welcoming caves. Also the different figurines that will accompany us and to which we have to bring the joy of God made man with the good criterion of our example and doctrinal formation.

We can now let the water run from the Charity that pours generously through rivers and fountains, to end up in serene lakes where everyone comes to rest their bodies and wash their souls.

And design horizons of Esperanza. Sometimes they open up in the open countryside, others can be glimpsed through caves and gorges that seem to tower over us; but they always find a way out towards wide and luminous horizons.

Currents of Charity, horizons of Hope..., it still remains for us to place the lights of the Faith that illuminate every corner, giving unusual reliefs even to the simplest things. Sometimes the entire Nativity remains in darkness, with no more light than a sad lantern that flickers dying; but little by little, that lantern that never goes out completely, is accompanied by a soft glow in the background that grows until it fills with light and relief the entire Nativity, its landscapes, its rivers and each of the figures that we have been placing.

Everything is ready. All that remains is to place the Child, his Mother and St. Joseph. Take them out of the case of your heart, perhaps old and spoiled by the passage of time (there are already so many years!), where your parents or grandparents put them, and place them with the same care and the same excited innocence as when you were a child.

Thus, so simply, the Earth receives the dazzling irruption of the divine in ordinary life and what until then had been a secret, known only to Mary and Joseph, is now a reality admired by all who approach it with a clean heart.

You can now contemplate your work and present your offering.

 "Lord, you are still very small, you have just been born, but you can do so much and I have so much to ask of you! From child to Child: in your hands I place my family, my Brotherhood, my work, my city, my Homeland and all the illusions, clean and noble, renewed every year before the endearing Mystery. Also the sorrows, worries, absences, loneliness".

The Holy Family thanks you for your effort and your affection in the assembly, because this Nativity of which I speak to you we began to build it on the day of our baptism and we will finish it when the Child invites you to enter the Portal; but there you will not be alone, you will meet the old figurines that preceded you and led you to the Manger, to sing with them an eternal carol. Behind you are the ones you have been placing and guiding towards the Portal, who one day will also join that eternal choir of bell ringers.

Christmas in the Brotherhood, Christmas in your home, Christmas in your soul, Merry Christmas!

The authorIgnacio Valduérteles

D. in Business Administration. Director of the Instituto de Investigación Aplicada a la Pyme. Eldest Brother (2017-2020) of the Brotherhood of the Soledad de San Lorenzo, in Seville. He has published several books, monographs and articles on brotherhoods.

Read more
Guest writersBorja Mora-Figueroa

God who is moved with tenderness

What is more improbable: that he who can do everything effectively demonstrates it, or that a poor creature accepts what he most repudiates, and moreover wants it? There is nothing unbearable for those who believe, nor anything comparable to what it means to be heard when hope is but a reflection. And yet the impossible is continually conquered.

December 20, 2021-Reading time: 4 minutes

She is a nurse who for half her life was unable to care for those who needed it. A degenerative condition consumed her for forty years, until she could barely walk; for the last 14 she needed morphine, daily, and was totally dependent on machines and appliances.

"I walk in the midst of you, I see your suffering, that of your sick brothers and sisters, give me everything". Three days after hearing it in Lourdes, this other Bernadette finally relaxed and a warmth came over her. "Take off your braces": for Sr. Bernadette Moriau, who still lives among us, had been cured.

He was sick, but what he really needed was a conversion. And God graciously granted him the gift of a clean faith.

She and he are examples that today, in every corner of the world, God acts and saves us from our miseries. And, sometimes, he does it in a miraculous way.

The life of the one who should despair is inexplicable in the eyes of the one who lives believing he has everything. The blind man who cannot even listen, who does not recognize the evil around him (or within himself), who asks bitingly: "Do we need miracles? What miracles? Who still believes in them today? The stubborn one who is unable to see, recognize and love.

And yet he who has ceased to have faith in himself can believe in the unbelievable, for he recognizes that he is so limited that he embraces nothing; he who has no choice but to abandon himself is amazed and astonished. This faith has existed since man was able to transcend, back in the beginning of time, although only Christianity has been able to explain it.

All miracles (healings, completely inexplicable or not, those that overcome the laws of physics and nature, spectacular or those that go unnoticed, instant conversions) have a meaning that goes beyond the event itself and is twofold: they are a call to faith and they seek to free us from the slavery of sin. A miracle, like the truth, sets us free: from pride, from unbelief, from sickness, from death, but, above all, from evil.

A miracle is the most personal encounter that God has prepared for us. It supposes absolute renunciation, total abandonment. It is the consequence of the purest faith, of the one who listens and responds to a call on our behalf. That kind of faith is a lighthouse in the middle of the night, illuminating a life that in the darkest hour can only be rescued by Someone.

God himself.

God who becomes man: a mystery that will escape our understanding until the end of time and that split our history in two.

God who redeems us: a Savior who, in the words of St. Peter at the first Pentecost, is so in our eyes because of the "miracles, wonders and signs" he performed (Acts 2:22).

God who dies and rises again: a sacrament of love that makes Jesus Christ his own witness to all humanity. Miracles that shorten the path between God and mankind. Like Sister Bernadette, who at the moment of her healing felt the "living presence of Christ".

Since the beginning of time there have been miracles... and today, and tomorrow, there will continue to be, all over the world. They are needed and they are granted if that is what is convenient for us. The Church, however, to avoid being accused of inventing supernatural events, is extremely cautious about recognizing them officially. Think of Lourdes, where we might believe that the hierarchy boasts of miracles that fall out of the hands of thousands... In reality, the International Medical Office - which has recorded and investigated thousands of claims of healing reported by the sick - has only recognized as miraculous 1% of the cases.

When Sister Bernadette felt that "strong heat in her body and the desire to get up" in 2008, she was not the first, far from it. Sister Luigina Traverso felt something very similar with a very similar illness. The pattern of a healing that is "sudden, instantaneous, complete, lasting and cannot be explained by current scientific knowledge" makes it sensitive and transcendent.

That is why science revolts and claims its dominion, because it cannot see beyond or the inexplicable. And not even when it asks for its space to 'prove' what happened can it silence the clamor that comes from a healed heart.

Not even faith in science allows unbelievers to accept the evidence that reality cannot always be explained, and that it is not a matter of giving up but of not turning away from faith in Love. St. Augustine, as sinful at the beginning as he was a saint for the rest of his life, said: "I call a miracle that which, being arduous and unusual, seems to exceed the possible hopes and the capacity of the beholder".

Those who desperately need a miracle, and receive it, are the last to want to corroborate that it is a case 'recognizable' by science. They needed it, they have lived it, they enjoy it. Neither the Church nor Science could tarnish it. Because "the miracle is the visible trace of a change operated in the heart of man. Miracle and conversion, miracle and salvation, miracle and holiness, are inseparable" (K. Sokolowski).

Nothing is impossible for God, as Sr. Bernadette Moriau proved in her own life: "The Gospel is not two thousand years old, the Gospel is still today, Jesus can still heal today. And the key to the Good News - yesterday, today, always - is that Christ himself manifests himself as pure Love. And before Him, Science yields; before Mercy, doubts are overcome. God cannot but be moved by naked and unconditional Faith (Mk 1:40-42). And so it is a matter of living the faith that precedes the miracle and the Love from which it proceeds.

The authorBorja Mora-Figueroa

TribuneCarla Restoy

The beauty of being free

Freedom is a great ideal of contemporary man. However, the apparent freedom that is sought, that of the uncommitted, leaves an aftertaste of dissatisfaction. The author, a speaker at the 10th St. Josemaría Symposium (Millennials of faith)reflects on it.

December 20, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

Few things attract human beings more than freedom. Freedom is a great point of union between Christianity and today's world. Although it is perhaps true that today the concept has been distorted. I dare say that in our time we enjoy great freedoms, but we suffer the worst of slavery. I am not mistaken if I say that in our days we enjoy exterior freedoms but little interior freedom, the most important one. 

But what binds us, what prevents us from being free? The prevailing thought in the world is that in order to emancipate ourselves and be true, we must succumb to the desires of our passions. The established norms are not valid, and rebellion against the established is the only guarantee of freedom. We live angry with the rules and it seems that only he who dares to break them is free. "No one is more a slave than the one who considers himself free without being free"Goethe said. I am afraid that our time is the time of "free" slaves. 

Our generation focuses on outer freedom and confuses it with inner freedom. It focuses on emancipation from that which binds us, which is outside of ourselves. The men of our time do not stop running away to try to free themselves from something that they feel imprisoned by, that prevents them from being free. The idea prevails that what the system has established is wrong and that is why we cannot be free. There is a great loss of the sense of reality. 

Perhaps we should rightly identify what it is that enslaves Western man in 2021. Few young people today have heard of Victor Frankl or Bosco Gutiérrez, or my good friend Jordi Sabaté Pons, great models of free people. It is hard for us to understand that the more our sense of freedom depends on external circumstances, the more evident it is that we are not yet truly free. If we want to be happy we will need to order our intelligence and will above all other passions and understand the truths established in our heart. And what are they? St. John Paul II said that "Only freedom that submits to Truth leads the human person to his true good. The good of the human person consists in being in the Truth and in realizing the Truth.". We must understand that our heart and nature are wounded and will always need healing.

What does our heart yearn for? Good, truth and love. We are very attracted to freedom because our fundamental aspiration is happiness and, deep down, our heart knows that happiness is not possible without love and love is impossible without freedom. Love is only possible between people who possess themselves in order to give themselves to the other. And our heart is not made for anything else but to love and to be loved. This revelation is the fruit of the knowledge of the human heart that comes from being born in our time. Our heart is free to the extent that it is capable of enslaving itself, of giving itself, of committing itself, for love. There is nothing more beautiful than freedom employed in this total surrender of the self. At sight is the cross of Christ which, pointing to the four winds, is the symbol of free travelers, as Chesterton rightly pointed out. 

Is the young person who consumes pornography every night so that he can go to sleep relaxed free? Is the elite athlete who does not go to training on a rainy day free? Is the one who gets angry when he is disturbed free? Or the one who decides to stay asleep even though he knows he has to go to class free? Freedom has to do with good and therefore with commitment to that good. Choosing the good in order to then remain in it. And the good has to do with reality, with the rules of the game that we have in our hearts or that have been revealed to us and that our intelligence or reason can accept as good. The truth is that a world where we are sold that the freest is the one who does what he wants can lead us to end up being slaves of the "want", which is the worst of dictatorships. Because when "will" rules, nothing else can be done but what it wants. If our emotions, feelings, passions and instincts dominate our intelligence and will, we will be slaves of ourselves. The person who is not formed in a firm and determined will is usually a prisoner of his desires and whims. As Chesterton said in The Eternal Man: "Dead things can be swept away by the current, only something alive can go against the current.". 

I dare to encourage you, dear reader, not to let yourself be swept away by the current of the lower passions. It is worthwhile, it is worth your life, to use your intelligence to understand what we really long for and to use your will to remain in that act with prudence and justice in order to give ourselves what we truly need. I do not know anyone truly free who does not possess himself or anyone truly free who has not decided to commit and enslave himself for love. I know nothing more beautiful than the freedom of Christ on the Cross.

The authorCarla Restoy

Degree in Business Administration and Economics.

Read more

No to the globalization of indifference!

Today there are still millions of people who suffer "avoidable" suffering, for some of which our passivity may be responsible. We must get involved - as Pope Francis asks - with the "discarded" and not give in to indifference.

December 19, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

Pope Francis constantly reminds us that we are at brutal levels of crimes against human dignity, of exploitation, impoverishment and discarding of more and more people. The majority of humanity is mired in misery, hunger and violence, in veritable corridors of death. And yet we live as if all this were not happening, as if we were indifferent, as if we were anesthetized, fleeing from suffering, or convinced that we can do nothing in the face of injustice. 

It is evident that alone, isolated from each other, we will not emerge from our passivity. Capitalism has been transformed at full speed with the technological revolution. A revolution that has never been guided by solidarity and the common good, but rather by profit and the desire for totalitarian power. Digital capitalism has its main source of wealth in the extraction of all our data and in the control of our behaviors, our habits and our desires. We are objects of economic and political experimentation and testing. If we are not profitable, we are discarded or ruthlessly exterminated. 

Our indifference alone is not enough for this system. Intellectual and digital borders are not enough. Walls, tanks and armies are also necessary. Physical borders have been erected to stop the flight of the hungry. The world has ten times more walls than it did 30 years ago. Surrounded by the hungry, the malnourished, the desperate and the humiliated, we erect walls and fences. Does it hurt us? We must be responsible for all humanity. 

No one can understand, at this moment of our technological capacity, that millions of people continue to die of hunger, that inhuman forced labor continues to exist, that prostitution and pimps increase, that there are more than 400 million children whose dignity is trampled on, that there are slave markets, wars of extermination, trafficking in organs and people, deaths from perfectly curable diseases, more than 80 million people living in refugee camps, ...and a long etcetera of injustices that seem to hide behind visible walls and those of our indifference.

Most of the time we are unaware of the extent to which our well-being and possibilities rest on the exploitation of people and natural resources, on violence and wars, and on discarding. We are all responsible for each other. Also for the generations to come. It is the moral obligation of all of us to offer new generations a hope built on love for an ideal of justice and solidarity. We have to sow an associated response, in which we are protagonists, a community response, guided by the common good. Young people must discover life in solidarity and partnership as the only response to a system that crushes their ideals.

In the face of the great lie of "a happy world", progressive, in a system that only protects the richest, we have to defend, as Pope Francis asks us, that there will only be fraternal life if we work to free our conscience from addictions, drugs and indifference? with a critical formation, with reading in common, with study, with a sense of responsibility towards others; if we bet on associating and organizing ourselves and committing ourselves seriously to the service of others, in a concrete and not generic way, starting with betting on families that are authentic schools and testimonies of life in solidarity and dedication to the common good; if there are people and groups that are not afraid to defend and work without complexes for the life and dignity of every human being. 

The authorJaime Gutiérrez Villanueva

Pastor of the parishes of Santa María Reparadora and Santa María de los Ángeles, Santander.

Read more
The Vatican

"Servants of the proclamation", the rite of institution of catechist arrives

As of January 1, 2022, the rite of institution of the lay ministry of catechist will come into effect, as announced in the motu proprio Antiquum ministerium. It is a ministry with a "strong vocational value".

Giovanni Tridente-December 19, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

Pope Francis had promised it a short time ago and so the Rite of Institution of the Lay Ministry of Catechist has arrived, which will come into force as of January 1, 2022. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, in fact, has recently issued the Decree with which it published the editio typica of the above-mentioned rite in Latin, as announced in the Apostolic Letter in the form of a motu proprio. Antiquum ministerium on May 10.

The approach with which the Pontiff decided to reach this institution is stated in n. 5 of the motu proprio: "fidelity to the past and responsibility for the present", with the aim of reviving the Church's mission in the world, thus being able to count on credible, active and available witnesses in the life of the community, who are properly trained and carry out this task in a "stable" way.

Profile to be defined

Hence the need to establish this ministry through a rite, as is the case with lectors and acolytes. Obviously, it will be up to each episcopal conference, also according to its own pastoral needs, to establish and regulate its exercise "in terms of duration, content and modalities," as explained by the Prefect of Divine Worship, Bishop Arthur Roche.

In the letter sent to the presidents of bishops' conferences throughout the world, it is also specified that, in order to avoid misunderstandings, "it is necessary to keep in mind that the term 'catechist' indicates different realities in relation to the ecclesial context in which the term is used". Therefore, it is not indicated that those who have already been admitted to the diaconate and presbyterate, religious in general or those who teach Catholic religion in schools should be instituted as catechists.

Strong vocational value

Since this ministry has "a strong vocational value that requires due discernment on the part of the Bishop", it is not even convenient that all those who limit themselves to accompanying the initiation of children, youth and adults receive it; it is sufficient for them - and it is recommended - to receive "at the beginning of each catechetical year, a public ecclesial mandate entrusting them with this indispensable function".

On the contrary, those who already "carry out the service of the message in a more specific way" and normally "remain in the community as witnesses to the faith, teachers and 'mystagogues', companions and pedagogues available to foster, as much as possible, the life of the faithful, so that they may be conformed to the baptism received", should receive the specific mandate of catechist.

For this reason, it is prescribed that they collaborate with the ordained ministers in the various forms of apostolate, "carrying out, under the guidance of the pastors, multiple functions", such as, for example: guiding community prayer; assisting the sick; guiding funeral celebrations; formation and guidance of other catechists; coordination of pastoral initiatives; human promotion according to the social doctrine of the Church; helping the poor; fostering relations between the community and the ordained ministers.

Therefore, it is up to the episcopal conferences to clarify well, according to their own territory and their own pastoral needs, the more specific profile of the catechist, thinking also about the formation courses and the preparation of the communities to understand its meaning.

The specific role of the bishop

A specific role is played by the diocesan bishop, who is called to consider the needs of the community and to discern the abilities of the candidates, "men and women who have received the sacraments of Christian initiation and have freely presented a written and signed request to the diocesan bishop". It will be he, or a priest delegated by him, who will confer the ministry of catechist, during a Mass or the celebration of the Word of God.

The rite foresees, "after the liturgy of the Word, an exhortation on the role of catechists; an invitation to prayer; a text of blessing and the handing over of the crucifix".

Resources

The decisive nature of listening

Only those who are able to listen to the world and to people are able to scrutinize its most hidden secrets. Listening: listening and being listened to, is essential for the human being.

Ignasi Fuster-December 18, 2021-Reading time: 4 minutes

Pope Francis, since the beginning of his pontificate, has insisted on the need to listen. At the time we heard the call to exercise that "apostolate of listening" to which the Pope referred. Now it has become a fundamental theme of the new Synod on the Synodal Church.

A synodal Church is a Church that knows how to listen. This is what the Pope said in his homily at the opening of the Synod in Rome (10.10.2021): "The Synod asks us to listen to the questions, concerns and hopes of every Church, every people and every nation. And also to listen to the world, to the challenges and changes that it puts before us". But whatwhy this human hearing can be so decisive?

It is said of the German thinker Hegel, that when he was young, he was walking along a road with a friend. Then, they heard the sonorous echo of the church bells ringing for the death of someone. That sound penetrated forever in the ears and heart of the young Hegel, who suddenly stumbled upon the mystery of our sordid finitude: at the end of existence the lights go out, the eyes close and the ears stop vibrating. It is said that all his idealistic philosophy (in search of the ideal of the eternal), is a relentless combat against the signs of corruption and death. His philosophy is a gloss on death and finitude. For Hegel heard the bells of death, and perhaps also the distant echo of immortality that resounds in the heart of man.

Someone told me that he had the good fortune to attend the lectures of the philosopher Martin Heidegger. Heidegger, according to the witness, addressed the audience in a thin, hard-to-perceive voice. And yet his soft voice revealed a keen sense of hearing. With his philosophical meditation, Heidegger was delving into the mysteries of reality and the world. So much so that he conceived thinking as thanksgiving for the secrets of the world and of history. Only he who is capable of listening to the world is able to scrutinize its most hidden secrets. Thus Heidegger revealed himself as a profound thinker who developed a delicate philosophy of human existence in the midst of the vicissitudes of the world.

But Heidegger and Hegel take up ancient intuitions, already present in Greek mythical thought, as well as in the feeling of Jewish revelation. The obscure Heraclitus already said that men are called to have "an attentive ear to the being of things". And what defines Israel, that People that received God's Revelation, if not being a People of listening to God and his omens? Once again, in the midst of our time of words and technology, it is necessary to urge the new generations to learn silence, solitude and listening -a triad that is surely fruitful. But not only listening to the word, to news, to conversation, to song or to text. But above all, listening to things that do not speak but that open us to the mystery of meaning they contain.

The listener who does not see (and knows how to close his eyes to the world) seems to bring a different vision of the world and of history. The descriptions of the seer seem to give power over a reality that becomes a stage. The reality penetrated by the eyes becomes a field of exploration and experimentation, subject to manipulation and transformation.

The visionary man of our time has seen the future of a new man, a mixture of flesh and technology, capable of developing his physical, psychic and spiritual powers to the extreme. But, if we complement sight with hearing, and combine vision and listening in a harmonious synthesis, another world appears: a world that is certainly knowable, but at the same time called to be heard, that is, touched by the gentle caress of a listening that allows us to gradually enter the dark light of existence.

Augustine said that "touch defines knowledge". This is when the question arises as to the lawfulness of our contemporary way of treating the world: Is it lawful or not to treat the mystery of nature in this way? Light illuminates, colors are admired, figures are observed, faces are contemplated, movements are seen. But the good and evil that resonate in the conscience are not seen, but heard in the depths of oneself. It is when the ethical sense of the world and of our variegated relations with the world emerges.

Then, what should we do? It was the distant question that some asked that prophet of the desert who announced the arrival of the new times. John the Baptist had listened in the silence and solitude of the desert to the voice of God and the groanings of man. If humanity does not become apt to listen, it will become incapable of perceiving the signs of the times that announce the Last Coming of the Son of Man. Only the attitude of listening as an anthropological place allows us to scrutinize the signs of the times, like that wind that announces the storm or that song that heralds spring. The ear is consecrated as the interpreter of the meanings of existence. The art of listening can preserve us from the nihilism that finds itself without the strength to understand the meaning of the world.

The authorIgnasi Fuster

Resources

Light - Love - Lust. Where does the division of nature and people come from?

Presentation by Professor Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz at the Omnes Forum in Madrid on 16 December 2021

Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz-December 17, 2021-Reading time: 13 minutes

Der neue Mensch ohne Natur?

Leib - Liebe - Lust - was wäre schöner? Und doch finden gerade darum "ungeheuerliche Kriege statt in Zusammenhang mit (kleinen) Fragen der Theologie, Erdbeben der Erregung (....). Es handelt sich nur um Fingerbreite, aber die Breite eines Fingers ist alles, wenn das Ganze in der Waagschale liegt. Wenn man eine Idee abschwächt, wird gleich die andere machtvoll." (Chesterton)

What ideas are there? For the nature of man. Is man a demon, who can choose for himself? In older language he means a "Fremdling", who does not know himself with himself so well. Not even with his own free will.

Jüngst nach dem Synodalen Weg Anfang Oktober 2021 meldete sich ein Kardinal (übersetzt: eine Türangel) zu Wort: Aussagen über den Menschen gehörten zur "Dispositionsmasse" des Christentums. They are not "de fide definita", they are not "de fide definita", they are not "de fide definita", they are not "de Glauben definiert", they are "de fide definita", but rather "de veränderbar". So a new ethic?

Ethik kommt von ethos, dem Weidezaun. Must the former weidezaun for sexuality be newly abgesteckt? The uncommon statements in Forum IV on the law of the law of the law are intended to make the world over; in fact, everyone can abstain from them. Do we still need them? This "new" sexual ethic was clearly expressed by two further speakers, including a biscuit: Finally, the final conclusion is that only the person with his or her individual freedom can be found in love. The nature = the light, the law, the landscape, the place, are at best proposals that one can change, however, by overcoming them. Heißt das nun: Der Leib ist nur Rohmasse meines Willens? First and foremost: Nature and bio are new in all the world, they are to be changed, to be reused again, not only by mankind. Technology? No, thank you. But we are supposed to have nature as our own? So free-spirited love? Un-natürliche Liebe? No, so it wasn't the same, it's all right. But how then? Let's look at the range of the irrungen and irrungen to us.

Vorsicht: "Die Verblendung des Geistes ist die erstgeborene Tochter der Unzucht." So Thomas von Aquin. The angeblich revolutionäre Gedanke ist eine Verblendung: die Trennung von Natur und Person. This is not at all new or postmodern, it has already been formulated for a long time. Auch seine Abwege sind sichtbar, und sie sind auch auch schon lange in der Kritik. Und sie sind widersprüchlich.

Mensch aus lauter Freiheit?

"Es ist die Natur des Menschen, keine Natur zu haben." Seit knapp 600 Jahren gibt es die berühmte Oratio de hominis dignitate (1486) Picos della Mirandola darin: Gott selbst gibt Adam (der übrigens ohne Eva antritt) die Freiheit gänzlicher Selbstbestimmung. While all things have their own reality as the law of God, man is created as a single law. In the middle of the world, Adam has also expressed his own unbearable power over himself as well as over all other members of the human race. This is formulated by a man, a man who has the power, who has the ability, who is the source of all the power under the order of one of the brothers. It is often referred to as the "second God" of the whole world. Dieser "Gott, mit menschlichem Fleische umkleidet".[1]wird sein eigener Schöpfer.

Picos Entwurf menschlicher (= männlicher) Freiheit hat allerdings die Rückseite solcher Kraftsteigerung nicht im Auge; bleibt gänzlich naiv.

It is fundamentally welcome that the free movement of people from natural science and technology into the world has been achieved despite the freedom of choice.

Other: Nature as a machine? The "vermessene Mensch".

Die behauptete Macht erstreckte sich zunächst auf die äußere Natur (fabrica mundi): auf räumliche, materielle, den neuentdeckten Gesetzmäßigkeiten unterworfene Dinge, um "uns so zum Herren und Besitzer der Natur machen."[2] Today, we are fighting with the facts.

From this "Herrschaftswissen" comes a second possibility: even the "outer" side of the man himself has been transformed with the new methods - built up and even "unscholarly" by the "experienced" men Leonardos and Dürers, on whose bodies the size of the gold-plated teeth has been found.[3] Als res extensa wird der Körper im Triumphzug des geometrisch-mathematischen Denkens schließlich dem Regelkreislauf einer Maschine verglichen - l'homme machine von La Mettrie (1748). Der Menschmaschine fehlte nur das seelenvolle Auge, so in E. T. A. Hoffmanns Menschenpuppe Coppelia. Here, too, we fight with the consequences, a transhumanism, of the merging of man and robot. Freedom is what it means here: to be left alone with chips and tools.

In fact, for about 500 years, nature has been a mechanical art of work, and man also functions as a natural machine among other natural machines. Neurobiology as a new discipline strengthens the very difficult task in some professions: Thinking is nothing more than the destruction of brain cells. Auch der Einwand, wenn alles determiniert sei, gelte das doch zuallererst für den Forscher selbst, stört dabei nicht. Ähnlich der Satz eines Nobelprepreisträgers für Chemie, der Mensch sei nichts als Chemie. Here the freedom would have been completely lost.

Stattdessen triumphs, but once again it is in opposition to the law of the land. A picture of nature represents a picture of freedom.

Freiheit: Der denaturierte Mensch

Seit Judith Butlers "Gender Trouble" 1990 zielt die Kultur auf einen erstaunlichen Extrempol: eine Umgestaltung bis Auflösung des Körpers im Cyberspace, im virtuellen oder auch realen medizinisch-technischen Raum. Even the interdependence of the book and the body can serve as a basis for the spannungsfeld, as the two German terms are already based on a different Ich-Wahrnehmung. So Körper will be understood in advance as a quantitative-mechanical tool, whereby the body is always in a state of readiness for the ever increasing, ever-lengthening body. Körper can be changed, changed, even (in parts) adjusted - even by his own deep-rooted "nature". "My body is my art". Körper will be the source of the protest against an identity that does not stand alone. Utopien der fließenden Identität meinen den totalen Selbstentwurf des "Ich".

Auch Geschlechtsleben wird "inszeniert", das Ich trägt die jeweilige geschlechtliche Maske - mit der Folge, dass "diese Maske gar gar kein Ich verbirgt" (Benhabib, 1993, 15). gender nauting ist angesagt: das Navigieren zwischen den Geschlechtern. The human being is his own software, made of law and lawlessness. In this direction, the gender debate is taking place: it would mean that the biological law (sex) would be transformed into the cultural (cultural, social, social, geschichtlichen) law (gender). Statt Festlegung durch Natur wird willentliche Selbstwahl angeboten: Ist Frau immer schon Frau oder wer "macht" Frau zu Frau und Mann zu Mann? Widerstandslos, ja nichtig bietet sich der Leib als "vorgeschlechtlicher Körper" an. I don't know what I'm talking about.

Nun braucht es einen roten Faden durch diese Widersprüche. In other words: no division of nature, culture and people. Einfacher: no division of law and wisdom, of love and pleasure, of joy and joy, of love and children.

So it is necessary to criticize the halbierten, auf Mechanik reduzierten Natur, but also the halbierten, auf reine Konstruktivität hin gelesenen Kultur.

The human being is very much different: in the direction of the planet. The human nature and, first and foremost, the culture is "on the inside". The size of nature is the fact that it is actually born: it wants to be born, it wants to be born. Just as nature seeks the free participation of man in its "on the inside": that is to say, it is its own existence. Auf den Ursprung hin ist das Geschöpf geschaffen, es trägt sein Merkmal, seine Heimat ist dort, woher es kommt.

This could already be read on the motor of the language: Es ist Selbstverlust im anderen, es ist fleischgewordene Grammatik der Liebe. Leib ist Gabe, Geschlecht ist Gabe, ist Grund und Ur-Sprung des von uns nicht Machbaren, der Passion des Menschseins, der ungeheure Trieb nach Hingabe. Reich an dieser Zweiheit von Mann und Frau und arm durch sie - uns selbst nicht genügend, abhängig von der Zuwendung des anderen, hoffend auf die Lösung durch den anderen, die aus dem Raum des Göttlichen kommt und in ihrer höchsten, fruchtbaren Form dorthin zurückleitet (Gen 1,27f). What in Greek thought is a "faith", the free will, in biblical thought, is the glory of the two.

Geschlecht can also be considered as a "Geschlachtetsein" or "Hälftigsein" or "Hälftigsein her gelesen werden. Die Brutalität des Nur-Geschlechts, der "Fluß-Gott des Bluts (...) ach, von welchem Unkenntlichen triefend" (Rilke, 1980, 449), muß daher vermenschlicht werden. Leib ist ohne ein reizvolles, anderes Gegenüber schwer zu denken. However, either "Nature" (Biology) or "Culture" (Self-image) is from itself "heil". Daher ist es es entscheidend, den göttlichen Horizont zu kennen, die Weisungen zu kennen, die von ihm kommen. Erst dann kann man "sittlich handeln", das heißt, "der Ordnung des Seins in Freiheit entsprechen" (Thomas von Aquin).

Spannungsfeld Nature and Culture

The danger of the self-preservation of mankind is always false or even morally sound. It is clear in the mercurial, yet sometimes embarrassing, fact that man, among the other things, actually has a sense of security, even in relation to his own life. Positive: He may not have the same reactionary security as a country, but freedom from instinct, so that freedom to the world and to himself - and: full risk of freedom and self-determination. Freedom is also the key to the management of the world and of mankind. The human being is a spiritual reality, between the "natural" and the "cultural" worlds: a world, a future, a "culture". "Werde, der du bist", formuliert der orphische Spruch, aber was so einfach klingt, ist das Abenteuer eines ganzen Lebens. Abenteuer, weil es weder eine "gußeiserne" Natur noch eine beliebige "Kultur" gibt, sondern beide in lebendiger Beziehung stehen: zwischen Grenze der Gestalt (dem "Glück der Gestalt") und Kultur ("dem Glück des Neuwerdens").

A country has its own law and must not act as such; therefore, its naturally secure sexuality is free of shame and functional and is undeniably based on a close-knit community. A man is and has his own lawfulness and must act as such: Sie ist nicht einfach naturhaft gesichert, vielmehr kulturell bestimmt und schambesetzt wegen des möglichen Mißlingens; außerdem ist sie nicht notwendig an Nachkommenschaft gebunden. In the right balance, there is a free range for glücken and mistlingen, on the basis of the unusually wide range of trieb (natural necessity) and Selbst (freedom). Fleischwerdung im eigenen Körper, seine Anverwandlung in den eigenen Leib, "Gastfreundschaft" (hospitalité, Levinas) gegenüber dem anderen Geschlecht sind die Stichworte. It is not about rebellion, neutralization, levelling out and "watching out" for the future.

Therefore, the second right is not only a cultural heritage, but also a cultural heritage. Nur: Geschlechtlichkeit ist zu kultivieren, aber als Vorgabe der Natur (was könnte sonst gestaltet werden?). Kultivieren meint: weder sich ihr zu unterwerfen noch sie auszuschalten. Beides läßt sich an den zwei unterschiedlichen Zielen der Geschlechtlichkeit zeigen: der erotischen Erfüllung im anderen und der generativen Erfüllung im Kind, wozu allemal zwei verschiedene Geschlechter vorauszusetzen sind. To the erotic right of the human being belongs the child (e.g. Fellmann, 2005). Und auch das Kind selbst ist wiederum wiederum kein Neutrum, sondern tritt als "Erfüllung" des Liebesaktes selbst in das zweiheitliche Dasein.

So wird Natur = nascitura: offen zur Freiheit

The first is also a vertiginous nature: nature is a source of pride, and it is also a source of birth: a source of wealth, an understanding of the place. Therefore, the actual mechanics of nature remains far behind, and therefore also the construction remains far behind.

"With the challenge of nature to human beings, the Telos of their own lives will not be completely lost and undoubtedly unimaginable. In dem Augenblick, in dem der Mensch das Bewußtsein seiner selbst als Natur sich abschneidet, werden alle Zwecke, für die er sich am Leben erhält, (...) nichtig."[4]

"Was die Neuzeit Natur nennt, ist im letzten Bestand eine halbe Wirklichkeit. Was sie Kultur nennt, ist bei aller Größe etwas Dämonisch-Zerrissenes, worin der Sinn immer mit dem Unsinn ist gepaart; das Schaffen mit der Zerstörung; die Fruchtbarkeit mit dem Sterben; das Edle mit dem Gemeinen. Und eine ganze Technik des Vorbeisehens, des Verschleierns und Abblendens hat entwickelt werden müssen, damit der Mensch die Lüge und die Furchtbarkeit dieses Zustandes ertrage."[5]

Also heraus aus der Lüge.

What is a person? A double-pellet

Person meint ein Doppeltes - in sich stehen und sich übersteigen, auf hin. "'Person' bedeutet, daß ich in meinem Selbstsein letztlich von keiner anderen Instanz besessen werden kann, sondern mir gehöre (...), Selbstzweck bin." (Guardini, 1939, 94) In sich stehen betont, daß ich mir ursprünglich und unableitbar selbst gehöre.

Doch ist Personsein nicht stumpfer Selbstbesitz. Augustinus speaks of a selfishness, an anima in se curvata, that in itself abstürzt.[6] Vielmehr: Ich erwache in Begegnung mit einem anderem Ich, das sich auch selbst gehört selbst gehört und doch auf mich zugeht.

Erst in der Begegnung kommt es zu einer Bewährung des Eigenen, zur Aktualisierung des Ich, insbesondere in der Liebe. "Wer liebt, geht immerfort in die Freiheit hinüber; in die Freiheit von seiner eigentlichen Fessel, nämlich von sich selbst." (Guardini, 1939, 99) Daher kommt in die Selbstgehörigkeit durch den anderen eine entscheidende, ja schicksalhafte Dynamik. It is based on the constitutive spannung from Ich zum Du: in the overlapping, Sich-Mitteilen, also in the legibility, always also in the spannung zu Gott. In such Dynamik entfällt eine Selbstbewahrung, die neutrale Subjekt-Objekt-Verhältnis schirmt, wie ein Sten auf einen Stein trifft, und es beginnt ein Sich-Aussetzen: Person wird auf Person resonant und von ihr her ins ins Antwortlose preisgegegeben oder auch ins Unerschöpfliche geöffnet.

Hingabe an die Andersheit des anderen

In Christlichen verliert die Selbstgehörigkeit nicht ihre erstrangige Stelle, vielmehr läßt sie sich überzeugender begründen: "Hinübergehen" über sich, sich öffnen kann die Person nämlich, weil sie sich immer sich schon gehört. These must be changed, so that a decisive sign of modernity, autonomy, is called for.

Personhood is, as we have christened it, the expression of an unequal or even a hidden "Existential": the existence is the activation of selfhood. The human being (is) not a thing, which is stored in himself. Er existiert vielmehr so, daß er über sich hinausgeht. Dieser Hinausgang geschieht schon immerfort innerhalb der Welt, in den verschiedenen Beziehungen zu Dingen, Ideen und Menschen (...); eigentlicherweise geschieht er über die Welt hinaus auf Gott zu." (Guardini 1939, 124)

Weshalb aber werde damit Ich selbst nicht außer Kraft gesetzt? Weil auch das Gegenüber Person, also ebenso unter Selbstand und Hinausgehen über sich selbst zu denken ist. Dazu sind aber wesentlich nicht nur zwei Menschen, sondern zwei Geschlechter vonnöten - als gegenseitige unergründliche Fremdheit, unergründliche Entzogenheit, bis ins Leibliche , bis ins Seelische, bis ins Geistige hinein; especially in the law of the law, which protects the freedom of others, it is the Transcendence in the freedom of other laws and not just a narcissistic Sich-Selbst-Begegnen.

Erst im anderen Geschlecht ist wirkliche Andersheit, von mir nicht zu vereinnahmende, nicht mich selbst zurückspiegelnde wahrzunehmen: Frau als bleibendes Geheimnis für den Mann. Whoever this zutiefst Anderen ausweicht, weicht dem Leben aus.

You could go through all the morbid passages that do not even mention the old Genesis Vision today, because in the culmination of the two Geschlechter's lives, the whole dynamic is absorbed into the basis of the beginning, the unerroneous life of the two youngsters, which has become the image for which all the pictures have been created? And if so, is the Sich-Einlassen on the free speech the only way to get the right to speak?

Nochmal das Doppelte in der Person: Selbstbesitz (Souveränität) und Hingabe schließen sich gerade nicht aus - weder in der göttlich-trinitarischen Beziehung noch in der menschlichen Liebe. Love is selfishness and selfishness in one. Nicht ist der Mann Selbstand und die Frau Hingabe, wie eine Verzeichnung lautet. Im Menschlichen geben nicht zwei Hälften ein Ganzes, sondern zwei Ganze ein Ganzes. Each person's right to live is restricted by his or her person and to live his or her life for a long time. The culture of today is based on the need for self-sufficiency and the ability to pay the price. Preisgabe wird sie, wo sie den anderen, die anderen nur als Sexobjekt oder in einer "Rolle", nicht aber als Person, leibhaftig, sieht. In the German language, the words "love", "life" and "love" do not necessarily belong to the same word. Whoever makes the book into a "proof of life" for the selfishness of the other, is underestimating the life. However, if life would allow people to grow in themselves, it would always be above all else: the other right to do so. And the biblical word's first provocation even goes through the whole world - into a new book. Auferstehung des Leibes, meines Leibes, also als Mann oder Frau, ist die Botschaft der Freude.

Letzter Schritt: Caro cardo

Deswegen ist die Fleischwerdung Gottes die große Herausforderung - kann Gott überhaupt Leib und Geschlecht annehmen? Ja, er ist Mann geworden, geboren von einer Frau. Wäre das Ohr nicht so abgestumpft, wäre das eine Explosion. The son Gottes and Marias is, in spite of all the idealistic ideals, a leibloser, the true interchange of other religious traditions, even from the Jewish world. caro cardo - Fleisch ist der Angelpunkt. This is where the light comes into a new, unique light (e.g. Henry, 2000) - up to the leibhaften Auferstehung zu todlosem Leben. Even the Church is as a light, the relationship between Christ and the Church is brute-erotic (Eph 5:25), and the Holy Spirit will be at the sacrament: to the certainty of the Gegenwart, which has gone into the hearts of the faithful. Auch zu dieser Gegenwart im Ehesakrament muß das Geschlecht erzogen werden, aber nicht um seiner Zähmung oder sogar Brechung willen, sondern wegen seiner wirklichen und wirksamen Ekstase. Freilich: The return of an ego can not be guaranteed by the sakrament, but the elements that can bring about the difficult balance can be christily put in place: You alone - you for always - from you a child. This is no longer a native natural phenomenon, but rather a scholarly overflowing of nature into a complex, angenomous, pure nature. It is not only primitive nature that will be destroyed by Christendom (and Judaism): it must be found in the realm of the Göttlichen, it must be found there. Auch der Eros wird in den Bereich des Heiligen gestellt: im Sakrament. Auch Zeugung und Geburt werden in den Bereich des Heiligen gestellt: Sie sind paradiesisch verliehene Gaben (Gen 1,28). "Geschlecht ist Feier des Lebens." (Thomas Mann)

The real human nature of the Gottmenschen is the most faithful of all human nature. Ihm zu folgen meint, die versehrte menschliche Natur in seinen Radius stellen, sich vollenden lassen, wo wir nur wechselnde Neigungen haben. Where there is no common nature of mankind, but only "freedom", there are only decisions to be made by the ungodly, but no fundamental freedom of our nature. The Fleischwerdung Jesu wäre dann überflüssig, auch sein Tod, auch seine Auferstehung. Immer vollziehen sie sich im Fleisch, warum? Simchat thora, Dein Gesetz ist meine Freude: das Gesetz meines Leibes, meines Lebens, meiner Lust, das der Schöpfer auf den Leib geschrieben hat. It is not the free will that wins us, but its pride.

Leib - Liebe - Lust: Alle drei Bausteine gründen in der Natur, werden geformt in Kultur, werden schön und menschlich in der personal Beziehung: Ich meine Dich allein - für immer - freue mich auf unser Kind. That is the answer that we all want to give and that we want to hear from the world. However, this answer will be overlooked if it is not given to our nature, if it is not given to us in the hope that it will be given to us in the hope of mutual aid. Leiblos - lieblos - lustlos sind heute schon Erfahrungen einer Cyberwelt: Sie bietet unentwegt Lust an, virtuell ohne Leib, real ohne einen wirklichen Anderen oder mit wechselnden Anderen, oder mit Vinyl-Sexpuppen, virtuell ohne Kinder: nur in Abwehr und Verhütung. Love, which no one wants to give, Love, which is what I want, Love, which I will never forget...: the last bruchstücke of a man, which makes the sinn brighter.

Halten wir uns an das Ganze. Nochmals Chesterton: "Es ist leicht verrückt zu sein; leicht, ein Häretiker zu sein. Es ist immer leicht, die Welt überhandnehmen zu lassen: schwierig ist, selbst die Vorhand zu behalten. Es ist immer leicht, Modernist zu sein, wie es leicht ist, ein Snob zu sein. In irgendeine dieser offenen Fallen des Irrtums und der Übertretung zu geraten, die eine Modeströmung und Sekte nach der andern dem Christentum auf seinen geschichtlichen Weg gelegt hatten - das wäre in der Tat leicht gewesen. (...) Sie alle vermieden zu haben, ist ein wirbelndes Abenteuer; und in meiner Vision fliegt der himmlische Wagen donnernd durch die Jahrhunderte - die langweiligen Häresien straucheln und fallen der Länge nach zu Boden, die wilde Wahrheit aber hält sich schwankend aufrecht."

Benhabib, S., 1993: Feminismus und Postmoderne. Ein prekäres Bündnis, in: Dies. Butler/D. Cornell/N. Frazer, Der Streit um Differenz. Feminismus und Postmoderne in der Gegenwart, Frankfurt.

Butler, J., 1991: Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, Frankfurt.

Butler, J., 1997: Körper von Gewicht. Die diskursiven Grenzen des Geschlechts, Frankfurt.

Fellmann, F., 2005: Das Paar. Eine erotische Rechtfertigung des Menschen, Berlin.

Gerl-Falkovitz, H.-B., 31995: Die bekannte Unbekannte. Frauen-Bilder aus der Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte, Mainz.

Gerl-Falkovitz, H.-B., 2001a: Eros - Glück - Tod und andere Versuche im christlichlichen Denken, Gräfelfing.

Gerl-Falkovitz, H.-B., 2001b: Zwischen Somatismus und Leibferne. Zur Kritik der Gender-Forschung, in: IKZ Communio 3, 225 - 237.

Guardini, R., 1939: Welt und Person. Versuche zur christlichen Lehre vom Menschen, Würzburg.

Henry, M., 2002: Inkarnation. Für eine Philosophie des Fleisches, übers. v. R. Kühn, Freiburg. R. Kühn, Freiburg.

Irigaray, L., 1982: Passions élémentaires, Paris.

Irigaray, L., 1991: Ethik der sexuellen Differenz (1984), Frankfurt.

Levinas, E., 1980: Die Zeit und der andere, dt. v.. Ludwig Wenzler, Freiburg.

Maximus Confessor, 1961: All-Eins zu Christus, hg. u. übers. v. E. v. Ivanka, Einsiedeln. E. v. Ivanka, Einsiedeln.

Pauwels, A., 2004: Gender Inclusive Language: Gender-Aspects of the Globalization of the English Language. Vortrag im Gender-Kompetenz-Zentrum der HU Berlin vom 16. April 2004.

Rilke, R. M., 1980: Die dritte Duineser Elegie, in: Werke, Frankfurt.

Sampson, Ph. J., 1996: Die Repräsentationen des Körpers, in: Kunstforum International 132. Die Zukunft des Körpers I, Ruppichteroth, 94 - 111.

Stoller, S. / Vasterling, V. / Fisher, L. (eds.), 2005: Feministische Phänomenologie und Hermeneutik, Reihe: Orbis Phaenomenologicus, Perspektiven NF 9, Würzburg.

Schumacher, M. M. (ed.), 2004: Women in Christ. Towards a New Feminism, Grand Rapids.

Ulrich, F., 1973: Der Nächste und Fernste - oder: Er in Dir und Mir. Zur Philosophie der Intersubjektivität, in: Theologie und Philosophie 3, 317 - 350.

Vasterling, V., 2005: Zur Bedeutung von Heideggers ontologischer Hermeneutik für die feministische Philosophie, in: Stoller S. u. a., 2005, 67 - 95.

Vinken, B., 2004: Stigmata. Poetik der Körperinschrift, München.

Weil, S., 1993: Cahiers. Aufzeichnungen, übers. v. v. E. Edl / W. Matz. München, II.

Young, I. M., 2004: On Female Body Experience, New York.


[1] Über die Würde des Menschen, übers. v. H. W. Rüssel, Amsterdam 1940, 49f. H. W. Rüssel, Amsterdam 1940, 49f.

[2] René Descartes, Discours de la méthode, 6.

[3] Vgl. den doppelsinnigen Titel: Sigrid Braunfels u. a., Der "vermessene Mensch". Anthropometrie in Kunst und Wissenschaft, München 1973.

[4] Theodor W. Adorno, Dialektik der Aufklärung, Frankfurt 1971, 51.

[5] Romano Guardini, Der Mensch. Umriß einer christlichen Anthropologie, (unveröfftl.), Archiv Kath. Akademie München, Typoskript S. 45.

[6] In this context, Romano Guardini has focused on the danger of self-determination; see Guardini: Der religiöse Gehorsam (1916), in: Auf dem Wege. Versuche, Mainz 1923, 15f, Anm. 2.: "Es widerspricht katholischem Geiste, viel von Persönlichkeit, Selbsterziehung usw. zu reden. Dadurch wird der Mensch beständig auf sich selbst zurückgeworfen; er gravitiert in sein eigenes Ich und verliert eben dadurch den befreienden Blick auf Gott. The best thing to do is to forget and to look to God, because 'will' and 'would' the human being in the global atmosphere. [...] Not even the soul is as deep as the ethic. What they are supposed to understand and to fill in are the deadly facts, the real meaning, the truth. Darin geschieht, was aller Erziehung Anfang und Ende ist, das Herausheben aus dem eigenen Selbst."

The authorHanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz

Ratzinger Prize 2021

Resources

"Are we facing a new ethic of sexuality in the German Synodal Way?"

Faced with some controversies that have arisen in the Synodal Path in Germany, the philosopher Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz, winner of the Ratzinger Prize 2021, asked yesterday: "Are we facing a 'new' ethics on sexuality, in which "God has to stand aside before my freedom?". It was in an Omnes Forum, at the University San Dámaso (Madrid).

Rafael Miner-December 17, 2021-Reading time: 14 minutes

– Supernatural conference had aroused expectations for several reasons. First of all, the German philosopher had just received in Rome, from the hands of Pope Francis, the 2021 prize of the Vatican Foundation Joseph Ratzinger - Benedict XVI, together with her compatriot, Ludger Schwienhorst-Schönberger, professor of Old Testament at the University of Vienna.

Secondly, the Synodal Path is taking place in Germany, which will last at least until 2023, and is the cause of philosophical and moral controversies, as Omnes has been reflecting in various chronicles and information. This synodal journey has sometimes been based on a separation between nature and person, which would justify a reform of sexual ethics and morality in the Catholic Church that some are proposing.

The philosopher Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falcovitz (Oberwappenhöst, Germany, 1945) alluded to this in her lecture at the University San Dámaso, whose title was 'Body, love, pleasure. Where does the separation between nature and person lead?'

You can read the full conference hereí

A complicated time for the anthropology of sexuality

The event, which took place both in person and online, was introduced by the dean of the Faculty of Philosophy of the Universidad San Dámaso, Victor Tirado; the director of Omnes, Alfonso Riobó, and the associate professor of the Faculty of Philosophy, David Torrijos, who moderated the session and the subsequent discussion.

Dean Víctor Tirado said that "it is a pleasure personally, and for San Dámaso in general, to host this event organized by Omnes, which brings us Professor Gerl-Falcovitz, with an essential theme today, such as the nature of the human being. At a time, moreover, when anthropology is so diffuse and so shifting, and in which metaphysical reflection has almost been lost in many aspects".

For his part, the director of Omnes, Alfonso Riobó, thanked "Dean Víctor Tirado for his interest and his willingness to host us at the University San Dámaso in a very significant event", because Professor Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falcovitz is "an outstanding philosopher, one of the great figures of current Catholic thought, who has just received the Ratzinger 2021 prize in Rome". The director of Omnes also thanked Banco Sabadell and the Roman Academic Center Foundation (CARF) for their collaboration, before giving way to Professor David Torrijos and the German lecturer. In his brief words, Professor Torrijos recalled that Edith Stein, a figure very studied by the German academic, is the patroness of the Faculty of Philosophy of the University San Dámaso.

hanna_barbara_4

Synodal Path in Germany

At the beginning of her speech, Professor Gerl-Falcovitz evoked a couple of anecdotes involving a German cardinal and a German bishop, whose names she omitted, and which focus on human nature, a cross-cutting concept in her speech.

"Recently, in Germany, after the Synodal Way, a cardinal (a word that translated means: 'quicio') pronounced thus at the beginning of October 2021: the affirmations about the human being belong to the "dispositional mass" of Christianity, because they are not 'de fide definita', defined about the faith, but changeable.", commented Gerl-Falcovitz.", commented Gerl-Falcovitz. "So, are we looking at a new ethics?" he wondered. "Ethics comes from. ethosIs it necessary to mark again the fence we had around sexuality?"

And she herself answered: "The surprising statements on sexuality at Forum IV (of the Synodal Way in Germany) simply want to open the fence; in fact, anyone could mark it. Do we still need it? This 'new' sexual ethic was greeted with joy by two other speakers, one of whom was a bishop; at last the step would have been taken: in love, it is not only the person with his or her individual freedom that matters. Nature - that is, the body, sex, the received disposition - are at best proposals that can be discussed or modified," warned Hanna-Barbera Gerl-Falcovitz, who is a member of the presidium of the European Institute for Philosophy and Religion at the Benedict XVI School of Philosophy and Letters in Heiligenkreuz/Vienna.

Background of the German controversy

Before continuing with her presentation, perhaps it would be useful to delve a little deeper into the context of this conference, the Synodal Way in Germany, which will allow a better understanding of her affirmations. Professor Gerl-Falcovitz did so when answering one of the questions of the colloquium.

"The sticking point [alleged by some] is that we have to separate nature from personhood, in contemporary sexual morality. Somehow we get closer in this way to people who have different conceptions of sexuality, but then somehow we leave behind whether nature can teach us anything about how to behave in the realm of sexual life or sexual morality."

Human nature

"In Freiburg there is a colleague who claims that the person has to be thought of without taking his nature into account," the German philosopher continued. "The reason he puts forward is that the person essentially consists in his freedom, which means autonomy in a very precise sense. The meaning of this autonomy is linked to Kant, although this colleague somehow departs from Kant himself, understanding that we have an autonomy, and that God imposing something on us, or saying something about our freedom, would be something foreign, alien, to us. If God is something foreign, alien, to me, that means that there is nothing He can say about my conduct without altering it in some way. In that way, God, as a heteronomous instance with respect to my freedom, has to be set aside in some way before my freedom".

According to this argument, the scholar specified, "whatever God might say by way of commandment about my own sexuality would have to be valid only to the extent that it was something rationally acceptable to me, meaningful within my own autonomy. So any divine command will be conditional on it being within my own autonomy, my own rationality."

The 2021 Ratzinger Prize winner further clarified the intellectual journey of this other person from Freiburg: "In recent times, this colleague has taken a journey starting from Kant and ending with Friedrich Nietzsche. The problem with this situation is that, in Kant's thought, autonomy is linked to rationality. So, for Kant autonomy can be shared with other people, it can be argued, it is linked to reason. But in Nietzsche's thought, autonomy is linked to will, which means that it is linked to my freedom exclusively, without somehow reason having anything to say there. My will defines my autonomy, one could say simplifying what the colleague says."

Separating nature and person: "an obsession".

The storyline was already on the table, so the lecturer wanted to go deeper from the beginning with some questions, which she answered herself.

"Does this mean that the body is only the raw material for my will? It is surprising: nature and bio-ecology are on everyone's lips lately; they must be protected, they must be nurtured, but under no circumstances can they be modified by man. Genetic engineering? No, thank you, but should we assume that nature has nothing more to say? So, an a-corporeal love? An a-natural love? No, you'll hear right away: we didn't mean that. But what, then? Let's see the spectacle of errors and confusions", the German philosopher affirmed, putting a point of caution: "Beware", she reminded, because "'obcecation of the mind is the first-born daughter of lust', says Thomas Aquinas".

In the opinion of the German professor, "the supposedly revolutionary idea is an obsession: the separation between nature and person. It is by no means very new or postmodern; on the contrary, it has been formulated a long time ago. Its deviations are also visible, and have also been criticized for a long time. And they are contradictory.

Brief historical review

For about 500 years, the Modern Age has conceived of nature as a kind of mechanical workshop, and man also functions as a natural machine among other natural machines, the German academic pointed out. "Neurobiology, the most recent discipline, reinforces in some of its representatives a very simple statement: thought is nothing more than interconnection of brain synapses. Even the objection that, if everything is determined, this applies first and foremost to the researcher himself does not bother. Something similar happens with the statement of a Nobel Prize winner in chemistry, who affirmed that man is nothing more than chemistry. With that, freedom would have been completely abdicated," he said.

"Since Judith Butler's 'Gender Trouble' in 1990, culture points to a surprising extreme: the transformation to the point of dissolution of the body in cyberspace, in virtual or also real medical-technical space," Gerl-Falcovitz noted, turning her gaze to extreme transhumanism. [...]. The 'body (Körper)' becomes a place of protest against a non-autonomously constructed identity. The utopias of fluid identity refer to the total self-design of the 'I'. ' Also sexual life is 'staged'; the 'I' wears the respective sex mask, with the result that 'this mask harbors no self' (Benhabib, 1993, 15)."

hanna_barbara_2

Is the man your software?

Following the thread of her reflection, the lecturer, who studied Philosophy, German Philology and Political Science at the universities of Munich and Heidelberg, and is a requested author in interventions on anthropology, pointed out: "what is in vogue is 'gender nauting', navigating between the sexes. Man is his own software, rooted beyond the body and sex. In this direction the gender debate points: it makes the biological sex ('sex') disappear in the attributed sex (cultural, social, historical - the 'gender'). Instead of determination by nature, a voluntary self-choice is offered: is woman already woman, or who 'makes' woman, woman, and man, man? Without resistance, without will, the body offers itself as a 'pre-sexual body'. The self does not know incarnation".

From the diagnosis, Gerl-Falcovitz stated his position: "Now, we need to find a common thread through these contradictions. It is this: there is no separation between nature, culture and person. More simply: there is no separation between body and sex, between love and duration, between pleasure and children. Hence the need for a critique of this nature split in half, reduced to mechanics, but also of culture split in half, read in terms of pure constructivity".

From his point of view, "man is, in reality, anchored in another place: in the direction of the divine. Human nature, and even more so culture, lives "towards". The greatness of nature ("natura") consists in the fact that it is actually called "nascitura": that which wants to be born. And it is nature that seeks the free participation of man in his "towards"; it seeks that he affirms and realizes his orientation. The creature has been created towards the origin, it carries its sign, its home is where it comes from".

"The body is gift, sex is gift."

"This can already be read in the engine of sex," he added. "It is loss of self in the other, it is the grammar of love made flesh. The body is gift, sex is gift, it is reason and origin (in German 'Ur-Sprung,' the primal leap) of that which cannot be done by us, of the passion of being man, of the enormous impulse toward self-giving."

In the scholar's view, we are "enriched by the duality of male and female, and impoverished by it; not sufficient ourselves, dependent on the attention of the other, waiting from the other for the redemption that comes from the realm of the divine and in its highest and most fruitful form leads back there (Gen 1:27ff). What in Greek thought is a 'deficiency,' the lack of unity, in biblical thought becomes the joy of duality."

In her argumentation, the lecturer underlined that "sex ('Geschlecht') can also be understood, from its literal sense, as 'being sacrificed' (in German 'Geschlachtetsein') or as 'being in half' ('Hälftigsein'). The brutality of the sex-only, of the 'river-god of blood [...] ah, oozing the unrecognizable' (Rilke, 1980) must, therefore, be humanized. It is difficult to think the body without a suggestive and different Other. But neither 'nature' (biology) nor 'culture' (self-design) is 'healed' by itself. Therefore, it is crucial to know the divine horizon, to know the guidelines that come from it. Only then can one 'act ethically', that is, 'freely correspond to the order of being' (Thomas Aquinas)," the professor points out.

Tension between nature and culture

As has been pointed out, Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falcovitz is an outstanding specialist in the studies on Edith Stein (Wroclaw 1891-Auschwitz 1942). But also of the German Catholic theologian Romano Guardini (Verona 1885-Munich 1968), whose 'Opera Omnia' she edited, and whom she quoted in her arguments, especially in relation to nature and the person. Earlier, the philosopher wanted to reflect further on human sexuality.

"The idea of man's self-determination is not in itself wrong, nor morally evil. It is based on the strange fact - as salient as it is dangerous - that man indeed occupies a special position among other living beings, also as regards his sex." "The positive side" is that "although he does not have the stimulus-response security of an animal, he does have freedom from instinct and thus freedom towards the world and towards himself; and also the full risk of endangering others and himself."

But "at the same time," he added, "freedom constitutes the creative flank, to shape the world and the human being. The human being is a reality full of tensions, stretched between the given 'nature' and the opposite extreme of change, becoming, the future, 'culture'. [...]".

At this point he distinguished between animals and human beings. "An animal has its sex, and does not have to mold it; hence its sexuality, naturally assured, is free from modesty and, from the functional point of view, clearly oriented to offspring."

"A human being is and has his or her sexuality, and must shape it: it is not simply naturally assured, but culturally determined and imbued with modesty due to the possibility of failure; moreover, it is not necessarily linked to offspring. In sexuality there is room for achievement and failure, on the basis of the inescapable tension between the impulse (of natural need) and the self (of freedom)".

"Sexuality, a fact of nature".

In Gerl-Falkovitz's view, "embodiment in one's own body, its adaptation to one's own body, 'hospitality' towards the other sex, are the key words. It does not indicate rebellion, neutralization, leveling, or 'disregard' of the received disposition. Thus, the duality of sex is not only accessible to a cultural processing, but even points towards it. But sexuality must be cultivated as a given of nature (what else could be shaped?)."

"To cultivate means neither to submit to it nor to eliminate it. Both can be demonstrated by the two different objectives of sexuality: erotic fulfillment in the other and generative fulfillment in the child, for which, in any case, two different sexes must be presupposed.

The child belongs to the erotic justification of the human being (Fellmann, 2005). And, again, the child itself is not something neutral either, but enters into dual existence as a 'culmination' of the very act of love."

Thus, "instead of a distorted nature, therefore, nature is a datum and at the same time means 'nascitura': a becoming, an unfolding of the given disposition. The current mechanization of nature is far behind, and so is construction. With the negation of nature in man, not only does the telos of life itself become confused and opaque. The moment man abandons the consciousness of himself as nature, all the goals for which he keeps himself alive become empty [...]," he added, quoting Theodor W. Adorno.

And finally, he mentioned Guardini, whose chair was suppressed in 1939 by the Nazi regime, and who was invited to teach at the University of Tübingen in 1945, and then at the University of Munich: "What modernity calls nature is, in the last analysis, a half-reality. What it calls culture is something demonic and torn, despite all the grandeur, in which meaning is always paired with meaninglessness; creation with destruction; fecundity with death; the noble with the petty. And a whole technique of overlooking, concealing and blinding has had to be developed so that man can endure the lie and the fright of this situation." "So let us abandon the lie," the philosopher proposed.

"Self-belonging through the other."

"Person means something double: to subsist in oneself, and to transcend oneself in some direction. [...] Now then, to be a person is not a flat possession of oneself. Augustine spoke of a self-possession, of an "anima in se curvata," which collapses in on itself. Rather, it happens that I awaken in the encounter with another I, which also belongs to itself and yet comes to me," Gerl-Falcovitz continued.

"Only in the encounter is the preservation of the self, the actualization of the I, especially in love. 'He who loves is always in transit toward freedom, toward freedom from his authentic bondage, that is, from himself,' said Guardini. "Therefore, self-belonging through the other acquires a decisive, even fateful, dynamic. It results from the constitutive tension that goes from the I to the you: in transcending, in giving oneself to share, also in corporeality, and likewise in the tension toward God."

"It takes two people, two genders."

The lecturer thus arrived, with the necessary limitations of space in an information of these characteristics, at her reflection on the necessity of the duality of sexes. "But why does this not invalidate me in my own Self? Because the person in front of me must be thought of equally as subsistence and as going out beyond itself. For this, however, one needs not only two persons, but two sexes - as mutual and unfathomable strangeness, unfathomable withdrawal, even to the bodily, even to the mental, even to the spiritual; it is precisely in sexual love, which experiences the body of the other, that transcending into the otherness of the other sex takes place, and not only a narcissistic encounter with oneself.

Only in the other sex is the true difference perceived, which cannot be appropriated by me, it does not reflect myself: woman as a permanent secret for man. Who dodges this profound difference, dodges life," he said.

Body, life and love

In this sense, the challenge posed by the German philosopher was the following: "Could the ancient vision of Genesis - beyond all moral doctrines, which in the end are ineffective - that, in the daring of the two sexes, in the background of the encounter the divine dynamic unfolds, that the unprecedented life of God himself generates the play of the sexes and has created it as the image of that which surpasses all images? And that from there the opening up to the other sex expresses the divine tension, be raised again today?"

"It is no accident," the scholar pointed out, "that the German words 'Leib' (body), 'Leben' (life) and 'Liebe' (love) come from the same root. Whoever makes the body an 'allotment', an enjoyment for oneself in the other, underdetermines life. Life allows man to be grounded in himself, but at the same time continually drives him beyond himself, towards the other sex. And the extreme provocation of biblical thought goes even through death, towards a new body. The resurrection of the body, of my body, that is, as a man or as a woman, is the message of joy".

hanna_barbara_3

"God became man, born of a woman."

The last step in Gerl-Falkovitz's reflection was to consider that "the great challenge is the incarnation of God: can God really take on body and gender? Yes, he became a man, born of a woman. If our hearing were not so dulled, this would be a blast.

The Son of God and of Mary, as opposed to all the idealizations of a divinity without a body, is the true difference with respect to other religious traditions, including Judaism. Caro cardo': the flesh is the central point".

"In this way the body is contemplated in a new and inexhaustible light (Henry, 2000), until the bodily resurrection to a life without death. Also the Church is considered a body, the relationship of Christ with the Church is nuptial-erotic (Eph 5:25), and marriage becomes a sacrament: a sign of the presence of God in the lovers," he added.

The sacrament of marriage

"In the sacrament of marriage the sex must also be educated for this presence, but not to tame it or bend it, but to enable it to reach its real and effective ecstasy. Obviously, the good outcome of a marriage cannot be guaranteed by the sacrament, but the elements under which the difficult balance can be achieved can be pointed out in Christian terms: you alone; you forever; from you a son."

"This is no longer a naive conception of nature, but the creative transformation of nature into a cultivated, accepted and finite nature," the speaker said. "Christianity (and Judaism) never glorify only primitive nature; it is to be elevated to the space of the divine and healed there. Likewise, eros is placed in the realm of the sacred: in the sacrament. And likewise procreation and birth are placed in the realm of the sacred: they are gifts bestowed in paradise (Gen 1:28). 'Sex is the celebration of life' (Thomas Mann)".

Ashlars founded in nature

Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falcovitz concluded with an allusion to the title of her lecture: "Body, love, pleasure. These three pillars are founded in nature, formed in culture, become beautiful and human in the personal relationship: I care only for you, forever; I look forward to our child. That is the answer we give each other, and the one we want to hear from the one we love. But this response is exaggerated if it is not grounded in our nature, if it is not given in the hope of divine help".

And, if it began with Chesterton, it ended in the same way: "Let us stick to the Whole. Again Chesterton says: 'It is easy to be mad; it is easy to be a heretic. It is always easy to be carried away by the world: the hard thing is to keep one's course. It is always easy to be a modernist, just as it is easy to be a snob. To fall into any of the traps opened by error and transgression, which one fad and one sect after another had placed in the historical path of Christianity, that would have been easy. [...] To have avoided them all is a rapturous adventure; and the heavenly chariot flies thundering through the centuries in my vision. The tedious heresies stumble and fall flat on their faces to the ground, but the wild truth stands astonishingly upright'".

Resources

What is the Holy Grail or Holy Chalice?

The cup used by Jesus Christ at the Last Supper, called the Holy Grail, has been the subject of legends and stories since time immemorial. As such, it is one of the most valued and appreciated relics of Our Lord.

Alejandro Vázquez-Dodero-December 17, 2021-Reading time: 5 minutes

The Holy Grail, o holy ChaliceThe cup, of which so much has been written and spoken, is the cup in which Jesus Christ drank with his disciples at the Last Supper, and for this reason it is considered a unique relic. Thus, it was used to institute the sacrament of the sacrament of the Eucharist

Various legends refer to her, and on some occasions she is attributed with curative properties and in others the power to raise the dead o feeding thousands of soldiers. The legends show the Holy Grail in the form of a cup or a fountain. 

For approximately ten centuries, these legends considered that the Knights Templar guarded the Holy Grail, although at no time was it detailed exactly what this relic consisted of.

There are those who relate the Holy Grail and the Joseph of ArimatheaThe authors of the book of Jesus' resurrection maintain that Jesus, already resurrected, would appear to Joseph to give it to him and order him to take it to the island of Britannia. Authors maintain that Joseph would use the chalice to collect the blood and water emanating from the wound opened by the spear of the centurion in the side of Christ and that, later, in Britannia, he established a dynasty of guardians to keep him safe and hidden. 

It should be noted that Holy Scripture does not mention the Holy Grail. The first reference we have is from the 12th century.

Origin of the legend of the Holy Grail

The search for the Holy Grail is a theme that is related to the story of King Arthur, combining Christian tradition with ancient Celtic myths referring to a divine cauldron. In addition, there are other legends about the Holy Chalice that are related to those concerning the various ancient cups that are considered to be the authentic relic.

It was first mentioned in history at the beginning of the 12th century by the French author Chrétien de Troyes in its narration Percevalalso called Le Conte du Graal (the Grail story).

In the play, King Arthur's father - known as the Fisher King - was ill. As the country was considered weak because of their leader's illness, several knights went to the king's castle to try to cure him, but only one of them could be the one chosen to bring about the cure.

Perceval

The chosen one was Perceval, and the king offered him a banquet, in which a mysterious procession of a maiden carrying the Holy Grail took place. As he had been advised not to speak too much, Perceval, although amazed by the procession, decided to remain silent, and after the banquet he retired to rest, as did the king. 

When Perceval woke up, he realized that the whole castle was deserted. He marched, and going into the forest he met a maiden to whom he told what had happened. She told him that if he had asked the meaning of the procession he would have restored the king to health, since the cup he had seen was the holy Chalice, and it was the king who guarded it. Upon learning all this, Perceval promised to find the Holy Grail and close the search.

The work of Chrétien de Troyes represented the beginning of the legend, but it was other authors who developed this version, as it became known to medieval Europe, spiritualizing it and emphasizing that it was the cup of the Last Supper; the same one that, according to different sources, Joseph of Arimathea later used to collect the blood from the wounds during the crucifixion of Christ. 

Several Holy Grails?

As we were saying, we have several versions of Grail saints that are considered authentic relics. We would highlight the following:

The Holy Chalice of the Valencia Cathedral, Spain

Considered as the chalice brought from Rome to Spain thanks to St. Lawrence the Martyr in the third century. Prior to its deposit in Valencia it was in various places in Aragon, such as the monastery of San Pedro de Siresa, the cathedral of Jaca or the monastery of San Juan de la Peña. After a short stay in Barcelona it arrived in Valencia.

Composed of an agate cup of 7 cm high and 9.5 cm in diameter, with a foot with handles added later. Dated by the specialists in the first century, and considered as an authentic Hebrew cup when observing the measures used at the time for this type of utensil. Made on stone catalogued as sardiusIt is representative of the tribe of Judah, the tribe to which Our Lord belonged. At the bottom, in addition, there is an inscription in Hebrew that alludes to Jesus.



The pontiffs who have visited Valencia - St. John Paul II and Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI - used it in the mass Eucharist they celebrated during their visits. This gesture about the tradition that concerns us -that this is indeed the Holy Chalice- and the fact that it has been declared a holy Jubilee year in Valencia in 2015, reinforce its authenticity. 

The Chalice of Doña Urraca

It is a chalice composed of two onyx cups of Roman origin that Doña Urraca - Spanish queen of the 11th century - had enriched, claiming that it was the Holy Grail. She received it from her father, Ferdinand I the Great, who in turn took it from the Muslim caliphs who donated it to her.

It must be said that this thesis lacks academic value, and certain errors are acknowledged to the detriment of its veracity.

The Holy Grail O'Cebreiro

In the middle of the road to Santiago we have a chalice guarded in the monastery of Santa Maria de O'Cebreiro since the mid-twelfth century, which is believed to be the Holy Grail.

Tradition holds that a Eucharistic miracle took place in such a cup, consisting in the conversion of the wafer and the wine that the celebrant would use in the Eucharist into sensitive flesh and blood, which stained the corporals. Later, in the 15th century, the Catholic Monarchs, during a visit to the monastery, would donate the lanterns that would guard the relic, attributing this gesture greater certainty about the authenticity of the holy Chalice.

However, there are those who maintain that this cup is not the Holy Grail, since its assimilation was due to a simple linguistic confusion, given that the O'Cebreiro hostelry was dedicated to Saint Geraldo de Aurillac, pronounced "Guiral", which would give rise to the confusion of having it for the Holy "Grail".

Hawkstone Park Cup

This version of the Holy Grail refers to the cup that was taken to England after the sack of Rome by the Visigoths. Of small dimensions - barely 6 cm - made of semi-precious stone, it is very possibly dated to Roman times.

It was located in the 13th century in the hands of a British family, hidden in a cave in Hawkstone Park, near Whittington Castle -northwest England- and found at the beginning of the 20th century, when it belonged to Victoria Palmer by inheritance.

Achatschale

It consists of a 4th century bowl from Constantinople or Trier, and has an inscription that reads "XRIST", attributed to Jesus Christ. 

What makes one think that it could be the true Holy Grail is the fact that it was part of the imperial relics of the Holy Roman Empire, which also included the spear of Longinus, the Roman soldier who pierced the side of Our Lord once he hung on the Cross just before expiring.

As can be seen, several versions could be the authentic Holy Grail. In any case, the interesting thing is that each one of them serves to increase the piety and devotion to the Eucharist from the place where it is found, since the genuine sense of preserving a relic is to contribute to that devotion or popular piety.

Back to don Quixote

"Don Quixote" is a monument of Christian culture, whose ideals have never and can never go out of fashion.

December 17, 2021-Reading time: 4 minutes

"It is really impressive to see the influence that Cervantes' immortal work has had on universal literature. Almost everyone knows that it is the most important book written in Spanish and practically all relevant writers have pointed it out as essential reading for anyone who wants to enjoy an average culture.

Why? Without going into the indisputable literary quality of this great novel, we can say that it is a monument of Christian culture, whose ideals have not gone and can never go out of fashion. Even now, the work of the one-armed man of Lepanto can serve as an inspiration to face today's challenges."

I confess that I read Don Quixote for the first and only time so far the summer before I started my university studies.

I had heard my grandfather say that no one should enter university without having read the greatest work of Spanish literature, apparently the most widely read book after the Bible. It seems that the advice affected me and I read it that summer, without fully understanding it. I liked it, but I was not too impressed either.

Years later I have been meeting people who have specialized in the book and who have drawn consequences and ideas that I had not even glimpsed.

Almost no one fails to introduce a quote from Cervantes' text in his speeches and centuries after it came to light it continues to be edited and quoted and now I see that with good reason.

On the one hand, the ingenious nobleman of La Mancha and his faithful Sancho represent the soul of Spain and of Spaniards, of everyone, although at times they may seem contradictory and incompatible.

This magnificent combination of idealism and realism, of a taste for adventure and an appreciation for comfort and pleasures, masterfully portrays the best virtues and the worst vices of the people of our country.

On the other hand, the ideals of Don Quixote are those of Christianity, since Alonso de Quijano and also in his own way Sancho Panza are a representation of the Christian knight.

What is it if not what moves the famous man from La Mancha to leave the comfort of his armchair and his books to go and help others, getting into trouble and risking his honor and his life, without losing his sense of humor at the same time?

Miguel de Unamuno, one of the Spanish authors who has best dived into the depths of Cervantes' work, said that the countries that have best understood the message of the ingenious gentleman are England and Russia.

Daniel Dafoe, Jonathan Swift, Jane Austen, Lord Byron, Chesterton or Graham Green, among others, have been inspired by the adventures of the knight of the sad figure for their best works.

The great Russian authors have often been fascinated by the adventures of Don Quixote, perhaps because it is true that Spain and Russia have many common elements such as their strong religiosity and their passionate defense of ideals. Cervantes' creation is present in Pushkin, Gogol, Turgenev, Dostoyevsky and many other Russian geniuses.

Turgenev compared in a famous lecture the thoughtful and irresolute Hamlet with the thoughtless and arrogant Don Quixote, finding great nobility in both characters. But it is probably in Fyodor Dostoyevsky where the Manchego's influence is more profound. He talks a lot about him in his letters where he refers to the work of Cervantes as an essential piece of universal literature, one of those books "that gratify mankind once in a hundred years".

For Dostoyesvsky, Cervantes' novel is a conclusion about life. Such was his admiration that he imitated it in The Idiot, whose protagonist, Prince Mishkin, is an idealist reminiscent of the hero of La Mancha. Stripped of ridiculous heroism, he actually resembles the final character of Cervantes' work, Alonso Quijano, the good, who is mainly an imitator of Jesus Christ.

In America, Jorge Luis Borges had a relationship with fiction as complex as that of Miguel de Cervantes, as he read the work since he was a child and glossed it in essays and poems, even drawing inspiration from it to write the short story "Pierre Menard, author of Don Quixote". included in his anthology Ficciones.

Already in Spain, the great poet of the Spanish exile León Felipe fell in love with the figure of the nobleman from La Mancha and dedicated numerous poems to him, such as the famous "Vencidos". His are the verses: Put me on the rump with you/ Knight of honor/ Put me on the rump with you/ And take me to be with you, shepherd.

The German Romantics as well as great philosophers of the stature of Hegel or Schopenhauer have admired and made much of Cervantes' novel.

The list could be endless. For example, the Swiss theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar, in some memorable pages of his work Gloria, sees in the comicality of Don Quixote the Christian comicality and ridicule: "To undertake at every step, modestly, the impossible".

In short, it is clear that the ideals embodied by Don Alonso de Quijano are immortal and can therefore continue to inspire current generations at this particular moment in history.

Honesty, audacity, magnanimity, generosity, contempt for ridicule, taking one's own limitations with a sense of humor, are or can be very necessary virtues to continue trying to achieve a fairer and more humane world, which we need.

Ideals that may seem naïve, as the nobleman from La Mancha undoubtedly was, but which are precisely those that make life happier and more fruitful.

Resources

Body. Love. Where does the separation between nature and person lead?

Presentation by Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz, Ratzinger Prize 2021, at the Omnes Forum held on December 16, 2021.

Hanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz-December 17, 2021-Reading time: 15 minutes
Original conference in German here

The new man without nature?

Body. Love. What could be more beautiful? And yet, precisely around these ideas "there are terrible wars over (small) questions of theology, earthquakes of heat [...]. It is only a question of trifles, but a trifle is everything when the whole rests in the balance. If one idea is weakened, the other becomes powerful at once" (Chesterton).

What ideas are we talking about? Is man a chameleon who can replace himself? In older language he is called a "stranger", who does not really get to know himself properly. He does not even know his body.

Recently, in Germany, after the Synodal Way, a cardinal (a word that means "hinge") pronounced this way at the beginning of October 2021: the affirmations on the human being belong to the "dispositional mass" of Christianity, because they are not "de fide definita", defined in terms of faith, but changeable. So, are we facing a new ethics?

Ethics comes from ethosIs it necessary to mark again the fence that we had around sexuality? The surprising statements on sexuality at Forum IV (of the Synodal Path in Germany) simply want to open the fence; in fact, anyone could mark it. Do we still need it? This "new" sexual ethic was greeted with joy by two other speakers, one of whom was a bishop; at last the step had been taken: in love, it is not only the person with his or her individual freedom that matters. Nature - that is, the body, sex, the received disposition - are, at best, propositions that can be discussed or modified. Does that mean that the body is only the raw material for my will? It is surprising: nature and bio-ecology are on everyone's lips these days; they must be protected, they must be nurtured, but in no case can they be modified by man. Genetic engineering? No, thank you, but should we assume that nature has nothing more to say? So, an a-corporeal love? An a-natural love? No, you will hear at once: it is not what we meant. But what, then? Let us see the spectacle of errors and confusions.

Caution: "The obcecation of the mind is the first-born daughter of lust," says Thomas Aquinas. The supposedly revolutionary idea is an obcecation: the separation between nature and person. It is by no means very new or postmodern; on the contrary, it has been formulated long ago. Its deviations are also visible, and have also been criticized for a long time. And they are contradictory.

A man of pure freedom?

"The nature of man is to have no nature." The famous Oratio de hominis dignitate (1486) by Pico della Mirandola dates from just over 600 years ago: God himself gives the freedom of total self-determination to Adam (who, by the way, appears without Eve). While all creatures carry within themselves their own reality as divine law, man is the only one created without law. Placed at the center of the world, Adam has unconditional power over himself and all other co-created beings. Still undaunted, he formulates this as a doing, a having, a submitting creation as a whole to the ordination of the one master creature. In accordance with the commission received, he assumes omnipotence as a "second God". This "God clothed in human flesh"[1] becomes its own creator.

In any case, Pico's design of man's (= masculine man's) freedom does not consider the reverse side of such an attribution of power; it remains entirely naive.

It is of course surprising that, conversely, despite the frenzy of freedom, man has been cornered by natural science and technology.

On the other hand: nature as a machine? The "measured man".

The power asserted was first extended to external nature ("fabrica mundi"), to spatial, material things, subjected to the newly discovered regularities, in order to "make us masters and lords of nature".[2]. Today we struggle with the consequences.

From this "knowledge of domination" a second possibility quickly emerged: also the "external" side of the human being was calculated with the methods acquired, in a plastic and still "innocent" way, by means of the "measured" man of Leonardo and Dürer, in whose body the measures of the golden number are inscribed.[3]. In the triumphal procession of geometrical-mathematical thought, the body, as "res extensa", is finally compared to the system of a machine: "l'homme machine" by La Mettrie (1748). The human machine lacked only human eyes, as in Coppelia, E.T.A. Hoffmann's human doll. Here, too, we are dealing with the consequences: transhumanism, the mixture of human and robot. Freedom comes to mean allowing ourselves to be equipped with chips and spare parts.

Indeed, for about 500 years, the Modern Age has conceived nature as a kind of mechanical workshop, and man also functions as a natural machine among other natural machines. Neurobiology, the most recent discipline, reinforces in some of its representatives a very simple affirmation: thought is nothing more than the interconnection of brain synapses. The objection that, if everything is determined, this applies above all to the researcher himself does not even bother. Something similar happens with the statement of a Nobel Prize winner in chemistry, who affirmed that man is nothing more than chemistry. With this, freedom would have been completely abdicated.

On the contrary, freedom triumphs again in reverse: in rebellion against one's own sex. With a distorted image of nature corresponds a distorted image of freedom.

Freedom: the denaturalized man

Since Judith Butler's "Gender Trouble" in 1990, culture has been pointing to a surprising extreme: the transformation to the point of dissolution of the body in cyberspace, in virtual or even real medical-technical space. The very difference (in German) between "Leib" and "Körper" can serve as a thread in this tension, since both German terms refer to a different perception of the self. Thus, "body (Körper)" is predominantly understood as a quantitative-mechanical coating, whereas "body (Leib)" indicates the already animated, living body. The "bodies (Körper)" we can modify them, work on them, even exchange their parts; that is, they can become independent of their previously given "nature"; "My body is my art". The "body (Körper)" becomes a place of protest against a non-autonomously constructed identity. The utopias of fluid identity refer to the total self-design of the "I".

Also sexual life is "staged"; the self wears the respective sex mask, with the result that "this mask harbors no self" (Benhabib, 1993, 15). What is worn is gender nauting, the navigating between the sexes. Man is his own software, rooted beyond body and sex. In this direction points the gender debate: it makes the biological sex ("sex") disappear in the attributed sex (cultural, social, historical - the "gender"). Instead of determination by nature, a voluntary self-choice is offered: is woman already woman, or who "makes" woman, woman, and man, man? Without resistance, without will, the body offers itself as a "pre-sexual body". The "I" does not know incarnation.

Now, we need to find a common thread through these contradictions. It is this: there is no separation between nature, culture and person. More simply: there is no separation between body and sex, between love and duration, between pleasure and children.

Hence the need for a critique of nature cut in half, reduced to mechanics, but also of culture cut in half, read in terms of pure constructivity.

Man is, in reality, anchored elsewhere: in the direction of the divine. Human nature, and even more so culture, lives "towards". The greatness of nature ("natura") consists in the fact that it is actually called "nascitura": that which wants to be born. And it is nature that seeks the free participation of man in his "towards"; it seeks that he affirms and realizes his orientation. The creature has been created towards the origin, it carries its sign, its home is where it comes from.

This can already be read in the engine of sex. It is the loss of oneself in the other, it is the grammar of love made flesh. The body is gift, sex is gift, it is reason and origin (in German "Ur-Sprung", the primary leap) of that which cannot be done by us, of the passion of being man, of the enormous impulse towards self-giving. Enriched by the duality of man and woman, and impoverished by it; not sufficient ourselves, dependent on the attention of the other, expecting from the other the redemption that comes from the realm of the divine and in its highest and most fruitful form leads back there (Gen 1:27ff). What in Greek thought is a "deficiency," the lack of unity, in biblical thought becomes the joy of duality.

Sex ("Geschlecht") can also be understood, from its literal sense, as "being sacrificed" (in German "Geschlachtetsein") or as "being in half" ("Hälftigsein"). The brutality of the sex-only, of the "river-god of blood [...] ah, oozing the unrecognizable" (Rilke, 1980, 449) must, therefore, be humanized. It is difficult to think the body without a suggestive and different Other. But neither "nature" (biology) nor "culture" (self-design) is "healed" by itself. Therefore, it is crucial to know the divine horizon, to know the guidelines that come from it. Only then can one "act ethically," that is, "freely correspond to the order of being" (Thomas Aquinas).

Tension between nature and culture

The idea of man's self-determination is not in itself wrong, nor morally evil. It is based on the strange fact - as remarkable as it is dangerous - that man does indeed occupy a special position among other living beings, also with regard to his sex. The positive side: although he does not have the stimulus-response security of an animal, he does have freedom from instinct and thus freedom towards the world and towards himself; and also the full risk of endangering others and himself. At the same time, freedom constitutes the creative flank, to shape the world and the human being. The human being is a reality full of tensions, stretched between the given "nature" and the opposite extreme of change, becoming, future, "culture". "Be in who you are," was the formula of the Orphic saying; but what sounds so simple is a lifelong adventure. Adventure, because there is neither a "coined" nature nor an arbitrary "culture," but both are in a living relationship with each other: between the limit of form (the "happiness of form") and culture ("the happiness of the new being").

An animal has its sex, and does not have to shape it; hence its sexuality, naturally assured, is free of modesty and, from the functional point of view, clearly oriented towards offspring. A human being is and has his sexuality, and must shape it: it is not simply naturally assured, but culturally determined and imbued with modesty due to the possibility of failure; moreover, it is not necessarily linked to offspring. In sexuality a space opens up to achievement and failure, on the basis of the inescapable tension between the drive (of natural need) and the self (of freedom). Incarnation in one's own body, its adaptation to one's own body, "hospitality" (hospitalité, Levinas) towards the other sex, are the key words. It does not indicate rebellion, neutralization, leveling or "contempt" of the received disposition.

Therefore, the duality of sex is not only accessible to a cultural processing, but even points towards it. But sexuality must be cultivated, but as a datum of nature (what else could it be shaped?). Cultivating means neither submitting to it nor eliminating it. Both can be demonstrated by the two different aims of sexuality: erotic fulfillment in the other and generative fulfillment in the son, for which, in any case, two different sexes must be presupposed. The child belongs to the erotic justification of the human being (cf. Fellmann, 2005). And again, the child itself is not something neutral either, but enters into dual existence as a "culmination" of the act of love itself.

Thus, nature = nascitura, opens itself to freedom

Instead of a distorted nature, therefore, nature is a datum and at the same time means "nascitura": a becoming, an unfolding of the given disposition. The current mechanization of nature is far behind, and so is construction.

"With the denial of nature in man not only does the telos of life itself become confused and opaque. The moment man abandons the consciousness of himself as nature, all the goals for which he keeps himself alive become empty [...]"[4].

"What modernity calls nature is ultimately a half-reality. What it calls culture is something demonic and torn, for all its grandeur, in which meaning is always paired with meaninglessness; creation with destruction; fecundity with death; the noble with the petty. And a whole technique of overlooking, concealing and blinding has had to be developed so that man can bear the lie and the dread of this situation."[5].

So let us abandon the lie.

What is the person? Something double

Persona means something twofold: subsisting in oneself, and transcending oneself in some direction. "Persona' means that, ultimately, I cannot be possessed in my selfhood by any other instance, but that I belong to myself [...], I am my own end" (Guardini, 1939, 94). This subsisting in oneself emphasizes that I belong to myself in an original and not derived way.

Now then, to be a person is not a flat possession of oneself. Augustine spoke of a self-possession, of an "anima in se curvata," which collapses in on itself.[6]. Rather, it happens that I awaken in the encounter with another Self, which also belongs to itself and, nevertheless, comes to me.

Only in the encounter is the preservation of the self, the actualization of the self, especially in love. "He who loves is always in transit towards freedom, towards freedom from his authentic bondage, that is, from himself" (Guardini, 1939, 99) Therefore, self-belonging through the other acquires a decisive, even fateful, dynamic. It results from the constitutive tension that goes from the I to the you: in transcending, in giving oneself to share, also in corporeality, and also in the tension towards God. In such a dynamic, there ceases to be a self-preservation that cements the neutral subject-object relationship, as when a stone strikes another stone, and a self-exposure begins: the person resonates in the person and from the person, is given to the incontestable, or also open to the inexhaustible.

Surrender to the other's difference

From a Christian point of view, self-belonging does not lose its primary place; on the contrary, it can be justified in a more convincing way: the person can "go beyond" himself, open himself up, because he already belongs to himself. We need to go deeper into this thesis, because it calls into question a decisive characteristic of modernity: autonomy.

From a Christian point of view, the person is the culmination of an undervalued or even denied "existential": a relationship is the activation of self-belonging. "Man is not a being closed in on himself. On the contrary, he exists in such a way that he goes beyond himself. This going out of oneself happens continuously already within the world, in the various relationships with things, ideas and persons [...]; in reality it occurs towards beyond the world, towards God" (Guardini 1939, 124).

But why does this not invalidate me in my own Self? Because the person in front of me must be thought of equally as subsistence and as going out beyond itself. For this, however, one needs not only two persons, but two sexes - as mutual and unfathomable strangeness, unfathomable withdrawal, even bodily, even mental, even spiritual; it is precisely in sexual love, which experiences the body of the other, that the transcending into the otherness of the other sex takes place, and not only a narcissistic encounter with oneself.

Only in the other sex is the true difference perceived, which cannot be appropriated by me, it does not reflect myself: woman as a permanent secret for man. Who dodges this profound difference, dodges life.

Could the ancient vision of Genesis - beyond all moral doctrines, which in the end are ineffective - that in the daring of the two sexes, at the heart of the encounter, the divine dynamic unfolds, that the unprecedented life of God himself generates the play of the sexes and has created it as the image of that which surpasses all images? And that from there the opening to the other sex expresses the divine tension?

Again we find the double in the person; self-possession (sovereignty) and self-giving are not excluded, neither in the divine-trinitarian relationship nor in human love. Love is loss of self and conquest of self at the same time. Man is not subsistence and woman surrender, as one annotation says. In the human, two halves do not form a whole, but two halves make a whole. Each sex corresponds in the first place to a person, and must be molded by that person throughout life. Today's culture tends to falsely turn subsistence into autonomy, and surrender into surrender. It becomes surrender when it sees the other, the others, only as a sexual object or playing a "role", but not as a flesh and blood person. It is no coincidence that the German words "Leib" (body), "Leben" (life) and "Liebe" (love) come from the same root. Whoever makes the body an "allotment", an enjoyment for himself in the other, underdetermines life. Life allows man to be grounded in himself, but at the same time continually pushes him beyond himself, towards the other sex. And the extreme provocation of biblical thought goes even through death, towards a new body. The resurrection of the body, of my body, that is, as a man or as a woman, is the message of joy.

Last step: Caro cardo

Therefore, the great challenge is the incarnation of God: can God, indeed, take on body and gender? Yes, he has become a man, born of a woman. If our hearing were not so dull, this would be a blast. The Son of God and of Mary, as opposed to all the idealizations of a divinity without a body, is the real difference with respect to other religious traditions, including Judaism. "Caro cardo": the flesh is the central point. In this way the body is contemplated in a new and inexhaustible light (cf. Henry, 2000), until the bodily resurrection to a life without death. Also the Church is considered a body, Christ's relationship with the Church is nuptial-erotic (Eph 5:25), and marriage becomes a sacrament: a sign of God's presence in the lovers. In the sacrament of marriage, sex must also be educated for this presence, but not in order to tame it or bend it, but to allow it to reach its real and effective ecstasy. Obviously, the good outcome of a marriage cannot be guaranteed by the sacrament, but the elements under which the difficult balance can be achieved can be pointed out in Christian terms: you alone; you forever; from you a son. This is no longer a naive conception of nature, but the creative transformation of nature into a cultivated, accepted and finite nature. Christianity (and Judaism) never glorifies only primitive nature; it is to be elevated to the space of the divine and healed there. Likewise, eros is placed in the realm of the sacred: in the sacrament. And likewise procreation and birth are placed in the realm of the sacred: they are gifts bestowed in paradise (Gen 1:28). "Sex is the celebration of life" (Thomas Mann).

The true human nature of the God-Man redeems the suffering human nature. To follow him means to bring the damaged human nature within his radius, to let it be perfected where we have only changing inclinations.where supposedly there is no common nature of man but only "freedom" there are only decisions taken by anyone for anything, but no substantial liberation of our nature. The incarnation of Jesus would then be superfluous, and the same would be true of his death and resurrection. Why? Simchat Torah, your law is my joy: the law of my body, of my life, of my pleasure, which the Creator has written on the body. It is not free will that redeems us, but His precept.

Body, love, pleasure. These three pillars are founded in nature, formed in culture, become beautiful and human in the personal relationship: I care only for you, forever; I look forward to our child. That is the answer we give to each other, and the one we want to hear from the one we love. But this response is exaggerated if it is not based on our nature, if it is not given in the hope of divine help. Without body, without love, without pleasure: today these are already experiences of a cybernetic world, which constantly offers us pleasure, virtual and without body, real without a real Other or with changing Others, or with vinyl sex dolls, virtual without children: only in prevention and contraception. A love that does not want to last, a pleasure that I seek only for myself, a body that I myself sculpt..., are only fragments of a whole that destroys meaning.

Let us stick to the Whole. Again Chesterton says: "It is easy to be mad; it is easy to be a heretic. It is always easy to be carried away by the world: the hard part is to keep one's course. It is always easy to be a modernist, just as it is easy to be a snob. To fall into any of the traps opened by error and transgression, which one fad and one sect after another had placed in the historical path of Christianity, that would have been easy [...] To have avoided them all is a rapturous adventure; and the heavenly chariot flies thundering through the centuries in my vision. The tedious heresies stumble and fall flat on their faces to the ground, but the wild truth stands astonishingly erect."

Bibliography

-Benhabib, S., 1993: Feminismus und Postmoderne. Ein prekäres Bündnis, in: Dies. Butler/D. Cornell/N. Frazer, Der Streit um Differenz. Feminismus und Postmoderne in der Gegenwart, Frankfurt.

-Butler, J., 1991: Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter, Frankfurt.

-Butler, J., 1997: Körper von Gewicht. Die diskursiven Grenzen des Geschlechts, Frankfurt.

-Fellmann, F., 2005: Das Paar. Eine erotische Rechtfertigung des Menschen, Berlin.

-Gerl-Falkovitz, H.-B., 31995: Die bekannte Unbekannte. Frauen-Bilder aus der Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte, Mainz.

-Gerl-Falkovitz, H.-B., 2001a: Eros - Glück - Tod und andere Versuche im christlichen Denken, Gräfelfing.

-Gerl-Falkovitz, H.-B., 2001b: Zwischen Somatismus und Leibferne. Zur Kritik der Gender-Forschung, in: IKZ Communio 3, 225 - 237.

-Guardini, R., 1939: Welt und Person. Versuche zur christlichen Lehre vom Menschen, Würzburg.

Henry, M., 2002: Inkarnation. Für eine Philosophie des Fleisches, übers. v. R. Kühn, Freiburg. R. Kühn, Freiburg.

-Irigaray, L., 1982: Passions élémentaires, Paris.

-Irigaray, L., 1991: Ethik der sexuellen Differenz (1984), Frankfurt.

-Levinas, E., 1980: Die Zeit und der andere, dt. v. Ludwig Wenzler, Freiburg. Ludwig Wenzler, Freiburg.

-Maximus Confessor, 1961: All-Eins zu Christus, hg. u. übers. v. E. v. Ivanka, Einsiedeln. E. v. Ivanka, Einsiedeln.

-Pauwels, A., 2004: Gender Inclusive Language: Gender-Aspects of the Globalization of the English Language. Vortrag im Gender-Kompetenz-Zentrum der HU Berlin vom 16. April 2004.

-Rilke, R. M., 1980: Die dritte Duineser Elegie, in: Werke, Frankfurt.

-Sampson, Ph. J., 1996: Die Repräsentationen des Körpers, in: Kunstforum International 132. Die Zukunft des Körpers I, Ruppichteroth, 94 - 111.

-Stoller, S. / Vasterling, V. / Fisher, L. (eds.), 2005: Feministische Phänomenologie und Hermeneutik, Reihe: Orbis Phaenomenologicus, Perspektiven NF 9, Würzburg.

-Schumacher, M. M. (ed.), 2004: Women in Christ. Towards a New Feminism, Grand Rapids.

-Ulrich, F., 1973: Der Nächste und Fernste - oder: Er in Dir und Mir. Zur Philosophie der Intersubjektivität, in: Theologie und Philosophie 3, 317 - 350.

-Vasterling, V., 2005: Zur Bedeutung von Heideggers ontologischer Hermeneutik für die feministische Philosophie, in: Stoller S. u. a., 2005, 67 - 95.

-Vinken, B., 2004: Stigmata. Poetik der Körperinschrift, München.

-Weil, S., 1993: Cahiers. Aufzeichnungen, übers. v. v. E. Edl / W. Matz. München, II.

-Young, I. M., 2004: On Female Body Experience, New York.


[1] Über die Würde des Menschen, trans. H. W. Rüssel, Amsterdam 1940, 49f.

[2] René Descartes, Discours de la méthode, 6.

[3] Cf. the double meaning of the title: Sigrid Braunfels u. a., Der "vermessene Mensch". Anthropometrie in Kunst und Wissenschaft, München 1973.

[4] Theodor W. Adorno, Dialektik der Aufklärung, Frankfurt 1971, 51.

[5] Romano Guardini, Der Mensch. Umriß einer christlichen Anthropologie, (unpublished), Archiv Kath. Akademie München, Typoskript S. 45.

[6] Romano Guardini has observed in this context the danger of self-education; cf. Guardini: Der religiöse Gehorsam (1916), in: ders., Auf dem Wege. Versuche, Mainz 1923, 15f, note 2: "It contradicts the Catholic spirit to speak much about personality, self-education, etc. Thus man is constantly thrown back on himself; he gravitates on his own I and thus loses the liberating glance towards God. The best education is to forget oneself and look to God; then man "is" and "grows" in the divine atmosphere. [Nothing destroys the soul so deeply as ethicism. What it must master and realize are the divine facts, the reality of God, the truth. There occurs what is the beginning and end of all education, the coming out of the self".

The authorHanna-Barbara Gerl-Falkovitz

Ratzinger Prize 2021

The World

The African woman

For some time now, there has been a radical change in the paradigm of African women, especially in Kenya, both socially, professionally and socially.

Martyn Drakard-December 16, 2021-Reading time: 3 minutes

Ever since the African continent opened up to the outside world, it has been the scene of all kinds of human tragedies. Now, some 150 years after the great European explorers ventured inland, the transformation has been immense. One area where this enormous change is noticed and felt is in the lives of African women.

In Kenya, sixty years ago, it was quite normal to see women of all ages carrying huge bundles of firewood on their shoulders, heading home to light the fire and prepare dinner. Those days are long gone. Now, thanks to improved living standards, universal education and healthcare and, above all, technology, African women are on a par with their sisters in Western countries.

Women are present in virtually all professions. In parliament, although in the region, Kenya lags behind Uganda and far behind Rwanda. In primary education, women have taken over and are well represented at secondary and university levels. In the legal profession they will soon outnumber men and the current Chief Justice of Kenya is a woman. Something similar is expected to happen among doctors. In sports, female athletes are known worldwide, and are making inroads in men's sports such as boxing and rugby. They have long been present in fields such as fashion, media and tourism. And more recently as airline pilots.

The African woman has taken to technology, in the form of a cell phone, like a fish to water: it helps her stay in constant contact with family and transfer money, through "M-pesa", a Kenyan invention. It also puts her in touch with the rest of the world. It seems that the African woman not only wants to catch up with women all over the world, but even surpass them.

Moreover, and this is important: Kenya is not ruled by an autocrat, like much of Africa, but enjoys a democratic system that elects its president every five years without fail. As Charles Onyango-Obbo writes in the Daily Nation on October 21, 2021: "Kenya has probably surpassed the United States as the country where, immediately after a general election ends, campaigning for the next one begins," and "Kenya is the most politically litigious country in Africa. Virtually every government and presidential decision ends up in court." In other words, everyone, including women, feels entitled to be heard, even in high places.

Both freedom and technology have helped African women, and not just Kenyan women. Many people now enjoy a fairly high standard of living and many material problems of sixty years ago have disappeared, hopefully for good.

However, technology has its downside, especially for women, and more and more young women are being exposed to the addictive nature of social media and many of the negative ideas coming into the country from more developed countries: they learn about LGBT, culture woke and all social and moral trends abroad. In vitro fertilization is beginning to be seen as a ray of hope for those who cannot have children. And the anti-natalist pressure has been intense since just after independence in the 1960s. Still, many have resisted, and one of the main reasons for the slow acceptance of coronavirus vaccination is that many believe it makes one infertile.

Nevertheless, old values are still strong in the country. As elsewhere, the capital is not representative of the entire population. The family is still strong, thanks largely to the woman, and to the mother's sacrifice and tireless effort. The woman transmits to her sons the customs, manners and religious beliefs, and teaches her daughters the norms she has learned from her mother and grandmother; and how to combine all this with modern ways.

As other African countries become more open and experience the freedoms that Kenya enjoys, the status of African women will generally improve on the continent; the next ten to twenty years are likely to see major changes in this regard.